|
You can already do 'del c:\ -S -F -Q' to destroy a windows machine (at next boot, so it's effectively a ticking time bomb!), why reinvent the wheel?
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 19:22 |
|
|
Alighieri posted:not pissing me off, Bash is coming to windows natively bash: rm: command not found Because I'd be surprised if Microsoft is also installing the full inventory of unix binaries.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
xzzy posted:bash: rm: command not found
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
From what I have read so far it runs in a ubuntu usermode, so it is bash on ubuntu on windows. Not sure what all it will actually support yet.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
From what I've read so far, it sounds similar to what coLinux is already doing, but probably better integrated. Maybe inspiration is half that and half Cygwin. Or perhaps rather, SFU/SUA/Interix but not horribly crippled. nielsm fucked around with this message at 19:48 on Mar 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
Good, now they need to swap \ for / and C for sda. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
Just learn to write you heinously destructive commands in PowerShell you lazy bums.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
PIssing me off: That stupid, self-important rear end in a top hat that cuts me off in meetings to address what they think I'm saying when I haven't even finished what I'm saying. "yeah, good point, too bad it's entirely unrelated to what I'm currently talking about" And then getting all defensive about it after they derailed everything and people start getting irritated. I get it, you want to show off how smart you are. But you aren't fooling anyone. You are a moron who got where you are because you can religiously follow procedures in a run-book. That doesn't qualify you to address on architecture issues. Perhaps if you were remotely on topic, we might pay more attention to you. Just go back and watch your blinky lights. Thank god I don't have to actually work with him day to day, but the projects that we're on that intersect, gently caress I hate those meetings.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Inspector_666 posted:Just learn to write you heinously destructive commands in PowerShell you lazy bums. Blog post I read about it says he used apt-get to install emacs, ran emacs and then had to close the window because he didn't know how to exit emacs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
Alighieri posted:Blog post I read about it says he used apt-get to install emacs, ran emacs and then had to close the window because he didn't know how to exit emacs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
Alighieri posted:Blog post I read about it says he used apt-get to install emacs, ran emacs and then had to close the window because he didn't know how to exit emacs.  
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:lmao http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DevelopersCanRunBashShellAndUsermodeUbuntuLinuxBinariesOnWindows10.aspx That's the one. Comment lower down asks why ubuntu and not something like debian or centos. Can't make this poo poo up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
Ubuntu GNU/NT I do want to know how much Linux code is in there, and how much is a reimplementation of the syscall interface.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:05
|
|
|
nielsm posted:From what I've read so far, it sounds similar to what coLinux is already doing, but probably better integrated. Maybe inspiration is half that and half Cygwin. The big thing is that coLinux/AndLinux is still strictly limited to 32 bit Windows, while the new thing works on 64 bit Windows. So you don't have Windows and Linux restricted to about 4 gigabytes of RAM to share altogether.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
Emacs devs didn't feel their job was complete until exiting their program was more obtuse than exiting vi.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
Maybe he missed the line below that about the Ctrl key and thinks he needs to hold shift and c on one keyboard, and then press c on the second.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
What sadist made the "exit" command for his text editor the standard "copy" and "cut" commands for windows machines since the dawn of time?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
Paladine_PSoT posted:What sadist made the "exit" command for his text editor the standard "copy" and "cut" commands for windows machines since the dawn of time? I think you are joking and know Emacs is older than Windows... But who thought it'd be good to use Control-C for 'copy' when it was the 'abort' command in DOS/and even earlier? > 10 PRINT 'BUTTS' > 20 GOTO 10 > RUN BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS ^C >
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Paladine_PSoT posted:What sadist made the "exit" command for his text editor the standard "copy" and "cut" commands for windows machines since the dawn of time? Emacs predates the dawn of time. And Windows. And indeed windows in the GUI sense. Oh yeah, and DOS. Edit: and Unix job control I believe. feedmegin fucked around with this message at 20:46 on Mar 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Bob Morales posted:I think you are joking and know Emacs is older than Windows... I was not aware of that, but yeah 1975 vs 1979. I'm fine with the overloading of copy and break, the two are used in mutually exclusive circumstances.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
Paladine_PSoT posted:I was not aware of that, but yeah 1975 vs 1979.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Bob Morales posted:Windows isn't that old. The PC didn't even come out until 1981, Windows 1.0 was 1985 I'm guessing the meaning there was DOS, wikipedia lists 86-DOS as being "demonstrated" in 1979 and released in 1980. I asked my DID vendor if their control panel can give me an option to select time zone so that I can see call records in local time instead of GMT, and instead of telling me they're working on it he proceeds to spend almost two actual talking minutes trying to explain what GMT is and how it's the center of timezones and that everything globally works on GMT. Yes you rear end in a top hat, I know what GMT is, I'm just asking for basic display functionality found in basically anything I can possibly sign up for on the internet. Brut fucked around with this message at 23:41 on Mar 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
nielsm posted:Ubuntu GNU/NT I guarantee it's a reimplementation. Microsoft isn't going to set themselves up for a GPL lawsuit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
We are about to get hosed sideways by Microsoft because the people that used to be in charge of licensing decided it was boring and stopped doing it. The the person in charge of that department decided to ignore multiple emails from Microsoft over a few months asking for a status check on our licensing. He hired an outside company to audit our licenses thinking that would make MS go way for awhile. Instead they said that's nice, but we need this information real soon, and if you don't have it we'll come get it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
I am at once sympathetic to your plight and  -ing in anticipation of Microsofts wrath.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 02:56
|
|
|
poo poo pissing me off: Infoblox.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Really minor stupid poo poo pissing me off: "self punching" keystone jacks. What a piece of poo poo. It somehow worked with a switch, it somehow passed all the line tests with my cable tester, it somehow powered my AP, but refused to let my AP actually get an IP or connect in any meaningful way. After lopping it off and replacing it with a proper punchdown, it works flawlessly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:I am at once sympathetic to your plight and I'm just glad I'm not the one that gets to go in front of the board and explain how IT's budget is now either all going to paying off Microsoft, or is going to be doubled this year. luminalflux posted:poo poo pissing me off: Infoblox. Before he left, my boss was super big into whatever Infoblox does. He kept going on about how we'd finally wrest control of IP addresses away from another group, but I never could figure out why. So whats going on with it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
The IPAM part is actually OK, the DNS is just ugh. Like I had to click 700 times or something to clean up the SOA MNAME entry on a bunch of zones because by default it thinks it should be authoratitive and not the hidden master, even though the hidden master is configured first in the DNS server group we created the zones with. Our usage of it isn't great either since we have an environment which started out with Infoblox in bare metal, and now we're shifting to AWS and Route53.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 07:43
|
|
|
Lightning Jim posted:I think that might be the generic cert but I wonder if didn't regenerate That was it. SSHd in and did a racadm sslresetcfg and the HTML5 console is happy now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 09:37
|
|
|
Not pissing me off Today is my last day as Tier 1 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 11:26
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:Good, now they need to swap \ for / and C for sda. Cygwin did a thing like "/cygdrive/c" so i bet it'll be something like that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
nitrogen posted:Cygwin did a thing like "/cygdrive/c" so i bet it'll be something like that. It's /mnt/c
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:11
|
|
|
Sefal posted:Not pissing me off  Congrats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
New job pros: More money Way, way less work Pharma company Some PCI, some HIPAA compliance New job cons: Micromanager NetApp that is EOL and 90% cap 3 vmware hosts that are out of resources No real concern about the last two from higher ups Pretty sure the company is going under Hmmmmm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 16:54
|
|
|
Sefal posted:Not pissing me off Famous last words.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:Famous last words. You never get away from tier 1, you just are tier 1 for "higher level" people. Which just means they're just as dumb or more but think they're more important. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
India did a great job of loosing this game. So West Indies vs England. How it should be
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 19:22 |
|
|
CitizenKain posted:We are about to get hosed sideways by Microsoft because the people that used to be in charge of licensing decided it was boring and stopped doing it. The the person in charge of that department decided to ignore multiple emails from Microsoft over a few months asking for a status check on our licensing. He hired an outside company to audit our licenses thinking that would make MS go way for awhile. Instead they said that's nice, but we need this information real soon, and if you don't have it we'll come get it. I kinda understand this attitude, but my company makes and sells software and we want to make sure our customers are properly licensed and pay the proper amounts. Why is Microsoft vilified for making sure that companies are compliant with their software licensing rules? It's more like, we didn't do what we were supposed to do, and we hosed ourselves. I guess my perspective changed once my company started making money on software.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:36
|
|