|
WickedHate posted:I agree people who hate it just for not being the old show are dumb, but it's apparently got some gross dumb problamatic stuff though. Even so, kids deserve smarter entertainment. First hit on "teen titans go problamatic": quote:I can forgive TTG! that they ruined all continuity by having no one know who Terra is. I can forgive them for completely ruining a fantastic female character who had deep emotional issues and a legitimate story arc over the course of Season 2 in the original Teen Titans. I can forgive them for making her a character who openly hates the team as opposed to a covert spy and traitor.
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 01:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 21:40 |
|
|
Can I say that I hated the episodes that were basically a vehicle for the show to lecture us about not liking them, because we're no-fun losers? Or will that hurt the feelings of the TTGo fans here?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
Moviebob posted his review of Batman V Superman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTKDtoBR-2M I know Moviebob is a huge dork who over exaggerates. But, the only way I was going to go see this was if the movie was SURPRISINGLY good or so bad that it needs to be seen to be believed and after hearing Bob describe the plot...wow I think it loving nails the latter requirement.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
Spark That Bled posted:Can I say that I hated the episodes that were basically a vehicle for the show to lecture us about not liking them, because we're no-fun losers? BravestOfTheLamps posted:...I can’t forgive is that this show perpetuates rape culture by blatantly ignoring conse...
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
TTG would be fine if it were a comedy that at least cared about its characters. Futurama, as an example, worked because the characters were like people. They have their interests and did jokes that naturally worked with them. Jokes in TTG would be that either one of the titans disagrees with The Plot, or 3-4 of them do. IE, it's a real bad comedy, on top of the fact that it destroyed a cast of heroes people liked, on top of, well, being shown nearly 50% of the time on CN's day block. Really, if TTG was at least a fun comedy, I imagine people wouldn't be AS salty. (But still incredibly salty by the end of the day)
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
Spark That Bled posted:Can I say that I hated the episodes that were basically a vehicle for the show to lecture us about not liking them, because we're no-fun losers? It was making fun of the people complaining it wasn't "serious" like Young Justice and Teen Titans ( if anyone actually thinks Teen Titans was a cartoon focused on being serious, I don't think they ever really watched the show), not making fun of people who didn't like it. If you are one of those people then yes , you are no fun. LightningKimba posted:TTG would be fine if it were a comedy that at least cared about its characters. Futurama, as an example, worked because the characters were like people. They have their interests and did jokes that naturally worked with them. Jokes in TTG would be that either one of the titans disagrees with The Plot, or 3-4 of them do. IE, it's a real bad comedy, on top of the fact that it destroyed a cast of heroes people liked, on top of, well, being shown nearly 50% of the time on CN's day block. .....Actually watch the show dammit. There are many, many episodes in the show that are exactly like what you described in Futurama. Asuron fucked around with this message at 02:45 on Mar 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
Stop talking about a lovely cartoon guys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iyxb87bddp4 Talk about lovely wrestling instead.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
Testekill posted:Stop talking about a lovely cartoon guys My God, this PPV. There's lovely wrestling that's at least funny to watch (Jenna vs. Sharmell in TNA is a good example), and then there's lovely wrestling that's just sad, because it's a bunch of broken-down old dudes who have no business being in the ring. Heroes of Wrestling is a prime example of making you feel bad for everyone involved. Speaking of which, we finally got the modern-day counterpart to Bushwackers/Sheik/Koloff with last year's Villanos/Psycho Circus match at TripleMania. One of the Villanos is a literal stroke victim and still allowed to "wrestle," and the match is a huge disaster. Dave Meltzer gave it his first minus-five star rating since that infamous Heroes of Wrestling show. I'd share a YouTube link but I don't hate you guys that much.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Testekill posted:Stop talking about a lovely cartoon guys  The Attitude Era Podcast did an episode about Heroes of Wrestling like last year. poo poo's even more depressing than I thought it would be. CaligulaKangaroo fucked around with this message at 04:23 on Mar 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 04:19
|
|
|
BigRed0427 posted:Moviebob posted his review of Batman V Superman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTKDtoBR-2M Usually when Bob dislikes something, its a sign that I'll like it. So far I've enjoyed every movie he criticized. Even Pixels(Tho that required alcohol and friends). Also I liked Man of Steel, though me not being a Superman fan might have something to do with that. Archer666 fucked around with this message at 08:13 on Mar 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 08:11
|
|
|
Benne posted:My God, this PPV. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo5VZNQrVgc It's not the match but the Bryan & Vinny show did a great job of covering Triplemania
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 08:19
|
|
|
Asuron posted:It was making fun of the people complaining it wasn't "serious" like Young Justice and Teen Titans ( if anyone actually thinks Teen Titans was a cartoon focused on being serious, I don't think they ever really watched the show), not making fun of people who didn't like it. If you are one of those people then yes , you are no fun. I don't think it's because it's not "serious", but because it just isn't funny.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 10:10
|
|
|
Spark That Bled posted:I don't think it's because it's not "serious", but because it just isn't funny. You'd be very, very surprised then if you ever take a look at the discussion on the show anywhere but here.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 10:13
|
|
|
Asuron posted:You'd be very, very surprised then if you ever take a look at the discussion on the show anywhere but here. You know what? I don't think I would be. At all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 10:41
|
|
|
Angry joe is very conflicted on the movie He likes and hates many parts of the film in equal measure And spoiler movie is pretty much hate Annointed fucked around with this message at 12:46 on Mar 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 12:02
|
|
|
What's this threads consensus on Jeremy jahns? He reviews movies and he's got a bit of jump cutting with his videos, but he seems like a genuinely nice guy who engages with his audience a fair bit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
Geekvolution posted a Batman v Superman video that got real awkward, real fast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE7kv3Iht78 James Rolfe talks about it, and makes terrible guest host decisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTJyfNPWRuY
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
Do you mean the hat, the jacket or the really terrible decision to have a guy talk trough Skype without any kind of audio post processing?
e X fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Mar 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Nope, that's AlphaOmegaSin. E: And now I realise which video you're talking about...
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
Given the name, the attire and the hair I assume he is a YouTube atheism guy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
With all the prerequisite "I am laid low by the matriarchy" antifeminist rants, yeah.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
CaligulaKangaroo posted:James Rolfe talks about it, and makes terrible guest host decisions:
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 19:40
|
|
|
Gertrude Perkins posted:With all the prerequisite "I am laid low by the matriarchy" antifeminist rants, yeah. He wears the beanie to hide a hilarious skullet, doesn't he
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
How was Ben Affleck as Batman?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
From what I've heard, good despite having nothing to work with.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
When I think "extremists", I think "people who get annoyed on twitter".
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
CaligulaKangaroo posted:Geekvolution posted a Batman v Superman video that got real awkward, real fast: Hahahah, fedora-gentlesir's facial expression gets sadder and sadder as the clip plays on. He's really bummed a batman movie is getting bad reviews.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
Given how much most of everything sucks, I'm shocked there haven't been more terrible batman movies. He should be weeping with joy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
What's the best film review so far for Batman vs Superman?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
Bad fashion aside, Captain Logan seems like a pretty chill guy and I really like his superhero rewind videos. He comes across as very sincere and diplomatic in that video which I will always take over something like Bob Chipman's "This movie has me shaking with rage it's so bad!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
BigRed0427 posted:Moviebob posted his review of Batman V Superman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTKDtoBR-2M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB-PQALppFQ But this reviewer says "it's close to perfect and Zac Snyder's work is like Kubrick's", so whom should I believe? Doesn't that make it a draw? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Josef K. Sourdust posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB-PQALppFQ Teach the controversy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:What's the best film review so far for Batman vs Superman? The one you compose in your mind after watching the movie, preferably with a hot bowl of popcorn and a cold drink
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 03:49
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:What's the best film review so far for Batman vs Superman? Walter Chaw's http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/03/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice.html Or the 110% on Thomas Tomatoes http://www.thomastomatoes.com/#home-1 As far as Ben Affleck's Batman, he's good but the only real moment he gets to actually do anything with it is the party scene that's in the extended trailer. The rest of the character is lost to poo poo writing. Rather than finding ideologically sound reasons for two rational people to fight, the plot relies on both of these rational (and ostensibly brilliant) people being duped into fighting each other in a way that could be (and in the end is) resolved in about two sentences. As with Man of Steel, BvS operates on the idea that mentioning a theme or idea is the same thing as developing it. For a film that is so clearly trying to be about ideas it refuses to ever address them. Aside from the party scene (which, again, 90% of that conversation in the trailer, so we're not talking about a whole lot of screen time) there's nothing like the dinner in The Dark Knight where Dent, Bruce, Rachel, and the ballerina debate the ethics of Batman. While there's parts that, in isolation, kinda work and are promising there's no cohesion to the package as a whole. And, no, it's not satire. Inadvertently revealing that you have lovely opinions about the audience by "giving them what (you think) they want" isn't the same thing as satire.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:What's the best film review so far for Batman vs Superman? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwXfv25xJUw
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
This video has better editing than BvS.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 09:38
|
|
|
Annointed posted:Angry joe is very conflicted on the movie Didn't Angry Joe love Man of Steel? Ouch... 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Augus posted:Didn't Angry Joe love Man of Steel? Ouch... Yeah he loved Man of Steel. I remember the Nostalgia Critic (Ah yes, Man of Steel. That nostalgic movie from 2013) and Angry Joe did a back and forth review of it. LFK posted:Inadvertently revealing that you have lovely opinions about the audience by "giving them what (you think) they want" isn't the same thing as satire. This is something I'm personally sick of too and claiming satire as a defense sounds a lot like "It's just a prank, bro!" to me at this point. Josef K. Sourdust posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB-PQALppFQ Is it just me or is she shilling really, REALLY loving hard in the first 3-4 minutes of this video? Tracula fucked around with this message at 21:15 on Mar 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
Watchmen has Nixon as a supporting character and Lee Iacocca gets shot through the head in graphic detail. And also there's that preposterous sex scene. In light of the source material and the fun it seems to have with Verhovenian excess, Watchmen has to be satire.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 21:40 |
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:Watchmen has Nixon as a supporting character and Lee Iacocca gets shot through the head in graphic detail. And also there's that preposterous sex scene. In light of the source material and the fun it seems to have with Verhovenian excess, Watchmen has to be satire.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2016 21:17
|
|