|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Hygiene can be trickier than that. Sometimes people just legitimately never learn how it all works. Second, poor hygiene can be a sign of depression. Yea, thinking on it further he probably can't JUST drop the guy. There probably needs to be a paper trail of the guy continuously failing, despite documented notifications and repeated warnings. I'm all for $assistant succeeding, but I'm also out of patience with a few of my own coworkers. Of course, I don't owe a guy I'll never see a dozen states away any slack 
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 05:53 |
|
|
RFC2324 posted:I usually let them know the new password on the way out, and tell them what I did to improve performance and security. For my curiousity, do you enjoy getting tech support calls for the next 12 months about totally unrelated things because they associate the fact you touched something IT related so you must have broken something else?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
iajanus posted:For my curiousity, do you enjoy getting tech support calls for the next 12 months about totally unrelated things because they associate the fact you touched something IT related so you must have broken something else? Its never happened at a place where they could later locate me, oddly. They always end up calling someone who knows nothing.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:I usually let them know the new password on the way out, and tell them what I did to improve performance and security. This is illegal hth.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 09:46
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:This is illegal hth. Very much so. RFC2324 was very lucky no one took exception to it, I'd recommend no one do the same.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 11:31
|
|
|
To clarify, it's not illegal to tell them, it's illegal to access their system without authorisation even if you don't have to break in.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 12:51
|
|
|
Ghostlight posted:To clarify, it's not illegal to tell them, it's illegal to access their system without authorisation even if you don't have to break in. True, and using a default user/pass is technically already breaking in, so be careful.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 12:59
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:
I hope everything will turn out ok for your son, Hang in there. You have been an inspiration for me in this thread
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:This is illegal hth. It's the dumbest thing as well. Hey, your security sucks because of XYZ.WHAT? YOUR UNDER ARREST!* Proceeds to have all of their customer credit cards stolen.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:It's the dumbest thing as well. I get it, but the way the law is worded it's the same as wandering into someone's house because their door is unlocked. And we're talking about actually changing settings, not just telling them "your security sucks".
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 14:07
|
|
|
Yeah maybe drop them an email with a few sentences to explain the problem and the fix and wait to hear back from them. Or just ignore it.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 14:15
|
|
|
flosofl posted:I get it, but the way the law is worded it's the same as wandering into someone's house because their door is unlocked. Yeah nobody writes a law saying 'it's illegal to gain unauthorised access to a network, unless it's totally small beans and they were using the default password'.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 14:58
|
|
|
Would anyone be interested in the latest CE story?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Stop it you tease
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:46
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Would anyone be interested in the latest CE story? 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Would anyone be interested in the latest CE story? 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Would anyone be interested in the latest CE story?  
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Would anyone be interested in the latest CE story? You did this on purpose
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
The story is that the CE is his time traveling son from the future.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
GreenNight posted:The story is that the CE is his time traveling son from the future. No at some point in his future larches will travel into the past and slowly become the CE who lets face it, has a great job: spends his time making money, probably stealing hardware and funds, doing almost no work, plays pranks on his younger self and knows he can't be fired BECAUSE HE WAS NEVER FIRED
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
What happened, happened.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
GreenNight posted:The story is that the CE is his time traveling son from the future. Better - has anyone seen Predestination or read "All You Zombies"? Not gonna spoil, but yeah, I'm going with that.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Customer called in with complaints of bad audio, dropped calls, just overall poor audio performance on a PBX. Fix your poo poo level3. Alighieri fucked around with this message at 20:49 on May 24, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
 Hey, I can't get to ${SERVER} Okay, what happens when you try? It doesn't work.(sigh) okay, whats your IP address? MY IP is 206.100.public.notprivate-addressI am not going to bother, I'm not desktop support, i'll let them handle this bullshit.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
Alighieri posted:Customer called in with complaints of bad audio, dropped calls, just overall poor audio performance on a PBX. From a friend who works at L3: ignore that our ear/car/bar routers deprioritize ICMP heavily on the first sign of load middle hops of traceroutes do NOT show anything valuble as far as a failure point
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Migishu posted:From a friend who works at L3: The one failing at 98% is fine, it's the one that has 7000ms average response that seems odd, why respond at all if your going to be 7 seconds late. Customer has a PRI going into an Ad-tran we have no control over anyways so not really our issue, opened ticket with their carrier.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
Sorry guys, not being a dick, I was writing up the tale when some poo poo came in so I'm dealing with that. CE shenanigans are coming though.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Sorry guys, not being a dick, I was writing up the tale when some poo poo came in so I'm dealing with that. Step one on the larches life improvement plan: Stop apologizing for stuff that is neither your fault nor your purview
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:Step one on the larches life improvement plan: These shenanigans do not concern us.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:Stop apologizing for stuff that is neither your fault nor
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 21:28
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:Step one on the larches life improvement plan: Be an insufferable cockbag, got it.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
You are ready for management.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:You are ready for management. But is management ready for me? 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:But is management ready for me? POoooooooooost POST POST POST GODDAMMIT YOU
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:But is management ready for me? Are you ready to announce a widely anticipated posting initiative, and then compound it with delays?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
I will patiently wait for the next entry in the Larches Saga. But only because I have to work and can't pay attention to the forum to constantly 
|
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
18 Character Limit posted:Are you ready to announce a widely anticipated posting initiative, and then compound it with delays? Not my fault. I'm not apologizing.  I'm writing it up now. Going slow since it's on my phone A Frosty Witch fucked around with this message at 23:06 on May 24, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Not my fault. I'm not apologizing. 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 05:53 |
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Not my fault. I'm not apologizing. CT
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 00:01
|
|
