|
How about we stop arguing with MisterBibs and get back to the topic at hand: Milking Rich Evans' tits.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:24 |
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Milking Rich Evans' tits.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
LividLiquid posted:But how will we get his pants off? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYFcZtO-QOE
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 08:35
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:I don't know why you (or others) came into a Superman film expecting anything short of trusting Superman being an absolute. MisterBibs posted:They did that by making the character Superman, though, and not some knockoff Superman where the notion of him not being trustworthy is possible. MisterBibs posted:You cannot separate the implicit trust Superman engenders from the Superman character.    MisterBibs posted:None of this "well, I think the dude who is consistently coded as the hero is secretly not a hero" stuff. MisterBibs posted:They did it by having a guy whose character is inherently, unarguably, intractably coded as a hero long before frame one airs.      None of those are mind control or misunderstandings.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 09:46
|
|
|
That implicit trust is literally what those covers are trading on, though? They're expecting you to see the cover, go "wait whaaaa, Supes wouldn't do that!" and buy it to figure out the context.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:18
|
|
|
Little Timmy buying Superman comics is a loving idiot though. The idea of Superman is extremely outdated. A new film could have been one of two things - the same idealised nostalgia geared towards a new audience, or a subversion of these ideas. The first one would be incredibly boring and probably forgotten in a few years. MoS and BvS went for something in between and the results were not good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:21
|
|
|
Funny, that's the opposite of what I was told less than a month ago when I asked in one of the Panel threads when I asked about Superdickery. The covers make you think Superman might not be the hero we all know and love, but their actual stories culminate in a "Pshaw, he's a hero we all know and love, what is wrong with you" message.
MisterBibs fucked around with this message at 11:32 on Mar 29, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:23
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:Little Timmy buying Superman comics is a loving idiot though. The idea of Superman is extremely outdated. A new film could have been one of two things - the same idealised nostalgia geared towards a new audience, or a subversion of these ideas. The first one would be incredibly boring and probably forgotten in a few years. I believe Captain America was fairly popular and remembered as "one of the good ones" among Marvel movies. There is nothing wrong with legitimate optimism, it's just apparently outside of the current WB's competency zone.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:24
|
|
|
Terrible Opinions posted:I believe Captain America was fairly popular and remembered as "one of the good ones" among Marvel movies. There is nothing wrong with legitimate optimism, it's just apparently outside of the current WB's competency zone. True, but that film did make fun of the original idealised version of Captain America pretty hard.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:31
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:Funny, that's the opposite of what I was told less than a month ago when I asked in one of the Panel threads when I asked about Superdickery. The covers make you think Superman might not be a hero, but their actual stories culminate in a "Pshaw, he's a hero, what is wrong with you" message. Most of them are built on Supes having a reason for his dickery. Tt usually involves plans he isn't informing his friends of and generally showing a sort of unfortunate disregard for their emotions. However the stories generally didn't take themselves seriously at all. Yes Superman made Jimmy Olsen morbidly obese as a plot to foil Lex Luthor's evil alien liposuction clinic, but the story will just end with a pun about "shaping up" and by the next issue he's back to normal shape. We're meant to laugh a bit at Jimmy's misfortune and not think too hard about it because he's a comic book character.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:32
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:True, but that film did make fun of the original idealised version of Captain America pretty hard. It made fun of the propaganda but the entire movie was an earnest and honest tribute to Greatest Generation values. It even had a sequel about the world being ruined by the Baby Boomers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 11:33
|
|
|
Donald Glover 
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
PooInAnAlleyway posted:Donald Glover Listen, if you don't want to know how to get a man's pants off, don't ask.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
That fuckin' grin.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:The idea of Superman is extremely outdated. Ummm. No. Irony and subversion are mainstream. They are outdated and cowardly approaches now unless played with genuine humor. Grant Morrison's All Star Superman interview remains relevant here. Grant Morrison posted:
Knight Boat fucked around with this message at 02:12 on Mar 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
rear end is extremely good & has an extremely good acronym
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
Superman is evil or dangerous in like 80% of timelines, probably the only hero with a worse track record for being evil is Reed Richards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 06:26
|
|
|
Reed Richards can't shoot lasers from his eyes though so he's not as evil as Superman.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
The best Superman comics are the ones where he inflicts his weird fetishes on Jimmy Olsen.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
Superman is a poor man's Goku
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
He's a poor gaijin's One Punch Man 
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
Lady Naga posted:Reed Richards can't shoot lasers from his eyes though so he's not as evil as Superman. He could invent laser goggles, though, so same difference.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 15:01
|
|
|
Acne Rain posted:like I'm starting to wonder if he's just a kid (Note his constant attempts to be a completely uninvited arbiter of what's "childish" and what isn't, like how non cgi effects are childish because power rangers used them and prequel dislikers are rejecting something not from their childhood, he's desperate to be seen as "mature"), a troll, or has something actually wrong with him. he's a sack of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
So on tonight's PreRec stream, Jack (half in jest) said that if someone donated 150 bucks, he'd do it dressed as a clown. A few minutes ago, someone donated 150 bucks. Rich is... displeased. E: holy balls, someone donated 200 for Jack to be a silent clown. MisterBibs fucked around with this message at 04:14 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Rich and Jack are just ripping BvS to shreds right now.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Rich and Jack are just ripping BvS to shreds right now. good that movie was a piece of poo poo I hate it
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
The gif's getting a lot of use.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:The gif's getting a lot of use. And rightly so.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 06:14
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:E: holy balls, someone donated 200 for Jack to be a silent clown. Ahahaha. Also did anyone else see the other thread's multi-page derail discussing the merits of the new Superman movie?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
TequilaJesus posted:Ahahaha. Oh poo poo, that was This thread!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
TequilaJesus posted:Ahahaha. I'm gonna ask if we can get the GBS thread moved here and this thread moved to GBS
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:19
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Rich and Jack are just ripping BvS to shreds right now. lol around what time in the video? https://www.twitch.tv/previouslyrecorded_live/v/57691548
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:38
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:I'm gonna ask if we can get the GBS thread moved here and this thread moved to GBS Is training people to specific subforums still a thing? Can we have Mr. Bibs?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:Chalk it up to them still being the folks who complained about MoS (represented in the new movie as anti-Superman folks who are consistently coded as wrongity wrong wrong), I guess. Tell me your thoughts about Lady in the Water.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:52
|
|
|
Race Realists posted:lol around what time in the video? try 48 mins
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
You (or someone) is doing God's work. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
Holy gently caress I just opened the new Pre Rec video and skipped to a random point and they were arguing with MisterBibs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWEJb_3IFBw&t=2698s
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:21
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:Holy gently caress I just opened the new Pre Rec video and skipped to a random point and they were arguing with MisterBibs. It wasn't just me, for once!  Others pointed out how they clearly ignored the scene where Lex discusses his motivation, after saying he doesn't have a motivation.Rich says it himself: "Where is that?!". It's a textual, blatant scene with Eisenberg practically talking to the audience that they missed (or, more realistically, were actively not bothering to pay attention). MisterBibs fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
Those people were able to articulate their arguments, so Jack and Rich engaged them. You just came off as foolish, again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:24 |
|
|
ooh ooh ooh i know why he keeps coming off as foolish, i know why!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:29
|
|
