|
as halfway crooks posted:as opposed to affirmative action for the nuclear football? i dunno Well it is true that only a white man has the probity and clear headedness to handle such matters.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 03:11 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:Nah, he's gonna pick a woman based on pandering that has a record good enough he can say it was based on competency. No one will buy it, and when they don't he can call them all sexist and hypocritical even though they're right. And he will win that argument because they will be cowed in precisely the way he never is. shouting and cowing somebody down doesn't equate to winning an argument, it's a fundamental bad understanding of how debate works
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:59 |
|
Al! posted:Hey oiled and ready that is some top notch TOP NOTCH weaseling I mean it completely seriously I'm going to use that one. Right? I knew people would bite on that one. It's going in the weasel quiver.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:59 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Evidence is, look how bad action movies with female leads do at the box office. Since we don't have any better data. Counterpoint: That's retarded. 2nd Counterpoint: Obama won twice in a row despite not being in many action movies. 3rd Counterpoint: No seriously, what the gently caress?
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:00 |
|
as halfway crooks posted:as opposed to affirmative action for the nuclear football? i dunno Clinton is easily the most qualified in terms of abilities but one of the least qualified ethically to be commander in chief. take that as you will
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:00 |
|
The only thing I know for sure about Trump's VP pick is that it's going to be loving hilarious.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:01 |
|
Typo posted:shouting and cowing somebody down doesn't equate to winning an argument, it's a fundamental bad understanding of how debate works No, he will be using a leftist argument there (sexist!!!) and therefore shouting and cowing someone down IS winning. E: time for WADR I'll be back in an hour and you'll be glad because now you're locked in here with NML
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:01 |
|
DaveWoo posted:So Steve Deace was on CNN a little while ago, it went about as well as you might expect Steve Deace is a hateful maggot.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:02 |
|
Al! posted:Women, like men, suffer from hysteria and are so drat crazy. Judging from this thread more men do
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:02 |
|
zoux posted:The only thing I know for sure about Trump's VP pick is that it's going to be loving hilarious. Donald Trump posted:And might I remind you that the longer this goes on, the closer I get to selecting a running mate. That realization kind of delighted you in a way, didn’t it? You absolutely want to know who I’d pick. A defeated GOP challenger who hates my guts? Another lunatic billionaire? Maybe my own son, Donald Trump Jr.? Whatever your wildest expectation is, I promise you I will surpass it. You’re not going to pass up an opportunity to see that, are you?
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:02 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:No, he will be using a leftist argument there (sexist!!!) and therefore shouting and cowing someone down IS winning. no it's not, the point of debating is to convince people to like you. winning an argument as defined by being the last person talking has almost no value
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:02 |
|
Typo posted:no it's not, the point of debating is to convince people to like you. winning an argument as defined by being the last person talking has almost no value (Opens jacket revealing Big Dogs "he who does with the most toys wins" tshirt)
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:03 |
|
Typo posted:Clinton is easily the most qualified in terms of abilities but one of the least qualified ethically to be commander in chief. Ummm Trump is a NYC real estate developer so.... EDIT: Deace looks like a human bullfrog.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:04 |
|
DaveWoo posted:So Steve Deace was on CNN a little while ago, it went about as well as you might expect Sometimes I wonder how that crazy person got on TV to scream and rant in such a way to make the crazy Trump lady seem reasonable. Than I remember. CNN.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:05 |
|
zoux posted:The only thing I know for sure about Trump's VP pick is that it's going to be loving hilarious. It's going to be Ivanka. He's always wanted her as his mate.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:06 |
|
If Trump picks a female VP he will lose
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:06 |
|
Shageletic posted:Ummm Trump is a NYC real estate developer so.... Right, a Trump administration would not be be any less corrupt than Hillary's.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:06 |
|
Shageletic posted:Ummm Trump is a NYC real estate developer so.... How soon we forget Clinton was associated with drones
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:07 |
|
No Mans Land posted:If Trump picks a female VP he will lose holy poo poo it's like nml's sexism outweighs his faith in the god emperor
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:07 |
|
Every candidacy with a female VP has failed. McCain/Palin, Mondale/Ferraro
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:08 |
|
zoux posted:Well well well looks like we all owe Ted Cruz an apology. Cool, it's even got the ring and all.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:08 |
|
Typo posted:holy poo poo it's like nml's sexism outweighs his faith in the god emperor I have no idea what you think you mean by sexism.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:09 |
|
Gentle Ben is the only answer
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:10 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Every candidacy with a female VP has failed. McCain/Palin, Mondale/Ferraro And all of those candidates? They drank liquid water. I think we all see the connection here.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:10 |
|
Male president/Female VP creates a bad sexual dynamic feeling for the voter. Everyone knows it but try to force it through anyway in order to feel correct about smashing the gender binary and Current Year
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:12 |
|
Typo posted:Right, a Trump administration would not be be any less corrupt than Hillary's. I don't know about that. Last I remember, Trump never toppled a Central American government so that he could install a genocidal but US-friendly replacement.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:12 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Every candidacy with a female VP has failed. McCain/Palin, Mondale/Ferraro Also I've tried to go to Coney Island twice but both times it was raining, so I've concluded its always raining at Coney Island. Even though both of those times it was already raining when I left the house. But still. 2-for-2 is clear proof that will never be refuted.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:13 |
|
chemtrail huffer posted:I don't know about that. Last I remember, Trump never toppled a Central American government so that he could install a genocidal but US-friendly replacement. Clinton never did so either
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:13 |
|
how many first ladies have gone on to become senators? because if this and dem thread are anything to go by its like the most natural career path ever
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:14 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Male president/Female VP creates a bad sexual dynamic feeling for the voter. Everyone knows it That's literally just you. Because you're weird I guess and can't stop thinking about John McCain pounding Sarah Palin over the desk. quote:but try to force it through anyway in order to feel correct about smashing the gender binary and Current Year stop browsing reddit
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:17 |
|
STAC Goat posted:Also I've tried to go to Coney Island twice but both times it was raining, so I've concluded its always raining at Coney Island. Even though both of those times it was already raining when I left the house. But still. 2-for-2 is clear proof that will never be refuted. Why pick the gender before the candidate though. It's not like anyone can think of a stellar candidate for VP who just happens to be female. Everyone is going out of their way to think of female VP's and then claiming that gender is not a factor for decision making. It's the worst cognitive dissonance I've seen. Does gender matter or does it not matter?
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:18 |
|
go to bed nml
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:18 |
|
babypolis posted:how many first ladies have gone on to become senators? because if this and dem thread are anything to go by its like the most natural career path ever Way more natural than female VP. They are not below someone by the nature of their position. VP is like a "hype man" position, not a natural fit for a woman.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:19 |
|
Typo posted:Clinton never did so either Actually, she did: quote:As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government “rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries,” opening the door for further “violence and anarchy.” http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:19 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Why pick the gender before the candidate though. It's not like anyone can think of a stellar candidate for VP who just happens to be female. Everyone is going out of their way to think of female VP's and then claiming that gender is not a factor for decision making. It's the worst cognitive dissonance I've seen. Does gender matter or does it not matter? Elizabeth Warren comes to mind off the top of my head for a good VP pick but that's okay, keep being really weird about this
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:20 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Male president/Female VP creates a bad sexual dynamic feeling for the voter. Well, I know I wasn't very comfortable with Buchanan having a male VP, but that turned out okay.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:20 |
|
No Mans Land posted:Every candidacy with a female VP has failed. McCain/Palin, Mondale/Ferraro
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:20 |
|
Lol oh yeah i forgot that Clinton did Iran Contra like that canvasser said
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:21 |
|
I'm glad to see the resident Trumpistas' grasp of probability is this good. It'll be a great election season
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 03:11 |
|
Louisgod posted:Elizabeth Warren comes to mind off the top of my head for a good VP pick but that's okay, keep being really weird about this It doesn't work. She's better where she is. And VP for Trump? or just VP in general. Holy poo poo
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 22:22 |