|
gently caress SNEEP posted:is this the yotj thread now? i haven't been on yopspos for 3 years because I've been busy with college. but now i'm done. hello yospos what was the yotj thread? this predates me slightly I think
|
# ? May 22, 2016 20:41 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 22:01 |
|
he's probably thinking of the cjs thread? i don't think i've seen yotj used outside of sh/sc
|
# ? May 22, 2016 20:47 |
|
you know before i installed watcom i never realized how much i lean on intellisense to tell me how to C++
|
# ? May 22, 2016 23:03 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:great my ADD kicked in, I saw someone in the grey forums who's writing a DOS MIDI player and visualizer in Watcom C and now I want to autism my way into making a DOS game like I have since 1994 I fight these urges with weed
|
# ? May 23, 2016 01:56 |
|
ctps: verilog is a miserable language to parse
|
# ? May 23, 2016 02:14 |
|
AWWNAW posted:I fight these urges with weed not legal here yet!!! anyway i figured out how to write to video memory with DOS4/GW and can write 8x8 tiles to a VGA mode 13 screen, i wish i would have been able to figure this out 20 years ago so i could be a shareware zillionaire
|
# ? May 23, 2016 02:25 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:anyway i figured out how to write to video memory with DOS4/GW and can write 8x8 tiles to a VGA mode 13 screen, i wish i would have been able to figure this out 20 years ago so i could be a shareware zillionaire 20 years ago you didn't have to figure it out yourself, you just had to read Michael Abrash's columns in Dr. Dobb's Journal
|
# ? May 23, 2016 04:38 |
|
anthonypants posted:he's probably thinking of the cjs thread? i don't think i've seen yotj used outside of sh/sc oh that might've been it. i never posted in sh/sc so i don't remember any of it...
|
# ? May 23, 2016 06:11 |
|
eschaton posted:20 years ago you didn't have to figure it out yourself, you just had to read Michael Abrash's columns in Dr. Dobb's Journal and here I am writing my own text rendering routines like a sucker
|
# ? May 23, 2016 14:24 |
|
fleshweasel posted:basically if you are still making GBS threads your pants about how bad jsx looks or something, you don't understand react yet, so just keep working with it, and you'll get how simple and good it is. This is 100% correct. I spent all weekend fiddling with React (and flux a little bit) and yeah, for jarvascript, it's pretty good. I wish the React docs were worth a poo poo, though.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 14:50 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:what was the yotj thread? this predates me slightly I think I thought it was this: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3571852
|
# ? May 23, 2016 14:51 |
|
Finster Dexter posted:I thought it was this: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3571852
|
# ? May 23, 2016 15:10 |
|
i have a theory that the main draw to a cj job is getting the ability to bitch about how dumb everyone is
|
# ? May 23, 2016 15:40 |
|
whats up you idiots. how do i write good unit tests and make it easy for people to write their own loving unit tests instead of making me do it. what's a good book, or maybe blog. help me out here. come on.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 15:49 |
|
i met the mythical 100x programmer today. he was some contractor a customer employs to write custom poo poo for them, and he has some interesting ideas my favorite is that he doesnt believe in using if-then-else for control flow at all. he thinks "if then" is 1960s technology, as irrelevant to modern programming as gotos (his words). he showed me some of his code, and he will seriously bend over backwards never to write an if, even for a simple conditional check. here's an example of one of his made up idioms: code:
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:03 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:i met the mythical 100x programmer today. he was some contractor a customer employs to write custom poo poo for them, and he has some interesting ideas
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:10 |
|
GameCube posted:whats up you idiots. how do i write good unit tests and make it easy for people to write their own loving unit tests instead of making me do it. what's a good book, or maybe blog. help me out here. come on. the art of unit testing is really good
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:16 |
|
hahahaha, i hosed myself up trying to imitate his terrible code and that function is actually isEven
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:17 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:i met the mythical 100x programmer today. he was some contractor a customer employs to write custom poo poo for them, and he has some interesting ideas I bet he is the guy that made that OOP hate video.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:24 |
|
raminasi posted:the art of unit testing is really good it's fifty freakin bucks and we don't have safari books. agh
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:34 |
|
GameCube posted:whats up you idiots. how do i write good unit tests and make it easy for people to write their own loving unit tests instead of making me do it. what's a good book, or maybe blog. help me out here. come on. rip
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:35 |
|
my test passes more frequently, but still not all of the time. love it
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:37 |
|
hmm. the ebook alone is 35 smackeroos. i'm poor right now, though - and, soon, i'll be even more poor... house-poor.. i wonder if i can convince someone to buy this book for me.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:44 |
|
since joining the team two weeks ago i've added 200 unit tests. lomarf.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:44 |
|
ok, fine, i'll ask and out myself as not one of the cool kids. what's the deal with "lomarf"?
|
# ? May 23, 2016 16:51 |
|
HoboMan posted:ok, fine, i'll ask and out myself as not one of the cool kids. what's the deal with "lomarf"? a lomarf is the smallest possible unit of funny computer
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:10 |
|
HoboMan posted:ok, fine, i'll ask and out myself as not one of the cool kids. what's the deal with "lomarf"? lomarf
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:13 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:i met the mythical 100x programmer today. he was some contractor a customer employs to write custom poo poo for them, and he has some interesting ideas i sort of get where he is coming from. it's the feeling that if you need if statements, youve modeled the problem incorrectly. im just saying i catch myself doing things in a bad way vecai wanted to avoid conditionals for an irrational reason i think if you deal with oo languages a lot, especially ones with many layers of abstraction like enterprise java code, it's easy to forget that at the bottom of your DI and encapsulation and SOLID turtles, there's a switch statement and that's just fine. these days i am sort of just embracing the switch statement. it's like a big line of demarcation in my code that says 'hey, you know all of that logic we've been hand waving away with fancy oo code? yeah this here is where we deal with it'
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:17 |
|
HoboMan posted:ok, fine, i'll ask and out myself as not one of the cool kids. what's the deal with "lomarf"? MALE SHOEGAZE posted:these days i am sort of just embracing the switch statement. it's like a big line of demarcation in my code that says 'hey, you know all of that logic we've been hand waving away with fancy oo code? yeah this here is where we deal with it' I wish somebody would make a popular language with a switch statement that was a SLOC savings over if-else
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:23 |
|
Some uni in Bolivia has the PDFs on their website lol
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:36 |
|
use library genesis
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:42 |
|
HoboMan posted:ok, fine, i'll ask and out myself as not one of the cool kids. what's the deal with "lomarf"? lomarf
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:49 |
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:a lomarf is the smallest possible unit of funny computer
|
|
# ? May 23, 2016 17:49 |
|
LordSaturn posted:
mls (ocaml, haskell, f#, elm), erlangs (erlang, elixir, lfe), rust, scala, clojure or prolog?
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:16 |
|
LordSaturn posted:I wish somebody would make a popular language with a switch statement that was a SLOC savings over if-else verilog has amazing case statements that don't really make sense outside of hardware. the control expression and case values can be interchanged, i.e. control expressions can be constant and case values variables. there's casex and casez which support dont-care and high-impedance values. there are keywords 'unique' and 'priority', although they just map to simulation assertions and help the synthesizer with optimizations. like this is perfectly legal: code:
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:28 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i sort of get where he is coming from. it's the feeling that if you need if statements, youve modeled the problem incorrectly. Now that you say this, in the python project imbworking on just now, Indont think I've seen many uses of if-then-else, it's all just really crazy inheritance and extreme OOIsm (that makes it hard to understand the flow of what's happening to virgin eyes)
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:28 |
|
LordSaturn posted:I wish somebody would make a popular language with a switch statement that was a SLOC savings over if-else swift
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:40 |
|
JawnV6 posted:if-else chains are a sequence of conditional checks and jumps. they're executed in order and a lengthy has worse runtime than a switch. LOC is irrelevant at my C shop, every single letter of code I write has to pass review by people who don't understand pointer arithmetic. LOC is absolutely relevant. obviousness is king. a new language obviously wouldn't help me, I was just curious to see what language would do it better than C
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:41 |
|
GameCube posted:hmm. the ebook alone is 35 smackeroos. i'm poor right now, though - and, soon, i'll be even more poor... house-poor.. i wonder if i can convince someone to buy this book for me. a used paperback version is like $25. i don't know your financial situation but i think it's worth $50.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 18:44 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 22:01 |
|
raminasi posted:a used paperback version is like $25. i don't know your financial situation but i think it's worth $50. i'm so freaking poor that i got myself a library card last week.
|
# ? May 23, 2016 19:03 |