|
Zeroisanumber posted:I'll DolphinCop posted:i feel good about being on the right side of history Ghetto Prince posted:I toxxed for Obama because I believe in him; I'll Basically these are the reasons I toxxed for Hilldawg.
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 22:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:33 |
|
|
 Figure 1: The last thing Donald Trump will see on this Earth.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Hey I'm here to  for the Hillbeast maiming Trump like a dingo finding a helpless baby
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Step 1: Hillary crushes Donny Boy like a tin can, Democrats take back Senate Step 2: Gut the filibuster rules Step 3: Pour legislative boiling oil down the throats of every Republican
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AP/status/739975278483656705
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
When Hillary crushes the golden turd in November, can we get a special gang tag for everyone with the sack to Toxx before the convention?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
So let's say Hillary wins (probable) and Obama subsequently withdraws his Garland nomination. Assuming Obama holds off on another nomination until Clinton takes office, who does she select for the bench?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
It didn't take sack, just a basic grasp of mathematics
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:So let's say Hillary wins (probable) and Obama subsequently withdraws his Garland nomination. Assuming Obama holds off on another nomination until Clinton takes office, who does she select for the bench? Cornel West.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
'loving biased media is gonna call it for Hillary before the CA polls close'
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:So let's say Hillary wins (probable) and Obama subsequently withdraws his Garland nomination. Assuming Obama holds off on another nomination until Clinton takes office, who does she select for the bench? Karl Marx. mrmcd posted:When Hillary crushes the golden turd in November, can we get a special gang tag for everyone with the sack to Toxx before the convention? Mine better say "Dragged Kicking and Screaming to the YAAAS QUEEN"
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Slate Action posted:Step 1: Hillary crushes Donny Boy like a tin can, Democrats take back Senate Can we use real oil instead?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
First one then the other. Then more real oil.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:So let's say Hillary wins (probable) and Obama subsequently withdraws his Garland nomination. Assuming Obama holds off on another nomination until Clinton takes office, who does she select for the bench? Justice Barack Hussein Obama II.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Can we use real oil instead? Molten gold would be more poetic.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
A bunch of my friends are complaining about the AP calling the race tonight. One of them even said he was going to support Trump now that Bernie is done. The rest just repeated their hatred of Hillary. Meanwhile, I train for my Clinton 2016 fellowship this weekend. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:A bunch of my friends are complaining about the AP calling the race tonight. One of them even said he was going to support Trump now that Bernie is done. The rest just repeated their hatred of Hillary. It's really dumb of the AP to call the race tonight, especially when the decisive outcome is coming tomorrow. The Clinton campaign seemed upset, though not nearly as much as the Sanders people. Sort of casts a pall over the whole primary tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:It's really dumb of the AP to call the race tonight, especially when the decisive outcome is coming tomorrow. The Clinton campaign seemed upset, though not nearly as much as the Sanders people. I mean, I agree that it was dumb of them, and I wish they had waited until tomorrow, but they're only confirming what everyone has known for a week. If you genuinely think that Hillary isn't the presumptive nominee, then you either think Sanders is gonna get a blowout win tomorrow that puts him ahead in the delegate count, Sanders is going to convince enough super delegates to switch their votes to him that he has more delegates at the convention, or that Hillary is going to be indicted, which is basically saying that you hope you win the lottery. I don't think this helps the Clinton campaign any, certainly, but the end result isn't gonna change any.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
Clinton's upsetness was probably more about how if somehow in Cali a bunch of her supporters decide gently caress it it's over and she winds up losing in a squeaker she's going to personally Vince Foster whoever in AP released that story.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:I mean, I agree that it was dumb of them, and I wish they had waited until tomorrow, but they're only confirming what everyone has known for a week. I agree the whole thing is illusory, but that's been true for weeks. The media rush to MAKE THE CALL FIRST is maddening.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Clinton's upsetness was probably more about how if somehow in Cali a bunch of her supporters decide gently caress it it's over and she winds up losing in a squeaker she's going to personally Vince Foster whoever in AP released that story. My wife and I area still voting for her tomorrow for that exact reason. Both of our brothers are bernout's and holy poo poo have they been massive assholes via text messages after that AP story dropped.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:09
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Clinton's upsetness was probably more about how if somehow in Cali a bunch of her supporters decide gently caress it it's over and she winds up losing in a squeaker she's going to personally Vince Foster whoever in AP released that story. I'm glad the best word filter is still around.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
This is an easy win, might as well. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:39
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:I mean, I agree that it was dumb of them, and I wish they had waited until tomorrow, but they're only confirming what everyone has known for a week. Everyone has known for months. So what they're doing is trying to scoop the actual election for no loving reason other than being first. It would be like if on election eve 2012 they ran a story at 8:00pm that Obama was going to win the election. Yes, it is accurate and anyone following the race knew that it was going to happen. It's still wrong, and quite frankly, morally repugnant. Wait until the votes are cast or at the very least give your rear end in a top hat statement of fact a week or three before the election. We've known that Hillary was going to be the nominee since around the same time we knew Obama was going to be the nominee in '08. We also knew that there was no way the Super Delegates were going to over rule the entire primary season up to this point and give it to the candidate with less pledged delegates, who had lost. Call it when New Jersey closes it's polls, or wait until California votes. Don't come out 12 hours before the election with some old rear end news repackaged just to poo poo all over anyone coming out to vote tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
I might not agree with her 100% of the time, but I'm ready to watch Hilary get an insane number of electoral college votes, but not be able to do anything because the DNC local chapters loving suck and will barely be take advantage for the local races. EDIT: I'll still laugh if she loses the popular vote for the primary to Bernie 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:I might not agree with her 100% of the time, but I'm ready to watch Hilary get an insane number of electoral college votes, but not be able to do anything because the DNC local chapters loving suck and will barely be take advantage for the local races. Bernie's down by 3mil last I checked.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Bernie's down by 3mil last I checked. Yea, Bernie would have to win California by 30 points with a nearly 100% voter turnout (higher than ever in a primary election) for him to even come close to winning the popular vote.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
e_angst posted:Yea, Bernie would have to win California by 30 points with a nearly 100% voter turnout (higher than ever in a primary election) for him to even come close to winning the popular vote. Well, it was a lot funnier in my poorly informed head 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:Well, it was a lot funnier in my poorly informed head Thank you for submitting to mandatory reeducation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 06:59
|
|
|
Addressing a crowd of supporters at a midnight victory rally Monday, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton credited her triumph to the baleful, pitch-black tide of fate from which no man, woman, or child could ever hope to escape. “Our victory today is proof that the floodgates of history have opened, and the dire, unremitting current of inevitability has been loosed on the helpless masses,” said Clinton, bidding voters to surrender themselves to the advancing and all-consuming veil of destiny before its icy, ink-dark gloom laid waste to all who dared resist. “Do not attempt to flee or hide, for the stygian waters I have unleashed upon this earth will sweep along all in their path. Those who stand with me shall ride the crest of this woeful tidal bore all the way through November and unto the very steps of the White House itself. And let any who would try to stem this mighty surge be borne under the dark-winged waters, where their pleas for mercy will go unheard by the world, stifled and subdued forevermore.” At press time, Clinton was reminding supporters there was still plenty of work ahead to secure a win in California tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
bring me death madame president bring me darkness
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 07:09
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:So let's say Hillary wins (probable) and Obama subsequently withdraws his Garland nomination. Assuming Obama holds off on another nomination until Clinton takes office, who does she select for the bench? Obama won't withdraw Garland's nomination because it would look like he used a good man and talented jurist as a part of a cynical political ploy. If Hillary wins, I expect that the GOP will continue to obstruct until the next congress is sworn in. There's the off-chance that they'll confirm him, but I doubt it. They've been stuck on "fling yourself to the ground while screaming and making GBS threads your pants" as a political strategy for so long that I think they'll keep it up out of habit. As for who she'd pick, I don't know. The three indicators to look for beyond talent are: young-ish, minority, and liberal as all get out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 07:49
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton is a good candidate. I will happily vote for her on my birthday, November 8th 2016. Her presidency will be my birthday gift.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 10:18
|
|
|
Zeroisanumber posted:Obama won't withdraw Garland's nomination because it would look like he used a good man and talented jurist as a part of a cynical political ploy. If Hillary wins, I expect that the GOP will continue to obstruct until the next congress is sworn in. There's the off-chance that they'll confirm him, but I doubt it. They've been stuck on "fling yourself to the ground while screaming and making GBS threads your pants" as a political strategy for so long that I think they'll keep it up out of habit. No, the day after the election Garland will be fast tracked. They aren't going to roll the dice and hope Hillary doesn't appoint a Notorious RBG 2.0. Garland is their best case replacement for Scalia and they know it. Hillary's 5 minute long cackle to start her victory speech is going to light a fire under the Senate GOP to get what they can from Obama in the lame duck Congress.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Gyges posted:Hillary's 5 minute long cackle to start her victory speech Something like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgflCE7zRpc Also, this is my official for Hillary. I already did it for the primary, and I'm one of the few people in my friend groups who actually likes Hillary, so it's somehow become part of my identity.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
trapped mouse posted:Something like this? There's a lot more people who like Hillary than a brief browse of the internet would suggest. Partially this is because her strongest demographics (low-income people, minorities, and women) are exactly the demographics that are most poorly represented online, and partly that's because those demographics tend to get shouted down a lot. The prevailing narrative for a long time was "Hillary only has cynical oligarchs and deluded sheep following her, nobody actually likes her," which is preposterous on the face of it. But if you wish to position yourself as a follower of the Only Logical Candidate, you have to minimize the real reasons some people support your opponent. And of course if you live in the Right Wing Outrageosphere, it's simply impossible to grasp the concept of someone legitimately desiring obvious Satanic vagina-witch Shrillary Killaton as president.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
It also tends to include demographics which are non-confrontational aboit politics compared to others.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
Pick posted:It also tends to include demographics which are non-confrontational aboit politics compared to others. Yeah, my wife isn't confrontational at all yet is easily the biggest Hillary supporter I've ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
I like Hillary and Sanders. So um I guess shoot me?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:33 |
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:I like Hillary and Sanders. So um I guess shoot me? ur a monster
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2016 23:40
|
|