|
OK then it's settled, I'm gonna put this thread on lock til Sunday to prevent any further stupidity. If I forget and it's still closed by Sunday evening (a distinct possibility), alert a mod.
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 12:08 |
|
|
Don't close discussion threads. Doesn't matter if you're the OP or not. If you have a problem with a thread alert a mod. If there's off topic non-show related stuff going on then knock it off.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
Ohhh hey, I just took a break from the thread once people brought up kneepad theory, how have things been since.... 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
Everyone's all upset about the tabs/spaces discussion, but this is what really bothers me:kiimo posted:less Big Head. Crazy talk! I think Big Head is the fictional character that I'd most want to be friends with.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Veskit posted:Ohhh hey, I just took a break from the thread once people brought up kneepad theory, how have things been since.... poo poo got real
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Sand Monster posted:Everyone's all upset about the tabs/spaces discussion, but this is what really bothers me: Say what you want about Big Head. He's got balls. Two big, heavy, balls.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
No Jin Yang the past two episodes. WHAT IN THE gently caress!
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Will Richard become CEO? Will Vince get the movie?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
Holyshoot posted:No Jin Yang the past two episodes. WHAT IN THE gently caress! He's just been in his room the last 2 weeks chain smoking.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
Every day that you're ripping off Erlich is a special occasion.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
Holyshoot posted:No Jin Yang the past two episodes. WHAT IN THE gently caress! I'm hoping his app becomes huge suddenly and now Big Head gets a piece of that pie. Somehow Erlich gets nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Did we ever come to a consensus as to whether or not leaking the plans for the skunk works was done on purpose? Because a couple of redditers I know swore that the fact that they promised to make the box first and then work on the platform proved that they planned it all along. Which didn't make sense to me, because I thought their secret plan was to spin their wheels as long as possible on the box while working on the platform in secret so they could present it instead of the box when it was time for everyone to show their hands, as it were. Now I'm confused. Excuse me while I press the space bar 8 times.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 07:35
|
|
|
X-O posted:Don't close discussion threads. Doesn't matter if you're the OP or not. If you have a problem with a thread alert a mod. If there's off topic non-show related stuff going on then knock it off. I gotta say, I'm not a big fan of Erlich this season. Before, he was an rear end in a top hat, but he was charming and he genuinely cared about the success of Pied Piper, even though sometimes it was tough love and other times it involved humiliating anyone that stood in its way. Now, he's just an rear end in a top hat who's leeching off of Bighead. Well, I guess I should say "leeched off of Bighead" now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 07:45
|
|
|
Erlich is reminding me of Taco from later seasons of The League, when they lost track of how to write him as thoughtless and tactless but not actively malevolent and turned him into an aggressive rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 14:03
|
|
|
I'm hoping Richard and Erlich's degeneration is a deliberate choice rather than inattention. It could be 'success/money changes people.'
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Pope Guilty posted:Erlich is reminding me of Taco from later seasons of The League, when they lost track of how to write him as thoughtless and tactless but not actively malevolent and turned him into an aggressive rear end in a top hat. Sure ain't THAT bad yet though, christ what a tire fire of a show The League turned into
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
tarlibone posted:Did we ever come to a consensus as to whether or not leaking the plans for the skunk works was done on purpose? Because a couple of redditers I know swore that the fact that they promised to make the box first and then work on the platform proved that they planned it all along. I think the consensus is that it would have been a masterstroke had it been intentional, and it wasn't reading unreasonably deeply into the episode's title to think that it was, but in the end Richard is a clutzy doofus.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I think the consensus is that it would have been a masterstroke had it been intentional, and it wasn't reading unreasonably deeply into the episode's title to think that it was, but in the end Richard is a clutzy doofus. This seems like a pretty reasonable consensus to me. In the end it didn't really seem like it was intentional, but I don't think that the theory that it was intentional was some Fox Mulder  theory either.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
If it were intentional, they audience would've been told by now. We weren't. It wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
LividLiquid posted:If it were intentional, they audience would've been told by now. We weren't. It wasn't. Yeah I don't think it's really arguable that it was intentional, knowing what we know now. But I also don't think that it being intentional was an unreasonable guess at the end of Meinertzhagen's Haversack.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
It being intentional wouldn't have been funny. It was just a good joke that people thought about a little too much.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
Mike's voice will never die.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 04:42
|
|
|
MiddleOne posted:Mike's voice will never die. That fateful line… "I tell you what."
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I think the consensus is that it would have been a masterstroke had it been intentional, and it wasn't reading unreasonably deeply into the episode's title to think that it was, but in the end Richard is a clutzy doofus.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 12:16
|
|
|
Somewhat related, just rewatched the last finale and Richard also nearly destroys his company then by letting his cell run out of battery after the trial, then dropping his keys and kicking them down a gutter while running out to his car.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 12:46
|
|
|
sticklefifer posted:At the end of the day this show is farce, and any debate as to whether a character is really that dumb or not defers to it being farce. Exaggerated actions and improbable situations for comic effect are the bread and butter of the genre. Yup, this isn't Arrested Development where there's millions of hidden jokes and foreshadowing through out the season. Everything is played straight forward and honestly I think it works really well with the cast.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
you guys are all forgetting what's important about tonight's episode: we're getting the return of Gilfoyle's girlfriend
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
Troy Queef posted:you guys are all forgetting what's important about tonight's episode: we're getting the return of Gilfoyle's girlfriend I literally can't remember a single thing about her last appearance. Not even which season it was in.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
MiddleOne posted:I literally can't remember a single thing about her last appearance. Not even which season it was in. She's a Satanist who wants to have sex with Dinesh, and Gilfoyle is fine with that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Medullah posted:She's a Satanist who wants to have sex with Dinesh, and Gilfoyle is fine with that. Nah Gilfoyle was just loving with Dinesh except he was too high to remember it
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Krowley posted:Nah Gilfoyle was just loving with Dinesh except he was too high to remember it 
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
Medullah posted:She's a Satanist who wants to have sex with Dinesh, and Gilfoyle is fine with that. Plus she's played by Milana Vayntrub (you know, the AT&T girl)
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
We can only hope she has just as big of a part in this new episode that she did the last one. Remember when she said "hi" to the guys and then later called Gilfoyle an rear end in a top hat?
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
I know where it is... IT'S IN THE BAY.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
Is your refrigerator running?
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
So will Dinnesh have coded in an awful bug that will kill the initial rollout?
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:29
|
|
|
Wow, a woman (one he's sweet on, no less) said something negative to Richard and he didn't explode and implode emotionally and took good advice in stride.M_Gargantua posted:So will Dinnesh have coded in an awful bug that will kill the initial rollout? That's been done. Also, how much do you want to bet that now that Bachman has cleaned his slate and done the right thing, he'll get Bighead's good karma? ...then promptly waste it and lose it, of course.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
Haha Monica is wearing the break up sweater when she goes to tell them how bad the beta is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 12:08 |
|
|
I knew Monica had bad news about the beta when I realized she was wearing the same beige sweater she wears (at Laurie's advice) to give the team bad news back in season 2. e: 
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 03:37
|
|