Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Anime Liker
Aug 8, 2009

by VideoGames
Man of Steel is just like Les Miserables.

The only scenes you should watch are the ones with Russell Crowe in them.

[but for different reasons]

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

8-Bit Scholar
Jan 23, 2016

by FactsAreUseless
I feel like the destruction in Man of Steel was vastly overemphasized by critics. Every Superhero Movie has had huge amounts of destruction; cities and poo poo get wrecked in Transformers movies too, nobody seemed to care. Superman cartoon had him getting thrown through buildings every Saturday morning.

The problems with Man of Steel weren't in its violence, it was in the overly somber tone. I liked it, but it's clear most people didn't.

The Anime Liker
Aug 8, 2009

by VideoGames

8-Bit Scholar posted:

I feel like the destruction in Man of Steel was vastly overemphasized by critics. Every Superhero Movie has had huge amounts of destruction; cities and poo poo get wrecked in Transformers movies too, nobody seemed to care. Superman cartoon had him getting thrown through buildings every Saturday morning.

The problems with Man of Steel weren't in its violence, it was in the overly somber tone. I liked it, but it's clear most people didn't.

"The incredibly lovely Transformers movies were just as bad" isn't a solid foundation on which to build an argument that Man of Steel wasn't a toilet made of turds.

Also, both Avengers movies had the heroes doing heroic poo poo to save lives.

Being Of PURE GOOD Superman straight up murdered thousands of people while alcoholic Tony Stark and Being of PURE RAGE Hulk mitigated loss of human life and protected the people.

Man of Steel is trash garbage and anyone that likes it is an edgy juggalo teen.

Lumpy the Cook
Feb 4, 2011

Drippy-goo-yay, mother-gunker!

SIR FAT JONY IVES posted:

My favorite part of comic-con is going up to the nerds in Rorschach costumes and telling them I'm also a huge Juggallo.

This dude goes to Comic-con and pwns those fuckin nerds! Badass.

8-Bit Scholar
Jan 23, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

A GLISTENING HODOR posted:

"The incredibly lovely Transformers movies were just as bad" isn't a solid foundation on which to build an argument that Man of Steel wasn't a toilet made of turds.

Also, both Avengers movies had the heroes doing heroic poo poo to save lives.

Being Of PURE GOOD Superman straight up murdered thousands of people while alcoholic Tony Stark and Being of PURE RAGE Hulk mitigated loss of human life and protected the people.

Man of Steel is trash garbage and anyone that likes it is an edgy juggalo teen.

I only compare them in that both had large amounts of urban destruction, but one was criticized for the unseen bodycount and violence and one wasn't. People got sold on some preconceived notion of Superman, which I felt was a shallow criticism of Man of Steel, which has its own, more holistic faults and strengths that warranted better inspection.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

8-Bit Scholar posted:

I only compare them in that both had large amounts of urban destruction, but one was criticized for the unseen bodycount and violence and one wasn't. People got sold on some preconceived notion of Superman, which I felt was a shallow criticism of Man of Steel, which has its own, more holistic faults and strengths that warranted better inspection.

CD is that way bro

Michael Bayleaf
Jun 4, 2006

Tortured By Flan
My favorite part of furry-con is dressing up as a bunny and then telling the furpeople that I'm a huge homo. This owns them

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

8-Bit Scholar posted:

I only compare them in that both had large amounts of urban destruction, but one was criticized for the unseen bodycount and violence and one wasn't. People got sold on some preconceived notion of Superman, which I felt was a shallow criticism of Man of Steel, which has its own, more holistic faults and strengths that warranted better inspection.

it's a total and complete mystery why people had "preconceived notions" about how a character who has had huge cultural resonance for nearly 80 years should be handled

if people respond badly to your handling of that character it is in fact possibly a sign that you hosed up rather than that the plebs were just too unsophisticated to handle your vision

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right
WB just posted one of the deleted scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-MUzvASr8s

It features Lex communing with Steppenwolf, Darkseid's military advisor and one of the New Gods. This likely explains why Lex is batshit crazy at the end of the film when he gets locked in prison.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppenwolf_%28comics%29



LGD posted:

it's a total and complete mystery why people had "preconceived notions" about how a character who has had huge cultural resonance for nearly 80's should be handled

Not just the character but also the entire genre.

Hell Yeah
Dec 25, 2012

more lke 2 bit scholar

bring back old gbs
Feb 28, 2007

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

WB just posted one of the deleted scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-MUzvASr8s

It features Lex communing with Steppenwolf, Darkseid's military advisor and one of the New Gods. This likely explains why Lex is batshit crazy at the end of the film when he gets locked in prison.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppenwolf_%28comics%29



Not just the character but also the entire genre.

Uhhhhhhh jfc thats a pretty huge loving scene to excise. Extended cut may actually be pretty bonkers if this is the sort of stuff they left out.

Fur20
Nov 14, 2007

すご▞い!
君は働か░い
フ▙▓ズなんだね!

Lord Binky posted:

My favorite part of furry-con is dressing up as a bunny and then telling the furpeople that I'm a huge homo. This owns them

oh word you too?

Owlbear Camus
Jan 3, 2013

Maybe this guy that flies is just sort of passing through, you know?



Snowglobe of Doom posted:

WB just posted one of the deleted scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-MUzvASr8s

It features Lex communing with Steppenwolf, Darkseid's military advisor and one of the New Gods. This likely explains why Lex is batshit crazy at the end of the film when he gets locked in prison.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppenwolf_%28comics%29



Not just the character but also the entire genre.

i'm sure the 3 hour cut is going to solve every problem with the movie

*eats a large bowl of poo poo*

that was really bad, but maybe if it were an enormous bowl of poo poo, it would be good.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

WB just posted one of the deleted scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-MUzvASr8s

It features Lex communing with Steppenwolf, Darkseid's military advisor and one of the New Gods. This likely explains why Lex is batshit crazy at the end of the film when he gets locked in prison.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppenwolf_%28comics%29


What the Christ? The film was so badly edited Warner Bros. couldn't wait until the pre-planned "Director's Cut" to drop a scene like this, they had to post it on YouTube on the first week of release.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

bring back old gbs posted:

Extended cut may actually be pretty bonkers if this is the sort of stuff they left out.
Yeah that was pretty much my exact reaction. :v:

Otisburg posted:

i'm sure the 3 hour cut is going to solve every problem with the movie
I think it'll at least explain character's motivations better which was one of the big problems with the movie




Hey I did a big :effort: post in CD about why violence is usually acceptable in Marvel films but whips up all sorts of "NOT MY BATMAN!" complaints in DC films

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

The MCU films resolve themselves by killing/destroying the villains almost every time - Iron Man kills Stane/Iron Monger, Iron Man 2 blows up Ivan Vanko/Whiplash, Captain America implodes the Red Skull with the Tesseract, Guardians of the Galaxy vaporise Ronan, Ant-Man violently crushes Yellowjacket by sabotaging his shrinking equipment, etc etc.. They solve the supervillain problem by just making them go away because they're operating under standard comicbook/action movie rules where killing the irredeemable villain is framed as being good and right and justified. When Marvel superheroes complete their trials they look like this:

Just look at how loving smug they are. But because of the way the story was framed the audience feels like they totally earned it, and because the audience identified with these characters they also get a smugly Pavlovian reward when the movies conclude like this. Marvel films tell the audience "Superheroes are awesome and you're awesome for liking them!"

Man of Steel, on the other hand, chose not to operate under those rules. The protagonist here wasn't a charismatic plucky underdog who was using his unique skills to win the day, he was a guy who was uncertain about his place in the world and constantly questioning his actions, or whether he should act at all. The villain wasn't just a selfish guy hell bent on destroying his enemies, he was a nuanced "the end justifies the means" character who was trying to save his race. We didn't completely identify with the hero and we didn't completely hate the villain. Zod's death was more of a "suicide via Supercop", forced by his own volition onto a reluctant 'hero' rather than the triumphant victory over evil that Marvel films dish up, and that SUperman films also used to dish up. Superman II back in 1980 was operating under standard superhero/action movie rules so when he killed Zod that time he looked like this:

... but when the DCCU Superman kills Zod he looks like this:

MoS wasn't trying to be standard comicbook/action movie and it instead decided to question the cliched comicbook resolution by asking "What if you can't neatly make the problem go away? What if you don't get the triumphant happy ending? What if the good guy doesn't have all the answers just because he's the good guy?"

And those are some really good questions to ask in a movie, but on the other hand they're attacking some of the core assumptions that have been underlying the superhero genre for nearly 80 years now. The great majority of superhero comics/movies/Saturday Morning cartoons have operated under a Just World milieu where the hero deserved to win and the bad guy deserved to die and this was hardly ever questioned. (There's a whole lot of obvious exceptions to this but most of the general public probably wouldn't be familiar with them and they're vastly outnumbered by the cliched comicbook stories.) When Superman is forced to end Zod's reign of terror by snapping his neck and when Batman decides to kill dozens of mooks and these acts are shown as being morally ambiguous instead of being justified retribution then these stories are stepping outside the popular perception of the superhero genre. They're asking audiences to think about the genre rather than just leading them to the happy ending they usually get.

So yeah, Marvel did "do it right" in that they served up superhero movies that comfortably fit inside the superhero framework that has been fed to the general public over these last 70-odd years. DC decided to step outside that framework and ask whether those cliched superhero plots might have different consequences in the real world, and that's perfectly fine but there's going to be giant swathes of the general public disappointed that they didn't get the uplifting morally unambiguous costumed punchman film they were expecting, and there's also going to be a whole ton of diehard fans that will be upset that these films are daring to raise questions about the superhero genre instead of faithfully recreating it on the big screen. If people walked into Mos or BvS expecting a standard "Superheroes are awesome and you're awesome for liking them!" experience then they won't have been prepared for what they were going to get instead.

bring back old gbs
Feb 28, 2007

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Snowglobe of Doom posted:

Hey I did a big :effort: post in CD about why violence is usually acceptable in Marvel films but whips up all sorts of "NOT MY BATMAN!" complaints in DC films
It is a good post.

Diesel Fucker
Aug 14, 2003

I spent my rent money on tentacle porn.

A GLISTENING HODOR posted:

(And apparently there's hilarious cutaways during the boss fight where they keep cutting to Batman going "thank god that building was EMPTY, viewers at home!")

Moments after he shot a dude with a machinegun, stabbed a goon in the heart and crushed ten other dudes with his bat-Tank. Hahaha.

The Anime Liker
Aug 8, 2009

by VideoGames
Sure, you can see deeply flawed men making terrible decisions that result in the deaths of thousands of people on C-Span every day.

So our escapist comic book movies about good people doing good for a change is very bad. We need Superman dropping buildings on children. That's what real life is like. And comic books and high adventures and tales of wonder should accurately reflect that life is poo poo.

What kind of rear end in a top hat thinks Superman shouldn't pulverize kids into liquid poo poo under 5 million tons of rubble?

Babies that don't understand art (aka realism), that's who.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

A GLISTENING HODOR posted:

Domestic weekend:



It's 6th of all time. But consider this: look at the loving title of the movie. Of course this was going to happen.

With almost universal negative word of mouth, I'm really interested to see if it has a 60%> drop in the second weekend.

Remember that Ang Lee's Hulk, Daredevil, and X3 weren't bombs. But the reviews and big weekend drop off scared away the studios.

Also note that all the other films in the top 9 opening weekend slots all made more than a billion worldwide in total, as did a bunch of other films that had way worse openings. At this point it's pretty much impossible to predict how its domestic box office will go. :shrug:

Early reports are that it's making mad bank in the international markets so maybe that'll make up any shortfall it may have on home ground.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
Stuff like "but it happens in the comics" is dumb too because 5% of the movie going audience reads the comics and Superman as a cultural mythology is bigger than the comics ever were.

Also comics are specifically pandering to stunted manchildren in a way even Hollywood movies even aren't

The Anime Liker
Aug 8, 2009

by VideoGames
Please enjoy my new Punisher film where Frank Castle comes back from Iraq with PTSD and gunshots cause him to freak out and piss his pants and he spends the whole movie trying different combinations of meds and filling out VA benefits forms.

It's more accurate than the cheesy comics and the brutal reality portrayed in his scene where he falls through the cracks in veteran care and overdoses on heroin, I feel, really captures the character of Frank Castle.

8-Bit Scholar
Jan 23, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

LGD posted:

it's a total and complete mystery why people had "preconceived notions" about how a character who has had huge cultural resonance for nearly 80 years should be handled

if people respond badly to your handling of that character it is in fact possibly a sign that you hosed up rather than that the plebs were just too unsophisticated to handle your vision

Well, in his long history in comic books Superman has basically played every conceivable role you could have him play, hero, villain, something in between. He's had somber and sad portrayals, cheery and cheesy ones, etc etc.

Superman Returns was the Christopher Reeve love fest that people seem to want Man of Steel to be and it was a boring and plodding brick of a film. They went to the opposite extreme and people suddenly claim they always wanted it to be the way it just was that they didn't like.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

8-Bit Scholar posted:

Well, in his long history in comic books Superman has basically played every conceivable role you could have him play, hero, villain, something in between. He's had somber and sad portrayals, cheery and cheesy ones, etc etc.

Superman Returns was the Christopher Reeve love fest that people seem to want Man of Steel to be and it was a boring and plodding brick of a film. They went to the opposite extreme and people suddenly claim they always wanted it to be the way it just was that they didn't like.

Perhaps the truth is somewhere...


In....



The....


Middle.........

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

A GLISTENING HODOR posted:

Please enjoy my new Punisher film where Frank Castle comes back from Iraq with PTSD and gunshots cause him to freak out and piss his pants and he spends the whole movie trying different combinations of meds and filling out VA benefits forms.

It's more accurate than the cheesy comics and the brutal reality portrayed in his scene where he falls through the cracks in veteran care and overdoses on heroin, I feel, really captures the character of Frank Castle.

There's a great scene in the new series of Daredevil where they're representing Frank Castle in court and they're planning on attempting a PTSD defence and Frank just goes "Nope, we're not going to do that. It's insulting to people who actually do have PTSD."

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


the worst thing i can say about man of steel is it makes superman returns look amazing because at least superman returns had a couple scenes where i felt like i was watching superman.

again it's like that fleischer retrospective i linked earlier said - the story surrounding superman can be complex but the strength of the character is how straightforward he is "a guy from kansas doing the right thing". people who think man of steel made him more humanized or realistic have a pretty lovely view of humanity since the big blue boy scout is a rejection of the idea that power corrupts and that being raised by good people can produce a good person no matter their circumstances of birth. superman is possibly the most human of all the superheroes.

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Young Freud posted:

What the Christ? The film was so badly edited Warner Bros. couldn't wait until the pre-planned "Director's Cut" to drop a scene like this, they had to post it on YouTube on the first week of release.

Kanye setting trends with his album patches, can't wait til we get Batman V Superman 1.1 in the theater.

Gaunab
Feb 13, 2012
LUFTHANSA YOU FUCKING DICKWEASEL
In Man of Steel, why didn't they shoot a nuke at the terraforming ship in the middle of the Indian Ocean again?

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Groovelord Neato posted:

the worst thing i can say about man of steel is it makes superman returns look amazing because at least superman returns had a couple scenes where i felt like i was watching superman.

As many problems as Returns has, that scene of him getting shot in the eye will always be loving awesome.

And as someone who grew up with a complete VHS of the Fleicher animations I completely agree they were the best Supes thing ever.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


awesome scenes in returns where i felt like i was watching a superman movie:

shot in the eye

saving the shuttle

flying up into space and listening to the world

pulling the boat out of the ocean

getting all juiced up on mother sun and throwing the kryptonite island out into space

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Groovelord Neato posted:

flying up into space and listening to the world

This. BvS would have immensely improved if they had just shown a scene of Superman guarding the world and caring about humanity like that.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Groovelord Neato posted:

awesome scenes in returns where i felt like i was watching a superman movie:

shot in the eye

saving the shuttle

flying up into space and listening to the world

pulling the boat out of the ocean

getting all juiced up on mother sun and throwing the kryptonite island out into space

All this, plus the reveal that Lois' kid is in definitely Clark's son.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

ruddiger posted:

Kanye setting trends with his album patches, can't wait til we get Batman V Superman 1.1 in the theater.

It's nice to know that "beta in a box" releases are now leaking out of the software and video game industry and into entertainment as a whole.

Prokhor Zakharov
Dec 31, 2008

This is me as I make another great post


Good luck with your depression!
DC fanboys are still defending the film on my facebook, I thought about why the discussion seemed so familiar until it hit me

BvS is DCs version of Star Wars Episode 1, the fanboy behavior is almost exactly the same

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

8-Bit Scholar posted:

Well, in his long history in comic books Superman has basically played every conceivable role you could have him play, hero, villain, something in between. He's had somber and sad portrayals, cheery and cheesy ones, etc etc.

Superman Returns was the Christopher Reeve love fest that people seem to want Man of Steel to be and it was a boring and plodding brick of a film. They went to the opposite extreme and people suddenly claim they always wanted it to be the way it just was that they didn't like.

It's almost like the wide range of portrayals he's had means the dichotomy you've presented is false

The point isn't that you have to adhere to the "real" superman or that you can't put your own spin on him, leaving him a static cardboard cutout who can't be used to make good commercial pop art, it's that if you're using him as a character you 100% cannot avoid dealing with his mainstream conception

you can choose to play into it and offer an appealing version of what people expect with the usual minor tweaks based on the actor portraying him or the story you're telling, or you can meaningfully deviate from it- but if you do the latter you'd better be drat sure the version of the character you're offering has real appeal and that the movie you're making implicitly explains why he's different (and you should also strongly consider why you're using the character to tell that story- it's often a story that would be better told with different characters entirely or a self-referential commentary on the genre/character, which don't seem like stories that should be used to launch the flagship title of a shared cinematic universe)

if you present an alternate version of such a storied character that a wide swathe of people respond badly to (because they find it unappealing and doesn't ring true to their preconception of who the character is) then that's absolutely on you for both failing to meet your audience's expectations and failing to subvert them a sufficiently entertaining/engaging/diverting manner, not on them for failing to abandon any preconceptions of what this character might be like

LGD fucked around with this message at 22:44 on Mar 28, 2016

Tenzarin
Jul 24, 2007
.
Taco Defender

Father Wendigo posted:

I will stand by Spiderman 3 for the sole purpose of being the most comic accurate portrayal of Peter Parker: a man who, in a city of nearly eight and a half million people, still manages to distinguish himself as the most insufferable dork to draw breath.

Don't you dare look away!



Be careful for what you ask, Lowtax could be lurking for material for Doom House 3!

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







Honestly I'll take MoS over Returns any day of the week.

Say what you want about accurate comic book movie portrayals, a movie has to be slightly more interesting than watching flies gently caress before we get into comparative analysis.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
Man, I really want a Fleischer style Superman movie now

I want Superman to punch a goddamn laser back into a laser cannon and then tie the barrel in a knot. That was loving sick.

EDIT: Also, whatever happened to Superhero Themes? Right now I bet you can sing the Donner Superman or Burton Batman theme in your head. Quick, sing the Man of Steel theme. Sing the Avengers theme. See what I mean? We need good memorable themes again.

Mel Mudkiper fucked around with this message at 22:46 on Mar 28, 2016

Booblord Zagats
Oct 30, 2011


Pork Pro

Mel Mudkiper posted:

Man, I really want a Fleischer style Superman movie now

I want Superman to punch a goddamn laser back into a laser cannon and then tie the barrel in a knot. That was loving sick.

I'd love that a whole lot, but happily settle for Dini, which in and of itself was just a love letter to Fleischer

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

Mel Mudkiper posted:

EDIT: Also, whatever happened to Superhero Themes? Right now I bet you can sing the Donner Superman or Burton Batman theme in your head. Quick, sing the Man of Steel theme. Sing the Avengers theme. See what I mean? We need good memorable themes again.

The John Williams Superman theme is p. good/recognizable though, but I think your general point is correct

further support- Deadpool was the best superhero movie this year and had a recognizable theme song

(it was a 90's-esque rap theme re-purposed from a fan-created song about a videogame but for that character/movie was 100% right)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

LGD posted:

The John Williams Superman theme is p. good/recognizable though, but I think your general point is correct

That is the Donner theme

  • Locked thread