|
make is pretty awful, and msbuild isn't much better.
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
eclipse is a good ide except workspaces
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:make is pretty awful, and msbuild isn't much better. yeah like i said im not holding up make as a great program, but i like it better than visual studio
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:02
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:eclipse is a good ide except workspaces i like eclipse workspaces better than vs solutions, but mostly because projects under the eclipse workspace can be totally unrelated whereas solution projects are always tied together at that high level.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
chmods please posted:the magic of ~hyperspace~ true story, that splash screen loving animates when you log in, but everyone everywhere turns it off because it makes shitrix eat poo poo and die. i hate it so much.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" we use cmake which has the nice controllability stuff from make but (a) is not a horrorshow like make and (b) can target make / msbuild / xcode / ninja / etc
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" vs/c# is the fastest way for me to get a GUI up for non-CS/non-technical users. live charting of sensor input in less than a day. another solution i have literally seen in practice is an excel spreadsheet with VBA macros. vs beats the pants of that dev environment. i can also do live charting in python/ipython/matplotlib, but ME's and other folks still run windows. had my phone screen. should've practiced embedded junk, I mixed up &&/& like some chump. o well~~~~
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
vs is real good and im glad it abstracts all the lovely parts about prgramming
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
im happy ive never once written a make file
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
got sent api documentation that's 18 pages long with no loving endpoint in it  why
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" a solution is a group of projects. a project builds a target from sources and dependent projects. it's pretty straightforward Notorious QIG posted:im not claiming that make is some paragon of programming tools but i like how explicit is it now? 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Awia posted:im happy ive never once written a make file same fake edit: not actually true, but the one i did was for a three file personal project in c++ so it wasn't too bad.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
ive never written a makefile more complex than a bunch of gcc calls in order. enterprise sized c builds terrify me.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
anyone making terrible python plots with millions of datapoints with something that isnt matplotlib?
cinci zoo sniper fucked around with this message at 21:08 on May 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
cut my array into pieces, this is my bubble sort
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
Skim Milk posted:cut my array into pieces, this is my bubble sort that sounds more like a merge sort imo
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
HoboMan posted:that sounds more like a merge sort imo but it doesn't fit the song 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:14
|
|
|
neither does array, you should have said list imo
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:why do you care? i care if for no other reason because it's currently choking on a library linking error and i cant for the life of me figure it out LeftistMuslimObama posted:ive never written a makefile more complex than a bunch of gcc calls in order. enterprise sized c builds terrify me. same, fortunately this company is small enough and young enough that the makefiles aren't horrific
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:i care if for no other reason because it's currently choking on a library linking error and i cant for the life of me figure it out i had trouble with a NI lib that was x64-only, there was a build setting I had to specify x64 instead of "All"
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:same, fortunately this company is small enough and young enough that the makefiles aren't horrific yet 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:Is sonarqube any good? i.e. not lovely i have no experience with other similar tools, but it seems fine
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 22:23
|
|
|
this is blowing my mind, for me, eclipse was borderline unusable. i will accept i'm wrong, but i really can't see anyone saying that the poo poo ide i tried to use is the best one. maybe i accidentally got a lovely fork? i am questioning my own reality right now.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
HoboMan posted:this is blowing my mind, for me, eclipse was borderline unusable. i will accept i'm wrong, but i really can't see anyone saying that the poo poo ide i tried to use is the best one. maybe i accidentally got a lovely fork? i am questioning my own reality right now. intellij is the best one. don't believe shaggar's lies
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
So, I'm learning what JSX is for the very first time. What the poo poo react tutorial posted:JSX is a preprocessor step that adds XML syntax to JavaScript. You can definitely use React without JSX but JSX makes React a lot more elegant. Just like XML, JSX tags have a tag name, attributes, and children. If an attribute value is enclosed in quotes, the value is a string. Oh hey how about we take lovely jarvascript and mix in some lovely xml.  I know I should probably read up on it more before I pass judgement but so far I'm not very hyped. I'm about 15 minutes away from just rolling my own jarvascript framework (well, more accurately typescript).
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
the answer is javascript
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
elm
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:idk man i just dont really like ides. they feel way overcomplicated to me yeah same, i hate it also hello terrible programmers, i think i have byte anxiety i've never decoded or encoded a byte. whenever someone talkes about reading some bytes or shifting some bits my palms get all sweaty
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:So, I'm learning what JSX is for the very first time. lol dont. you have occasion to write javascript. it's not going to be good. it's javascript. but since you're using javascript, you might as well use react. react is the best you're gonna get for a front end javascript framework, period. you will not roll a better one yourself. jsx is fine too. i mean it works well with react. you could make all the js objects manually but christ why would you???
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Condiv posted:intellij is the best one. don't believe shaggar's lies
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah same, i hate it 
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
it's ok, im ground flooring this poo poo. either (a) we get bought out and then im hosed or (b) we grow huge and since im an early employee i get hella privileges as we become more legit
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:also hello terrible programmers, i think i have byte anxiety its actually v easy. pencil and paper can help if you're struggling
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:also hello terrible programmers, i think i have byte anxiety it's okay, I do endian-ness and masking and shifting all the time and I don't know a fucken thing, except when to start googling and drawing diagrams Notorious QIG posted:it's ok, im ground flooring this poo poo. either (a) we get bought out and then im hosed or (b) we grow huge and since im an early employee i get hella privileges as we become more legit congratulations, you beautiful starchild, you get to see how good people build bad old code
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
LordSaturn posted:congratulations, you beautiful starchild, you get to see how good people build bad old code 
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 03:04
|
|
|
hold up cuz im gonna drop some fuckin bombs about msbuild/vs it's loving garbage if what you're working on is bigger than a breadbox (or essentially bigger than a single solution file) you're basically going to be writing makefiles in powershell that call msbuild on your various solutions, then copying the output around to where you need it to go
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
intellisense is neat
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:Everyone in the company is flipping their poo poo because I added the EF config section and a binding redirect to an updated MySql.Data.dll. Someone loving kill me now. I'm chain-firing email responses to every non-technical piece of poo poo complaining about having to update configs on 50 different client sites. this is us, only if someone makes a config change then they have to manually deploy it to 100+ websites i've done this once
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:hold up cuz im gonna drop some fuckin bombs about msbuild/vs my job uses VS for C++ and groups all of the projects each team uses into their own solution. this naturally means we have 400-project solutions that take a long rear end time to compile and everybody's too lazy to add new projects to them
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
latest R# has a thing where it doesn't rebuild projects unless the public interface changes probably doesn't work for C/C++ solutions, though
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2016 07:35
|
|
