|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:And cover up her beautiful scootyfruit battle scars? All won in fair combat against foolish foes daring to challenge the forces of physics. True, it does look pretty cool. I just watched the extended compilation video of all the truck v 11foot8 bridge wrecks. In some of them, there's a pedestrian on the sidewalk as the truck hits the bridge. They don't appear to even miss a step or react to the crash. They must be so numb to it by now. I wonder if the city has a couple road crew guys dedicated to just cleaning up the debris from the truck wrecks or if they all take turns going out there when another hits. Please enjoy these demolition fails - a testimony to superior construction or inferior explosives placement! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBPpfg_aWcE
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:46 |
|
|
This is amazing 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
Karma Monkey posted:
Ahahah amazing. Turning a mild problem into an unmitigated disaster. What the hell do they do for a building leaning at 15 degrees with no foundation? Getting close enough to knock it down is a suicide mission.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:36
|
|
|
Wanamingo posted:Not even a whole page. Why don't they just close the drat road and make traffic go through one of the literal dozens of other intersections that cross the rail without a 11'8" bridge?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
That last one just looks like the building is taking its clothes off.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Karma Monkey posted:True, it does look pretty cool. I just watched the extended compilation video of all the truck v 11foot8 bridge wrecks. In some of them, there's a pedestrian on the sidewalk as the truck hits the bridge. They don't appear to even miss a step or react to the crash. They must be so numb to it by now. I wonder if the city has a couple road crew guys dedicated to just cleaning up the debris from the truck wrecks or if they all take turns going out there when another hits. that last one that revealed that the building was pregnant with a baby building inside.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Spectral Debt posted:that last one that revealed that the building was pregnant with a baby building inside. Speaking of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYD5hBIqJaI
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
I missed out on the Gawker and Hulk Hogan trial and it seems like a really long event. Is there somewhere I can read up on it easy like a video compilation or a Top 10 things things said Hulk vs Gawker.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:I missed out on the Gawker and Hulk Hogan trial and it seems like a really long event. Is there somewhere I can read up on it easy like a video compilation or a Top 10 things things said Hulk vs Gawker. Gawker were a bunch of hypocrites, refusing to post young celeb debutante hacked pics, but pretty much putting Hulkamania porn on the front page, brother Gawker said a bunch of things that probably made the jury give them the legal flying knee drop
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:I missed out on the Gawker and Hulk Hogan trial and it seems like a really long event. Is there somewhere I can read up on it easy like a video compilation or a Top 10 things things said Hulk vs Gawker. The main takeaway is $115m
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 23:43
|
|
ElGroucho posted:Gawker were a bunch of hypocrites, refusing to post young celeb debutante hacked pics, but pretty much putting Hulkamania porn on the front page, brother Seriously, some of the poo poo they said sounded like it was ripped straight from GTA.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
God drat is that sad. loving birds, how do they work?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Regalingualius posted:Seriously, some of the poo poo they said sounded like it was ripped straight from GTA. Okay, I have to know. What the hell did they say?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Okay, I have to know. What the hell did they say? One of the things that popped out to me that gawker said was they would consider posting about sex videos made by anyone over the age of 5... evil_cheese has a new favorite as of 00:38 on Mar 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
evil_cheese posted:One of the things that popped out to me that gawker said was they would consider posting about sex videos made by anyone over the age of 5... ...Made of anyone over the age of four, per the CEO. Maybe someone should investigate him for kiddie porn.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:43
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Okay, I have to know. What the hell did they say? The one thing that stuck out from the CNN article on it: "Turkel [Hulk's lawyer] invoked a 2013 interview in which Denton [Gawker's founder] said 'invasion of privacy has incredibly positive effects on society.'"
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Aerdan posted:...Made of anyone over the age of four, per the CEO. Maybe someone should investigate him for kiddie porn. holy poo poo  just when you think people can not possibly get worse they find a way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:I missed out on the Gawker and Hulk Hogan trial and it seems like a really long event. Is there somewhere I can read up on it easy like a video compilation or a Top 10 things things said Hulk vs Gawker. One of those cases where both sides are so horrible and such scourges on humanity that it doesn't matter who wins as long as at least one of them loses.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Jesus loving christ  Snapchat A Titty posted:One of those cases where both sides are so horrible and such scourges on humanity that it doesn't matter who wins as long as at least one of them loses.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:One of those cases where both sides are so horrible and such scourges on humanity that it doesn't matter who wins as long as at least one of them loses. Oh? What's Hogan done?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
Hyperlynx posted:Oh? What's Hogan done? Hogan is a big ol' racist who is a Real American.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
Regalingualius posted:The one thing that stuck out from the CNN article on it: "Turkel [Hulk's lawyer] invoked a 2013 interview in which Denton [Gawker's founder] said 'invasion of privacy has incredibly positive effects on society.'"
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
Hyperlynx posted:Oh? What's Hogan done? He allowed this mannequin to be in the entrance to his former Hulk-branded restaurant in Tampa (no longer associated with him). I went there with coworkers once.  All we could do the whole night was commiserate with him taking a massive poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Aerdan posted:...Made of anyone over the age of four, per the CEO. Maybe someone should investigate him for kiddie porn. Don't know what's worse, AJ Daulerio saying that or ruining Deadspin
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
Pigsfeet on Rye posted:He allowed this mannequin to be in the entrance to his former Hulk-branded restaurant in Tampa (no longer associated with him). I went there with coworkers once. Looks like Sweet Dee with hot dog skin.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
some of you seem upset by the idea of gawker posting child pornography, but don't worry! the gawker guy was just being flippant when answering a line of questioning designed to make gawker look like an opportunistic and unsympathetic organization! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Pr8S44o6N4&t=261s
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
re: bridge chat, this is pretty much the only thing left to do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoTMC-uxJoo
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
NuttO posted:some of you seem upset by the idea of gawker posting child pornography, but don't worry! the gawker guy was just being flippant when answering a line of questioning designed to make gawker look like an opportunistic and unsympathetic organization! Sarcasm under oath is never a bad idea!
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Inco posted:Probable schadenfreude about to bloom: Wait a second. quote:Atlanta, whose new Falcons stadium is set to open in 2017, had hoped to host a Super Bowl in 2019 or 2020. The bill could put a kink in those plans if it’s signed into law by Gov. Deal. On top of the language on faith-based groups, the bill ensures that pastors cannot be forced to preside over same-sex marriage ceremonies, and that individuals cannot be forced to attend these ceremonies. Gay rights activists have called the bill, which has gone through multiple changes but whose latest version passed the state House Wednesday, a “slap in the face,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports. How do you force someone to attend a wedding ceremony? Forget gay weddings, I'm pretty sure there's no way of doing that which isn't illegal for any wedding.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
Probably means something like, if you work for a catering company that's been hired for a wedding, they can't fire you if you refuse to work the event on "religious" grounds.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
Okay, right up until like the last 20 seconds of that video, I thought that the sound on further thought I suppose must be a dog barking was actually being made by the sister, who was having some kind of breathing problem over in the corner. In retrospect, way less alarming/hilarious than on first viewing. e: Lazlo Nibble posted:Probably means something like, if you work for a catering company that's been hired for a wedding, they can't fire you if you refuse to work the event on "religious" grounds. "Uh, yeah, just wanted to let you know that I got blackout drunk last night and then found religion, so I can't work the Smith party today mkay bye." LonsomeSon has a new favorite as of 06:05 on Mar 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
President Ark posted:How do you force someone to attend a wedding ceremony? Forget gay weddings, I'm pretty sure there's no way of doing that which isn't illegal for any wedding. Something something Shotgun wedding.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
The Natural Environment Research Council asked the internet to vote on the name of their new research vessel https://twitter.com/NERCscience/status/710834620229672960
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 06:48
|
|
|
Where's the schaden?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
FAROOQ posted:Where's the schaden? Because the leading entry is RSS Boaty McBoatface
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 06:59
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:Because the leading entry is RSS Boaty McBoatface FAROOQ posted:Where's the schaden?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:Because the leading entry is RSS Boaty McBoatface Also reddit seems to think it's a funny boat name.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
I've got a feeling that the option to name it after a ship from Halo, however, wasn't a joke. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:46 |
|
|
Minarch posted:Why don't they just close the drat road and make traffic go through one of the literal dozens of other intersections that cross the rail without a 11'8" bridge? There's two intersections nearby that just cross over without any bridges, but they may be afraid that closing the road would just increase congestion elsewhere and one crash a month is a small price to pay.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2016 07:19
|
|
