|
Zombies' Downfall posted:There's a QTE really early in Bayonetta that kind of comes out of nowhere and kills you if you fail it, it might be the worst thing I can think of about that entire game (which is great) instafail Bayonetta QTEs are a notable exception to the "Awesome Platinum QTE" rule
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 00:24 |
|
Zombies' Downfall posted:There's a QTE really early in Bayonetta that kind of comes out of nowhere and kills you if you fail it, it might be the worst thing I can think of about that entire game (which is great) Bayonetta probably has the worst QTEs I've ever seen in a game. Don't get me wrong, it's an amazing game but everything about the QTEs and their implementation is about as bad as it can be.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:41 |
|
I want to play as, dirty old man, Sully in the Uncharted game.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:42 |
|
MinibarMatchman posted:if it's any consolation I liked playing as doomguy, and doom, more than uncharted 4 but that probably certifies me for the guillotine in games court I heard new Doom is really good though? SP anyway.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:43 |
|
Uncharted 2 has Drake going for "revenge" against the guy he was backstabbing in the beginning already and who basically just did the job they were all hired for without letting Drake gently caress it up So he's gotta die ofc
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:44 |
|
littleorv posted:I want to play as, dirty old man, Sully in the Uncharted game. I like to play as Sully in the multiplayer.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:44 |
|
Golden Goat posted:Are QTE's better when they have no failstate or when they do? Failing QTEs should make your onscreen videogame person look like a dope and earn you less points for your shameful performance
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:44 |
|
VideoGames posted:Stux, please stop. You brought this on yourself, VideoGames... https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3776384
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:44 |
|
Please do not close this thread. Please do not start silly threads such as that. Simple rules.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:52 |
|
Ah, welcome back everyone.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:52 |
|
You should probably just take some time and play some video games instead of posting. Might I suggest getting a Wii-U? A ton of fun games on that I know you haven't played
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:53 |
|
axleblaze posted:Bayonetta probably has the worst QTEs I've ever seen in a game. Don't get me wrong, it's an amazing game but everything about the QTEs and their implementation is about as bad as it can be. Nah, suckerpunches after every enemy introduction cutscene are TOTALLY fair.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:53 |
|
So yeah Persona Q and Prime 3 are pretty alright. I was gonna grab Ace Attorney Trilogy off the eShop since it's on sale, but I was waiting for it to be June so I can get Kirby Planet Robobot and #FE.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:54 |
|
VideoGames posted:Please do not close this thread. Please do not start silly threads such as that. You may have won this battle, but the war is not over... And I Will Win The War VideoGames.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:54 |
|
In the minutes of downtime, I wrote this I played around three hours of Diablo II last night, on a whim. It feels better than Diablo III. And I like Diablo III. Here are some serious thoughts, this is a serious post that I will probably put effort into It's nice to have to stop to consider whether some item on the ground is worth picking up; Diablo III basically eliminated that choice, which is kind of a loss. It makes it more mindless. The latter also has its dropped loot specifically tailored for the character you're playing; generally a good thing, but combined with the increased inventory space, you basically end up picking up every piece of equipment with a yellow name, gently caress what it is, what it's called or what it looks like. I couldn't tell you the generic name for most helms, for example, because I don't even look at the name when deciding what to do with them. In comparison, I could give you the entire line of helmets in Diablo II: cap, skull cap, helm, full helm, great helm, crown, mask, bone helm... Because I actually have to think about it, if only for a second. In Diablo III, by, say, level five, you're already a spinning tornado of destruction. Every class, by then, has an area-of-effect attack, and you're killing tons of skeletons and zombies and fat zombies and goat men, sending sparks and gibs everywhere. I think it looks too busy, there're too many particle effects, you can barely see your character or living enemies under all of the lights. The game constantly displays distracting text on screen: "Massacre! 26 enemies killed!" Diablo II is much more quiet than that, and I think I prefer it. That said, Diablo II's leveling system is pretty bad. Putting points into Energy is basically always a bad idea. Putting points into your level 1 skill is basically always a bad idea. Passive skills have harsh diminishing returns per point spent in them. The optimal way to play is to save up your skill points until you're level 18, or 24, or 30, depending on your build, only putting points into the prerequisites to unlock your favourite ability. Same with Strength and Dexterity: enough to wear your equipment, everything else should go into Vitality. You have to wait until you're 80% through the game before your Barbarian can perform Whirlwind, which is crazy. And, the very worst thing: your melee swings can miss. The game might tell you, "Chance to hit similarly-leveled enemy: 95%" but it's closer to 50% most of the time. Some bad design decisions were made. But I just prefer the second game's relatively slow combat to the third's explosions of colour. So I guess I'm mostly comparing Diablo II to III right now. I'll keep playing though.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:54 |
|
littleorv posted:Ah, welcome back everyone. Good Afternoon Goon I don't have time for videogames today because tomorrow is D&D night and I'm DMing this week. Do any other Games Chat posters play tabletop games?
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:54 |
|
I have gotten back into playing Smash 4, which is good. I wish there was some sort of matchmaking for it though. I'm pretty good but I like to play on the gamepad while doing other things. I feel like I either end up matching with terribad dudes or people who have their special edition gamecube controllers and spend hours studying frame data. The good fights are really good though!
PantsBandit fucked around with this message at 17:57 on May 17, 2016 |
# ? May 17, 2016 17:54 |
|
bloodychill posted:I heard new Doom is really good though? SP anyway. it's great, I love it, UC4 I loved a little less so though since some parts dragged and I was a bit fatigued near the end. I liked the end boss though, plus the big setpieces like the whole escape downhill/being tied up to a rope being dragged are really good. Both are entirely different but worth playing, especially if you want to see some great grafix + performance. DOOM runs flawlessly and looks great, while UC4 is on another level and is extremely solid 30FPS like 99% of the time.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:55 |
|
PantsBandit posted:I have gotten back into playing Smash 4, which is good. I wish there were some sort of matchmaking for it though. I'm pretty good but I like to play on the gamepad while doing other things. I feel like I either end up matching with terribad dudes or people who have their special edition gamecube controllers and spend hours studying frame data. The good fights are really good though! Who is your main/secondaries, PantsBandit
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:55 |
|
None of you are free from sin. Do Not think I will forget what happened here this day... Cowards...
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:56 |
|
Stux posted:None of you are free from sin. Do Not think I will forget what happened here this day... Cowards... Yeah no kidding. I'm full of sin.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:58 |
|
Alfalfa The Roach posted:Who is your main/secondaries, PantsBandit I have a lot because I hate playing the same characters over and over I guess I would say my real main is Dedede. I also play almost as much as Yoshi and Ganondorf though. Near secondaries would be Little Mac, Toon Link, and Bowser. I like them all! I will pretty much alternate at random.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 17:59 |
|
Stux posted:None of you are free from sin.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:01 |
|
I made someone in LF snap once due to similar things to what Stux is talking about but that guy actually kinda had a point and was actually being picked on while still being an idiot babby.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:01 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:if you buy FFX HD you can solve this problem That you assume I do not already own it shows you are part of the problem. I am sick of these attacks on my character, on my typing and on my game ownership.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:01 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:if you buy FFX HD you can solve this problem NO WAY
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:02 |
|
Jay Rust posted:In the minutes of downtime, I wrote this Diablo 1 was a classic and has the best atmosphere but is very rough around the edges and kinda repetitive and mostly completely outdone by D2. Diablo 2 is great to this day and Diablo 3 is inherently way different. D3 at launch sucked, but now that they removed the RMAH and made personal drops viable, its pretty good at what it does. Its colorful, you can do bounties and rifts and smash your way to trying to get the loot you want. You have the cube now and ways to mitigate getting hosed by RNG. The biggest difference between the two is character advancement. In D3 you unlock everything and then can freely flip between abilites and runes based on what you feel like doing. This means you can't gently caress up but also that there's no identity at all. Any max level barbarian can do what any other max level barbarian can do, other than armor abilities and builds that require certain armor, but then you just need to get that armor. In D2 however each class would have to be built in a certain direction as you went. The downside was that you'd lock yourself into something and couldn't try anything else without leveling another character, and new players would often gently caress up their early stat investment and ruin their build, but in return gave the game more depth and replayability. Also Diablo 2 has lots of weapons which give pretty amazing bonuses and really change your build with skills and ability modifiers in addition to unique affixes. In D3 the stats are so extremely streamlined (all you want is HP and mainstat pretty much, maybe life on hit) that it really reduces the RPG depth. But they try to make up for it by having more unique affixes and build-defining gear sets. They're both good games.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:03 |
|
Stux posted:That you assume I do not already own it shows you are part of the problem. I am sick of these attacks on my character, on my typing and on my game ownership.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:04 |
|
Just kidding I bought FFX/2 remastered because they are both great games and tell good stories if you kind of squint your eyes through the more nonsensical aspects of the plot.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:05 |
|
exquisite tea posted:Just kidding I bought FFX/2 remastered because they are both great games and tell good stories if you kind of squint your eyes through the more nonsensical aspects of the plot. Combined, I think FFX and FFX-2 have the strongest gameplay in the series. I love FFXII a whole lot (HD version on PC/PS4/Vita when???) but its combat just isn't as involving. I hear Lightning Returns has great combat but I haven't played that one yet.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:06 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:you criticize people's gaming platform choices but True Gamers recognize and appreciate all of the different ways and places to play video games This is a fallacy... That u would even entertain this as proper ideology is indicative of your mindset and approach to the subject. Let me be the one to educate u: The quality of a video game itself is subjective... therefore all games are good and own... The quality of hardware is objective... There fore all bad hardware must be removed to allow the good hardware to become universal, so that all games are available in one place for all players. This is much the same as capitalism and communism. I hope you understand better now and will refrain from making such bad and idiot statements in the future...
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:06 |
|
Stux posted:None of you are free from sin. Do Not think I will forget what happened here this day... Cowards... i'm an immaculate angel who loves to game with god
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:12 |
|
you have a subjective view of the PC however, false gamer i will pray for u
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:13 |
|
The best system was the loving Dreamcast!!!
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:13 |
|
re: ludditenarrative dispensary
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:14 |
|
the best system was probably the gamecube, with n64 right behind
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:15 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:Diablo 1 was a classic and has the best atmosphere but is very rough around the edges and kinda repetitive and mostly completely outdone by D2. I will disagree only insomuch that I think Diablo 2 had the best atmosphere because the art was really great for the time and music was on par with D1 but there were so many more tracks for the locales. D2 Act 2 is still one of my favorite settings in any game. It is the best "generic middle eastern desert palace" ever implemented.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:15 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:you have a subjective view of the PC however, false gamer PC hardware is objectively bad for two reasons: Cost and Windows. Do not @ me again unless its to apologise and admit your error.
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:16 |
|
if you are a true gamer you will play games at any cost
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 00:24 |
|
what if the cost is xbox one...
|
# ? May 17, 2016 18:18 |