Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009
Hamas are some little scamps no doubt.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

jre
Sep 2, 2011

To the cloud ?



FinalGamer posted:

Um...they're not, what slogans are you referring to can I see some evidence of this?

Um they are ?

communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009
Lol jesus christ snp :cripes:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

OwlFancier posted:

Is it really hard to be a socialist without putting your foot in your gob about stuff that's pretty easy, I think, to not put your foot in your gob about?
It's definitely harder than being a conservative, you can pretty much go around calling black kids picaninnies, Ed's dad the International Jew, and everyone that fails the paper bag test as a Muslim terrorist sympathizer and the narrative will be that you had an unfortunate turn of phrase, you represent yourself and not the party, and it's the PC lefty bleeding heart do gooder metropolitan elite brigade getting all sensitive over nothing.

The left can't really use those arguments. Nor should they really.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Yeah but like, how difficult is it to say "I think the state of Israel should stop doing war crimes on Palestinians, and also I don't like that it makes a concerted effort to conflate Zionism and Judaism because the two are absolutely not the same thing." without sounding like a lunatic?

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

If anyone wants to compare what happened behind the scernes to a The Thick Of It episode, now's your chance

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/29/jeremy-corbyn-interview-ken-livingstone-it-is-not-a-happy-day

Bonus content:

quote:

“The Daily Mail used to hide behind that door,” he quips, pointing to the corner of the room, before standing up and taking exaggerated steps towards the door, softening his tread and lowering his voice conspiratorially.

“We were doing shadow cabinet. I told everyone else to keep talking,” he says, gesticulating animatedly behind him. “Then I pulled the door open like this,” he adds, stretching out his arm and yanking it back towards himself, before dissolving into a chuckle. “And they were all there on the ground listening in. I said: ‘If only I had a camera. Why don’t you lot clear off?’”

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
The left is by its nature difficult to herd, so there will always be people going off-message. Plus the media has a stake in blowing anything that the reasonable ones say out of proportion to tie them in with the out there ones, so the ones that aren't sounding like a lunatic will either not be reported on or will be twisted to say

Forums Anti-Semite OwlFancier posted:

"I think the state of Israel should stop doing Judaism"
- Daily Mail, 30th April 2016

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

OwlFancier posted:

Yeah but like, how difficult is it to say "I think the state of Israel should stop doing war crimes on Palestinians, and also I don't like that it makes a concerted effort to conflate Zionism and Judaism because the two are absolutely not the same thing." without sounding like a lunatic?

Acknowledging the zionism/judaism conflation is the controversial bit

John Mann posted:

To compound this egregious behaviour Livingstone alleged that ‘the Israeli lobby’ was out to get people.

Well I am part of no lobby and again the idea of a powerful outside Jewish influence mirrors the approach of the Nazis. This is why these comments were so outrageous.

Our party has a problem that it needs to face up to.

SSJ2 Goku Wilders
Mar 24, 2010

pointsofdata posted:

In case you thought it was all over:
http://order-order.com/2016/04/29/seumas-milne-praises-hamas/
That's from Seamus "Putin’s absorption of Crimea and support for the rebellion in eastern Ukraine is clearly defensive" Milne

He's right.

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

Tesseraction posted:

Depends on your views on if black people being allowed to vote is good or a tragic undermining of democracy.

Hah, brilliant response, I laughed. A very good point - I was only thinking of the petty side of it rather than the more fundamental benefits.

pointsofdata posted:

In case you thought it was all over:
http://order-order.com/2016/04/29/seumas-milne-praises-hamas/
That's from Seamus "Putin’s absorption of Crimea and support for the rebellion in eastern Ukraine is clearly defensive" Milne

Wow.

Prince John fucked around with this message at 19:15 on Apr 29, 2016

FinalGamer
Aug 30, 2012

So the mystic script says.

jre posted:

Um they are ?
So...wait.

It's not JUST the SNP using it then, it's everybody using it, that just speaks of laziness and copying from everybody because nobody is gonna call the GREEN party of all people to be Thatcherite right, or even close to Tory agreements?! I mean considering how anti-Tory Nicola Sturgeon has been and was one of the few people to actually dare to badmouth about Thatcher in recent times next to...Mhairi Black, that's the only two people I can think of who actually had the balls to say she was a terrible person.

Soooo...I mean this is just a slogan everybody is ripping off, it's not really indicative of a subtle political alliance now is it? That's like if every single fast food company had "I'm Loving It", because it's not a copyrighted phrase (at least I think it's not, I know McD's tried ages ago to copyright it but I forget if they managed to or not).


Spangly A posted:

Acknowledging the zionism/judaism conflation is the controversial bit
I'm a little...confused about this, is this like some sort of "not all Jews are zionists but all zionists are Jews" kinda bullshit or is this something deeper than that?

I genuinely have no idea what a Zionist even is, I always thought it was just some kind of racist insult because of the kingdom of Zion. Because the only time I ever heard anyone say "zionist" or some variation were all racist anti-semitic people, usually white supremacists who ALWAYS use this word because it sounds a little classier and more politically affluent than "filthy Jewish scum" which is kind of what they're saying regardless.

Using the term honestly is just asking for trouble and I never trusted anyone who uses that phrase honestly. If someone is smart enough to understand the troubles of Israel Vs. Palestine, they can be smart enough to debate the entire thing without falling into anti-semitic rhetoric. You can hate things ABOUT Israel without hating Jewish people, the two should not be synonymous with each other.

I feel a lot of this comes from the fact people are incredibly ignorant about Israel and Palestine and are not instructed about the smaller particular details that permeate the entire conflict.

FinalGamer fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Apr 29, 2016

Extreme0
Feb 28, 2013

I dance to the sweet tune of your failure so I'm never gonna stop fucking with you.

Continue to get confused and frustrated with me as I dance to your anger.

As I expect nothing more from ya you stupid runt!


FinalGamer posted:

Um...they're not, what slogans are you referring to can I see some evidence of this?






pointsofdata posted:

In case you thought it was all over:
http://order-order.com/2016/04/29/seumas-milne-praises-hamas/
That's from Seamus "Putin’s absorption of Crimea and support for the rebellion in eastern Ukraine is clearly defensive" Milne

How loving hard is it for people to keep their mouth shut.

loving Hell. Get rid of these loving idiots labour.

Where the gently caress is Tom Watson.

TinTower
Apr 21, 2010

You don't have to 8e a good person to 8e a hero.
Livingstone and company seem to have fallen into the Conspiracy Theorist 101 trap: assuming systemic issues automatically have a nefarious shadow group pulling the strings.

Like, there is definitely a pro-Israel bias in the media, but that doesn't mean that the Rothschilds are dictating the word and letter of BBC output.

communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009
Best case scenario for that poster is some snp staffer wanted to rip it off and either didn't remember or didn't want to admit it was a ripiff of a tory poster. It's a good, snappy line for a political poster.

I can't believe anybody senior would do something that stupid knowingly. Feel free to quote this last bit out of context for every stupid thing a politician does any time soon.

FinalGamer
Aug 30, 2012

So the mystic script says.

Oberleutnant posted:

Best case scenario for that poster is some snp staffer wanted to rip it off and either didn't remember or didn't want to admit it was a ripiff of a tory poster. It's a good, snappy line for a political poster.

I can't believe anybody senior would do something that stupid knowingly. Feel free to quote this last bit out of context for every stupid thing a politician does any time soon.
I am hoping that it's that because if every single other party is using it, you can pretty much claim that some junior staffer or ignorant middle-bracket person just took it from one of the other posters. Because it's not clear WHO started the slogan by taking it from Thatcher's campaign and then everybody else ripping it off from them.

If it was just SNP doing it, oh yeah I would be pretty upset and confused by it, but since it's not well...

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.

FinalGamer posted:

Yeah um that's kind of what I was believing they were from their previous talks, especially when Scandinavia approached the SNP with potential offer to join their union on similar principles if we became independent.

Shame it was all talk and no trousers.

Trin Tragula
Apr 22, 2005


That's his own sodding constituency office, too :ughh:

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

FinalGamer posted:

So...wait.

It's not JUST the SNP using it then, it's everybody using it, that just speaks of laziness and copying from everybody because nobody is gonna call the GREEN party of all people to be Thatcherite right, or even close to Tory agreements?! I mean considering how anti-Tory Nicola Sturgeon has been and was one of the few people to actually dare to badmouth about Thatcher in recent times next to...Mhairi Black, that's the only two people I can think of who actually had the balls to say she was a terrible person.

Soooo...I mean this is just a slogan everybody is ripping off, it's not really indicative of a subtle political alliance now is it? That's like if every single fast food company had "I'm Loving It", because it's not a copyrighted phrase (at least I think it's not, I know McD's tried ages ago to copyright it but I forget if they managed to or not).

I'm a little...confused about this, is this like some sort of "not all Jews are zionists but all zionists are Jews" kinda bullshit or is this something deeper than that?

I genuinely have no idea what a Zionist even is, I always thought it was just some kind of racist insult because of the kingdom of Zion. Because the only time I ever heard anyone say "zionist" or some variation were all racist anti-semitic people, usually white supremacists who ALWAYS use this word because it sounds a little classier and more politically affluent than "filthy Jewish scum" which is kind of what they're saying regardless.

Using the term honestly is just asking for trouble and I never trusted anyone who uses that phrase honestly. If someone is smart enough to understand the troubles of Israel Vs. Palestine, they can be smart enough to debate the entire thing without falling into anti-semitic rhetoric. You can hate things ABOUT Israel without hating Jewish people, the two should not be synonymous with each other.

I feel a lot of this comes from the fact people are incredibly ignorant about Israel and Palestine and are not instructed about the smaller particular details that permeate the entire conflict.

Zionism is the belief that there should be a Jewish Homeland, because historically while Judaism has many of the characteristics of a nation, it has never held a state except in distant history.

More contemporarily, Zionism in its modern form is generally support for the State of Israel on the basis that it fulfills the previous belief, though of course you can have people who think a Jewish homeland is a good thing but disagree greatly with the State of Israel in practice.

While there are various groups and people who like to use Zionist as shorthand for Jew, perhaps chief among them the actual State of Israel because it's in their interest to classify all criticism of the state as antisemitic, I think the responsible and, honestly, rather easy position to take is to flat out refuse to do so. Zionism is not Judaism and Judaism is not Zionism, support for Israel as a state and all its actions is not a requirement of being Jewish, or semitophillic.

But apparently a lot of people have trouble articulating that and I think it's weird.

Spangly A
May 14, 2009

God help you if ever you're caught on these shores

A man's ambition must indeed be small
To write his name upon a shithouse wall

FinalGamer posted:

I'm a little...confused about this, is this like some sort of "not all Jews are zionists but all zionists are Jews" kinda bullshit or is this something deeper than that?

Zionism is the field of thought revolving around the building of a jewish state in the middle east. The direction taken by the state of Israel is essentially then the same as discussions of Zionism in general, and absolutely the same as zionism in the world. Pro-zionist thought then is any viewpoint expressed which agrees with the existence of the state of Israel.

The moral issues viewed from the west arise where Zionism starts to overlap strongly with Apartheid values, from frameworking Israel as the deliverance of the kingdom of david and it's associated historical and religious heritage, to the current Israeli far-right of it being a state of Jewish and, specifically, Ashkenazi privelege.

Most people in political circles would, hopefully, be using Zionist to describe anyone attempting to frame the issues of I/P from one of Israeli identity and right to existence. There is plenty of zionist thought that does not require a jewish-privelege state, and I don't think that the international left has any real issue with that beyond a more fundamental issue of the impact of nation states.

It's use as a slur is weird and means "Jew".

Rigged Death Trap
Feb 13, 2012

BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP

Tangerines posted:

We risk losing the ability for good posts to those immigrating from other threads. There just aren't enough good posts to go around!

British posts for British posters

E: Wow this thread moves

Rigged Death Trap fucked around with this message at 19:51 on Apr 29, 2016

Scikar
Nov 20, 2005

5? Seriously?

It's best just not to use 'zionist' at all. People tend to either misunderstand you and think you're an antisemite, or they deliberately misinterpret you in order to dismiss you as an antisemite. Chances are good that you'll end up in a semantic argument about what 'zionist' really means to everyone involved which is a convenient distraction tool if the original discussion was about the latest terrible thing that Israel has done.

winegums
Dec 21, 2012


This poo poo is staying in the news until Khan wins the London mayoral campaign isn't it? I can't help but wonder if it's related to trying to help out Zac Goldsmith somehow. Regardless, is this resonating with the public at all? Does anyone actually care? Antisemitism isn't the hot button topic here that it is in the states.

Pantsuit
Oct 28, 2013

Scikar posted:

It's best just not to use 'zionist' at all. People tend to either misunderstand you and think you're an antisemite, or they deliberately misinterpret you in order to dismiss you as an antisemite. Chances are good that you'll end up in a semantic argument about what 'zionist' really means to everyone involved which is a convenient distraction tool if the original discussion was about the latest terrible thing that Israel has done.

I think somebody in this thread said it best. Just call it for what it is, a colonial state.

pointsofdata posted:

In case you thought it was all over:
http://order-order.com/2016/04/29/seumas-milne-praises-hamas/
That's from Seamus "Putin’s absorption of Crimea and support for the rebellion in eastern Ukraine is clearly defensive" Milne

Love the straight up racism and fantasies of murdering brown people in the comments. Bigotry is fine as long as it's not aimed at whites Jews!

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

winegums posted:

This poo poo is staying in the news until Khan wins the London mayoral campaign isn't it? I can't help but wonder if it's related to trying to help out Zac Goldsmith somehow. Regardless, is this resonating with the public at all? Does anyone actually care? Antisemitism isn't the hot button topic here that it is in the states.

I'm wondering that, does the british public's apathetic lack of concern for others also make them rather unconcerned about antisemitism so long as it is sufficiently inconspicuous?

Paxman
Feb 7, 2010

winegums posted:

This poo poo is staying in the news until Khan wins the London mayoral campaign isn't it? I can't help but wonder if it's related to trying to help out Zac Goldsmith somehow. Regardless, is this resonating with the public at all? Does anyone actually care? Antisemitism isn't the hot button topic here that it is in the states.

As someone said earlier, a lot of people have little idea what antisemitism is or even what a Jew is really. I suspect the general idea that this is bad for Corbyn, unironically, might be getting across a bit.

I'm looking forward to Sadiq Khan winning London, the smear campaign against him is a disgrace and hasn't really had the widespread condemnation it deserves.

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008
I actually took part in a telephone opinion poll today. About the EU Referendum. Very exciting.
Of course, if I hadn't had the day off work, I wouldn't have taken part.

I'm pretty sure that's the first opinion poll I've taken part in for at least 10 years.

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

winegums posted:

This poo poo is staying in the news until Khan wins the London mayoral campaign isn't it? I can't help but wonder if it's related to trying to help out Zac Goldsmith somehow. Regardless, is this resonating with the public at all? Does anyone actually care? Antisemitism isn't the hot button topic here that it is in the states.

Maybe it's the eternal optimist in me, but I can't see it doing that much damage. The Tories and UKIP have spent years conditioning the British public to immediately dismiss accusations of racism/sexism/etc. as irrelevant or untrue to the point where it seems hard to damage any party over them. The defences of 'it was just a misunderstanding' and 'don't be so politically correct' are so often heard it might as well be taken as read for this situation too. Plus Ken is a known idiot and no-one genuinely thinks Corbyn has a malicious bone in his body. Incompetent yes, full of hatred no.

BBC News posted:

If Livingstone is expelled, not only will Jeremy Corbyn have lost an articulate high-profile ally,

Seriously BBC? The word that best describes Ken Livinstone is articulate?

jabby fucked around with this message at 21:06 on Apr 29, 2016

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

An independent enquiry into anti-semitism in the Labour party is being launched. I would hope that this would kick it out of the news for a few months, but presumably this means there will now be endless articles about who's being appointed to it...

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Paxman posted:

As someone said earlier, a lot of people have little idea what antisemitism is or even what a Jew is really.
Hitler killed bunch of them, and no other groups. He was bad and tried to force us into Europe. That's about as deep as it goes I think.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Prince John posted:

An independent enquiry into anti-semitism in the Labour party is being launched. I would hope that this would kick it out of the news for a few months, but presumably this means there will now be endless articles about who's being appointed to it...

Who's launching the enquiry?

Jippa
Feb 13, 2009
Just like the edl claims to be anti muslim extremists/militants not normal muslims (or what ever it does/did). The damage is done by association. If you have too scrabble too define your particular anti *insert group of people* sentiments you are fighting a losing pr battle.

Paxman
Feb 7, 2010

Shami Chakrabarti is leading this inquiry according to the Beeb, which is smart as everyone likes her.

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

OwlFancier posted:

Who's launching the enquiry?

Sorry, here's a link - Labour are launching it. Shami Chakrabarti will be leading it apparently.

Hoops
Aug 19, 2005


A Black Mark For Retarded Posting
People know what Jews are.

I think you might be going overboard with this one.

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!

FinalGamer posted:

I genuinely have no idea what a Zionist even is, I always thought it was just some kind of racist insult because of the kingdom of Zion. Because the only time I ever heard anyone say "zionist" or some variation were all racist anti-semitic people, usually white supremacists who ALWAYS use this word because it sounds a little classier and more politically affluent than "filthy Jewish scum" which is kind of what they're saying regardless.

Using the term honestly is just asking for trouble and I never trusted anyone who uses that phrase honestly. If someone is smart enough to understand the troubles of Israel Vs. Palestine, they can be smart enough to debate the entire thing without falling into anti-semitic rhetoric. You can hate things ABOUT Israel without hating Jewish people, the two should not be synonymous with each other.

I feel a lot of this comes from the fact people are incredibly ignorant about Israel and Palestine and are not instructed about the smaller particular details that permeate the entire conflict.

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.681525

quote:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler's mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them.

In a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem, Netanyahu described a meeting between Husseini and Hitler in November, 1941: "Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jew. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, 'If you expel them, they'll all come here (to Palestine).' According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: "What should I do with them?" and the mufti replied: "Burn them."

World Zionist Union posted:

The World Zionist Organization is committed to promoting Zionism & the Zionist idea and the Zionist enterprise through Israel Education as vital and positive elements of contemporary Jewish life, in accordance with the principles articulated in the Jerusalem Program. This manifesto is dedicated to instilling the centrality of Israel and Jerusalem its capital deep within Jewish consciousness, encouraging the return to Zion, fashioning an exemplary society in the Jewish state, expanding Zionist education including Hebrew language instruction, settling the land, and combating Anti-Semitism.

...

Zionism aims at establishing for the Jewish people a legally assured home in Eretz Yisrael. To achieve this purpose, the following means shall be employed:

Promoting the settlement of Jewish farmers, artisans, and tradesmen inPalestine.
Organizing and uniting the whole of Jewry through effective local and international means in accordance with the laws of each country.
Strengthening of the Jewish national sentiment and national consciousness though Israel education with shlichim.
Preparatory steps toward obtaining the consent of governments, where necessary, in order to achieve the goals of Zionism.

(Members: Likud, Yisrael Beiteinu, and basically the entire Israeli right wing)

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Hoops posted:

People know what Jews are.

I think you might be going overboard with this one.
Jews don't even know what Jews are.

Get an Orthodox, Reform, and Liberal rabbi in a room and ask them "who is a Jew?"

communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009
The Jewish Socialists' Group (which has a fairly illustrious history on the left in Britain) have released their own statement on this mess, btw:

Statement on “Labour’s problem with antisemitism” posted:

From the Jewish Socialists’ Group

Antisemitism exists and must be exposed and fought against in the same way as other forms of racism by all who are concerned with combating racism and fascism.

Antisemitism and anti-Zionism are not the same. Zionism is a political ideology which has always been contested within Jewish life since it emerged in 1897, and it is entirely legitimate for non-Jews as well as Jews to express opinions about it, whether positive or negative. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews.

Criticism of Israeli government policy and Israeli state actions against the Palestinians is not antisemitism. Those who conflate criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism, whether they are supporters or opponents of Israeli policy, are actually helping the antisemites. We reject any attempt, from whichever quarter, to place legitimate criticism of Israeli policy out of bounds.

Accusations of antisemitism are currently being weaponised to attack the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour party with claims that Labour has a “problem” of antisemitism. This is despite Corbyn’s longstanding record of actively opposing fascism and all forms of racism, and being a firm a supporter of the rights of refugees and of human rights globally.

A very small number of such cases seem to be real instances of antisemitism. Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights, but expressed in clumsy and ambiguous language, which may unknowingly cross a line into antisemitism. Further cases are simply forthright expressions of support for Palestinian rights, which condemn Israeli government policy and aspects of Zionist ideology, and have nothing whatsoever to do with antisemitism.

The accusations do not refer to antisemitic actions but usually to comments, often made on social media, long before Jeremy Corbyn won the Labour leadership. Those making the charges now, did not see fit to bring them up at the time, under previous Labour leaders, but are using them now, just before mayoral and local elections, when they believe they can inflict most damage on the Labour Party led by Jeremy Corbyn.

The attack is coming from four main sources, who share agendas: to undermine Jeremy Corbyn as leader of Labour; to defend Israeli government policy from attack, however unjust, racist and harmful towards the Palestinian people; and to discredit those who make legitimate criticisms of Israeli policy or Zionism as a political ideology. As anti-racist and anti-fascist Jews who are also campaigning for peace with justice between Israelis and Palestinians, we entirely reject these cynical agendas that are being expressed by:

• The Conservative Party

• Conservative-supporting media in Britain and pro-Zionist Israeli media sources

• Right-wing and pro-Zionist elements claiming to speak on behalf of the Jewish community

• Opponents of Jeremy Corbyn within the Labour party.

The Jewish Socialists’ Group recognises that ordinary Jewish people are rightly concerned and fearful about instances of antisemitism. We share their concerns and a have a proud and consistent record of challenging and campaigning against antisemitism. But we will not support those making false accusations for cynical political motives, including the Conservative Party, who are running a racist campaign against Sadiq Khan, and whose leader David Cameron has referred to desperate refugees, as “a swarm” and “a bunch of migrants”. The Conservative Party demonstrated their contempt for Lord Dubs, a Jewish refugee from Nazism, when they voted down en masse an amendment a few days ago to allow 3,000 child refugees into Britain while Labour, led by Jeremy Corbyn, gave total support to Lord Dubs and his amendment.

The Jewish Socialists’ Group sees the current fearmongering about antisemitism in the Labour Party for what it is – a conscious and concerted effort by right-wing political forces to undermine the growing support among Jews and non-Jews alike for the Labour Party leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, and a measure of the desperation of his opponents.

We stand against antisemitism, against racism and fascism and in support of refugees. We stand for free speech and open debate on Israel, Palestine and Zionism.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Can we hire the Jewish Socialists' Group to do PR for labour full time?

EmptyVessel
Oct 30, 2012
^^^2nded, that's a great, clear statement - so presumably they've already been called "self hating Jews"..

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

OwlFancier posted:

Can we hire the Jewish Socialists' Group to do PR for labour full time?

Nobody is going to listen to a group of virulent anti-Semites like them.

  • Locked thread