|
Prosperity Gospel says poor are ungodly and thus deserving of their fate.
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 01:00 |
|
|
TheQat posted:oh man there's a video of the cruz handshake fakeout: https://twitter.com/GMA/status/727456210677469184 Hahaha Oh God it's as good as I imagined, "oh! too slow joe!"
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
Doomtalker posted:I found why people vote Trump! http://patch.com/massachusetts/milf...utm_content=aol People are sick of cyclists on the road???
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:00
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:I disagree with your assumption here and the intent you ascribe to it. I agree with you on why people like that woman feels that way since she (like most of us) has very little agency in how the world works which can be terrifying. However this sort of messaging that feeds into her fear and creates a specific target of the poor has been coming down from powerful interests for years. Those people are very much trying to destroy the safety net. I disagree that she is merely trying to reassure herself though. That might be part of it but showing that you disapprove of other people and trying to make them feel bad or responsible for their plights is becoming a big thing. Eggplant Squire fucked around with this message at 14:23 on May 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc Everything is terrible. 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Prosperity Gospel says poor are ungodly and thus deserving of their fate. But what if I'm poor and I go to church every week?  Peven Stan posted:People are sick of cyclists on the road??? Yankee spotted
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:25
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:But what if I'm poor and I go to church every week? Tithe more!
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:But what if I'm poor and I go to church every week? You aren't worshiping God correctly/enough.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:58
|
|
|
That poor kid 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
Anchor Wanker posted:That poor kid 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc Wow, what a gigantic oval office!
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc Good for that guy on not calling her a huge oval office. Because I would've been streaming "oval office oval office oval office" towards her non-stop.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:40
|
|
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Good for that guy on not calling her a huge oval office. Because I would've been streaming "oval office oval office oval office" towards her non-stop.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
hangedman1984 posted:Wow, what a gigantic oval office! Seriously. That wasn't even the conservative fear of the welfare mooch buying lobster, steaks, and expensive desserts. He was buying groceries with his family and even that is now too much. There's also always the "don't have kids you can't afford!!" bullshit which doesn't help the kids that are already alive and need food unless they know a magical spell to reverse time and unbirth a child. Of course that solution is just a cowardly way to say sex havers should be punished but they know that's not as popular as Sensible economic solutions. Eggplant Squire fucked around with this message at 15:45 on May 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
Clinton insiders have been pointing to her work on the Iran deal as foreign policy credentials, saying her fingerprints were all over it. It turns out she was trying to break it: quote:“They shared the same tactic, which was engagement, but they envisioned different endgames,” said Karim Sadjadpour, an expert on Iran at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The president’s endgame was, ‘I’m a guy who can bridge differences. I’ve bridged races and countries all my life, so I’m going to be able to resolve this.’”
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:50
|
|
|
Not surprising. Disappointing, though.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
I wonder if she learned the real lesson she was trying to teach the Iranians. Probably not. I have a feeling that her foreign policy isn't going to be very good.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:56
|
|
|
TheQat posted:embedded that for ya: Twitter's going crazy over this one: 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc On the plus side, think of how miserable this woman is going to be on Nov. 5.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Clinton insiders have been pointing to her work on the Iran deal as foreign policy credentials, saying her fingerprints were all over it. Okay that's not what the article actually said at all. I encourage everyone to read the whole thing. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:04
|
|
Cat Army 
|
Noticed something in his basket the second time that may have triggered the conversation 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
The Iron Rose posted:Okay that's not what the article actually said at all. I encourage everyone to read the whole thing. It's the New York Times, obviously they're not going to come out and say it.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:08
|
|
|
Rick Scott flew over to California to tell companies to move their operations to Florida, where we will never have a $15 minimum wage. In response, Jerry Brown wrote a letter telling him to start worrying about climate change instead. You may remember that Florida government officials are officially banned from talking about global warming.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Clinton insiders have been pointing to her work on the Iran deal as foreign policy credentials, saying her fingerprints were all over it. It's funny how "Break" and "Didn't think it would work but pursued it anyway, though with less vigor than others" apparently mean the same thing these days. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:10
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:It's the New York Times, obviously they're not going to come out and say it. Is there somewhere I can get an English- to-Anti-Clinton dictionary somewhere? Words seem to have brand new and exciting meanings when they involve her.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:It's funny how "Break" and "Didn't think it would work but pursued it anyway, though with less vigor than others" apparently mean the same thing these days. Also it just means Clinton is just more cynical than Obama, She was fine with the deal, but she completely expected the deal to break down from Tehran's side. And was preparing for that to happen. That's exactly how I want a Secretary of State to think. Work towards a solution, but also expect and prepare for what happens if that solution breaks down.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Also it just means Clinton is just more cynical than Obama, She was fine with the deal, but she completely expected the deal to break down from Tehran's side. And was preparing for that to happen. Where did you get the impression she was fine with the deal? She's stuck in a bunch of tough-guy caveats every time she's talked about it.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Taerkar posted:Is there somewhere I can get an English- to-Anti-Clinton dictionary somewhere? Words seem to have brand new and exciting meanings when they involve her. Just add words that make her seem more nefarious and/or illiberal and/or a secret disciple of Barry Goldwater and Henry Kissinger. Put something in there about her being sold out to the man at the end and you can sell it to Salon.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Where did you get the impression she was fine with the deal? She's stuck in a bunch of tough-guy caveats every time she's talked about it. Thinking like a normal person.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:It's the New York Times, obviously they're not going to come out and say it. lol at the idea of the Times being on Hilldog's side.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:26
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Where did you get the impression she was fine with the deal? She's stuck in a bunch of tough-guy caveats every time she's talked about it. So two things: - Elaborate on your claim - Is the NYT on Hillary's side now? I have a hard time following when they're pro and when they're anti depending on how the person feels about her personally
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
Boon posted:So two things: quote:“It’s not enough just to say yes to this deal,” she declared last October. “We have to say, ‘Yes, and.’ Yes, and we will enforce it with vigor and vigilance. Yes, and we will embed it in a broader strategy to confront Iran’s bad behavior in the region. Yes, and we will begin from Day 1 to set the conditions so Iran knows it will never be able to get a nuclear weapon.” Don't pretend like she hasn't tried to paint Obama as naive. quote:- Is the NYT on Hillary's side again? I have a hard time following when they're pro and when they're anti Sorry, who are they supposed to be for? What I mean is that the Times, just like NPR or any other supposedly respectable news outlet, will never state the obvious when it calls out an establishment politician. You have to use a little intelligence to see what is being laid out in front of you. In this case what is being laid out is that Hillary was reluctant to do her part in getting the deal.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Sorry, who are they supposed to be for? What I mean is that the Times, just like NPR or any other supposedly respectable news outlet, will never state the obvious when it calls out an establishment politician. You have to use a little intelligence to see what is being laid out in front of you. In this case what is being laid out is that Hillary was reluctant to do her part in getting the deal. Read between the lines man!! Can't you see what's going on here!!! Maggie Hassan is the current NH governor and she's going up against Republican Kelly Ayotte for NH Senate in November. She has an extremely good ad team: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GG_L9-kazw
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
quote:After she left the State Department, Mrs. Clinton diverged from Mr. Obama on a central tactical question: whether to impose harsh new sanctions on the Iranians after they elected Hassan Rouhani, who had run for president seeking better relations with the West to ease Iran’s economic isolation. Mrs. Clinton was swayed by many in Congress, as well as by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who argued Iran was so desperate for a deal that tightening the vise would have extracted better terms. The only difference is she would have negotiated a bit harder than Obama did, She was ok with a deal, She just differed slightly from Obama in the sense that she would have tried to impose more restrictions. While Obama was satisfied with the deal as it was. She wasn't trying to break the deal up, at worst she wanted to negotiate a bit more and add more restrictions with Iraq in such a weak position. Obama just wanted to get the deal done as is without the risks that come with squeezing them. Having Disagreements with how hard to push a negotiating party =/= Trying to break up a deal. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
rkajdi posted:Rule of law doesn't need a check against it. The continual move to turn trials more and more into spectacle instead of being about objective truth(I know this has always been the case, but jury selection seems to have gotten worse from the outside) is poisonous to actual justice happening.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Also it's hard to see being "swayed by" Bibi as anything other than not doing your job on behalf of the president.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Zeroisanumber posted:lol at the idea of the Times being on Hilldog's side. Uh the NYT has been pretty obviously anti-Sanders for a while, and that helps Hillary. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
botany posted:Uh the NYT has been pretty obviously anti-Sanders for a while, and that helps Hillary. NYT has famously been out for Hillary's scalp since the 90's and one of their regular columnists, Maureen Dowd, absolutely hates her guts.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
I don't think Maureen Dowd has any influence at NYT. Them having it out for Hillary is news to me. e: I mean, Hillary probably thinks they have it out for her, along with everyone else who hasn't given her money. I wonder what betrayal number she has assigned them on her spreadsheet.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 01:00 |
|
|
SedanChair posted:Also it's hard to see being "swayed by" Bibi as anything other than not doing your job on behalf of the president. It's a Secretary of State's job to consider all options and bring them up. Especially something at this level of importance. If I was a president and my secretary of state had concerns or thoughts about the on going negotiations, or even bringing up other people's opinions. I would be pissed as gently caress if they held back because they thought disagreeing with me was a bad thing. It's not like she was actively trying to sabotage the deal which is how you tried to paint it initially. But actually nevermind, just keep moving those goal posts.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:50
|
|