|
Cardboard Box A posted:Alienation Gonna go ahead and guess it's PS4 only ? 
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 04:12 |
|
|
Level Slide posted:Apparently the criticism wasn't that it was "like" but that it "is" Considering it's a reboot of sorts that's not surprising. I think the Gyro aiming is fine but when you need to switch between the gamepad and TV it can be kinda overwhelming. Beat the Abyss Watchers last nigh in Dark Souls 3. The idea for that boss was great, to the point that I could literally stand back and let others handle it. Also Skeleballs are the best new addition to the series.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:56
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:Gonna go ahead and guess it's PS4 only ? Housemarque are pretty much owned by Sony at this point so yeh
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:58
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Alienation quote:this is more of a faster-paced spiritual successor with Diablo leanings than a rehash of that exact approach. There are item drops demarcated by the usual shades of blue, purple, and orange to signify rarity. You can socket your guns and grenades with upgrades, or recycle them for materials to spend on re-rolling individual stats (rate of fire, ammo count, that sort of thing). Damage indicators fly off enemies' heads as their health bars melt away.  I'll be getting this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 09:59
|
|
|
Why is this dumb game only coming out for PS4.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIkdsvuY-HAexquisite tea posted:Why is this dumb game only coming out for PS4.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:10
|
|
|
That's a kinda old trailer at this point
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:12
|
|
|
I want Nier 2
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:13
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:Why is this dumb game only coming out for PS4.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 10:28
|
|
|
Palpek posted:I'm getting a PS4 soon and I'll be getting both Driablo 3 + RoS and that game asap. This is going to own. wait for that playstation neo poo poo and get a good 2nd hand deal
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 11:04
|
|
|
corn in the bible posted:im still not sure how "its like sf64" is a criticism like I said, I think people would have been mad regardless of how the game ended up, which is unfortunate because yeah I thought last e3's star fox vids were poo poo but the game looked to be heavily improved since then and it isn't like it being similar to sf64 is a bad thing or invalidates it as a game
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 11:46
|
|
|
maybe the reviewer doesn't think the game holds up to 2016 standards, maybe they'd like a sequel that does something new? i dunno, it's probably great for people who are already fans of 64 I guess, I've never played a star fox game 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 11:55
|
|
|
Nintendo has tried doing new stuff with Star Fox in the past and everyone hated it so they tried remaking SF64 and everyone hates it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 11:58
|
|
|
maybe starfox was always bad
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:00
|
|
|
The new stuff in this Tales of Maj'Eyal expansion is all really really cool, I like the new classes like "wields dual chainsaws" and stuff. I hope the Naloren/Naga expansion that's in development is at least half as interesting as this steampunk orc stuff. I also wish I knew how to code because there are a couple different classes/races I wanna try to make but meh, that's just a pipe dream, I can talk about how cool it'd be if I could mod ____ all day long, it's not gonna let me suddenly be able to wrap my head around how to code poo poo 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:01
|
|
|
I'm suddenly getting super deja vu
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:07
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:maybe starfox was always bad what you've done here, is confuse star fox, with your posts !! 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:09
|
|
|
Golden Goat posted:That's a kinda old trailer at this point 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:15
|
|
|
does star fox 0 have a macbeth level & is it as good as or better than 64's macbeth level
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:16
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:Nintendo has tried doing new stuff with Star Fox in the past and everyone hated it
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:20
|
|
|
oddium posted:what you've done here, is confuse star fox, with your posts !! nooooo!!!! 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:24
|
|
|
for real tho star fox is probably a-ok
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:25
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Context for this Ah right I see. The wrong Star Fox stuff turns out to be hard to handle controls.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:25
|
|
|
a bunch of reviews I've seen don't like star fox zero because it is too different because of the gyro controls but also because it isn't different enough and is a reboot of sf64
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:25
|
|
|
FirstAidKite posted:a bunch of reviews I've seen don't like star fox zero because it is too different because of the gyro controls but also because it isn't different enough and is a reboot of sf64 please don't let negative reviews ruin your enjoyment of a game namaste 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:please don't let negative reviews ruin your enjoyment of a game namaste I will not the only thing affecting my enjoyment of a game is my lack of money to buy said game
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
sharif don't like it
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:32
|
|
|
After a bit a few levels in Star Fox Zero start to feel a little like Kid Icarus Uprising and I actually liked that control scheme.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 12:34
|
|
|
I don't think people were bitching about Metroid Prime being too different than the previous games as it was too awesome. It looks to me like the reviewers simply don't enjoy Star Fox but because of zero actual analytical skills then fail to pinpoint what exactly isn't working so they're going with the stupid 'because it's too different AND not different enough'. I dunno, I haven't played it and have no favorites in this matter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:08
|
|
|
some things could be different in a bad way and some other things the same in a bad way just saying
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:11
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:maybe the reviewer doesn't think the game holds up to 2016 standards, maybe they'd like a sequel that does something new? i dunno, it's probably great for people who are already fans of 64 I guess, I've never played a star fox game I only played the first one like 20 years ago, have no particular attachment to the franchise, and I think sf0 is pretty good. Controls take some getting used to for sure, but if you can't deal with that then you're a great big baby bitch
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:11
|
|
|
Palpek posted:I don't think people were bitching about Metroid Prime being too different than the previous games as it was too awesome. It looks to me like the reviewers simply don't enjoy Star Fox but because of zero actual analytical skills then fail to pinpoint what exactly isn't working so they're going with the stupid 'because it's too different AND not different enough'. Some people at the time absolutely hated Metroid Prime for being different and complained that Nintedo had turned it in to an FPS. The same people who referred to Wind Waker as Celda, I imagine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
I too would have prefered that they'd done nothing at all with the metroid ip instead lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:some things could be different in a bad way and some other things the same in a bad way just saying Same in a bad way is sorta weird though, if they're referring to the mission structure (Multiple pathways is fantastic) or the fact that it's literally a reboot of Star Fox then I don't see those as being huge points against the game. I mean they can't refer to the gameplay being too familiar mainly due to the new control scheme. Maybe it's just directed at space shooters like this and rogue squadron-like stuff being out of date.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:Some people at the time absolutely hated Metroid Prime for being different and complained that Nintedo had turned it in to an FPS. The same people who referred to Wind Waker as Celda, I imagine. I think there is also the legitimate issue that people have with the game, that it's too slow compared to the 2D games. But that's a byproduct of the perspective swap so it's all lumped together I suppose.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:23
|
|
|
Golden Goat posted:Same in a bad way is sorta weird though, if they're referring to the mission structure (Multiple pathways is fantastic) or the fact that it's literally a reboot of Star Fox then I don't see those as being huge points against the game. I'm just playing the devil's advocate here because, like I said, I've not even played the game. In fact I've not even read the reviews. Either way, video game journalism ain't poo poo so just find someone who has similar tastes as you and a watch a video of the game or something imo
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:23
|
|
|
They're probably mad that it's not Star Citizen Fox.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:24
|
|
|
In Training posted:I think there is also the legitimate issue that people have with the game, that it's too slow compared to the 2D games. But that's a byproduct of the perspective swap so it's all lumped together I suppose. To be fair, going from a side-scroller to a FPS changes the way the game plays. Same reson ppl got upset over Fallout or Syndicate or whatever...
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:25
|
|
|
Ahundredbux posted:I'm just playing the devil's advocate here because, like I said, I've not even played the game. In fact I've not even read the reviews. That's fine, I'm just curious about how it feels too similar to 64 and all I can really think of is the fact that it's a reboot and I don't hold that against the game. Video game journalism is fine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 04:12 |
|
|
FirstAidKite posted:The new stuff in this Tales of Maj'Eyal expansion is all really really cool, I like the new classes like "wields dual chainsaws" and stuff. Goddam, that's all I ever wanted in life. This should be a class that dual wields chainsaws in all games. All of them. FirstAidKite posted:sharif don't like it I like this thank you
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 13:26
|
|
