|
Zelder posted:he knows that it's just ladies pissing and making GBS threads in there, right? it's not sexy like the pornos have led him to believe Well, I mean, aside from the orgy pit.
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 06:27 |
|
|
The Iron Rose posted:Sure, if it means we avoid a war between great powers. wait are you into that dark enlightenment thing?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
Zelder posted:he knows that it's just ladies pissing and making GBS threads in there, right? Oh, he knows..... 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
louie gohmert locking up the pivotal Porky's vote
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
The Real Foogla posted:serious people, not liberals, liberals hate scalia too
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:25
|
|
|
Zelder posted:he knows that it's just ladies pissing and making GBS threads in there, right? it's not sexy like the pornos have led him to believe If he would have, why isn't he doing it now? or is he?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
The opening sentence said, "Hillary Clinton’s email scandal is one of the most important, yet undiscussed issues of the 2016 election." Most important? Undiscussed? If an opening sentence is meant to set the tone, that one certainly did. It's something that has dogged Hillary since it came to light and has brought up in multiple debates. It's an issue that is consistently trumped up by conservative news outlets. It's an issue that sounds scary but has no reason to be currently seen as a legitimate issue because there hasn't been anything released to warrant it. That is, unless you think her judgement is seriously an issue in this matter (nevermind that it's a precedent only in a qualified way). Further, I don't really think this forum needs to seriously engage and deconstruct every rear end in a top hat that makes what is essentially a long post on these here forums except somewhere else. Boon fucked around with this message at 14:35 on Apr 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
Mah name is lurleen gommert and ah just need to pee here tee hee hee hee
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
Zelder posted:he knows that it's just ladies pissing and making GBS threads in there, right? it's not sexy like the pornos have led him to believe There isn't a waist-high hole in each stall door?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
The Iron Rose posted:Sure, if it means we avoid a war between great powers. That's taking a circumscribed data set (17th-20th century Europe) that can't be extrapolated to anything other than that era. It is not a theory of IR, it's a theory of explaining that era and geography only.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:33
|
|
|
i'm louie gohmert, and i stand for women with bodacious bazongas *makes the hubba hubba noise, wolf whistles*
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:If he would have, why isn't he doing it now? or is he? Just wait until O'Keefe pulls a stunt like that to "prove a point."
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
Playstation 4 posted:You can 100% be a supporter of vastly expanded civil rights, economic equality, and other progressive positions while supporting the US in a naïve 'Terran Republic' wistfulness, also the lack of WWI repeats. This sums it up pretty well, atleast I support the notion when progressives are in charge of the military murder machine because I feel it is wielded with an amount of subtlety, but conservatives treat it as a cudgel for all situations. Every slight to national image or prestige is immediately followed a lustful cheer for war, it is terrifying I admit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:Just wait until O'Keefe pulls a stunt like that to "prove a point." Didn't Crowder do something like this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:54
|
|
|
ErIog posted:and the rules changed after her time was up anyway. Just as an aside, I periodically chortle about the fact that this is getting practically no play in the right wing mediasphere. It accidentally implies that Obama did a good thing (conveniently after the SecState who really didn't want the GOP pawing through her email left). Edit: Uroboros, subtlety and cost effectiveness.  Barack Obama: maintaining American hegemony on a budget! I mean this unironically positively.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:56
|
|
|
Kilroy posted:Nah e.g. Bill Maher plays at being a Serious Person, and he's a retarded fuckbag, but he's no Republican. alright you win, he's a retarded liberal fuckbag
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
 Phew, that's a relief.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:04
|
|
|
Kro-Bar posted:Didn't Crowder do something like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJdmLu18Vzk
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
The Real Foogla posted:serious people, not liberals, liberals hate scalia too There were a few opinion articles written by liberals that talked about how they disagreed with him but he was such an amazing opinion writer and oh so funny that we should respect him and such. That irritated me a lot more than the stupid Republicans that just were happy he did their bidding since at least those jerks were being sincere.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
zoux posted:
Well yeah, that's because RBG is the one holding it up with her mighty thews. Radish posted:There were a few opinion articles written by liberals that talked about how they disagreed with him but he was such an amazing opinion writer and oh so funny that we should respect him and such. That irritated me a lot more than the stupid Republicans that just were happy he did their bidding since at least those jerks were being sincere. Not gonna lie, given a liberal majority (which we don't have yet) I want Clarence Thomas on the court for the next century for similar reasons. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
Yeah in a world where Scalia was on a 6-3 minority I would be a lot more able to wax poetic about his positive qualities. He would be that goofy old guy that was on the wrong side of history in his opinions but was able to make cross aisle friends with his wit instead of the man that set us back for years on all kinds of issues as one of the most powerful people in the country for over two decades. Eggplant Squire fucked around with this message at 15:16 on Apr 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:10
|
|
|
Wasn't the accusation of receiving SUPER SECRET CLASSIFIED INFO actually just someone emailing her an NYT article about some Wikileaks cables?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
What the gently caress is this. Why is this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:23
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:What the gently caress is this. Why is this. Rippetoe might have good ideas about fitness but he is a nut job libertarian politically.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Crowder spends his time much like Jesse Waters, Milo, and the other "young conservatives" on the internet spend their time. They go to some big city and try to act outraged about something the people there really don't care about so that assholes on their computers can feel better about their lovely opinions. Trouble is, people like O'Keefe and Chuck C Johnson take it to the next level and try to destroy lives in their quest for clicks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:Wasn't the accusation of receiving SUPER SECRET CLASSIFIED INFO actually just someone emailing her an NYT article about some Wikileaks cables? No. Some things are important and classified right away. Other things that aren't really important get classified later, so that they can't be released with FOIA requests. Clinton had emails that were not classified at the time, but a few months later were marked classified by other agencies.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
Sloppy Milkshake posted:wait are you into that dark enlightenment thing? Oh hell no! gently caress those regressive guys. There's a manifest difference in wanting to return society to feudalism and recognizing that the world stage is anarchic, not a liberal democracy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:43
|
|
Cat Army 
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:No. Some things are important and classified right away. Other things that aren't really important get classified later, so that they can't be released with FOIA requests. It should be noted that things which are otherwise not classified, can be classified in aggregate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
Boon posted:The opening sentence said, "Hillary Clinton’s email scandal is one of the most important, yet undiscussed issues of the 2016 election." Most important? Undiscussed? If an opening sentence is meant to set the tone, that one certainly did. wrong, by undiscussed he means "has not received non-partisan attention in a way that allows the author, a likely clinton voter, to understand why this issue is an issue", not "has not been on the news", this is obvious and i still dont understand it all but what about the thing about the clinton foundation employee sending memos including the names of active informants from his aol email to her private email that she had been repeatedly warned was a hack target, someone tell me why this does not reflect on her judgement / is a non-issue please i mean i am uncomfortable with the whole "okay we deleted all the non-work emails for you, here are only the work ones, yep we made the decision ourselves which was which and no you cant check" thing but i get that it also contains the possibility that its just bad (very bad) optics to counter gop  attempts to find out what she got huma for her bday, but mails containing the names of active informants is something elsequote:Further, I don't really think this forum needs to seriously engage and deconstruct every rear end in a top hat that makes what is essentially a long post on these here forums except somewhere else. exactly content you dont like? ignore it but shame on you, shouting down actual content like you did (which that link undeniably is if only for the coherent timeline it presents of events), you should squirm and try to justify yourself but you cant i dont get why you would call the author an rear end in a top hat though, he comes off as earnest and endearing in his self-critical 22-year old "let me try to understand this complex issue" precocious dual major way also what about the saudi arabia funding benghazi thing, you guys dont buy it? seems to tie in perfectly with just about every story that comes out about us relations with that shithole: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,480226,00.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:46
|
|
|
as halfway crooks posted:and i still dont understand it all but what about the thing about the clinton foundation employee sending memos including the names of active informants from his aol email to her private email that she had been repeatedly warned was a hack target, someone tell me why this does not reflect on her judgement / is a non-issue please The ironic thing about this is that the state department email system was hacked from outside, Chelsea Manning took files from the inside, and a security error made state department employee personal information and email accounts briefly public. That means Hillary's closet server was the only piece of State Department affiliated hardware that was never compromised in any way. lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:50
|
|
|
as halfway crooks posted:wrong, by undiscussed he means "has not received non-partisan attention in a way that allows the author, a likely clinton voter, to understand why this issue is an issue", not "has not been on the news", this is obvious I don't know man, this is a weird post. Reading through it, I get this sense of jittery panic behind the words like I'm about to get told that jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams. I should note that "every rear end in a top hat" is just a layman's term because I am uncouth in a small town sort of way (as that's how I grew up and the Navy certainly didn't dispel it) and you're right I should probably be better at that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:51
|
|
|
Boon posted:I don't know man, this is a weird post. Reading through it, I get this sense of jittery panic behind the words like I'm about to get told that jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams. (the answer is that she got huma something sexy from fredericks for her bday)
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 15:56
|
|
|
The Iron Rose posted:Oh hell no! nah there are definitely some similarities between the hosed up weird poo poo you believe and those weirdos.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
reminder that nixon kept ~30% support even in the lowest post-watergate lows cus it was seen as a partisan attack (it was) just saying, its a non-issue/no one cares... until something changes
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Noted partisan attack, Watergate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
Kro-Bar posted:Didn't Crowder do something like this? Did Chuck ever poo poo on a women's bathroom floor or was it only the floor of men's rooms?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
The Larch posted:Noted partisan attack, Watergate. everyone bugs see Jarmak posted:That blog post was a steaming pile hot of garbage that read like someone's freshman composition homework that they threw together at the last minute. It wouldn't have passed muster as a decent post to make on this forum never mind some sort of source this thread should waste it's time discussing. It was strewn with factual errors, carried a writing style commiserate with a Myspace page, and a level of legal analysis of someone who watched nice meltdown, netflix viewer as halfway crooks fucked around with this message at 16:07 on Apr 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
as halfway crooks posted:reminder that nixon kept ~30% support even in the lowest post-watergate lows cus it was seen as a partisan attack
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
as halfway crooks posted:wrong, by undiscussed he means "has not received non-partisan attention in a way that allows the author, a likely clinton voter, to understand why this issue is an issue", not "has not been on the news", this is obvious That blog post was a steaming pile hot of garbage that read like someone's freshman composition homework that was cobbled together at the last minute. It wouldn't have passed muster as a decent post to make on this forum never mind some sort of source this thread should waste it's time discussing. It was strewn with factual errors, carried a writing style commiserate with a Myspace page, and a level of legal analysis of someone who watched The only thing that's more of a waste of time then that article is your stupid concern trolling over whether we've "academically engaged" with the latest poo poo-smeared rag of a blog post someone happened to fetch out of the dumpster that is the internet. Hope that loving helps Jarmak fucked around with this message at 17:26 on Apr 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 06:27 |
|
|
Zelder posted:i'm louie gohmert, and i stand for women with bodacious bazongas *makes the hubba hubba noise, wolf whistles*
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2016 16:14
|
|
