|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:What are the actual benefits of juicing compared to blending? Juicing seems more for vegetables as I've never hear of people throwing denser vegetables like carrots in a blender, but nowadays you can get spinach and kale and other leafy greens in your smoothie at smoothie stores with your delicious fruits... You get all the sugar without any of that pesky fiber stuff! ...yeah it's dumb.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2016 12:56 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 14:22 |
|
Drinking juice is so inefficient, guys, eat your meals optimally like the rest of us.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2016 08:23 |
|
Sometimes I want to eat the wheatgrass you know?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2016 08:27 |
|
Part of me just died a little: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPnTa1UJPEI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4LUasFly0c (Ford commercials)
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 14:37 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Part of me just died a little: Why would a part of you die because of good commercials? They also did this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uiho8HLI3A
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 14:40 |
|
It feels weird to have decades-old media rehashed and re-purposed with the original actors just to get you to buy a drat car. All that work that goes into it, the campaign pitch, the budgeting, the contracting, the rights acquisition from Konami, the recording, the editing, etc. It's a ton of thought and effort to produce something....dumb. Please also understand that "dumb" isn't always a negative thing. I love lots of dumb things.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 14:49 |
|
10 years is a perfect time frame for teenagers to grow up and start buying cars. I never watched any of those cartoons, but the commercials seem amusing even without proper context.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 15:39 |
|
I thought it was pretty well done actually, they put more effort into it than most other companies would have and made it a little funny at the same time. Didn't really expect to see a car company make these though.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 17:40 |
|
Nitrox posted:10 years is a perfect time frame for teenagers to grow up and start buying cars. I never watched any of those cartoons, but the commercials seem amusing even without proper context. try 20
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 21:08 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Part of me just died a little: I remember in the 90s some car company was doing the same thing only with Speed Racer, nothing new under the sun etc.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 21:48 |
|
Lord Chumley posted:try 20 The original Metal Gear Solid turns 18 this year and I bet a LOT of people reading this suddenly feel far older.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 22:00 |
|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:The original Metal Gear Solid turns 18 this year and I bet a LOT of people reading this suddenly feel far older. For that matter, the original Metal Gear turns 29 this year, so they're probably hitting the midlife-crisis target too.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 22:37 |
|
Wow, they did one with Captain Planet too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MKZkvCppx4 What's next, Skeletor ranting about how He-Man keeps kicking his rear end because the 2016 Ford F-150 is so fuel efficient?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 23:09 |
|
C.M. Kruger posted:Wow, they did one with Captain Planet too. "Truck of Omens, give me hauling capacity beyond hauling capacity!"
|
# ? Apr 9, 2016 23:23 |
|
For the first time in my life, I remember what a car commercial tells me about estimated MPG because Cambpell said it and Snake repeated it verbatim. Holy cow.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 02:21 |
|
Grey Fox posted:It feels weird to have decades-old media rehashed and re-purposed with the original actors just to get you to buy a drat car. All that work that goes into it, the campaign pitch, the budgeting, the contracting, the rights acquisition from Konami, the recording, the editing, etc. It's a ton of thought and effort to produce something....dumb. I would imagine it was a lot cheaper and easier than filming a whole new commercial. It's a really good idea, really well done. If there was an actually pretty cool moves in marketing thread this whole series would belong in it.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 03:37 |
|
C.M. Kruger posted:Wow, they did one with Captain Planet too. Uhhhh
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 05:11 |
|
Nyah!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 05:14 |
|
Why are they all hyping up the rearview camera? Isn't that, like, legally required nowadays? fake edit: Oh never mind, it's required "by 2018".
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 05:39 |
|
It's required because they make the vehicles so drat bloated that you can't see out the back window.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 06:19 |
|
Might as well pretend that your vehicle is a special snowflake for having it. Until the unwashed masses realize it's a mandatory accessory
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 06:59 |
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:Why are they all hyping up the rearview camera? That Chevy commercial where people are blown away by all the technology in the car and think it's some BMW or something that costs over $50,000 is kind of like that. Have these people not looked at cars in like, 10 years? You can get an econo shitbox that syncs your Iphone and plays streaming music. I'm sure the car companies are counting down the days until the radio/CD unit is replaced by a bluetooth receiver entirely.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 07:01 |
|
Johnny Aztec posted:It's required because they make the vehicles so drat bloated that you can't see out the back window. Working as a valet was amazing because like 99% of people don't realize its generally easier to back up using the side view mirrors.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 07:06 |
|
I don't know if it's really marketing but I can't think of a better place for this. Evidently the place I've just been on holiday has a gang problem, because all the bars in the area have government mandated (or at least in the same style as stuff about age limits etc.) signs forbidding the wearing of gang colours. Except they must not want to say "gang", because/so they just forbid the wearing of 'colours', emphasis theirs. Because reading extra meaning into the word colour has absolutely no unpleasant history whatsoever.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 07:08 |
|
In more tales of companies congratulating themselves for doing the bare legal minimum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJvzptyMR4A Travelocity: almost always following federal guidelines!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 20:07 |
|
Nitrox posted:Might as well pretend that your vehicle is a special snowflake for having it. Until the unwashed masses realize it's a mandatory accessory It's toasted!
|
# ? Apr 10, 2016 20:27 |
|
AlphaKretin posted:I don't know if it's really marketing but I can't think of a better place for this. Evidently the place I've just been on holiday has a gang problem, because all the bars in the area have government mandated (or at least in the same style as stuff about age limits etc.) signs forbidding the wearing of gang colours. Except they must not want to say "gang", because/so they just forbid the wearing of 'colours', emphasis theirs. Because reading extra meaning into the word colour has absolutely no unpleasant history whatsoever. Since bars, restaurants, clubs, whatever in America can't legally say "no black people" you end up with places that have "dress codes" instead.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 00:51 |
|
This showed up as promoted by McDonald's in my Twitter feed. I'm honestly not sure what they're trying to achieve. Convince mothers to get their kids to work at McD?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 04:13 |
|
FrozenVent posted:This showed up as promoted by McDonald's in my Twitter feed. This is a clever bit of marketing where McDonald's paid some hack journalist to write a piece that tries to scrub away some of the stink of having McJobs be a frequently used term in the US by pretending it's a cool, hip place to work with a nest uniform and a fun atmosphere that will definitely get you a better job in the future, with their new skills for life system. So it's totally ok that you'll be working for minimum wage, just keep working and eventually you'll get those skills you need to advance.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 06:22 |
|
It's bootstraps thinking, isn't it? You're learning the skills you need to become successful at your lovely minimum wage job, so keep working there and eventually you'll get rich and powerful! You're not a member of the repressed proletariat, you're a temporarily embarrassed millionaire.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 06:39 |
|
The key word in that "blog" is Canada. We're on of the markets where they've spent a bunch of money renovating and launching trying to go more upscale. They've been running TV ads trying to play it up as a great place for young people to work as well (which is sort of true even if it's mostly because we've got decent minimum wage laws). Here's on the TV spot they've been running: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QyZ54Helw
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 09:02 |
|
Lagomorphic posted:The key word in that "blog" is Canada. We're on of the markets where they've spent a bunch of money renovating and launching trying to go more upscale. They've been running TV ads trying to play it up as a great place for young people to work as well (which is sort of true even if it's mostly because we've got decent minimum wage laws). I love how comments are disabled.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 09:07 |
|
TontoCorazon posted:I love how comments are disabled. It's a standard practice with all promotional material.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 11:41 |
|
Captain Monkey posted:This is a clever bit of marketing where McDonald's paid some hack journalist to write a piece that tries to scrub away some of the stink of having McJobs be a frequently used term in the US by pretending it's a cool, hip place to work with a nest uniform and a fun atmosphere that will definitely get you a better job in the future, with their new skills for life system. So it's totally ok that you'll be working for minimum wage, just keep working and eventually you'll get those skills you need to advance. You know how they can stop the association of McJob? By paying a living wage. It would cost a few ad campaigns, but be worth ten times that.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 13:31 |
|
Rigged Death Trap posted:You know how they can stop the association of McJob? By paying a living wage. Walmart has a promoted tweet now about "1 in 7 Americans can't put food on their table" and it's getting savaged with "because you assholes don't pay your employees enough"
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 15:16 |
|
ElwoodCuse posted:Since bars, restaurants, clubs, whatever in America can't legally say "no black people" you end up with places that have "dress codes" instead. "NO DO-RAGS, FLAT-BRIMMED HATS, OR ROLLED-UP PANT LEGS. Wait, what do you mean, 'that's racist?' It has nothing to do with keeping certain people out of our nightclub!"
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 16:00 |
|
One I saw was "No sleeveless shirts for males" Is that targeting any ethnicity?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 17:07 |
|
Mu Zeta posted:One I saw was "No sleeveless shirts for males" Italians?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 17:20 |
|
Mu Zeta posted:One I saw was "No sleeveless shirts for males" MISANDRY!!1!
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 17:36 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 14:22 |
|
I'm pretty sure this counts as dumb marketing trick
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 17:43 |