|
I know everyone constantly says it but how hosed up does your world view have to be that your response to doctors making less money than service staff is to lower service staff wages instead of raising doctors'? We are having a similar thing at the minute with tram drivers striking for better money and shitlords using exploited junior doctors as an example of tram driver greed.
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 21:15 |
|
|
Oue EMTs wages are paid for by the government so obviously we need to raise taxes if they're not getting paid enough for the work they do. It should be easier with more people earning a higher minimum wage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Oh for sure, I didn't mean it as if the government had giant abacuses for allocating money etc. I meant it more in the if you asked a person hypothetically what they'd do only a total oval office would lower service staff wages instead of raising medical workers'.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
goose fleet posted:Lottery of Babylon would be a fantastic moderator I consider him a type of honorary moderator EmmyOk posted:I know everyone constantly says it but how hosed up does your world view have to be that your response to doctors making less money than service staff is to lower service staff wages instead of raising doctors'? We are having a similar thing at the minute with tram drivers striking for better money and shitlords using exploited junior doctors as an example of tram driver greed. I feel like people like that just see fast food workers/manual labour workers as an extension of the lovely food and services that they are inexplicably really picky about.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Sure but it's not even the casual disrespect for service staff (I used to be one after all) it's that they look at the poo poo doctor's conditions and don't think maybe we should pay and treat doctors way better they instead focus on people getting 'uppity' e: images like this only appear to denigrate the tram drivers not to support the doctor's struggles which are only ever used as a juxtaposition to make others look lovely. No one ever kicks up a huge fuss over their horrific conditions unless it's to compare it to someone elses'.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Sure but it's not even the casual disrespect for service staff (I used to be one after all) it's that they look at the poo poo doctor's conditions and don't think maybe we should pay and treat doctors way better they instead focus on people getting 'uppity' They also leave out that the ceiling in the doctor's salary is likely in the high six figures.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Sure but it's not even the casual disrespect for service staff (I used to be one after all) it's that they look at the poo poo doctor's conditions and don't think maybe we should pay and treat doctors way better they instead focus on people getting 'uppity' loving doctors, playing trash like Call of Duty. Play a real game like Dark Souls or gtfo, jesus christ.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
Here's something fun that happened in a mountain climbing group I'm in, figured we all like to see lighthearted stuff every now and then.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
It's like some kind of dog fighting. Let's pit my pit against your pit and let them rip each others throats out. We forget we're all working hard here and should all be rooting for each other to get higher wages, not fighting each other over who deserves more.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:I know everyone constantly says it but how hosed up does your world view have to be that your response to doctors making less money than service staff is to lower service staff wages instead of raising doctors'? We are having a similar thing at the minute with tram drivers striking for better money and shitlords using exploited junior doctors as an example of tram driver greed. I know when I was a kid my parents and teachers told me time and time again that if I didn't work hard and study, I'd have to work at McDonald's.They assume the only people flipping burgers are lazy, stupid or otherwise deserve a poo poo job for poo poo pay so of course a raise sounds ridiculous to them. It's supposed to be a punishment.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Of all the big TCGs, it has the biggest numbers, the least arithmetic, and the most ridiculous extra mechanics and rules that are printed in 2 point font on special cards.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
goose fleet posted:Lottery of Babylon would be a fantastic moderator If there were a way I could make somebody a mod of a single thread LoB would have been in charge of this one months ago. He got a nice gold star instead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:If there were a way I could make somebody a mod of a single thread LoB would have been in charge of this one months ago. But how would a mod moderate with only quotes from idiots and racists?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:19
|
|
|
TontoCorazon posted:But how would a mod moderate with only quotes from idiots and racists? You're a certified moron and are beyond being educated. For the edification of others reading this however, I will say that your logic assumes that most of our history = the dawn of civilization, which was not the case at all. Monogamy, which allowed an inferior man like you to reproduce, was recently introduced along with the start of civilization to rapidly increase the population. In a truly unregulated SMP, those poor women join the harems of the wealthy and attractive nobles who would normally be shackled in a monogamous relationship to an aristocratic woman. User loses posting privileges for 6 hours.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
TontoCorazon posted:But how would a mod moderate with only quotes from idiots and racists? All probations in PYF should take the form of a random sentence from an LoB post in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:User loses posting privileges for 6 hours. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:32
|
|
|
 Yes, because people you don't like should die. Does anyone who post these ever think about what it is they're posting? Of course not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:38
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Sure but it's not even the casual disrespect for service staff (I used to be one after all) it's that they look at the poo poo doctor's conditions and don't think maybe we should pay and treat doctors way better they instead focus on people getting 'uppity' I love that this is apparently "24-year-old newbie doctor" vs "guy who's been driving a bus for 38 years." Let's see that picture again, where it's "doctor in his 25th year of practice" vs "tram driver in his 25th year of, uh, driving trams."
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:
Similarly, do these people ever think about why they hate the Kardashians?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:You're a certified moron and are beyond being educated. For the edification of others reading this however, I will say that your logic assumes that most of our history = the dawn of civilization, which was not the case at all. Monogamy, which allowed an inferior man like you to reproduce, was recently introduced along with the start of civilization to rapidly increase the population. In a truly unregulated SMP, those poor women join the harems of the wealthy and attractive nobles who would normally be shackled in a monogamous relationship to an aristocratic woman. User loses posting privileges for 6 hours.  I love you LoB
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 07:18
|
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:You're a certified moron and are beyond being educated. For the edification of others reading this however, I will say that your logic assumes that most of our history = the dawn of civilization, which was not the case at all. Monogamy, which allowed an inferior man like you to reproduce, was recently introduced along with the start of civilization to rapidly increase the population. In a truly unregulated SMP, those poor women join the harems of the wealthy and attractive nobles who would normally be shackled in a monogamous relationship to an aristocratic woman. User loses posting privileges for 6 hours. You're an inspiration to us all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 07:35
|
|
|
TontoCorazon posted:But how would a mod moderate with only quotes from idiots and racists? loving AMAZINGLY, that's how.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:16
|
|
|
Tiggum posted:Isn't that just how TCGs work? Yes and no. All of them do introduce all new mechanics and such every so often, but Yu-Gi-Oh does it the most and is the worst about making them actually accessible. For point of comparison (if people don't mind me being spergy), here's a Break Evolution from the Pokemon TCG's latest expansion. Note how all the key details about a Break Evolution are in that little box in the corner.  Now look at a Toon monster, one of Yu-Gi-Oh's earliest 'special' types of monster. Note how it takes six lines to explain itself.  AND uses a bunch of jargon it doesn't explain; it doesn't describe anything all that complicated, it's just special names for what you'd immediately expect the game to have given what it is. Cleretic has a new favorite as of 08:55 on Apr 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 08:53
|
|
|
Scathach posted:I like that the person writing this obviously isn't an EMT at all. EMTs don't give meds, and they certainly don't decide what hospital is "good" to take a person to. Also she's a spiteful bitch, raising wages is good for everyone. Its not a big deal but EMT-Basics do give some very few meds. And EMT SOMETIMES (but not in this case) refers to paramedics or EMT-Ps
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:01
|
|
|
Tracula posted:People that complain about hurrdurr were all on our cellphones all the time durrhurr are the loving worst. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS3jbaeseT8
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:06
|
|
|
Funny enough Louis CK even sort of contradicts himself in another video/interview where he says cellphones and technology are amazing as gently caress. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFsOUbZ0Lr0
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:37
|
|
|
It's called "one of the amendments"!
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:42
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Now look at a Toon monster, one of Yu-Gi-Oh's earliest 'special' types of monster. Note how it takes six lines to explain itself.  Tracula posted:People that complain about hurrdurr were all on our cellphones all the time durrhurr are the loving worst.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:50
|
|
|
isnt that no longer the case if you are w2m trans?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:53
|
|
|
Arctic Baldwin posted:isnt that no longer the case if you are w2m trans? if you mean trans women, not always. some people choose to get bottom surgery/"gender reassignment surgery", others do not. it's both a very personal choice and a very expensive one (many women who want it just can't afford it, either due to not having insurance at all, or because it's been deemed 'cosmetic' by many insurers. America!).
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:00
|
|
|
QVC Drinking Game posted:loving doctors, playing trash like Call of Duty. Play a real game like Dark Souls or gtfo, jesus christ. Nice. Working in French academia cured me of the illusion that wage is in any way related to years of study or even hours worked, at least in this country.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:01
|
|
|
Tiggum posted:I dunno, doesn't look much different to a lot of Magic: the Gathering cards to me. Your original post mentioned how it shoves bullshit on cards because it can't do it on the rulebook. Magic in particular puts a lot of stuff in the rulebook if appears on multiple cards, rather than on cards, especially when you compare it to Yu-Gi-Oh! which... Doesn't. Compare the YGO! card that was posted to these:     It helps a lot that Magic cards are properly formatted, with activated abilities always being "Cost:Effect", and triggered ones explaining their trigger conditions, and so on. Obviously, it's not all perfect (especially when more than one card is involved), but it tends to make sense much more often than not. Reminder text (the parentheses italicized stuff on Monastery Swiftspear) also helps with comprehension, giving a summary of what it does, even if it's not actual rules text (see the Madness example)
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:14
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Some day my Xbox will save YOUR life, Dad! Lmao http://zenpencils.com/comic/58-living-well-is-the-best-revenge/
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:45
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Yes and no. All of them do introduce all new mechanics and such every so often, but Yu-Gi-Oh does it the most and is the worst about making them actually accessible. One of these cards explains how to use it. One doesn't even explain how it gets played to the board. It's not the way round you're claiming.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:49
|
|
|
Uuuuuugh I loving despise zen pencils.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
Rule #2: cram so much food into your mouth you literally cannot move and you die.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:53
|
|
|
FAROOQ posted:One of these cards explains how to use it. One doesn't even explain how it gets played to the board. That's because the Break Evolution isn't that different from the rest of the game's mechanics; you play it how you'd play any other evolution, except for the rules it states in a small box in the corner. If you have any other questions about them they're now in the central rules, but they leave those details off the card itself largely because it works like how you'd assume it does. The Toon takes six lines to describe how it works because it doesn't work at all like how you'd assume given the rest of the game. It's got a bunch of confusing bullshit to work through that would've been really nice to see them consolidate in a place that can take up more space than one quarter of a playing card, but they didn't do that. I had the starter deck the Toon cards came from, by the way. Not only were they borderline-useless as a focus because they were so situational and risky, that wasn't even the longest description from that deck. Not only is there a description that's seven lines long, it forgets to mention a crucial rule to how the card is played (that, thankfully, is in the rulebook as I recall). I'm sorry for the derail, but I kinda like ripping on Yu-Gi-Oh. It's the stupidest loving game, but I loved it as a kid, and I'd probably eat it right back up again if I could get into a version that's borderline-comprehensible and not terrible.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 11:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 21:15 |
|
|
Cleretic posted:That's because the Break Evolution isn't that different from the rest of the game's mechanics; you play it how you'd play any other evolution, except for the rules it states in a small box in the corner. If you have any other questions about them they're now in the central rules, but they leave those details off the card itself largely because it works like how you'd assume it does. Do not reply to Farooq.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:35
|
|