|
Can someone please do this with this as style 
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
KoRMaK posted:My version of this turned out the same  i need to pick better source material
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
 Just dont  http://i.imgur.com/eXFufV3.jpg
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
 Tubgirl + goatman?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:25
|
|
monkey posted:Can someone please do this Doing this.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
  David Mincechell. E: Bonus David Meatchell. 
Paladinus fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
Has anybody tried larger than 512? I feel like with all the passes it could effectively blow up an image quite a bit beyond the original resolution without loss of quality but I was unable to get above 512 without CUDNN installed. I'd be interested for prints and stuff
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
Astrobastard posted:I tried animating one (its a walking mech avatar from BARONS GBS Avatar thread) ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffucq. I think i know someone who may want this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
 oh god, thats disturbing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
OOOH YEAAAAAAA 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:
Yeah, she's lookin' sharp. So great, thanks!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:59
|
|
THE DOG HOUSE posted:Has anybody tried larger than 512? I feel like with all the passes it could effectively blow up an image quite a bit beyond the original resolution without loss of quality but I was unable to get above 512 without CUDNN installed. I'd be interested for prints and stuff I've done a few larger than 512. Memory is the issue. CudaNN helps with that. You get tons of lost quality, but you're not trying to replicate the original, so the quality loss is just part of the new image.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
David Cameron plus Baked Beans Audrey Hepburn in the style of David Hockney   
Stoatbringer fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:I've done a few larger than 512. Memory is the issue. CudaNN helps with that. You get tons of lost quality, but you're not trying to replicate the original, so the quality loss is just part of the new image. Er yeah thats what I was imagining I worded it poorly, but im glad to hear it works. How large did you do? I seriously couldn't make anything even a tiny bit above 512 with 6gb of vram. I wish I knew what was going wrong with the cudann thing, I imagine its just some super simple issue but having zero knowledge of what the strings im typing actually do or mean isn't helping. I was consider using that image embiggener software but I can't remember what it was called, does anybody know? It was something that could make any image any size using some kind of algorithm and the results could be fantastic depending on the source.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Requesting a blend or w/e we're calling these. This source:  And this style:  Thanks in advance. I hope it looks super rad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
art   and  
Hefty Leftist fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
Requesting this mashup +  Thanks in advance!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:45
|
|
THE DOG HOUSE posted:Er yeah thats what I was imagining I worded it poorly, but im glad to hear it works. How large did you do? I seriously couldn't make anything even a tiny bit above 512 with 6gb of vram. I wish I knew what was going wrong with the cudann thing, I imagine its just some super simple issue but having zero knowledge of what the strings im typing actually do or mean isn't helping. There are a number of resizing solutions available. Another option, which might work OK for some of these images that have a lot of clear lines and sharp angles, is to run it through a vectorizer. Once the image is in a vector format, you can export it to any size with no loss of quality, although there may be some loss in the process fo converting it to a vector image.  I am running this one, again, with different parameters. This reminds me of another project of mine that's along these lines:          http://imgur.com/yN7gyEU http://imgur.com/4JCEOyc   It slaps random polygons onto a canvas until they start to look the reference image. It also exports in SVG, so I can blow the results up to any size. The last couple actually look MUCH better in the software, because I introduced a rounding error or something into the SVG export at some point.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:There are a number of resizing solutions available. Another option, which might work OK for some of these images that have a lot of clear lines and sharp angles, is to run it through a vectorizer. Once the image is in a vector format, you can export it to any size with no loss of quality, although there may be some loss in the process fo converting it to a vector image. That is so cool! Are you going to release it in some way so we can mess around with it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:37
|
|
PoopSok posted:That is so cool! Are you going to release it in some way so we can mess around with it? If I get around to it, I might. The code is a bit of a mess. I was in the middle of making a ton of changes, and borked some stuff, and rolled it back, then added back on. It works fine, but the code is not great, and the SVG export isn't perfect. I'm not sure what I changed in that, but the SVGs no longer perfectly match the images. I should have used Git or something on that project. Edit: A personal favorite of mine from that project:   The other version of Emo Octo: 
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
Hey Centripetal Horse - I have a volume and stuff working, how do I use it on a spot instance so I can start saving money?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:52
|
|
KoRMaK posted:Hey Centripetal Horse - I have a volume and stuff working, how do I use it on a spot instance so I can start saving money? Right now, you don't. Spot prices have been crazy all day. It's the worst I've seen since I started playing with the g2 units. Last time I looked the spot price in two of the regions was over $6 an hour. I have a hypothesis about what causes that, but I don't know for certain. However, the steps are approximately this: In your instances list, right-click on the instance, and go to "Image->Create image." After a couple more steps, you will have an AMI that you can use when you spin up new instances. When you request a spot instance, go to "My AMIs" and select the AMI you just made as the basis for the new instance.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:
ahahaha drat now please do pizza gross face
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:12
|
|
Hogge Wild posted:ahahaha drat I can do that.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:Right now, you don't. Spot prices have been crazy all day. It's the worst I've seen since I started playing with the g2 units. Last time I looked the spot price in two of the regions was over $6 an hour. I have a hypothesis about what causes that, but I don't know for certain. Ah ok, so its not about just attaching the volume, it's gotta be an AMI. Also, fyi everybody. Someone in yospos made me aware that there is an existing AMI in the north viringia region that has everything you need immediately and can be used on spot instances (which they said they were using) Gobbeldygook posted:i don't know what "attaching the volume" means, i have no idea what i'm doing. i searched for "ami-84c787ee" in the instance search thingy, started an instance, it spent a couple minutes starting it (possibly installing software? i dunno) and started typing commands into the command line. What this means is that if you have a credit card and can click diligently and persevere you too can run your own server to spit this out in 10 minutes or less. Good luck figuring out the other linuxy stuff to transfer files back and forth (check my earlier post for tips). And thats it!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:There are a number of resizing solutions available. Another option, which might work OK for some of these images that have a lot of clear lines and sharp angles, is to run it through a vectorizer. Once the image is in a vector format, you can export it to any size with no loss of quality, although there may be some loss in the process fo converting it to a vector image. I found a program called Perfect Resize it seems to work well used this as test  I thought I was seeing pixels everywhere but after zooming in on the original I can actually see thats just what it looks like. At any rate if I make one of these images I really, really like I can put a little work into some "post processing" (quotes because i dont know poo poo about it) and make a poster or something. edit: or more likely an artsy rasterbation since I only have free access to high quality laser printers that print in 8x11 lol 
penus penus penus fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:20
|
|
|
Bill Cosby and Spoon Worms. They're sea creatures but they look a bit like penises so 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:David Cameron plus Baked Beans David Cameron plus a pig's severed head would be more appropriate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
YESSS YESSS YESS!!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
it's incredible it looks exactly the loving same
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
somehow he is less greasy
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:24
|
|
  The second one is even more disgusting.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:
ahahahaha drat this thread delivers how about the body horror filter with him
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
Holy poo poo at flesh pizza
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:36
|
|