cash crab posted:

I'm so sad. I just unfriended a few good mines for IoSM for posting super-unfunny poo poo. So, I'll go to my other favourite source, people who share trending news with walls of text.



Imagine being this mad about a nipple four nipples

Picnic Princess posted:

Here, have some equal opportunity.

Fishvilla posted:

givin

Fishvilla posted:

givin

Henchman of Santa posted:

Looks like a joke based on the watermark, but I love the bong on the counter.

Fishvilla posted:

givin

Lottery of Babylon posted:

Hidden anti-SJW in Hearthstone? Card name: Black Knight

So as you all know, Hearthstone is one of the most popular video games in the world atm, and as a medium can be considered mainstream because of it.

They have a card called The Black Knight in this game:


Now let me explain why this card is so anti-SJW. Not only is it called the black knight, but it's effect is to instantly kill a minion that protects others when it is played. These 'taunt' minions that protect others have a big shield around them to signify this. So basically he kills white knights.

Now of course there are numerous ways to think about this in another way, and because the game developer isn't stupid they would always support pro-left views in public. But I love how a little RP always leaks through.

Fishvilla posted:

givin

cash crab posted:

I'm so sad. I just unfriended a few good mines for IoSM for posting super-unfunny poo poo. So, I'll go to my other favourite source, people who share trending news with walls of text.



Imagine being this mad about a nipple four nipples

Lottery of Babylon posted:

And if the idealists begin to tell you that something is good, you can be certain that it will be morally reprehensible when it all comes out in the end. If the altruists say that something is a matter of civil rights, than you can be drat sure that it is going to be morally repugnant.

GOTTA STAY FAI posted:

It's $325 for a single person with no dependents whose household income is just above the filing threshold, and it increases with your income. That's as low as it goes, but goddrat it gets bad quickly as you make more money.

I volunteer at a tax clinic for low income people and yeah, there are a shitton of people pissed as gently caress that they've been slammed with individual shared responsibility payments (the IRS doesn't want us calling it a "fee" or "penalty" even though it is literally an amount of money charged to you for not complying with the law). Things get really depressing when it's a married couple with lots of dependents and nobody in the house had insurance. They come in thinking they're getting a refund and walk out with a bill for twice what they thought they were getting back

GOTTA STAY FAI posted:

If your suspicions about his actual level of taxable income are correct, his AGI is way below the filing requirement, so he shouldn't be assessed the Individual Shared Responsibility Payment.

If you want to help him despite his propensity toward making racist comments on social media, point him toward IRS form 8965. It's just one page--all he's gotta do is put his name and SSN on it and check "yes" for 7a, then submit it with his 2015 taxes (if he hasn't sent them in already).

Blind Pineapple posted:

No dogwhistles here, no sir.

BrigadierSensible posted:

But it's not about that. It's that the "poor urban person wink wink*"'s vices, (expensive clothes) are visible. And how dare they have nice things?!? We worked so hard to oppress you so that you wouldn't have or even know how to enjoy nice things!

Lottery of Babylon posted:

I’m not going to lie to you: I’ve been known to slap a woman around. I am not proud of it – sometimes I just can’t resist putting woman in her place. Often the only way that woman can be brought to a recognition is to smack some sense into her.

Thumping a woman every now and then is going to release some rather primordial emotions in her. What she then feels toward the man who takes a swipe at her is going to be more intense, more animal, and more dangerous. Slapping a woman can destroy a relationship, but it can also unleash a gritty passion. And, with the right woman, it is worth taking that risk.

1. Hitting a woman will offer an insight into her personality that could not be captured by any other means. Transgressive acts produce transgressive insights. Giving a lady a dose of corporal correction yields a glimpse of the feminine mind that could be obtained no other way. Often doing something reprehensible will give an awareness that would be impossible to acquire without risking such social stigma. It is usually necessary to become a bit of a reprobate in order to understand the ultimate nature of reality.

2. Corporal punishment builds character. Just as hitting a child helps to strengthen personality; a righteous whack helps knock the liberalism out of a smug broad. A good right hook will tend to smack four years of liberal arts right out of her head. A slap across the mouth, from time to time, helps to deepen her personality – by bringing her back in contract with traditional feminine roles. Daily life was never intended to be without pain.

3. The expression on her face when she is given that first whack is absolutely priceless. Like a Zen mediation student getting a whack on the back from the master’s staff, that first slap makes a lie of all the liberal platitudes that government schools have pounded into her head. Coming to a physical awareness of the cruelty of life does have a way of brushing the clichés from the eyes.

4. The kind of women who thinks she is too special to be hit is not the kind of female you really want to be around. For thousands of years of human history, men have beaten their mates; non-violence is the aberration in the Western tradition. If women were hit by their mates for time immemorial, then modern damsels shouldn’t be treated any differently. Just because a girl now has a cell phone and a stylish haircut doesn’t mean that she is any better than her ancestors. Sexual violence has always been part of human heritage and will never disappear – so deal with it.

5. Women will assent to physical correction. I’m not going to say women enjoy being hit: they don’t. No one likes being hurt. Any gent who claims otherwise doesn’t know the first thing about females. She might resent the blow, but the woman will still accept a wallop from the right man. Although it is not exactly politically correct, there are actually times when a woman will assent to being smacked. What is more, the female knows exactly when she deserves a whack. The true lady realizes when a slap is warranted.

6. Men who do not use physical violence will be rigorously tested and regularly despised. Woe to the man who does not react when his gal is out of line. A woman will never respect a man who fails to knock her around when she breaks the rules. I’d rather that lover would come to hate me than to think I am not up to a little violence now and then. Women expect a man to put a bit of determination in his reprimand. Real men not only hit women, but a gentleman always knows just how much force is appropriate. Only a wimp bothers to argue with a woman; a true man uses his superior body mass to get his point across physically.

7. When you hit a woman, you immediately remove yourself from consideration as a suitable father for her children. When you raise a hand against her, she knows that you would not ever be a good dad, so she yields to your overriding objective of keeping the relationship childfree. A guy who beats women demonstrates that he is simply unsuitable to have around kids, so you won’t have to worry about any surprises with the home pregnancy test kit. A touch of physical violence makes the romance more primal. (Leave the diaper-changing to the pantywaists.)

8. Bruises are emblems of our encounter. Look, it is not like I hit a woman every day; it is not that I cause her any real bodily damage. I just sometimes feel the need to leave a marker of my passage across her fleshy territory, like a surveyor’s mark upon the expanse. Not a sign of ownership as much as visual notice that my hands have passed across her.

9. Female erotic fantasy often includes being hit. In public, women will talk and talk and not shut-up about a society in which gents and broads are equal. But in private, ladies never fantasize about such wimpy egalitarian men. Women are not aroused by pansy-assed males, but by a guy with a firm hand. The men that end-up between a woman’s legs are seldom non-violent. Female sexual fantasies will often involve a male figure who can dominate her; whether that dominance is sexually expressed will depend on the extent of her socialization into the feminist agenda.

10. Slapping a woman is an act of tenderness. Striking a soulmate is far more intimate than making love. Should you raise a bruise, she will look at you with mingled dislike and devotion; she will loathe you, but she will be loyal. She might well detest you, but she will remain dedicated. Beating a woman does not make a girlfriend obey every whim – quite the reverse – but smacking a lady makes her focus upon you (at least after the swelling subsides). Raising a hand forces attachment, not affection. A women who is regularly administered the belt almost never abandons her man.

A gracious woman receives her chastisement without complaint. A seductive dame doesn’t fuss when she is set right. A charming hostess does not remonstrate when she is chastened. She’ll flinch when you take her in your arms, but she will press herself harder against you. She’ll jump when your fingers brush the back of her neck, but she will incline her head in front of you.

11. When I lay a hand on a woman, we create a bond. Romance isn’t what you see in the movies. Although violence against women is not exactly socially accepted at this moment in history, such brutality does make carnal knowledge all that more in-depth. Beating a woman is a sort of pact, a sign of a fleshy covenant. Consider my punch as the signing of a contract.

12. Having your mark on her changes the sexual experience. Just as make-up sex after a knockdown argument is more satisfying, so screwing a woman you have just slapped is more emotionally fulfilling than the casual variety. Sex with a woman you have hit carries deeper meaning. Copulation isn’t all caresses and kisses; if fornication doesn’t leave blemishes, you aren’t doing your adultery right. The most intense orgasms always leave most lingering bruises.

I make no secret of my proclivities; I do not hide my history of violence toward women. If a lady comes to dislike my touch, then she is always free to leave. I am not some Puerto Rican kidnapper with an assortment of teenagers chained in the basement; I take no prisoners. Feminists would have you believe that dames are as strong as any man – except in one area – although broads at said to be as powerful as any male, these bitches just can’t seem to open the front door when subjected to unwanted chastisement. If a female doesn’t like being nudged, she can always leave. If a woman stays with me, she knows what is coming to her.

Fishvilla posted:

givin

Madkal posted:

I wish my roommate posted his insane rants on Facebook. He just went on a long rant about how Donald Trump is going to keep the rape-happy Syrian refugees out of America. An interesting proposal and all seeing how my roommate also thinks that rapes don't happen very often and are mostly false allegations to keep men down.
I tried to google some info to refute the claim of some kind foreign rape-epidemic sweeping through Europe but sadly the only websites that come up are the rightwing garbage site he visits constantly.

SpacePig posted:

I never thought I'd have a Flat Earther in my family, but I guess if it'd be anybody, it'd be the one who's also anti-vaccination.


It's a two hour video of somebody spouting "facts" that have a fundamental enough misunderstanding of how physics works that even I, a guy who failed high school physics, knows he's completely wrong.

Digirat posted:

My favorite thing about flat earthers is the presence of the ISS livestream that you can see anytime it's in contact with the ground, for constant real-time confirmation that yes, the earth is in fact round as demonstrated by this object orbiting around it.

Fishvilla posted:

givin

Jonas Albrecht posted:

Give in.

Henchman of Santa posted:

Looks like a joke based on the watermark, but I love the bong on the counter.

Tiberius Thyben posted:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3766302&pagenumber=157&perpage=40#post457995564

Scalie. Sorry.

Kracken posted:

I'm in the red, trying to argue. I guess it's me that's the idiot.

Kracken posted:

I'm in the red, trying to argue. I guess it's me that's the idiot.

Laurenz posted:

God, that post by the "19 year old American Muslim woman" is so fake, even if everything had been spelled correctly.

"I had not removed my hajib in my life while outside. I tried to do it once when I was 10 years old, and my parents grounded me for a week".

10 year old girls don't even wear the Hijab at that age. They only have to wear it once they are full into puberty, so around 13 - 15 years old.

RagnarokAngel posted:

Ehhhh the post is fake as hell but this isn't necessarily true. Depending on the country they immigrated from and how conservative they are it varies pretty widely.

I've seen toddlers in hijabs, while more permissive parents let their daughters hold off until they felt ready.

SpacePig posted:

So you're saying that maybe one person's experience with Islam isn't necessarily representative of the religion as a whole, and we shouldn't base our assumptions about it based on a few folks with more radical ideals. Interesting.

Maker Of Shoes posted:

oh my god shut up shut up shut up

here, have a thing. A not terrible message but the username attached to it is both hilarious and wtf

TinTower posted:

That's the name of Britain's new polar research ship, I'll have you know.

Maker Of Shoes posted:

Krispy Kareem posted:

I thought the British called that buggery.