|
im sure there's a niche in the hooker market for a big breasted anime dog
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:21 |
|
|
Encrypted posted:what are people even arguing here besides getting blue stymied? i'm not really arguing, i wanted to know what the gently caress he was talking about with the 5s, since i have one, and it appears to be fine. turns out he wasn't talking about the 5s, idk? the xp thing is pretty lol though, because that is some serious rose-tinted bullshit. microsoft maintained it and it ran like rear end by the end of extended support
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
i got an old 5 on 9.3 and it runs fine, no lag typing or poo poo. amethyst is full of poo poo lol.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
OSI bean dip posted:i just want to know what they do for work lol you dishonest piece of poo poo. if your going to weasil around and try to set up a job burn do it honourably
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:lol you dishonest piece of poo poo. if your going to weasil around and try to set up a job burn do it honourably i am not looking for a job burn. please tell me what you do for work
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:i got an old 5 on 9.3 and it runs fine, no lag typing or poo poo. amethyst is full of poo poo lol. a friend of mine has one too. i don't use his phone much except for itunes remote occasionally, but there wasn't anything noticeably wrong with it
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:microsoft pushed security patches for xp for over a decade, yes. and i can tell you with absolute certainty those fixes changed the performance of the os, eventually degrading it noticeably on older hardware. i can say this, and know i'm right because for a chunk of that decade part of my job involved building and testing images for deployment I don't believe it was true to the same extent, there certainly weren't mass complaint about it liket here are about ios but even if that is true, it was always possible to downgrade to a version of windows that worked smoothly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
and lol @ people who are clamoring for downgrades without caring for the possible complications downgrading without proper baseband patches, since not every version will re-patch the baseband, will essentially brick your radio or crash the call function, downgrading without matching bootsector also brick your phone the possibilities are endless especially when users are idiots
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Encrypted posted:and lol @ people who are clamoring for downgrades without caring for the possible complications apple can, and should, provide baseband downgrade patches. don't tell me this is impossible
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:I don't believe it was true to the same extent, there certainly weren't mass complaint about it liket here are about ios ... and not have updates. because the updates were changing the os in ways that required more resources to run. i literally did this for a living, it did exist and if you really need that to be proven go take the vm challenge i mentioned. people have complained about this poo poo for years, you've just somehow only picked up on it in the context of ios
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
you don't need to do a vm side by side comparison to know that xp machines didn't become unusuable pieces of poo poo with no way out from microsoft within 3 years dude.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:apple can, and should, provide baseband downgrade patches. wait why? that you almost certainly don't want to do, and if we're just turning the magical development firehose on old os versions, why not just patch ios8 to sup[port the new baseband while we're backporting all the security fixes for everything else?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:I don't believe it was true to the same extent, there certainly weren't mass complaint about it liket here are about ios people didn't complain about it as much (they still did, but it wasn't as loud, your right), BUT by that point windows xp installations probably ran like dogshit anyway and it was hard to tell the difference between a slow clean install and a bogged down eight year old installation infested with malware.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:wait why? that you almost certainly don't want to do, and if we're just turning the magical development firehose on old os versions, why not just patch ios8 to sup[port the new baseband while we're backporting all the security fixes for everything else? that would also be an acceptable solution
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:you don't need to do a vm side by side comparison to know that xp machines didn't become unusuable pieces of poo poo with no way out from microsoft within 3 years dude. they shipped that way  but you didn't say anything about 3 years until just now. over the extended life cycle of the os, even after only five years, there were pretty major differences in performance on machines that had shipped with xp at launch
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:apple can, and should, provide baseband downgrade patches. don't tell me this is impossible do you think its better to let users have android level of system control?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
pretty clearly, yes. a selective patcher and full ability to revert to insecure versions. on an appliance. but hey, to each their own.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Encrypted posted:why? so that people can keep using their perfectly functional hardware. not sure why yosposters are constantly asking me to repeat myself
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:25
|
|
|
once again, I'm just not seein' it. there's two types of computer whiz: one will just say "get the latest iphone if yours is running slow" the other kind downloads roms off of XDA, jailbreaks their phone, looks at graphs comparing cell phone performance, and posts earnestly in the android thread in IYG. you're actually advocating that people interact with the latter kind?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
I threw away my iphone and got a winphone because its ftw.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:32
|
|
|
what winpho did you get? is 10 less laggy than the beta? cause that was some sarnsung level poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:i got an old 5 on 9.3 and it runs fine, no lag typing or poo poo. amethyst is full of poo poo lol. the background app running and refresh feature they added allowed apps to make the phone run like poo poo but hey that's a check box you can remove. so turn that feature off and you're set
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
does anyone know of any way to save an audio file in ios, without using itunes? i don't care how, even if it's a third party app or whatever. you can save pdfs and web pages for offline viewing but audio files seem to be left out, for some reason
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:what winpho did you get? 950. its not laggy at all. its great.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
i was thinking about getting that, but then apple released the not-huge phone, and welp
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:i was thinking about getting that, but then apple released the not-huge phone, and welp the iphone se is so good
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
if you don't care about apps boy has MS got the phone 4 u
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:i got an old 5 on 9.3 and it runs fine, no lag typing or poo poo. amethyst is full of poo poo lol. to be fair there was lag in ios8 and ios9 on stevephones 5 but they fixed it in 9.1 or w/e
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
amethyst is obv an apple marketer. sowing the seeds that your current phones are slow and need to be upgraded.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:so that people can keep using their perfectly functional hardware. not sure why yosposters are constantly asking me to repeat myself
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
graph posted:to be fair there was lag in ios8 and ios9 on stevephones 5 but they fixed it in 9.1 or w/e the only time I got annoyed with slowness was with the original iOS 7 release when they added all those animations that took way too long. that has long since been fixed though. apple gave me a free new battery (replaced in store in 30 minutes) since mine was a day 1 phone so the battery is still great too. apple support has been nothing but good to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
graph posted:to be fair there was lag in ios8 and ios9 on stevephones 5 but they fixed it in 9.1 or w/e wait are you saying that if the issue he's complaining about even does exist it's specifically because he hasn't updated? no. no that's too much now
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
moonshine is...... posted:amethyst is obv an apple marketer. sowing the seeds that your current phones are slow and need to be upgraded. explains it. they work for apple and want to keep their role within the organization a bit hidden. what's your job title, amethyst?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:45
|
|
|
this is getting sad, dude just accept that you got owned by amethyst and move on
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
Amethyst posted:apple can, and should, provide baseband downgrade patches. don't tell me this is impossible This is in the best interest of exactly no one
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:if you don't care about apps boy has MS got the phone 4 u windows phones are great if you want a large screen feature phone
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
feature phones are for olds maine has the oldest population in the us interesting
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
Millstone posted:This is in the best interest of exactly no one i mentioned that. tbf, i don't think he knows what the baseband firmware does, and he certainly doesn't care
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
the agreeable solution was "maintain concurrent development of every os release in perpetuity, with bug and security fixes ported between them, with no performance degradation on any supported device"
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:21 |
|
|
infernal machines posted:the agreeable solution was "maintain concurrent development of every os release in perpetuity, with bug and security fixes ported between them, with no performance degradation on any supported device" you keep saying this, and I keep telling you multiple vendors have maintained long term support for various OS releases. if you keep repeating a lie for long enough it doesn't magically become true
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2016 06:17
|
|