|
baquerd posted:Out of curiosity, how much would you charge for one of your wooden vagina simulacrums? Anatomically correct or not?
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:09 |
|
|
KoRMaK posted:Nice wood analog of your moms hoohaw btw. Too bad the blank was only big enough for 1:24 scale
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
Nitrox posted:Anatomically correct or not? It doesn't matter, as long as it's made while "occupied" and "working" at polishing that wooden pearl like only a good boy can.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:Too bad the blank was only big enough for 1:24 scale drat, what a big pussy! drat, what a big pussy!
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
kizudarake posted:drat, what a big pussy! drat, what a big pussy! There is a hell of an Echo in here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
VendaGoat posted:There is a hell of an Echo in here. he shouting into that pussy
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
Roller coaster accident: http://coaster-nation.com/alton-towers-pleads-guilty-to-the-smiler-roller-coaster-accident-photos-released/
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
 Please don't let this derail vulva chat.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
H110Hawk posted:
That is just awesome
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 08:39
|
|
|
Trains. http://imgur.com/gallery/GhpvH http://i.imgur.com/6hz6Rs7.webm
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
I choose to believe he just kept on truckin' and didn't even look back.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 09:38
|
|
|
new Rafael Viñoly building looking good. (For reference: http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/vdara-visitor-death-ray-scorched-hair and http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/09/03/218536265/death-ray-ii-london-building-reportedly-roasts-cars )
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 11:42
|
|
|
That is a terribly designed intersection to include a train crossing 
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 13:17
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:God drat get a loving pedicure would you? Those aren't my toes. While I think you're all overreacting, and it really doesn't look like a vahjayjay in real life (I think it's the macro image and the lack of 3D depth that's throwing you), I have taken your opinions in mind and added a design to the pendant to hide any potentially confusing imagery http://imgur.com/in3f5Yj
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
Placid Marmot posted:Those aren't my toes. Much better 
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 15:14
|
|
|
I need one of each for earrings
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
H110Hawk posted:
This is what "Big Solar" doesn't want you to know about how dangerous it is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
peanut posted:I need one of each for earrings That is how baby is made.  High vis shorts help identify him in the roadway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:we've been chewing on this over the morning and i'm 99% sure this is a home studio attempt. Tip 1 is the styrofoam sheets, a likely cheap go-to for lazy people (I buy the 2" thick sheets of the exact same stuff from Home Depot to build insulating skirts underneath our RV in the winter). Tip 2 is the fact that they didn't extend the ground. This is a Feature Not A Bug as they probably have a bunch of lovely ground loop issues in their janky amps and gear, and that would solve it for everything downstream of that outlet. Nope, I know exactly what they were trying to do here, because I recognize the problem, but am amazed by how stupid their solution is. I had something similar when I was retrofitting my 1960's-era house from no insulation to 2" foam insulation; they cheaped out by not using the good foam, but hey, if you're going to make mistakes, make a bunch. Anyway, basement room had wood paneling on stapping on block, with the outlet boxes inset into the cinderblock by knocking holes in them. If you're adding a few inches of insulation you can no longer use the old outlet boxes because you've got two inches foam plus drywall thickness more wall in the way, and often you don't want to pull new wire through the ceiling. Smart answer 1 is finding the origin point, mounting an accessible junction box somewhere out of sight and running new wire. Smart answer 2 is using the previous wires, only mounting new outlet boxes an inch or two higher on the wall if the previous job cut the wires short. This is neither option 1 nor option 2 - it's just plain stupid.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
Zero One posted:Roller coaster accident: http://coaster-nation.com/alton-towers-pleads-guilty-to-the-smiler-roller-coaster-accident-photos-released/ I work in the theme park industry and to Merlin's credit, they immediately got out in front of it, basically said "we aren't fighting any lawsuits and take responsibility". I was pretty damned shocked to see The Smiler reopen though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
wyntyr posted:I work in the theme park industry and to Merlin's credit, they immediately got out in front of it, basically said "we aren't fighting any lawsuits and take responsibility". I was pretty damned shocked to see The Smiler reopen though. Man, watching the video with the people on there screaming for help I was like "that doesn't look too bad" then I saw the photos of the front row seats and was like "welp, I get why they were screaming now, it basically just cut off some legs" which was then confirmed in the article.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
wyntyr posted:I work in the theme park industry and to Merlin's credit, they immediately got out in front of it, basically said "we aren't fighting any lawsuits and take responsibility". I was pretty damned shocked to see The Smiler reopen though. how in the blue hell is it even an option for operators to violate block integrity
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 21:24
|
|
|
I feel like this is the before picture in those youtube videos of people sitting on airbags then setting them off.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Ты держишь мое пиво. Смотри. Dang It Bhabhi! fucked around with this message at 23:56 on Apr 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
fyodor posted:Ты держишь мое пиво. Смотри. водка, surely...
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5ZSDiEJruI
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Goddamn, it's like Shake Hands With Danger on mescalin. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Those look like antitank mines, though. They're designed to only be set off by the weight of vehicles. I guess it's still not the safest idea, to be fair.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
I'd gently caress with him and pop a bag put of his sight line and then watch his pants get soiled.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 04:16
|
|
|
Adix posted:how in the blue hell is it even an option for operators to violate block integrity From what I understand (I don't do attractions), it's something ride manufacturers build in, to be used in controlled testing circumstances and so on. The people who actually did it violated every single safety procedure in the book. Basically I don't know exactly how it happened but I saw the reaction. It's easy to pin any after-action safety stuff as a company trying to cover its rear end. I genuinely think Merlin's reaction - getting out in front, saying "hey our company hosed up and we will take care of this as best as possible" and then scouring all 100+ of their sites worldwide top to bottom genuinely came off as a concern for safety, not for PR and monetary concerns. I really hope those people are taken care of well.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
Stinky bum bum http://www.itv.com/news/meridian/20...ltural-reasons/
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
Well yeah, it's curry.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 06:25
|
|
|
Fortunately it's only actually holding up the pipe/conduit to the right of the bridge.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 07:35
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Fortunately it's only actually holding up the pipe/conduit to the right of the bridge. If that's the case, isn't it a bit over-engineered?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:04
|
|
|
Mistle posted:If that's the case, isn't it a bit over-engineered? Not for the architectural style of "Pile up poo poo we've found lying around" it's not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:09
|
|
|
wyntyr posted:From what I understand (I don't do attractions), it's something ride manufacturers build in, to be used in controlled testing circumstances and so on. The people who actually did it violated every single safety procedure in the book. Basically I don't know exactly how it happened but I saw the reaction. I did spend several years doing attractions, and you're basically describing Maintenance Mode versus Normal Mode. Where they lose me on this is that maintenance mode was never, ever allowed when the attraction wasn't empty. The idea that some ride ops just casually powered down and back up in the wrong mode to get a train off the lift when the ride is insisting it shouldn't go farther is some combination of horrifying and criminally negligent on the part of the individuals at the ride in that moment. How does a corporate culture breed a choice like that?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:09 |
|
|
Adix posted:I did spend several years doing attractions, and you're basically describing Maintenance Mode versus Normal Mode. Where they lose me on this is that maintenance mode was never, ever allowed when the attraction wasn't empty. The idea that some ride ops just casually powered down and back up in the wrong mode to get a train off the lift when the ride is insisting it shouldn't go farther is some combination of horrifying and criminally negligent on the part of the individuals at the ride in that moment. How does a corporate culture breed a choice like that? I think it's one of those things that operators had done it on the fly and were never found out; nothing bad had happened for years, so when the knowledge was passed on by people who eventually moved on or up, the newer pools of talent probably accepted it as normal practice. I'm fairly certain that it's not really corporate culture, if it falls under this circumstance. At that point, it's negligent, of course, but culpability would likely lie on the rid op who, in spite of "by the book" training, used this other method assuming nothing bad would happen. This kind of poo poo happens in the military and industrial accidents; people get used to some cowboy poo poo, years of bad habits become accepted training, something bad happens, no one can figure out who the gently caress to blame, so PFC Snuffy is blamed for improper practices causing the injury/death of someone else and is hung out to dry, cycle continues.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:41
|
|
