|
did the daughter also ask why the income inequality gap keeps rising
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
It's because men keep dressing like women and taking all the high paying jobs that would've gone to women because the men are biologically superior and the companies can't discriminate against them because of PC CULTURE.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
Where is that "Drinking Pee Is Good, Says Man" image, again? And was that for Matt Walsh or someone else? I feel the need to repost that everytime that persons says something awful.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:Guy is a prick but i remember my dad being mad and sad at the news after i asked him, what a blowjob was because of the clinton affair scandals. Maryland. It boggles my mind that this state spawned both John Waters and Matt Walsh.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
They hate it when teachers dare to talk about sex education so its no surprise expanding on the already dreaded birds and the bees would be something Walsh would detest as more work on his part. "WHAT THE gently caress DOES THIS LITTLE poo poo WANT FROM US? I BOUGHT A SHOTGUN! I'VE DONE MY DUTY AS A FATHER, drat IT". Crabtree fucked around with this message at 06:42 on Jun 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 06:37
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:After a few minutes of research, here you go: If I understand you right, then the argument for hate speech laws is: 1) They set the boundaries of public discourse 2) Assholes get what's coming to them If I have either of those wrong, that's my bad and I apologize. I have no specific issue with the first point, other than questioning whether the state is the actor best suited to set those boundaries. But I don't think "they get what's coming to them" is a legitimate enough idea to justify any action, and definitely not state action.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 07:48
|
|
|
Von Sloneker posted:That Milo dipshit is having some kind of event at UC Irvine tonight at 10 EST. I think last night's (or the night before) got canceled. I'm not even sure what he does but I'm guessing I'll be annoyed by it. Lot of explaining to be done to conservative parents by their good sons hopping on the "Dangerous human being Tour"
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 07:59
|
|
|
Chantilly Say posted:If I understand you right, then the argument for hate speech laws is: That's basically it. In a civilized society, I think it is one of the duties of the State to censure people like Le Pen. For example, Trump's rhetoric has already tapped into a very violent reactionary id in American politics. This is not a new thing, it has always been there. But a long string of demagogues have created a pretty nasty powder keg. Hate speech laws aren't going to make things like white racism go away, but they serve to delegitimize both the ideology and the clowns peddling it. Crazy racists party gets 10% of the vote while bleeding funds due to hate speech court cases? Not good, but you've got the forces of law and media saying "look at these clowns, they are clowns." Contrast that with people like Trump, W, Reagan or Goldwater where the law and media collude to legitimize them. In your guts, you know they are nuts.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 08:28
|
|
|
When you support hate speech you are saying society has a right to act against what it considers blasphemy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 08:41
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:That's basically it. Maybe it's just an issue of philosophy. I don't want to make my gut feelings other people's business. But the idea of the State de-legitimizing these ideologies is a really intriguing one to me, because the mechanism by which the State is able to do that has to be dependent on people saying "it's illegal therefore it must be bad."
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 08:51
|
|
|
It's funny how at the beginning of the whole trans debate, one of the most common conservative arguments was along the lines of "Why should we need to change our laws for such a tiny minority? There are only a handful of them around in the first place!". Yet now there are apparently roving packs of them going around in every city, and you can't even go to a single public bathroom without stumbling over at least three transpeople in the process.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:It's funny how at the beginning of the whole trans debate, one of the most common conservative arguments was along the lines of "Why should we need to change our laws for such a tiny minority? There are only a handful of them around in the first place!". Yet now there are apparently roving packs of them going around in every city, and you can't even go to a single public bathroom without stumbling over at least three transpeople in the process. Speaking of roving packs of three transgender people as well as 'SEE, this minority gets it!' http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...theres-a-twist/
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 09:16
|
|
|
King Dopplepopolos posted:I tweeted this at him. No response so far. I should join Twitter so I can do that nonstop until he blocks me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 11:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/738515686591463424 I take solace in the idea that his kids will grow up and realize what a terrible father they have l.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 12:13
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:
Which should be tempered by the fact it'll take years of therapy to undo all the damage he caused.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/738515686591463424 Also the fact that this, too, did not actually happen
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:14
|
|
|
Gustav posted:Also the fact that this, too, did not actually happen Someone should point out that lying is a sin.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:28
|
|
|
comes along bort posted:Which should be tempered by the fact it'll take years of therapy to undo all the damage he caused. I only hope that when theyou reach the point in their lifetimes where they start to put it all together, but they are in a situation where their needs are met and they will be emotionally supportive as they deal with what will be a very difficult time in their lives.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:29
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/738515686591463424 and in ten years Walsh will kill himself after hearing, "I'm not a girl, I'm a boy!" from the same daughter.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:46
|
|
|
Rick_Hunter posted:Speaking of roving packs of three transgender people as well as 'SEE, this minority gets it!' I'm really at a loss on the takeaway from this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
What come next once they realize that this transgender panic isn't getting any traction outside of their bubble?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
they only really care about being top dog inside the bubble though
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:40
|
|
|
Nah they like loving over people on a national scale as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:45
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/toddstarnes/status/738708257066258434
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:58
|
|
|
THAT'S the guy who got the "drinking pee is good, says man" tweet. Now I just need to find a link to it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:04
|
|
|
Takoluka posted:I'm really at a loss on the takeaway from this. Many people are exactly as tolerant as they need to be to accept themselves
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/738515686591463424 Maybe Walsh's daughter has a future as the person that actually stands outside bathrooms and makes sure you're the right sex. Seems uniquely precocious.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:40
|
|
|
What's this gravy on my dipstick...
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:53
|
|
|
The problem with laws against hate speech in america vs. other western countries is that it's up to the judiciary to determine what hate speech is, and as far as I know, america is the only western country with a justice system that was built from the ground up as a white supremacist enforcement agency. I mean sure you can argue that the right will find any excuse to imprison people they don't like for sedition but I don't think we need to give them any more legitimacy in their actions and I certainly don't think that hate speech laws would result in any significant quantity or quality of Brother Deans or Milos thrown in prison or deported. Like how black people are overrepresented in hate crime convictions. Hate speech laws are a theoretically good idea but only if paired with responsible and judicious justice system, which we definitively do not have.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
Bushiz posted:The problem with laws against hate speech in america vs. other western countries is that it's up to the judiciary to determine what hate speech is, and as far as I know, america is the only western country with a justice system that was built from the ground up as a white supremacist enforcement agency. Sadly true. We'd need massive reforms to our entire justice and legislative systems before we get to the point where such a law wouldn't be immediately abused.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
Hate speech incites violence against out groups and normalizes it by saying "oh its ok, billy bob can say whatever he wants, we can't tell him to not say that" Meanwhile sensible people get drowned out by the drooling retards who use hate speech to push their message. It's one side is louder than the other and therefore they are right. This is how america makes its policy. Isn't the US supposed to be a world leader? Lead the world in making a new hate speech law if you don't like any others. But hate is the biggest thing driving america so it'll never be fixed. Easier to keep the poors fighting against themselves, while they get hosed in the rear end by the rich
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
Fried Watermelon posted:
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
Fried Watermelon posted:Hate speech incites violence against out groups and normalizes it by saying "oh its ok, billy bob can say whatever he wants, we can't tell him to not say that" your av is appropriate because I can easily picture you flapping your hands around as you make this nonsense post.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Bushiz posted:The problem with laws against hate speech in america vs. other western countries is that it's up to the judiciary to determine what hate speech is, and as far as I know, america is the only western country with a justice system that was built from the ground up as a white supremacist enforcement agency. I think you have an overly-rosy view of non-American justice systems.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:37
|
|
|
This reads like a 13 year old trying to afirm their sexuality with a SI swimsuit edition.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:37
|
|
|
By all means, colleges should not be letting self loathing masc4masc neonazis on campus and certainly not paying them with title IX money and people should continue to disrupt and shut down those speeches(though I do wish they were better about it), but establishing laws against hate speech, in the modern political climate, will result in 20 people associated with black lives matter in prison for each channer that gets a slap on the wrist, and the assholes who make a profession out of it will never see a courtroom.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Zeroisanumber posted:I think you have an overly-rosy view of non-American justice systems. I do not mean to imply that non-american justice systems are good, just less bonkers hosed up nightmares  Crowsbeak posted:This reads like a 13 year old trying to afirm their sexuality with a SI swimsuit edition. I'm still unconvinced that Todd Starnes isn't a character being played by Patton Oswalt
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:This reads like a 13 year old trying to afirm their sexuality with a SI swimsuit edition. He is single and he has to put his dipstick somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
Bushiz posted:Hate speech laws are a theoretically good idea but only if paired with responsible and judicious justice system, which we definitively do not have. Honestly, not really; hate speech laws are at best a bandaid that "treats" a symptom of the real problem by letting you arrest the occasional David Duke while also letting shitheads arrest the Martin Luther Kings of the world because they're not being polite enough in asking for their rights. Does anyone even have evidence (beyond annecdotes) that these laws actually make life better for at-risk minorities in the first place? Because they clearly don't do anything to stem the growth of actual racist organizations.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
Bushiz posted:By all means, colleges should not be letting self loathing masc4masc neonazis on campus and certainly not paying them with title IX money and people should continue to disrupt and shut down those speeches(though I do wish they were better about it) I think my favorite counter demonstration/disruption of a Neo -Nazi speech rally was when literal professional clowns showed up and just made jokes about them the entire time with people stopping to laugh at them. When the neo-nazis broke down and started shouting white power the clowns replied with "Wait what? White flour?" And pulled out bags of flour and stated pelting each other with it. The neo nazis just kind of faded away and the entire demonstration broke apart with everyone in attendance laughing at them
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 17:02
|
|
