|
Armyman25 posted:So to recap, her and her merry gang of idiots intentionally put classified information on a non-governmental server that was stored in her private residence. They also sent this information to/from private Blackberries, including while they were in foreign countries (because if there's one thing that's absolutely secure, its the wireless network in a foreign country). They got the classified information out into the unclass realm by pulling up classified documents on one SIPR or JWICS terminal and then typing the information onto an unclassified terminal, intentionally leaving out any classification markings that were present on the original document in an attempt to hide the fact that it was classified; this was done in at least once instance at the direct behest of Clinton. This classified information included, among other things, information from multiple IC SAPs as well as information that was protected by HCS (i.e., stuff that had the potential to put HUMINT sources at risk. Do you have a chart to clarify things here?
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:I hope he drops spoilers mid-conversation with the GOP leadership. I don't think he would make it 7 and a half years through his presidency only to then guarantee an assassination attempt in the last 6 months.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Also, if he makes it to the convention he can and there is a possibility he will sell the nomination back to the GOP. Could he actually do this? If yes then that actually sounds like the most plausible option. Trump's ego his huge, but his greed seems to be all-consuming. Why take a job he is guaranteed to lose at when he could instead get filthy rich off of it without losing any face?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
Person Dyslexic posted:Could he actually do this? If yes then that actually sounds like the most plausible option. Trump's ego his huge, but his greed seems to be all-consuming. Why take a job he is guaranteed to lose at when he could instead get filthy rich off of it without losing any face? I mean normally I wouldn't believe someone would do this, but we're talking about Trump so it's not really a bad idea to take the most ridiculous possibility and run with it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
zoux posted:Do you have a chart to clarify things here? Can I apply for a waiver to post goatse itt?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
smg77 posted:Can I apply for a waiver to post goatse itt? I was thinking "reverse vampires" but I like yours better.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Armyman25 posted:So to recap, her and her merry gang of idiots intentionally put classified information on a non-governmental server that was stored in her private residence. They also sent this information to/from private Blackberries, including while they were in foreign countries (because if there's one thing that's absolutely secure, its the wireless network in a foreign country). They got the classified information out into the unclass realm by pulling up classified documents on one SIPR or JWICS terminal and then typing the information onto an unclassified terminal, intentionally leaving out any classification markings that were present on the original document in an attempt to hide the fact that it was classified; this was done in at least once instance at the direct behest of Clinton. This classified information included, among other things, information from multiple IC SAPs as well as information that was protected by HCS (i.e., stuff that had the potential to put HUMINT sources at risk. I've only paid passing attention to the email thing, and I'm certainly no fan of the Clintons, but if there's one thing I know it's that when it comes to the Clintons, where there's smoke - even billowing, 3 alarm amounts of smoke - there isn't necessarily fire; it's more likely chaff being thrown in the air by the career Clinton smearers. 8 loving years of the kind of poo poo you posted above and literally nothing ever found to be illegal except perjury about a consensual affair. Don't mind of I don't hold my breath until there's some actual evidence and some actual charges are filed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TexasTribune/status/719582074512879616
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
Wait, the SEC is doing something? I thought that was against its religion
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
"Wow, Obama really must have it our for our Hero!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
It's a civil suit, by the way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:"Wow, Obama really must have it our for our Hero!" Where's the charges against Shillary Obummer? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
Armyman25 posted:So to recap, her and her merry gang of idiots intentionally put classified information on a non-governmental server that was stored in her private residence. They also sent this information to/from private Blackberries, including while they were in foreign countries (because if there's one thing that's absolutely secure, its the wireless network in a foreign country). They got the classified information out into the unclass realm by pulling up classified documents on one SIPR or JWICS terminal and then typing the information onto an unclassified terminal, intentionally leaving out any classification markings that were present on the original document in an attempt to hide the fact that it was classified; this was done in at least once instance at the direct behest of Clinton. This classified information included, among other things, information from multiple IC SAPs as well as information that was protected by HCS (i.e., stuff that had the potential to put HUMINT sources at risk. The government got hacked but Hillary didn't, looks like she took actual initiative to keep classified information safe, ha ha. Lemming fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Apr 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Gyges posted:There's an old saying in Alberta — I know it's in Texas, probably in Alberta — that says, dunk on me once, shame on — shame on you. Dunk on me — you can't get dunked on again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Family Values posted:I've only paid passing attention to the email thing, and I'm certainly no fan of the Clintons, but if there's one thing I know it's that when it comes to the Clintons, where there's smoke - even billowing, 3 alarm amounts of smoke - there isn't necessarily fire; it's more likely chaff being thrown in the air by the career Clinton smearers. 8 loving years of the kind of poo poo you posted above and literally nothing ever found to be illegal except perjury about a consensual affair. Don't mind of I don't hold my breath until there's some actual evidence and some actual charges are filed. My favorite part of that was where each Speaker pushing for impeachment over an affair was, at the time, cheating on his wife. Except for the serial pedophile.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
Ceiling fan posted:My favorite part of that was where each Speaker pushing for impeachment over an affair was, at the time, cheating on his wife. Except for the serial pedophile. To be fair to them, it wasn't the affair that Clinton got in trouble for, it was lying under oath about it. The fact that he was easily the most investigated president in history made their job of getting him to lie under oath though that much easier.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:26
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:To be fair to them, it wasn't the affair that Clinton got in trouble for, it was lying under oath about it. The fact that he was easily the most investigated president in history made their job of getting him to lie under oath though that much easier. And the lie made them seem like huge dumb babies for caring about.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
zoux posted:Do you have a chart to clarify things here? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
haha holy poo poo https://twitter.com/aurosan/status/719548983161524224
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Yeah when a lame duck president's party wins seats in the final midterm, it probably means the opposing party screwed up big time. The 1998 election being bad news for Republicans was said to be a repudiation of their efforts to bring down Clinton, who was pretty popular at the time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:35
|
|
|
Lemming posted:And the lie made them seem like huge dumb babies for caring about. Ehh, lying under oath is a pretty serious thing. That they only got him to do it for something totally unrelated to what they were investigating him for was what was bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:haha holy poo poo jesus loving christ
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:haha holy poo poo That's loving sick. How do I access the actual image? Clicking that tweet brings up a super-zoomed portion of the image, and clicking that zoom just refreshes the page basically. Is my browser retarded at the twitter?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:haha holy poo poo The thing is, that's not even the best thing on that guys twitter. The best one is a clip of two people dressed as Fin and Poe stopping just before they kiss
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
Comedy, in which Hillary Clinton and deBlasio joke about Colored People time. Black people. Ha!
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:46
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:The thing is, that's not even the best thing on that guys twitter. If they don't reveal Poe to be gay, it will have been a huge missed opportunity in a number of ways.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:haha holy poo poo Didn't Cruz do pretty much the same thing in one of the early primary states? In fact I recall that one was even worse, implying the recipient was in trouble over a "voting violation" or some such nonsense. When all else fails, scare the living poo poo out of your voter base with misleading threats of legal action.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
mdemone posted:If they don't reveal Poe to be gay, it will have been a huge missed opportunity in a number of ways. Hasn't the gay director of the next gay film been tweeting a bunch of gay fanart to troll the turbonerds?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
Meet the Trump Bros http://www.cbsnews.com/news/meet-the-trump-bros/?linkId=23326658 quote:
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:Hasn't the gay director of the next gay film been tweeting a bunch of gay fanart to troll the turbonerds? Had to quote this to make sure there wasn't a new word filter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:Had to quote this to make sure there wasn't a new word filter. You know, you can quote it and then not hit post.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
silvergoose posted:You know, you can quote it and then not hit post. Oh word? Is that how this posting thing works?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
Family Values posted:I've only paid passing attention to the email thing, and I'm certainly no fan of the Clintons, but if there's one thing I know it's that when it comes to the Clintons, where there's smoke - even billowing, 3 alarm amounts of smoke - there isn't necessarily fire; it's more likely chaff being thrown in the air by the career Clinton smearers. 8 loving years of the kind of poo poo you posted above and literally nothing ever found to be illegal except perjury about a consensual affair. Don't mind of I don't hold my breath until there's some actual evidence and some actual charges are filed. Pretty sure Bill didn't technically perjure himself due to the highly specific definition of intercourse his lawyers pushed through. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
silvergoose posted:You know, you can quote it and then not hit post. Did you know that clicking here will make all of your wildest dreams come true?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
zoux posted:Do you have a chart to clarify things here? Its Armyman25.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Pretty sure Bill didn't technically perjure himself due to the highly specific definition of intercourse his lawyers pushed through. Also doesn't perjury require lying under oath about the facts of the case?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
Spotify asked members of Congress to create playlists and they are all awful. They go from one genre to the next in a sad attempt to please everyone, they all seem to put a song from Hamilton on them, and a disturbing number of fifty year old dudes listen to Katy Perry and Taylor Swift. Credit to Senator Mike Lee for just listing Zeppelin, Rush, and U2, which I have no trouble believing is a real Mike Lee playlist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
"Interns create modern music playlist for old white men"
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:Didn't Cruz do pretty much the same thing in one of the early primary states? In fact I recall that one was even worse, implying the recipient was in trouble over a "voting violation" or some such nonsense. Yes he did in Iowa and I still have it in my Cruz keepsake box. It is a time honored tradition to shame your base into supporting you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:"Interns create modern music playlist for old white men" There is literally a Veep episode with this
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2016 20:18
|
|