|
what are you using to do it? i'd like to give it a go
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 06:06 |
|
|
http://www.openwatcom.org dig up a DOS4GW.EXE and you can make protected mode dos (or win3.1 lol) programs that run in dosbox
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Wheany posted:please stop posting weird porn you downloaded from a bbs in the early 90s please don't stop making s.exe
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:http://www.openwatcom.org cool, thanks!
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:laughed out loud in real life same. it also made me think harder about tags, gonna try to incorporate them on one of our projects where they make sense. most of the other projects are just web dev every ticket goes straight to prod chaos, unfortunately.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i think monoqc is right that the paren free style of elixir makes it actually pretty bad. it just wont not feel clunky to me it's me i'm the erlang apologist being smug about syntax
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:it's me i'm the erlang apologist being smug about syntax 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
go is neat but yeah empty interfaces are dumb as hell
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
go is bad and not having a proper ide makes all the interface bullshit annoying elixir will be a mess of unmaintained dsls in a few years because they're all ruby developers
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:property-based testing you should put these posts up on your blog
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
redleader posted:you should put these posts up on your blog I might. Been a while since I posted anything there. Thanks for the idea.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:http://www.openwatcom.org i used this at my internship. in 2011. lomarf!
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:elixir will be a mess of unmaintained dsls in a few years because they're all ruby developers at least elixir users will be able to graduate to erlang. poor ruby devs.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:go is bad and not having a proper ide makes all the interface bullshit annoying visual studio code is actually a great go ide
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
go has oracle (lol) and other things which are essentially the backend for an ide. it works well. emacs suppots it and it gives you ast and scope aware suggestions / completion. im not super familiar with its features but it's very smart
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:it's me i'm the erlang apologist being smug about syntax. fixed
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:04
|
|
|
another nice thing about go is that the spec is light reading. it's not good enough for someone wanting to implement a compiler, but it's good enough for someone learning the language and that's cool.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
Yeah what I want from a spec is not enough information to create an implementation
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
Bloody posted:Yeah what I want from a spec is not enough information to create an implementation yes and no
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
it needs another spec for implementors but there are like, very few implementors and very many users so tell me which one is more valuable
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
if you say this you end up with xml and no-one has time to implement it properly so despite having namespaces, schemas, binary encodings, none of them really work or interoperate i guess the alternative is ending up with json, where most people implement it ok still, people them implement their own schemas, namespaces, binary encodings and none of them really work or interoperate
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
Bloody posted:Yeah what I want from a spec is not enough information to create an implementation specs that describe behaviour and expectations over implementation and function are often more useful well, sometimes turns out that it's more of a social problem than a technical one so
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
go has at least solved the coding style problem early with gofmt
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 05:18
|
|
|
can someone fill me in on what may have been meant with necessity to use non-pythonic components in a python module for parts that require triple for loops? just wrote triple for loop in straight python and it seems to be neither dysfunctional nor slow
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 06:27
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:go has at least solved the coding style problem early with gofmt yeah but they chose the wrong brace style, which is one more reason why I will never willingly use go
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 08:22
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:yeah but they chose the wrong brace style, which is one more reason why I will never willingly use go have your ide format the code they way you like (a wall of punctuation) and then run gofomt in a commit hook
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 09:12
|
|
|
it's easier just to not use go
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 12:22
|
|
|
use c# imo. did they ever fix go's horrendous import system
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 14:14
|
|
|
reminder that it takes like 9 seconds to run a hello world app on linux in .net core
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:use c# imo. no, but govendor is ok
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:reminder that it takes like 9 seconds to run a hello world app on linux in .net core i think nowadays many distros ship with mono by default too
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
idk why anyone would use go for anything.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:idk why anyone would use go for anything. there's a hint in the thread title
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
is the hint "car extends vehicle"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
pokeyman posted:is the hint "car extends vehicle"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:i think nowadays many distros ship with mono by default too i was talking to someone who worked for a financial place and they apparently have a lot of success running stuff in mono but it just seems like a lot of effort and I really like that compiled go stuff doesn't have any dependencies so I can just poo poo out some little executables and hand them off and say "drop this in your path and run it". for server stuff, I can just make a dockerfile with an onbuild image, shove it into a repo then have TeamCity or w/e run the build and tests then publish the container to a registry and it all just kinda works. I'd never want to use go for a lot of stuff, but where it works, it works pretty well I think
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
pokeyman posted:is the hint "car extends vehicle"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:i was talking to someone who worked for a financial place and they apparently have a lot of success running stuff in mono but it just seems like a lot of effort this works for pretty much any non-plang dependency manager, i don't see why that's special for go
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
Brain Candy posted:this works for pretty much any non-plang dependency manager, i don't see why that's special for go idk, go seems a lot easier to use than the alternatives. java requires the jre, c/c++ native binaries are their own horrible clusterfuck, c# is either targeting core clr (which is slow outside of windows) or mono (requires you to package the runtime or have the user install it themselves). for server stuff then yeah it's not really special
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 06:06 |
|
|
rust and haskell
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2016 20:12
|
|