|
Ataxerxes posted:Well, that is not a simple matter. The Finnish cavalry of the Swedish forces was kinda badly equipped, notoriously lacking in the pistol department especially. The were, to my understanding, rather prone to charging due to this, at least in part. The thing is that the slogan that gives them their name "Hakkaa päälle!" (means pretty much "at 'em!" or "hack 'em down!") is a really decent warcry on its own, easy to chant and sounds rather badass in Finnish. Did the Swedes have Finnish-speaking cavalry troopers shouting that at the charge? That's very much possible. Did they have a cavalry formation called "Hakkapeliitta"? Maybe not. That the Hakkapeliittas formed a substantial part of the Swedish cavalry is most likely a later, nationalistic invention, but at least several cavalry regiments were raised in the Finnish-speaking areas and some of them did certainly see service in Germany. Don't feed him.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 00:57 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 20:43 |
|
In case you don't understand what Hogge Wild is talking about, check the time the post quoted by the dude asking the question was made.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 00:59 |
|
cheerfullydrab posted:Listen, I get the premise, but I was talking about the Soviet people in the novel not the Soviet state itself. JcDent posted:Nobody remembers that Rainbow Six is the book where hippies and environmentalists try to kill the world via a virus they developed by testing it on hobos and kidnapped club girls. Raskolnikov38 posted:I dunno what was more hilarious about Red Storm Rising, an attack on one oil refinery being enough to cripple the entire USSR or the soviets conquering Iceland with a single container ship.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 03:58 |
|
Red October is good in the way that in a sub Clancy didn't really have the space(HA!) to go off the deep end. LOL in Bear and the Dragon Russia is now part of NATO. Without Remorse is your pretty standard white male revenge fantasy but completely horrifying as he turns people into paste with a hyperbaric chamber. Ends with "You murdered a poo poo ton of people with extremely questionable methods, would you like to work for the CIA?". I really hope that no one took his writing seriously, but I know there are plenty.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 06:06 |
|
oohhboy posted:Red October is good in the way that in a sub Clancy didn't really have the space(HA!) to go off the deep end. LOL in Bear and the Dragon Russia is now part of NATO.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 06:19 |
|
oohhboy posted:Red October is good in the way that in a sub Clancy didn't really have the space(HA!) to go off the deep end. LOL in Bear and the Dragon Russia is now part of NATO. Was without remorse the one with Clark killing drug dealers? Reading and being unable to finish whichever one was that right after Rainbow 6 made teenage me realize how stupid Clancy was.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 06:29 |
|
Red Army by Peters is a good dad novel (that's how Cold War thread is calling them) and the most interesting thing about it is how he doesn't name drop tech. Like, half the boner I get from these books comes from people gushing about planes and tanks, but in Peters work, you can only guess for yourself. Is the recon vehicle at the start of the book a BMP-1 or BMP-2? It doesn't really matter to the plot and you can play a fun guessing game. inb4 "muh realism" because it doesn't end in graphic depiction of everyone dying in a nuclear exchange...
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 07:27 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:Was without remorse the one with Clark killing drug dealers? Reading and being unable to finish whichever one was that right after Rainbow 6 made teenage me realize how stupid Clancy was. Yeah, it's the "Prequel" for John Clark before he became John Clark. It pretty much embodies everything one could do wrong as a nation/person unless you just wanted to murder drug dealers in which it does in great detail and glee.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 07:36 |
|
Battlefield 1 gameplay! Time to be unhappy about scooting tanks and WWI parachute assaults!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 08:55 |
|
Alchenar posted:Churchill tried to micromanage like crazy. Fortunately Alan Brooke was an exceptionally capable Chief of the General Staff who was able stare him down over all his bad ideas. Oh man, I read Alanbrookes war diaries, I've never seen so much complaining about Churchill in a single book, let alone a single page!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 09:25 |
|
Hi thread! I'm putting together a (very) light strategic board game for a friend, based on the wars of medieval Europe. For balance purposes I need to divide the bit covered by today's Germany into two seperate regions/zones/provinces. Any thoughts on the least worst way to do this? Also I have learnt that maps of the HRE are literally incomprehensible.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:15 |
|
"Medieval" is pretty broad. What time period are you thinking?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:20 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Hitler entered a nasty cycle where things would go bad -> he'd blame his generals, and often either sack them and replace them with more optimistic men, or just begin managing battles himself. And of course, as things went worse for the Germans, he was taking on more personal responsibility. Stalin is kind of odd, in that he seems hyper involved in the day to day management of the war, but at some point learned to trust his generals. (Easy to do, I guess, when you got a guy like Zhukov working for you.) The British managed some appallingly bad ideas, but I don't know how much to blame specifically on Churchill. It's best to think of British strategy as a formulation of Churchill's saying 'in war, all things are on the move at once', that is to say 'fight everywhere, with everything you have'. In the early years of the war you have a lot of places to fight and nothing to fight with, so there's a lot of grasping at any scheme that looks like it might pay dividends. The key to Stalin is to realise that he understood very acutely that perception of events does not have to match reality. He could let his generals run things at key points and then take all the credit for victory - and he did, Zhukov basically ended up under house arrest after the war to keep him out of the picture. Hitler's perception of reality was never that grounded or pragmatic - he was right to insist on the Manstein-Guderian plan for France, but rather than just enjoy public credit for the victory seems to have genuinely believed it was entirely down to his strategic genius and forgot the contribution anyone else might have made.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:29 |
|
High medieval- no gunpowder, plenty of interestingly dreadful stabby things.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:31 |
|
Tree Bucket posted:Hi thread! I'm putting together a (very) light strategic board game for a friend, based on the wars of medieval Europe. For balance purposes I need to divide the bit covered by today's Germany into two seperate regions/zones/provinces. Any thoughts on the least worst way to do this? Also I have learnt that maps of the HRE are literally incomprehensible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wei%DFwurst%E4quator
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:43 |
|
Tree Bucket posted:Hi thread! I'm putting together a (very) light strategic board game for a friend, based on the wars of medieval Europe. For balance purposes I need to divide the bit covered by today's Germany into two seperate regions/zones/provinces. Any thoughts on the least worst way to do this? Also I have learnt that maps of the HRE are literally incomprehensible. Catholic and Protestant doesn't work, there's spots and enclaves and poo poo. House of Austria and the rest of the Empire? If you spread it out to more than just Germany you could have "Bohemian bits" and "German bits"
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:43 |
|
Draw the line further north, separate those fucks who speak Platte from the normal people? Anyway I'm back from a reenactment and my God do fat old Bavarian officers sure love their wine.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:45 |
|
HEY GAL posted:Draw the line further north, separate those fucks who speak Platte from the normal people? Oh me and my family you mean? jk I don't speak that poo poo and we're not German anyway, but north-south might still be the most logical divide though.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:50 |
|
Anachronistic east west divide? Don't forget to fortify the border.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:52 |
Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question Could the allies have effected a successful naval invasion of Western Europe prior to June 1944.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 12:57 |
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Drunk and nowhere near where a German cavalryman was supposed to be. glad he got to hang out with his opponent and have a beer or twelve before he died tho
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:04 |
|
Thanks, looks like I'll be going with the sausage equator method! It might be an Australian thing, but I have real problems getting my head around the history of any region that can't be defined by its coastline. Maybe if I start imagining the Alps as just a taller, rockier ocean with very few sharks?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:04 |
|
Tree Bucket posted:Thanks, looks like I'll be going with the sausage equator method! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire#/media/File:Holy_Roman_Empire_1648.svg it's a thing
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:09 |
|
HEY GAL posted:The Empire is...uh...it's a Okay, that works, there's a fair bit of coastline there. And I'm digging the bite taken out of the south east border by the Most Serene Republic... Again, apologies for butchering the history & culture of an entity ten times older than my home town for the sake of a board game, but if it's any consolation, even Byzantium had to be left out entirely.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:24 |
|
Disinterested posted:Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question Sure! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_invasion_of_Sicily https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_invasion_of_Italy
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:32 |
|
HEY GAL posted:Uh. Jeeze. Only two? You saw he said high mediaeval, right? No such thing as a Protestant yet and the top dogs are probably the Hohenstaufens.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:33 |
Disinterested posted:Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question And whenever you see Britain launching a naval invasion with one division along the french/german coast, remember the Dieppe Raid happened.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:36 |
|
feedmegin posted:You saw he said high mediaeval, right? No such thing as a Protestant yet and the top dogs are probably the Hohenstaufens.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:44 |
|
HEY GAL posted:yeah i was just collared by my morbid obsession and couldn't stop 17th century posting you're a maniac hegel, if you keep this up we are gonna take your signs of high office!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 13:50 |
|
WW2 Data The Japanese Inventory for WW2 is finally over! What rifle grenades did the Japanese use? Which one carried a cartridge inside it? Why is the smoke rifle grenade given such an indepth description? What sabotage device will forever change how you view "Pineapple grenade?" Which sabotage device was skillfully done and which sabotage wasn't well thought out? All that at the blog! With the Russians and Japanese done, its time to move on to the thread-vote Italian and French explosive. And for those of you who have been reading since the beginning, thank you!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:00 |
|
HEY GAL posted:Ask Us About Military History: was just collared by my morbid obsession and couldn't stop 17th century posting
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:07 |
|
Disinterested posted:Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question From the wiki article abour Alan Brooke: "As CIGS, Brooke had a strong influence on the grand strategy of the Western Allies. The war in the west unfolded more or less according to his plans, at least until 1943 when the American forces still were relatively small compared to the British. Among the most crucial of his contributions was his opposition against an early landing in France, which was important for delaying Operation Overlord until 1944." It would probably have been a disaster.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:21 |
|
Disinterested posted:Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question They tried that with the Dieppe raid and that didn't go so well.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:33 |
|
The Allies could certainly have invaded France in 1943 if they desired but it would be at the cost of the Mediterranean operations and Churchill probably wouldn't have stood for it. There may also have been some problems letting Italy recover after its North African disaster.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:38 |
|
Beevor points out in his Overlord book that as last as spring 1944 an assessment of most of the US divisions slated for the invasion scored them as unfit for combat and there was a massive remedial training effort to get the Army ready to go in time.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:43 |
|
Alchenar posted:Beevor points out in his Overlord book that as last as spring 1944 an assessment of most of the US divisions slated for the invasion scored them as unfit for combat and there was a massive remedial training effort to get the Army ready to go in time. US divisions received remedial training all throughout 1944 even after the invasion though no doubt the experience in Italy helped a lot.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:47 |
|
Disinterested posted:Since I'm sure some core threadposters have been playing HoI4 - and experiencing the bizarre phenomenon of giant allied naval invasions in 1939 and 1940 - I'd like to ask a pretty well trodden WW2 militaria question Weather allowing, yes - May 1944 is prior to June 1944, right?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 14:52 |
|
100 Years Ago Yesterday: The ground has been prepared now for the Battle of Mont Sorrel; the men go over after midnight. General Petain is deeply worried about the prospects for Verdun if something doesn't change soon; the Emilio Lussu Comedy Cavalcade continues with, er, some brutal and unflinching memories of combat; Clifford Wells does some Lewis gun training to try to make himself more attractive to potential employers; General Haig continues dreaming about the possibilities of an amphibious attack on Ostend; E.S. Thompson has been predictably censored; Robert Pelissier prompts much-needed childish sniggers with his description of the queer trenches on the Vosges; and Oskar Teichman has heard a truly bizarre rumour. Today: The Canadian recapture of Mont Sorrel is a complete success. They've got to be careful about this, or they might get a reputation of being good at things! The Battle of Mecca isn't going so well for the rebels; Henri Desagneaux travels the Voie Sacree; one of Lt-Col Fraser-Tytler's guns is on fire; and Georges Connes notices that hard times have been put on the German people. Trin Tragula fucked around with this message at 15:14 on Jun 13, 2016 |
# ? Jun 13, 2016 15:07 |
feedmegin posted:Sure! Western.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 15:08 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 20:43 |
|
Tree Bucket posted:Okay, that works, there's a fair bit of coastline there. And I'm digging the bite taken out of the south east border by the Most Serene Republic... This sucks, gently caress you. Also I'd suggest the House of Welf as the dividing faction
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 15:13 |