|
Eonwe posted:also the fact that mittani talks to dabigredboat so much makes me less sympathetic You can come chat in the Discord. Kimsemus made me mod so I plan to prove how terrible of an idea that was by spamming "!airhorn"
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 23:41 |
|
Iseeyouseemeseeyou posted:Maybe the best place to start is not making GBS threads on an ally 1/3rd your size that's pulling 2x your numbers Keep trying. You'll get there.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:13 |
|
Xolve posted:Everything you're coalition is doing, literally every single loving thing is something the Imperium has chastised other groups for doing in previous wars. "please feed us fleets, oh god please feed us fleets"
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:15 |
|
Phi230 posted:I lost 700,000 isk on eve bet Lost 9billion on a hockey game
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:15 |
|
fyi, we're not going to feed you fleets to the best of our ability anyways
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:15 |
|
cravius posted:Regardless of his personal views, you'd think a dude so obsessed with coalition building would not condone his directorate openly making GBS threads on said coalition members at every possible turn. aren't these illum logs? if so then he's not letting them openly poo poo on them; he's letting them poo poo on them in private, so as to avoid letting all that frustration bottle up and lead to apathy or fuckgoons
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:16 |
|
Nietzschean posted:aren't these illum logs? if so then he's not letting them openly poo poo on them; he's letting them poo poo on them in private, so as to avoid letting all that frustration bottle up and lead to apathy or fuckgoons Yeah, I didn't pay attention to the source. I thought they were from elysium. This resulted in my badpost.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:17 |
|
like when the enemy broadcasts the same desire over, and over, and over, the easy play becomes "don't give them what they want"
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:18 |
|
Also considering the actual full logs were posted after, it was blatantly obvious that people ran with it out of context.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:18 |
|
Xolve posted:Everything you're coalition is doing, literally every single loving thing is something the Imperium has chastised other groups for doing in previous wars. Yet here you are chastising us for not doing what you think we should be doing to give you guys content? Do you honestly think we loving care at all to try to fight those kinds of odds? We aren't loving retarded, we know we'll get loving rolled. So what do we do? We continue to troll the gently caress out of the rest of this dumb game because we know it pisses you off so much that we rolled over and let you take it all and denied you the fights that you guys are howling for. You know that once the rest of your coalition gets bored enough the infighting will begin, half of them will gently caress off because goons have no more sov so they will declare victory and then move on. PL will gently caress off to the alliance tournament and whichever group of morons thinks settling in Deklein is a good idea will find out the meaning of guerrilla warfare as we retake Deklein and the surrounding regions. The only potential pitfalls is that GSOL might murder us all in our sleep as they are tasked with rebuilding our home.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:19 |
|
Glory of Arioch posted:to the best of our ability anyways I can only do my best. I also can't tell if Xolve is just concern trolling.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:19 |
|
What's the full context?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:19 |
|
Xolve is really coming unhinged it's hilarious
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:20 |
|
vyst posted:Xolve is really coming unhinged it's hilarious
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:22 |
|
Glory of Arioch posted:like when the enemy broadcasts the same desire over, and over, and over, the easy play becomes "don't give them what they want" I can see the point, but I don't really get it. If we really want to just deny the enemy the opportunity to do anything to or with us then why not just have a directive handed down from on high for everyone to just unsub for a month and hey look there's conveniently another game that we're going to go invade. If our goal is to flatly deny them EVE Online content, then why are we even forming up the fleets that we are? If our goal, as various people have painted it, is to effectively just roll over and wait for the invaders to fracture then come back and reclaim the space in a month or so, then why not crack down even harder on absolutely denying content?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:23 |
|
Glory of Arioch posted:"please feed us fleets, oh god please feed us fleets" You're doing it anyway. Why not ship up into something threatening? vyst posted:Xolve is really coming unhinged it's hilarious You're dumb.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:23 |
|
Xolve posted:You're doing it anyway. Why not ship up into something threatening? nope
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:24 |
|
Nietzschean posted:I can see the point, but I don't really get it. If we really want to just deny the enemy the opportunity to do anything to or with us then why not just have a directive handed down from on high for everyone to just unsub for a month and hey look there's conveniently another game that we're going to go invade. If our goal is to flatly deny them EVE Online content, then why are we even forming up the fleets that we are? If our goal, as various people have painted it, is to effectively just roll over and wait for the invaders to fracture then come back and reclaim the space in a month or so, then why not crack down even harder on absolutely denying content? better to harangue them as much as possible, unsubbing doesn't actually help us
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:25 |
|
with the new sov mechanics, wolfpax actually makes sense now I don't really even see a point in a traditional BS fleet
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:26 |
|
Huge_Midget posted:We continue to troll the gently caress out of the rest of this dumb game because we know it pisses you off so much that we rolled over and let you take it all and denied you the fights that you guys are howling for. Yeah you sure trolled us by getting utterly shitstomped. Literally crying myself to sleep over how we've been burning all of imp space.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:27 |
|
Glory of Arioch posted:better to harangue them as much as possible, unsubbing doesn't actually help us
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:27 |
|
evilweasel posted:i mean, the problem you have with this narrative is mittens shared the email privately which is a completely reasonable thing to do This thread is getting to Reddit level. Anyway that is a weak defence, but the logs are in paste bin, and the chats are logged in third party software - IRC. If CCP decides to do anything, it's likely that they say the paste bin logs are made up and deny the email's authenticity in public, then loving hate mittani in private. If CCP really ban mittani over this, it would open the flood gate of inditing logs to accuse duders.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:28 |
|
Unfunny Poster posted:What's the full context? Mittens didn't give a gently caress about fcon losing random caps by being idiots
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:31 |
|
Altran posted:This thread is getting to Reddit level. You're wrong because if the text in that log exactly matches the email they sent him then they can be certain that part is real.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:32 |
|
Xolve posted:You're doing it anyway. Why not ship up into something threatening? Better idea, why not ship down into something cheap and fun. The end result is the same given the numbers situation and believe it or not, flying a shinier ship is not automatically more fun. MBC loves to mock Swordfleet but it does elicit howls of rage in local when it's FC'd well.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:33 |
|
formally request to rebrand as a cult
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:34 |
|
Morris posted:Better idea, why not ship down into something cheap and fun. The end result is the same given the numbers situation and believe it or not, flying a shinier ship is not automatically more fun. Pretty sure this has never happened. Flying 30 command ships into 100+ intys and bombers supported by white legion is a lot more fun.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:34 |
|
Also this applies to the illum leaks too:Numismancer posted:I do enjoy seeing the squid ink here from the fuckgoons crew in Generic Elite PvP MMO Guild, Eve Online Edition; if you weren't spewing and equivocating, we wouldn't have confirmation of the impact and veracity of these leaks. Thanks~ Thanks for the confirmation weaselior and friends.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:35 |
|
ullerrm posted:OTOH, I really wish they'd do Burn Jita with us... and Sour Namy is at the top of a very short list of FCs that I will never fly with.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:36 |
|
SperginMcBadposter posted:You're wrong because if the text in that log exactly matches the email they sent him then they can be certain that part is real. it doesn't really matter if CCP can match the email on the paste bin to the actual email on their server, at all. This whole thing is dodgy, pastebin, logs on IRC, consequences, etc. CCP being a company, want to make money, not loving being a court of law, so I think they prob play it low key and it's all water under the bridge, and mittani please keep on making people pay for our game and free publicity. Unless, mittens go crazy and personally leaks every correspondence from CCP. Altran fucked around with this message at 23:42 on Apr 11, 2016 |
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:37 |
|
Cygni posted:
It wasn't long ago that I suggested we go 100% in character on a hunt for frozen corpses for the Mittens Golden throne. High sec, low sec, null sec. Just kill anything and gather up all the corpses. Every now and then we let a T1 hauler get killed by wardeccers and then it's just filled with a thousand corpses.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:37 |
|
Cygni posted:
Oh please do not do this. He's weird enough as GSFs ceo. Also, goons, you can piss off any of your other allies all you want, but kindly do not piss off the Russians while I am living in Moscow, tia.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:37 |
|
Xolve posted:You're doing it anyway. Why not ship up into something threatening? I'm undocked in a pvp fit gila right now, come at me.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:37 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:DId you mean to say "harass" there? You don't need to be subbed to harangue anybody. i totally did, i had that in my head as "annoy them aggressively" not understanding it specifically meant a speech thanks
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:40 |
|
Zephyrine posted:It wasn't long ago that I suggested we go 100% in character on a hunt for frozen corpses for the Mittens Golden throne. High sec, low sec, null sec. a whole lotta stupid eve players seem to have bought off on the evil empire role playing goof, i fully support moving it to the next phase
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:40 |
|
Citizen Rat posted:Oh please do not do this. He's weird enough as GSFs ceo. P. sure we're not going to stick our collective genitals in that blender. You'll be fine.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:41 |
|
Rhymenoserous posted:I'm undocked in a pvp fit gila right now, come at me. Are you logged in?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:42 |
|
Xolve posted:Everything you're coalition is doing, literally every single loving thing is something the Imperium has chastised other groups for doing in previous wars. We have absolutely no way to contest prime time stuff and any chance of escalating to solve that is off the table so again idk what you want us to do because throwing ships into the fire doesn't do anything but keep the enemy around longer because they know we will undock and die. This isn't damage control or "didn't want that sov anyway" this is just common sense. If we threw away our war chest and super fleet putting up a hopeless defense of Dek we wouldn't have the resources to get back into sov null.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:44 |
|
I resubbed and promptly died 4 times to gate camps. It's me, I'm the killmails MBC are hoping for.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:46 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 23:41 |
|
Venom Snake posted:what you want us to do fyi this is Venom Snake posted:throwing ships into the fire he doesn't want to help us, and nothing he says will attempt to help us in any way
|
# ? Apr 11, 2016 23:46 |