|
Saw some pretty cool stuff at the San Diego Safari Park this weekend. A Tiger with its Kill by Sneeze Party, on Flickr Gorillas Playing Together by Sneeze Party, on Flickr Meerkat Sitting in Meditation by Sneeze Party, on Flickr Sneeze Party fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Feb 15, 2016 |
# ? Feb 15, 2016 05:49 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:56 |
|
That meerkat rules
|
# ? Feb 15, 2016 08:55 |
|
Went to the St. Louis Zoo over the weekend. Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 03:49 |
|
Two more from the STL Zoo. Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 00:55 |
|
I love both shots of the Polar Bear. How long did you hang out at the enclosure to get those? My wife is always in such a hurry to see the next thing.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 03:08 |
|
Protip: Go by yourself.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 04:57 |
|
I scattered a den of Carolina anoles while working on my roof this week. This one went from brown to green pretty fast when it got out into the sun.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 06:14 |
|
Sneeze Party posted:I love both shots of the Polar Bear. How long did you hang out at the enclosure to get those? My wife is always in such a hurry to see the next thing. Thanks. Checking the timestamps from my first shot to last, I'd say about 25 minutes. Luckily, Kali (the polar bear) was pretty energetic, so my girlfriend and our two other friends with us were happy to hang and watch for awhile. But going alone would also work well. What I was pleased about was that all of my shots of Kali were viewed through a glass barrier. Have some bonus Kali photos. Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr Untitled by Ryan Sees What, on Flickr
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 02:52 |
|
Cheetahs playing. Unfortunately it was a quite dark/cloudy day. Ika fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Mar 12, 2016 |
# ? Mar 12, 2016 17:12 |
|
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 04:35 |
|
The texture of the wet polar bear fur and anole skin is fantastic.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 08:42 |
|
Spotted this lil guy on my walk home from work the other day. This is the first half decent non-smartphone picture I've ever taken. Just got my a6000 a couple weeks ago and haven't had much time to get out. I'm super thrilled with how it turned out for how little experience I have
|
# ? Mar 30, 2016 07:02 |
|
I went to the mouth of the Mad River to see if the seals had pups yet. They didn't. seal-colony by Redwood Planet, on Flickr seal-surface by Redwood Planet, on Flickr Some rowdy Caspian Terns were fighting above the seal colony. tern-chase by Redwood Planet, on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 30, 2016 23:26 |
|
Like those photos. Talking about the title of this thread, would a 230mm lens (345mm equiv) be enough range to take photos of bears (in national parks, not zoos) without getting too close? e: Not while solo hiking, either from a vehicle or with a group of people hiking.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2016 03:09 |
What kind of bears and are they in an environment where they're used to humans? That's more than fine for the black bears that live around here and wander around the golf course (hell 70mm is usually enough for those) but I'd stay a lot further away from Grizzlies or bears that live in more remote locations. Either way, the answer is yes, but your shots of black bears would likely be a lot more closeup than shots of grizzlies.
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2016 03:16 |
|
Something like grizzlies in yellowstone was what I was specifically thinking about.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2016 04:29 |
Then yeah, you won't get any closeups, you'll want bigger range than that, but you should be able to get some decent-ish far-off shots with that kind of range.
|
|
# ? Mar 31, 2016 04:47 |
|
New Zealand Fur Seals by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr New Zealand Fur Seal by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr Anarkii posted:Like those photos. I used a Nikon 70-300 for these from inside a truck at the side of the road, these were up in Yukon/northern BC: @70mm Grizzly and cubs by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr @145mm Grizzly Cub by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr @165mm Black Bear by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr @300mm Black Bear by Tyler Huestis, on Flickr Black bears don't give a gently caress, but I would never want to be any closer to a momma grizzly with cubs than we were despite being in a Ram 3500 with the driver ready to take off if the bears seemed even slightly agitated
|
# ? Apr 5, 2016 04:32 |
|
I don't know, a Ram 3500 might not be fast enough. Probably need a Ferrari to be sure.
|
# ? Apr 5, 2016 14:51 |
|
Red Canyon mulies-1367 on Flickr Red Canyon mulies-1374 on Flickr CHG male sage grouse vocal sacs-1293 on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 5, 2016 22:08 |
|
Nature is so drat weird.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2016 01:18 |
|
Muskrat by Steven Sarginson, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 17, 2016 07:54 |
|
Pretty happy with how this turned out: Another angle where he looks like a real smug motherfucker:
|
# ? Apr 21, 2016 04:40 |
|
My Sigma 150-500 is dead as gently caress and out of warranty. So I'm actually sort of excited to have a reason for getting a new toy. Is the newer Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary the current "king of budget telephoto" lens? There's also the Tamron 150-600, but surprisingly people seem a lot happier with the Sigma. The Sports version looks mighty nice, but I can't see myself trekking about and holding that thing for a few hours.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2016 13:18 |
|
Mango Polo posted:My Sigma 150-500 is dead as gently caress and out of warranty. So I'm actually sort of excited to have a reason for getting a new toy. Not sure if your using Canon or Nikon but I just got the Nikon 200-500 and love it, the sharpness is amazing and worth the extra cost if you can swing it.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2016 14:30 |
|
Ezekiel_980 posted:Not sure if your using Canon or Nikon but I just got the Nikon 200-500 and love it, the sharpness is amazing and worth the extra cost if you can swing it. I do use a Nikon! So something new did come out while I wasn't paying attention, excellent. It loses a bit of range compared to the new Sigma, but I rarely had that as an issue with my old one so it's not a bad thing.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2016 14:45 |
|
Mango Polo posted:I do use a Nikon! So something new did come out while I wasn't paying attention, excellent. I posted some stuff with it in the bird thread, only down side so far is it doesn't like birds that are far away against blue sky on my body.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2016 17:07 |
|
I think this one turned out alright, turning on a dime.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2016 23:20 |
|
Wyoming... Young mule deer Dubois-3709 on Flickr Ram face Dubois-3839 on Flickr Rams Dubois-3846 on Flickr Ridge rams Dubois-4506 on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 29, 2016 04:12 |
|
That's awesome. The muted colors make it look like a painting.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2016 05:13 |
Yeah, I love what you did in post.
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2016 05:23 |
|
Thanks! I didn't do much- the sheep were high up a ridge with some falling snow in between. Definitely one of my favorites from the day.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2016 11:46 |
|
Turns out the Sigma 150-600 (S) and the Nikon 200-500 are about the same price in Europe, making the choice difficult again. I'll swing by a shop tonight to hold both and see how the weights feel, but seems like in terms of AF the Sigma wins out, and birds in flight sure love to gently caress up my focus. e. jesus christ the Sigma S is heavy Mango Polo fucked around with this message at 13:01 on May 1, 2016 |
# ? Apr 29, 2016 12:43 |
|
Sleeping Squirrel by Steven Sarginson, on Flickr
|
# ? May 2, 2016 03:10 |
awwwwww
|
|
# ? May 2, 2016 05:31 |
|
I found a bear yesterday
|
# ? May 3, 2016 01:43 |
|
InternetJunky posted:I found a bear yesterday Sweet. exif?
|
# ? May 3, 2016 03:19 |
|
torgeaux posted:Sweet. exif? No, grizzly.
|
# ? May 3, 2016 04:45 |
|
torgeaux posted:Sweet. exif?
|
# ? May 3, 2016 15:03 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:56 |
|
I woulda done it with my 10-22.
|
# ? May 3, 2016 17:04 |