|
Isn't there something about how the red filter should actually make things appear yellow? Someone mentioned before that the encyclopedia the eye dimension thing is from also has some other nonsense explanations for things, like Spider-Man's wall clinging I think? Those books are usually written by people who don't actually work in comic books.
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
It seems Kate Beaton does not like Dagger's costume: http://www.bleedingcool.com/2016/04/17/kate-beaton-on-cloak-and-dagger-and-that-costume/
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
Picklepuss posted:It seems Kate Beaton does not like Dagger's costume:  Kate Beaton is the best. She's posted an updated version here (warning: mildly  )Also, I guess this apparently forthcoming TV series might explain why Dan Slott rolled 'em back to the classic power sets (after they got swapped round over in Spider-Island) for no reason.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
That's not what her costume looks like anymore though. I mean the new one's not much better, but it's not stuck on with magic anymore.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Picklepuss posted:It seems Kate Beaton does not like Dagger's costume: Rich Johnston always on the case to alert the internet scum of a person saying things
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:That's not what her costume looks like anymore though. They'd probably just adapt the Ultimate/cartoon one. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
cdougherty9 posted:So she complains about a costume with “tit windows” then proceeds to draw (well scribble is a better term) boobs with nipples. Seems counter-intuitive to her outrage. how do you fail at a basic understanding of satire this hard
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:They'd probably just adapt the Ultimate/cartoon one. Oh god, Galactus is trying to drop a Cosmic Deuce! Also hey, they made a version of the costume where they have the dagger motif without the bare skin! It only took them what, 20 years?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
fatherboxx posted:Rich Johnston always on the case to alert the internet scum of a person saying things I read the comments. Why did I read the comments? quote:So she complains about a costume with “tit windows” then proceeds to draw (well scribble is a better term) boobs with nipples. Seems counter-intuitive to her outrage. quote:Most female outfits like this can also have the foundation that it is a distraction when battling male opponents. quote:So I think there might maybe, just maybe, be some young super-heroines who might be prone to show off a little. quote:Just another sex negative feminist ranting about boobs. Nothing new here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 00:08
|
|
Kate Beaton is right and awesome, as usual.Yvonmukluk posted:Also, I guess this apparently forthcoming TV series might explain why Dan Slott rolled 'em back to the classic power sets (after they got swapped round over in Spider-Island) for no reason. That swap was stupid and that comic sucked.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
Selachian posted:I read the comments. Why did I read the comments?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:They'd probably just adapt the Ultimate/cartoon one. If they go with costumes at all, yeah. In all the movies, the only ones I can think of who have shown comic book skin are Psylocke and Emma Frost. And that was probably 75% of the reason for including either character in the first place. Plus both Fox, not Marvel.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Kate Beaton is right and awesome, as usual. Actually she's wrong. She drew the classic costume instead of the updated one in the article, thereby invalidating her side's arguments completely. Sorry those are the internet rules.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
SirDan3k posted:Actually she's wrong. She drew the classic costume instead of the updated one in the article, thereby invalidating her side's arguments completely. Sorry those are the internet rules. I realise you're being sarcastic, but in case anyone's wondering this is Dagger's latest costume:  God dammit, Marvel. You had one job!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
You could combine that with two Emma Frost costumes, and she'd have most of a shirt!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 08:18
|
|
|
Savidudeosoo posted:Nah, this is different. He starts seeing a demon and it screws up his combat effectiveness, so they have to go see Doctor Strange for help. I think it might be the same dimension, though. What issue is this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 08:38
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:What issue is this? X-Men: First Class (Vol 1) #4: Seeing Red
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 08:55
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:I realise you're being sarcastic, but in case anyone's wondering this is Dagger's latest costume: You know, that costume would be fine if that area wasn't cut out and was just different colored fabric. Or put like a glow effect on there or something. Anything but skin.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:00
|
|
|
The top doesn't actually look too bad there where there looks like something resembling support, but if you have to consider a character's pube maintenance, their crotch cut out is probably too low.
Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 12:15 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:06
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:You know, that costume would be fine if that area wasn't cut out and was just different colored fabric. Or put like a glow effect on there or something. Anything but skin. Part of the problem is that it's a giant cross-shaped hole and making it gold or red just makes her look like Catholic-Girl. I do like the glow idea though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
Filling the hole with mesh would work, and it'd give the costume some texture variation. I think part of the reason tit/flesh windows are so prevalent is yeah, they're a sexualisation thing, but it also means that in terms of what colours a character design is using, it distributes the flesh tone you have on the character's face elsewhere on the body, which can help balance a design out, especially if you have more exposed skin elsewhere on the body (i.e. the prevalence of female superhero costumes having bare legs). But that doesn't really excuse the fact that yeah, it's blatantly sexualisation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:39
|
|
|
You could make it silver, y'know, like a loving dagger.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 12:51
|
|
|
Her daggers are made of light. That wouldn't make any sense at all!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 13:07
|
|
|
So have her constantly radiate blinding light from it. Would save the artist a lot of time if they just had to draw a head and limbs coming out of a corona of light.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
Shakenbaker posted:So have her constantly radiate blinding light from it. Would save the artist a lot of time if they just had to draw a head and limbs coming out of a corona of light. Well, tracing over Cloak and inverting the color scheme sure would save time, yes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
Shakenbaker posted:So have her constantly radiate blinding light from it. Would save the artist a lot of time if they just had to draw a head and limbs coming out of a corona of light.  young justice #1 redbackground fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 14:53
|
|
|
Red Bones posted:Filling the hole with mesh would work, and it'd give the costume some texture variation. I think part of the reason tit/flesh windows are so prevalent is yeah, they're a sexualisation thing, but it also means that in terms of what colours a character design is using, it distributes the flesh tone you have on the character's face elsewhere on the body, which can help balance a design out, especially if you have more exposed skin elsewhere on the body (i.e. the prevalence of female superhero costumes having bare legs). But that doesn't really excuse the fact that yeah, it's blatantly sexualisation. I think if that were a concern, a lot more male characters would be showing a lot more skin. It's probably safe to chalk it up entirely to sexualization. Poor Miserable Gurgi fucked around with this message at 15:59 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
Imagine how weird it would be if DC made a new Batman costume where the bat symbol is a pec window.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
Ridiculous! Then what happens when he gets shot there?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
That'll never happen, female villains will be too distracted to shoot straight.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:12
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Imagine how weird it would be if DC made a new Batman costume where the bat symbol is a pec window. Grant Morrison parachute account spotted.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:I realise you're being sarcastic, but in case anyone's wondering this is Dagger's latest costume: It even comes with camel toe!
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:I realise you're being sarcastic, but in case anyone's wondering this is Dagger's latest costume: You mistakenly posted a picture from her Maximum Carnage 90's era costume, I assume. The blank white void design would work fine if you closed the collar.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
Not sure if it would work, but I was thinking if you had Cloak and Dagger essentially be pallet switched. Turn Cloak's cloak white with the black void in the middle. Have Dagger's costume be black with the dagger white in the middle.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 04:53
|
|
|
Keep their costumes the same and switch their genders.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
redbackground posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
MH Knights posted:It even comes with camel toe!  Jesus, I didn't even notice that! SirDan3k posted:You mistakenly posted a picture from her Maximum Carnage 90's era costume, I assume. Timeless Appeal posted:Not sure if it would work, but I was thinking if you had Cloak and Dagger essentially be pallet switched.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:48
|
|
|
Tit windows with Cloak and Dagger, kinda nws: http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=398
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
Alhazred posted:Tit windows with Cloak and Dagger, kinda nws: http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=398 I, er, already posted that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
as awkward as Dagger's costume in here rn
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 18:16
|
|
