|
Lizard Wizard posted:
Seen similar stuff in Sweden. Right-wing racist party don't like what the "established" press digs up about them, so they either treat them horribly at press events (like refusing to give them chairs to sit on) or they specifically ban certain reporters.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:05 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:44 |
BigglesSWE posted:Seen similar stuff in Sweden. Right-wing racist party don't like what the "established" press digs up about them, so they either treat them horribly at press events (like refusing to give them chairs to sit on) or they specifically ban certain reporters. Can you actually do that though? I thought there was a thing where you couldn't actually ban the press and have meetings and poo poo behind closed doors? Or am I just completely wrong again?
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:22 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:Seen similar stuff in Sweden. Right-wing racist party don't like what the "established" press digs up about them, so they either treat them horribly at press events (like refusing to give them chairs to sit on) or they specifically ban certain reporters. As a proud bernout and someone who for a flash of a second considered voting trump. Ahahahaha no he's proven time and again that he's a fascist. I'll vote Hillary without a shred of hesitation.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:50 |
|
IamnotJoe posted:Guns don't kill people. Gun Owners kill people. Let's just ban Gun Owners. You know a gun never killed nobody You can ask anyone People get shot by people People with guns
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:50 |
|
Canada is garbage when it comes to First nations issues, and one major problem here is a section of highway in northern British Columbia where a lot of women have gone missing or been murdered. The provincial government has finally put a bus route along this stretch of highway to try and prevent more women from being murdered. Most people see this as a good thing. Not so much for this one cheapskate rear end in a top hat. The response to him is even more horrid. No anonymity for the guilty here.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 02:56 |
Huh. I drove that highway on the way back from Alaska via the ferry system back in 2005. I had no idea that was a thing.
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 03:14 |
|
As we all know, no-one who has ever fired a gun has suffered from PTSD.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 03:28 |
|
RFC2324 posted:I've heard more than a few military guys point out that its stupid to trust a base full of 18-22 year olds who have been trained to kill at the drop of a hat. They have constant brawls on bases, and having those guys armed is not a good idea. Most weapons, down to and including fixed blade knives, are typically banned on bases unless you are on duty at the moment. In my experience (from living on base/being enlisted), you can have personal guns and other weapons in your home, but you can't just have a weapon on you unless you are assigned a duty that requires that weapon. You also have to qualify with that weapon to a certain degree of proficiency before they issue it to you. Folks that live in the barracks have to lock up their weapons in their unit's barracks unless they are taking it to the range. This is for a multitude of reasons, chief among them security (due to proximity) and the typical barracks dweller is young and immature. The policies may just be dependent upon which base you are talking about.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 03:34 |
|
Nuebot posted:Can you actually do that though? I thought there was a thing where you couldn't actually ban the press and have meetings and poo poo behind closed doors? Or am I just completely wrong again? I would have thought a private organisation (such as a political party) could have private events where they invite whoever they like and can keep anyone out who they don't like? Being a journalist doesn't give you the right to barge into private events.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 04:36 |
|
Tiggum posted:I would have thought a private organisation (such as a political party) could have private events where they invite whoever they like and can keep anyone out who they don't like? Being a journalist doesn't give you the right to barge into private events. You are correct. Every candidate has a gaggle of reporters following them, but candidates have been choosing which members of the press can and cannot have access to their presence for a long time.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 04:48 |
|
Tiggum posted:I would have thought a private organisation (such as a political party) could have private events where they invite whoever they like and can keep anyone out who they don't like? Being a journalist doesn't give you the right to barge into private events. Yeah wasn't this the whole thing with Mitt Romney's speech about 48% of the country being leeches? That was a closed republican event thingy that the press wasn't supposed to hear.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 04:58 |
|
For a good time jump on twitter and search #filibuster. It is 49 supportive tweets, then one "oh yeah, dems love to filibuster things like the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT". 49 support tweets then a "never seen a libitard do any work, this is a surprise". Good stuff.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 05:25 |
|
Elpato posted:In my experience (from living on base/being enlisted), you can have personal guns and other weapons in your home, but you can't just have a weapon on you unless you are assigned a duty that requires that weapon. You also have to qualify with that weapon to a certain degree of proficiency before they issue it to you. That's pretty much the entire reason they have people in the barracks lock up their personal weapons in the vault. Anyone who's seen the poo poo combat arms soldiers get up to in the barracks would want their guns locked up. Every unit I was in required the commander's written permission to withdraw your guns and then you had to have them back by the end of the duty day, so basically only during leave because the unit armorer isn't going to be there on the weekends. Some guys did have friends who lived off-post store them to avoid the hassle.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 06:41 |
|
GOTTA STAY FAI posted:You DON'T see mass shootings at is the dirty denny's not gun free? i dunno why but the dirty dennys bit made me laugh pretty hard
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 07:36 |
snergle posted:is the dirty denny's not gun free? You know the dirty dennys when you enter it.
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 07:49 |
|
Noun Verb 9/11
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 09:44 |
|
"Man, why did those people have to be gay, now I have to go back to 9/11 again to make my point"
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 12:42 |
|
Blind Pineapple posted:Noun Verb 9/11 I...uuuuh...what? What's the argument here? More guns on airplanes? Can we really be that stupid? Can out species really produce such ignorance?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 13:08 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:What's the argument here? More guns on airplanes? Can we really be that stupid? Can out species really produce such ignorance? The 9/11 hijackers killed thousands of people without guns, so therefore restricting access to guns wouldn't actually prevent any mass shooters from killing fifty people.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 13:32 |
|
Can we just go ahead and make 9/11 a national holiday where everyone enjoys fantastic sales and a three-day weekend? It's been fetishized for just about anything at this point, let's just say "Happy 9/11!" to each other and move on.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 13:37 |
|
You'll need a moment of silence.. to reflect on this BRAND NEW CARRRRRR
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 13:38 |
|
A second sale has just hit the tower and our prices are crumbling!
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 13:50 |
|
Jet fuel can't melt our deals! Gather all your Loose Change and come check out our brand new 2016 mattresses!
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:00 |
|
Watch Macy's start a loving sale.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:12 |
|
9/11 terrorists killed thousands of people without any guns, just planes. Now if everyone on that plane had their own plane this wouldn't have happened.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:18 |
|
9/11 terrorists we interviewed recommend sensodyne.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:20 |
|
Blind Pineapple posted:Noun Verb 9/11 I don't recall tens of thousands of rednecks going out and buying Boeing 767s after 9-11.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:23 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:I...uuuuh...what? Looking for an actual argument in a Facebook macro ? C'mon you should know better. EmmyOk posted:9/11 terrorists we interviewed recommend sensodyne. Perfect
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:27 |
|
Oh Hell No posted:I don't recall tens of thousands of rednecks going out and buying Boeing 767s after 9-11. I'd like to see them try. Seriously, it'd be hilarious.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:31 |
|
She was bleeding in the ambulance while this was tweeted. Classy as gently caress. https://twitter.com/brokLI_farts/status/743433286605643777
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:31 |
|
Bad guys with planes will be stopped by good guys with planes. Duh.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 14:48 |
|
Considering the absurd amount of airstrikes the US has conducted in the middle east, I'd say they indeed fought planes with planes.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 15:29 |
|
Come on, in a real shooting situation you wouldn't be able to get your plane out of your blouse in time to do any good
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:04 |
|
Olympic gymnast posts a picture of a 16-year-old female gymnast's rear end with the caption “My sport has its moments.” http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/louis-smith-carly-patterson-sexualisation_uk_57627949e4b03f24e3db404a?xaiz4cxr (public page, cba hiding names)
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:11 |
|
Oh, here I thought the outfits were for flexibility. Silly me.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:13 |
|
Labour mp Jo Cox has been shot and stabbed and is now in critical condition in hospital. There are eyewitness reports of the attacker shouting Britain First (a far right organisation) during the attack.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:13 |
|
Brawnfire posted:Oh, here I thought the outfits were for flexibility. Silly me. Yes, because men wear the exact same thing right?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:17 |
|
ratbert90 posted:Yes, because men wear the exact same thing right? I don't actually know, who actually picks the outfits? Are they a provided uniform, or the athlete's personal clothing?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:30 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:44 |
|
Brawnfire posted:I don't actually know, who actually picks the outfits? Are they a provided uniform, or the athlete's personal clothing? Their more than likely a provided uniform. And I tend to agree; there's no good reason why females wear those outfits and men don't.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2016 16:32 |