|
Moist Mardu, come on people.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 00:33 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 06:37 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Do you actually need a playset of both? I thought it was more a 3/3 split card Actually no clue, I didn't play in the small stretch that card was being played. All I know is that they were 3 bucks, old, and if I didn't buy some they would be a lot more expensive. If that is the case I will simply trade the extra away while its still expensive and be happy.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 00:54 |
|
Thisuck posted:It's loving Marblue black potus posted:Sad Mardu. sarmhan posted:Moist Mardu, come on people. you guys are making the baby grumpy
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 00:58 |
|
rinski posted:you guys are making the baby grumpy This is correct.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 00:59 |
|
I've heard you're meant to run one less sword than foundry, since you can combo with sword in your graveyard.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:02 |
|
JerryLee posted:Didn't they have specific draft rules in place for Innistrad 1.0 to deal with exactly this situation? Looking to see whether a dude's drafted a DFC isn't a new problem, and as I recall you were explicitly permitted to see if someone had taken a DFC. Yeah it was a total BS DQ. Lots of salt on that one.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:07 |
|
rinski posted:you guys are making the baby grumpy Let's be honest, nobody remembers which of the Nephilim is which. Might as well just call the deck "Not Green."
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:08 |
|
African american is always the best deck name
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:12 |
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:I've heard you're meant to run one less sword than foundry, since you can combo with sword in your graveyard. http://www.channelfireball.com/videos/channel-pmayne-modern-thoptersword/ Pascal Maynard has a version of the deck he's testing out. Looks good but I seriously dunno why no River of Tears E: I do like the idea of looping EE a lot, seems good against Affinity. Three Hurkyl's Recall does not, though TheKingofSprings fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Apr 8, 2016 |
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:18 |
|
GimmickMan posted:Let's be honest, nobody remembers which of the Nephilim is which. Might as well just call the deck "Not Green." That is why I am performing this public service announcement. Know Your Nephilim! White has Glint Hawk, not Glint-Eye! Dune-Brood blue? Nope! Not true! It's Ink-*Treader* Nephilim, not "Submerged In Ink, Specifically Black Ink" Nephilim. Witch-Maw kind of rhymes with rickshaw, which begins with R, but it is not a rickshaw and therefore has no R. The only other Tiller is Spike Tiller, a green card, so obviously Yore-Tiller costs WUBR.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:39 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:http://www.channelfireball.com/videos/channel-pmayne-modern-thoptersword/ Pascal Maynard has a version of the deck he's testing out. Why is Hurkyl's bad against affinity? It's a fantastic card?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:40 |
|
Bugsy posted:SOI drafts are going to work like ISD drafts right? Got to show the which DFC cards are in the pack when opening. On LR Marshall said when drafting paper you show which DFC cards you open to the table but you don't need to announce when you take them; however they need to go to the top of the pile in front of you regardless of pick order.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 01:44 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:Why is Hurkyl's bad against affinity? It's a fantastic card? Are you killing them next turn? If you're not Hurkyl's is pretty medium. Sure you get your "bounce a manland, 2 Darksteel Citadels, make them discard 4 cards and kill their Glimmervoid EOT" Hurkyl's but you get more "oh well I'm dead if I don't blow this mid-combat. Also he's going to vomit all these cards back out this turn so I'm still dead next turn so I guess I just cast a 1U Fog" Hurkyl's. You really need multiples for it to be guaranteed to be good. Snapcaster Hurkyl's or Hurkyl's, wait a turn or 2 Hurkyl's again is usually good enough. It's also much better if you have Chalice of the Void. EOT Hurkyl's, Chalice on 0/1 is a giant beating.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:07 |
|
Really looking forward to the clusterfuck that is people trying to hide their DFCs again.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:08 |
|
Gridlocked posted:On LR Marshall said when drafting paper you show which DFC cards you open to the table but you don't need to announce when you take them; however they need to go to the top of the pile in front of you regardless of pick order. Well, Marshall's wrong. The requirements are as written in the MTR, quoted last page
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:14 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:Why is Hurkyl's bad against affinity? It's a fantastic card? suicidesteve posted:Are you killing them next turn? If you're not Hurkyl's is pretty medium. Sure you get your "bounce a manland, 2 Darksteel Citadels, make them discard 4 cards and kill their Glimmervoid EOT" Hurkyl's but you get more "oh well I'm dead if I don't blow this mid-combat. Also he's going to vomit all these cards back out this turn so I'm still dead next turn so I guess I just cast a 1U Fog" Hurkyl's. You really need multiples for it to be guaranteed to be good. Snapcaster Hurkyl's or Hurkyl's, wait a turn or 2 Hurkyl's again is usually good enough. It's also much better if you have Chalice of the Void. EOT Hurkyl's, Chalice on 0/1 is a giant beating. There's also the issue of about a third of the deck running it being artifacts TheKingofSprings fucked around with this message at 02:36 on Apr 8, 2016 |
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:33 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:Really looking forward to the clusterfuck that is people trying to hide their DFCs again. What is this about?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:34 |
|
mfcrocker posted:Well, Marshall's wrong. The requirements are as written in the MTR, quoted last page I kinda miss having Joe Bono on, as it was nice to have a Judge to make intricate rulings on the show. I know the three local stores I play at all revealed DFCs during ISD, so I assume they will do the same. It wouldn't surprise me if someone shows up trying to challenge it and referencing the MTR though.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:34 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:There's also the issue of about a third of the deck running it being artifacts That's uh, not an issue at all? It's not Rebuild. Unless you're Hurkyl'sing yourself in response to Shatterstorm or something I guess.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:40 |
|
suicidesteve posted:That's uh, not an issue at all? It's not Rebuild. Maybe TKoS plays against a lot of Swerves
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 02:49 |
|
Elyv posted:Maybe TKoS plays against a lot of Swerves Commandeer your Hurkyl's.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:02 |
|
TheTofuShop posted:I kinda miss having Joe Bono on, as it was nice to have a Judge to make intricate rulings on the show. The TO could make a rule that says that after each pick each player is required to pat their bellies and rub their heads simultaneously and it'd be fine—as long as it's done ahead of time, TOs have pretty wide discretion in filling in whatever the MTR doesn't address. (Any such things should technically be on a tournament fact sheet, but at a Regular REL event I don't expect that to happen and nobody's really going to care about it.) E4C85D38 fucked around with this message at 03:13 on Apr 8, 2016 |
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:05 |
|
The MTR says only this:quote:Players may not reveal the front face of their card selections or the contents of their current packs to other
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:08 |
|
Sickening posted:What is this about? In draft, I'll watch people grab a DFC real quick and slide it under their previous picks or all their picks all sly-like so the people next to them won't know what colors they're in.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:27 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:In draft, I'll watch people grab a DFC real quick and slide it under their previous picks or all their picks all sly-like so the people next to them won't know what colors they're in. Is that not allowed?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:32 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:In draft, I'll watch people grab a DFC real quick and slide it under their previous picks or all their picks all sly-like so the people next to them won't know what colors they're in. That's not unintuitive.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:33 |
|
There's really not much advantage to be gained by hiding your colors anyway, and probably some disadvantage.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 03:59 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:In draft, I'll watch people grab a DFC real quick and slide it under their previous picks or all their picks all sly-like so the people next to them won't know what colors they're in. What? I would rather announce loudly what colors I'm in than hide it. Unless you know the person next to you is a troll or something.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:05 |
|
Well if you're passing to the person who pack 1 pick 1s Arlinn it kinda makes sense to cut them off of RG.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:15 |
|
Sickening posted:Is that not allowed? The draft procedures say this: quote:Players choose one card from their current booster pack and then pass the remaining cards It seems mandatory to place the card on top of the pile, even if it's not mandatory to reveal the DFC. But at regular REL, doubt anyone would care.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:18 |
|
Was there a change to the MTR since Origins? Because in Origins revealing DFCs was required and you weren't allowed to hide them. Which was kind of annoying - I asked on Judge Apps what the implications of this would be at a competitive level event and they just kind of brushed it off and said that those would be really rare and not to worry about it. Meanwhile I was slated to judge at a GPT that thankfully at the last minute switched from limited to Standard.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:22 |
|
Emerson Cod posted:Was there a change to the MTR since Origins? Because in Origins revealing DFCs was required and you weren't allowed to hide them. Which was kind of annoying - I asked on Judge Apps what the implications of this would be at a competitive level event and they just kind of brushed it off and said that those would be really rare and not to worry about it. Meanwhile I was slated to judge at a GPT that thankfully at the last minute switched from limited to Standard. This is the version of the MTR that was effective with Origins, but I don't see any notable changes. http://wpn.wizards.com/sites/wpn/files/attachements/mtg_mtr_17jul15_en.pdf You weren't allowed to hide them then, you aren't allowed to hide them now (just plop them on top of your pile of picks), but nothing in policy either then or now requires affirmatively revealing them/announcing them to the table.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:42 |
|
suicidesteve posted:Well if you're passing to the person who pack 1 pick 1s Arlinn it kinda makes sense to cut them off of RG. Only if you are confident you can cut them so hard that they just abandon RG entirely. Otherwise you just wrecked your second pack on purpose, that's not how you win a draft.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 04:56 |
|
Was it Zvi during Torment that almost got in trouble for publicly announcing he was forcing White (a weak color) before drafts, so he had a tshirt made or something for the PT?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:00 |
|
ShadeofBlue posted:Only if you are confident you can cut them so hard that they just abandon RG entirely. Otherwise you just wrecked your second pack on purpose, that's not how you win a draft. Trying to jam a dude you might not even play seems like a bad draft strategy in general
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:02 |
|
Rinkles posted:Was it Zvi during Torment that almost got in trouble for publicly announcing he was forcing White (a weak color) before drafts, so he had a tshirt made or something for the PT? I remember the T-shirt story. It was him and at least one teammate. The shirts had the art of Teroh's Faithful, and the caption "And all the drafters say I'm pretty fly for a White guy." I didn't recall him actually getting in any trouble for it.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:03 |
|
The Zvi story: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=sideboard/ptnice02/dr1
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:09 |
|
suicidesteve posted:That's uh, not an issue at all? It's not Rebuild. Whoops I thought it was symmetrical. In that case it's a lot better but I don't know that Affinity's that bad of a matchup that they need it.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:12 |
|
I hadn't remembered that Zvi got griefed by PTR in the process. That's magical.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:15 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 06:37 |
|
What's the point of not letting players show their picks?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2016 05:43 |