Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Deki
May 12, 2008

It's Hammer Time!

Eonwe posted:

my coworkers all hate goons and they have been especially smug, so I would like to see you guys kick their poo poo in

I have one coworker that plays, hates goons, but also thinks TEST and co are really fuckin' annoying and seems to think that they'll get their poo poo pushed immediately after goons are done.

I want goons to win, but that's a fair consolation prize if it does happen.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rhymenoserous
May 23, 2008

Eonwe posted:

can you guys explain why the other factions couldn't hold your territory

I keep seeing that in this thread, but I'm wondering what that actually means

Low ADMS make space hard to hold. Unless PL and NC choose to just loiter for years we can generally curbstomp any 3 parties in this war.

kiresays
Aug 14, 2012

My Hordeling mentee tackled his first bad guy yesterday :shobon:

Ice Fist
Jun 20, 2012

^^ Please send feedback to beefstache911@hotmail.com, this is not a joke that 'stache is the real deal. Serious assessments only. ^^

lol sometimes being on the outside and coming back after years to hear about this retarded drama is the best way to play eve.

Blacklisting a guy for something he did in Archeage :laffo:

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Alunan posted:

Live coverage from the Fade-Deklein border tonight.



This would have been better propaganda if you had labeled the little boy "SMA". :golfclap:

Endie posted:

Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow;
Bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow.
One simple truth there is, that cannot be refuted
Right-thinking people want to see Tom executed.

This is why I miss your war updates. :saddowns:

ChickenWing posted:

Of the total number of dudes in our coalition, only X% will show up for any given fight because that's just how nerds work - people are in different timezones, there's alts, there's people who don't feel like playing right now, there's people who only log in to update their skillqueue, there's super pilots, et cetera.

The other guys' 3000 are their X%, amplified by the sheer hurf they're huffing. more :words:
So yeah, give it time.
I seem to remember running some numbers on this a few years ago. Back when FA was still cutting its teeth helping the nascent CFC kick IT Alliance and pets out of Fountain we were having between 3-4% of characters show up in fleet, and that really good. Alliances were generally happy to get between 1-2%. I seem to recall that Walltreipers hit upwards of 20% for the few weeks they held out in Delve, and that was simply amazing, and allowed them to punch far above their bench weight during that time.

I guess what I'm saying is, that in order to outblob your opponents you do two things:
1. Have a larger base (Allies ~50K, Imperium ~30K)
2. Have a larger multiple of that base show up (Allies ~6.0% for major objectives, Imperium around 5.6% for the same)

The Allies have an advantage in both right now, but a small shift in #2 can change the game very quickly.

Fake edit: I pulled the numbers above from an earlier post ITT, so treat them as reliably as you will.

Drythe posted:

Why has lowtax not sent you a thank you letter yet

He's a cheap bastard and postage rates just went up.

Drythe
Aug 26, 2012


 
thank you pm then

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

kiresays posted:

My Hordeling mentee tackled his first bad guy yesterday :shobon:

:3:

Ice Fist posted:

lol sometimes being on the outside and coming back after years to hear about this retarded drama is the best way to play eve.

Blacklisting a guy for something he did in Archeage :laffo:

Yeah. It was pretty dumb.

Ice Fist
Jun 20, 2012

^^ Please send feedback to beefstache911@hotmail.com, this is not a joke that 'stache is the real deal. Serious assessments only. ^^

Also for the record, I've met boat and he was chill irl, but I wouldn't put enacting a space vendetta past him at all.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Deki posted:

I have one coworker that plays, hates goons, but also thinks TEST and co are really fuckin' annoying and seems to think that they'll get their poo poo pushed immediately after goons are done.

I want goons to win, but that's a fair consolation prize if it does happen.

Won't PL just swap from shooting goons to shooting TEST if this ends with goons losing? I don't see PL giving up shooting nerds for basically anything.

Siets
Sep 19, 2006

by FactsAreUseless

Eonwe posted:

can you guys explain why the other factions couldn't hold your territory

I keep seeing that in this thread, but I'm wondering what that actually means

Right now, the new sov mechanics strongggggly favor the attackers when they are going up against coalitions that own vast swathes of space like we do.

Mostly this is due to that "ADM rating" that you've probably seen mentioned a few times. Without getting into details, ADM rating is quite simply a measure of how much a space is used. It goes up when players rat, mine, or simply hold the system for a period of time. The higher the ADM, the harder it is for an attacker to flip a system.

The problem Imperium faces is that we have a lot of space that is not fully occupied or used, thus there are a lot of systems out there with very low ADM. As a result, there is a lot of low-hanging fruit out there for attackers to harass and flip, which means its a ton of busywork for defenders to be bouncing all over the map to try and contest attackers who only need very short time windows to flip a system.

So to answer your question, why couldn't TEST or others hold our space assuming they conquer it? A few key reasons:

-Probably the biggest reason is that MBC has stated multiple times that they are only temporarily blue to each other while they crusade against goons. They have said that as soon as the Imperium is ousted (lol) that they will reset each other and go back to shooting each other. If they do this, then they stand no chance at holding all of the space we currently hold, because we are having trouble doing that even now with the coalition we have. Trying to do that without blueing everyone around you would be a hilarious exercise in futility. They might be able to concentrate and fortify ADMs in part of Vale or something, but taking and hold all of Deklein and Pure Blind without a coalition? Good loving luck.

-TEST and other groups do not have SRP. In the long-run, their wallets will wear down and their fleet numbers will decrease. The Imperium is fabulously wealthy and can sustain long war efforts like no other entity in the game. Crushing the will of others via a long war of attrition that eventually wears them down where we march on has been the name of our game for the past decade. Unless TEST changes their culture from "lolbertarian bootstraps!" to a similar socialist SRP program to match our game, they simply will lose in the long run (as they have in the past.)

brand engager
Mar 23, 2011

Who even let that poo poo through? "Oh you want me to blacklist someone for poo poo in another game? No that's loving stupid" is how that should have went.

Magres
Jul 14, 2011

Drythe posted:

I think you could get unblacklisted if you wanted.

come home to goons

#freekimsemus2016

FruitNYogurtParfait
Mar 29, 2006

Sion lied. Deadtear died for our sins. #VengeanceForDeadtear
#PunGateNeverForget
#ModLivesMatter

SperginMcBadposter posted:

Who even let that poo poo through? "Oh you want me to blacklist someone for poo poo in another game? No that's loving stupid" is how that should have went.

the directors that were aggrieved, one of them being a spymaster one of them being ~a hero of the swarm~

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


I really want someone we hate to end up in Vale/Tribute with a stable enough footing that they start to try to use the space.

Magres
Jul 14, 2011

Siets posted:

-TEST and other groups do not have SRP. In the long-run, their wallets will wear down and their fleet numbers will decrease. The Imperium is fabulously wealthy and can sustain long war efforts like no other entity in the game. Crushing the will of others via a long war of attrition that eventually wears them down where we march on has been the name of our game for the past decade. Unless TEST changes their culture from "lolbertarian bootstraps!" to a similar socialist SRP program to match our game, they simply will lose in the long run (as they have in the past.)

lol reddit nerds being crushed by their own stupid libertarianism would be amazing



also agreed that goons have an endurance for war that is completely unmatched, and it's why they've won every war in the long run - a war of attrition in a world of infinite resources means that the only way to win is to make your opponent want to stop fighting

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Fozziesov really does sound like the worst thing

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

Won't PL just swap from shooting goons to shooting TEST if this ends with goons losing? I don't see PL giving up shooting nerds for basically anything.

Yeah basically. We tend to go wherever we figure we can get the most entertainment. With Citadels I have no clue where that will be, but it will be a lot of fun destroying a 250 billion ISK autism tower.

FruitNYogurtParfait posted:

the directors that were aggrieved, one of them being a spymaster one of them being ~a hero of the swarm~

ENDIEEEEEEE :argh:

eonwe
Aug 11, 2008



Lipstick Apathy

Siets posted:

Right now, the new sov mechanics strongggggly favor the attackers when they are going up against coalitions that own vast swathes of space like we do.

Mostly this is due to that "ADM rating" that you've probably seen mentioned a few times. Without getting into details, ADM rating is quite simply a measure of how much a space is used. It goes up when players rat, mine, or simply hold the system for a period of time. The higher the ADM, the harder it is for an attacker to flip a system.

The problem Imperium faces is that we have a lot of space that is not fully occupied or used, thus there are a lot of systems out there with very low ADM. As a result, there is a lot of low-hanging fruit out there for attackers to harass and flip, which means its a ton of busywork for defenders to be bouncing all over the map to try and contest attackers who only need very short time windows to flip a system.

So to answer your question, why couldn't TEST or others hold our space assuming they conquer it? A few key reasons:

-Probably the biggest reason is that MBC has stated multiple times that they are only temporarily blue to each other while they crusade against goons. They have said that as soon as the Imperium is ousted (lol) that they will reset each other and go back to shooting each other. If they do this, then they stand no chance at holding all of the space we currently hold, because we are having trouble doing that even now with the coalition we have. Trying to do that without blueing everyone around you would be a hilarious exercise in futility. They might be able to concentrate and fortify ADMs in part of Vale or something, but taking and hold all of Deklein and Pure Blind without a coalition? Good loving luck.

-TEST and other groups do not have SRP. In the long-run, their wallets will wear down and their fleet numbers will decrease. The Imperium is fabulously wealthy and can sustain long war efforts like no other entity in the game. Crushing the will of others via a long war of attrition that eventually wears them down where we march on has been the name of our game for the past decade. Unless TEST changes their culture from "lolbertarian bootstraps!" to a similar socialist SRP program to match our game, they simply will lose in the long run (as they have in the past.)

This is an excellent explanation thank you

brand engager
Mar 23, 2011

Unfunny Poster posted:

Yeah basically. We tend to go wherever we figure we can get the most entertainment. With Citadels I have no clue where that will be, but it will be a lot of fun destroying a 250 billion ISK autism tower.


ENDIEEEEEEE :argh:

I think 'Autism Palace' is more fitting for XLs. Also aren't those 700bil for the hull itself?

FruitNYogurtParfait
Mar 29, 2006

Sion lied. Deadtear died for our sins. #VengeanceForDeadtear
#PunGateNeverForget
#ModLivesMatter

Unfunny Poster posted:

Yeah basically. We tend to go wherever we figure we can get the most entertainment. With Citadels I have no clue where that will be, but it will be a lot of fun destroying a 250 billion ISK autism tower.


ENDIEEEEEEE :argh:

i said spymaster not spinmaster you dumbdumb!!

Endie
Feb 7, 2007

Jings

Reverand maynard posted:

You can target Russians, just look for the words "wtb Nyx 21kkk"

The master speaks.

Edit: I guess when my phone says it'll need to resubmit the form to refresh then it means it.

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

SperginMcBadposter posted:

I think 'Autism Palace' is more fitting for XLs. Also aren't those 700bil for the hull itself?

I thought XL's were going to be 250 billion? Regardless I was referring to them when I said "autism palace" and how much fun that'll be to destroy. I really don't think PL will make one, unless it's in like Amamake.

FruitNYogurtParfait posted:

i said spymaster not spinmaster you dumbdumb!!

I can't keep up with who is who in this thread. :mad:

Mekchu fucked around with this message at 18:56 on Apr 4, 2016

Xolve
Oct 12, 2012

Well, shoot! We ain't come this far just to dump this thing in the drink. What's the nearest target opportunity?

Eonwe posted:

can you guys explain why the other factions couldn't hold your territory

I keep seeing that in this thread, but I'm wondering what that actually means

You actually have to use your space to keep ADMs (active defense multipliers) high, afaik every ADM level adds an additional 10 minutes to the capture timer.

This means the 'Good Guys' would have to rat, mine and use their space instead of just setting up a shanty town and waiting to see what the CFC/Imperium reaction will be. Honestly, I think it's pretty foolhardy to think that the invaders are looking to setup a permanent shop there, and instead they will just install groups that always wanted space, but couldn't take it or just let the people that want it move in. Honestly, a nullsec full of random groups of people all fighting their little tribal wars is a lot more fun than one coalition owning 'the galactic north'. Maybe this shake up will be the kick in the rear end CCP needs to 'fix' otherwise underwhelming nullsec income.

The worst case scenario and the best case scenario both involve Goons losing all their space.

Siets posted:

-TEST and other groups do not have SRP. In the long-run, their wallets will wear down and their fleet numbers will decrease. The Imperium is fabulously wealthy and can sustain long war efforts like no other entity in the game. Crushing the will of others via a long war of attrition that eventually wears them down where we march on has been the name of our game for the past decade. Unless TEST changes their culture from "lolbertarian bootstraps!" to a similar socialist SRP program to match our game, they simply will lose in the long run (as they have in the past.)


I don't expect many of you to agree with me on this- but honestly, flying in groups without SRP makes people gently caress up less and overall contributes to a better EVE experience.

That being said, groups have lived and thrived for years without it, so it's not like some big Achilles heel everyone tries to make it out to be.

Xolve fucked around with this message at 18:58 on Apr 4, 2016

Richard Bong
Dec 11, 2008

Unfunny Poster posted:

Yeah basically. We tend to go wherever we figure we can get the most entertainment. With Citadels I have no clue where that will be, but it will be a lot of fun destroying a 250 billion ISK autism tower.

I pretty much see you guys being the first to pop one of those and look forward to the eve-o/reddit whining about loot recovery and citadel defenses from the recently displaced.

Siets
Sep 19, 2006

by FactsAreUseless

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

Fozziesov really does sound like the worst thing

It is and it isn't. Like everything, pros and cons.

Pros:
-Game is all about subcaps now, which is way more fun than invincible bullshit supercaps online escalations of which only elite-skilled members get to participate in.
-Mechanics lends to a reduction of sov for large entities that don't use their space. This means more space for new blood to move into after a conflict.

Cons:
-It is a little too easy to troll sov right now with very small ships that can simply run away if defenders coming hunting for them. Benny Hill doesn't even begin to describe what this is like in-game right now, and it's why we've moved to an interceptor headshot doctrine to deal with it.
-As in the pros section, mechanics lends to a reduction of sov for large entities that don't use their space. This means less wealth for large coalitions as they lose control over their territory.

Eonwe posted:

This is an excellent explanation thank you

yw bud :eonwe:

Dr. Pangloss
Apr 5, 2014
Ask me about metaphysico-theologo-cosmolo-nigology. I'm here to help!

FruitNYogurtParfait posted:

it was in another game entirely so it shouldn't matter if he shattered the whole goon guild

:thepoint:

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Richard Bong posted:

I pretty much see you guys being the first to pop one of those and look forward to the eve-o/reddit whining about loot recovery and citadel defenses from the recently displaced.

Man, do you know how great some of the SMA tears we've gotten are? There's a thread on EVE-O atm complaining about I-Hubs costing 800mil or so and begging CCP to lower the price. I can't wait for the Citadel price complaint threads :black101:

FruitNYogurtParfait
Mar 29, 2006

Sion lied. Deadtear died for our sins. #VengeanceForDeadtear
#PunGateNeverForget
#ModLivesMatter

that was my point, before you had a chance to chime in come at me pangloss ill fite u

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Is it basically assumed that, when the Imperium breaks out of its lowsec staging point in a few weeks, nobody will come back to fight them?

Xolve
Oct 12, 2012

Well, shoot! We ain't come this far just to dump this thing in the drink. What's the nearest target opportunity?

Richard Bong posted:

I pretty much see you guys being the first to pop one of those and look forward to the eve-o/reddit whining about loot recovery and citadel defenses from the recently displaced.

I personally hope the first citadel gets popped and some weird 'the logs show nothing' poo poo happens and they actually lose all their poo poo.

It's been a while since EVE players have experienced actual loss that mattered.

Altran
Mar 20, 2013

Reverand maynard posted:

I've been screaming into the void about staging everyone in a lvl 5 mission hub in lowsec and keeping 1-3 regions for ratting and then whatever r64s we can hold on the fringes. gently caress entosis bullshit, gently caress stations. Plop down a max of 5 citadels with thè sole purpose of docking your ratting Ishtar/procurer

Right now the biggest problem is we are the only game in town if you want to force fights by attacking someone that has set down roots in nullsec. We approach sov like it is the end goal in and of itself rather than a tool to facilitate wealth creation. Our regions are so spread out that we can't mutually defend one another.

This has been a problem in the past because there were more players in the sov game, so if this was n3 attacking us, there would be Russians snatching up their r64s and making n3 renters Russian renters.

We're in a post scarcity world now. A large amount of the pvp player base has old money, pve alts, or are simply white collar workers in their thirties who can simply buy plex to sell. Why deal with holding sov when your members no longer need to generate their fortune, when you can offset your few losses with r64 money and by only taking favorable engagements?

Another thing is just how interconnected the older pvp groups are. Tishu has members who were in BL, PL, NC., HK etc. simply due to how long they've been around. They aren't really blues, but when they have a chance to gank their old corp member or team up with their old coro member to dunk on BNI, it's easier and funner to go for the sure victory. Any new group that tries to put down roots will simply make itself a target that can be attacked thus forcing fights, while not having the social ties outside of their own group to get help.

You got experience with a good lvl 5 hub? That's a great idea btw, it's like a system with unlimited anoms, but sucks to be the new dude or the dude with lovely standing.

Edit: BTW we struggling getting more than 100 dudes in 1 inty fleet, what's your favourite ice cream flavour?

rob3r
Dec 27, 2012

Siets posted:

-TEST and other groups do not have SRP. In the long-run, their wallets will wear down and their fleet numbers will decrease. The Imperium is fabulously wealthy and can sustain long war efforts like no other entity in the game. Crushing the will of others via a long war of attrition that eventually wears them down where we march on has been the name of our game for the past decade. Unless TEST changes their culture from "lolbertarian bootstraps!" to a similar socialist SRP program to match our game, they simply will lose in the long run (as they have in the past.)

This is a really good paragraph. Except Test has always had SRP.

eonwe
Aug 11, 2008



Lipstick Apathy
I like this version of the EVE thread

So happy and full of life :3:

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Eonwe posted:

I like this version of the EVE thread

So happy and full of life :3:

You bring out the best in all of us Eonwe. You should head up the next EVE thread.

Addamere
Jan 3, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Glory of Arioch posted:

if you've got the skills and the patience for it, production is going to poo poo loving isk for months because of the war

everything i am looking at is destroying right now, there has never been a better time

if you can keep what you build in the family too that is even better

Please build interceptors and stealth bombers.

Deofuta
Jul 7, 2013

The Corps is Mother
The Corps is Father

rob3r posted:

This is a really good paragraph. Except Test has always had SRP.

Indeed, TEST can't be faulted for its SRP program and general attitude towards its new players. It was the privatization of its money moons under noted trustable individual Baki that had the earmarks of lolbertarian silliness.

Drythe
Aug 26, 2012


 

Nietzschean posted:

Please build interceptors and stealth bombers.

eonwe
Aug 11, 2008



Lipstick Apathy

Unfunny Poster posted:

You bring out the best in all of us Eonwe. You should head up the next EVE thread.

I think this war was good for the thread

Gwyneth Palpate
Jun 7, 2010

Do you want your breadcrumbs highlighted?

~SMcD

Nietzschean posted:

Please build interceptors and stealth bombers.

way ahead of you

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FruitNYogurtParfait
Mar 29, 2006

Sion lied. Deadtear died for our sins. #VengeanceForDeadtear
#PunGateNeverForget
#ModLivesMatter

Eonwe posted:

I think this war was good for the thread

lotta mad dudes coming in telling everyone how hard goonfleet gettin owned makes me want to disagree with you

  • Locked thread