|
Teflon Don posted:I thought Ford said gently caress movies I'm going to make fancy cabinets now? That's what I'm saying, the guy's got other interests. These projects like Star Wars and Blade Runner aren't the kind of thing you can film in 2 weeks. He's committed a lot more of his time the past several years to acting than I'd have guessed he would. Maybe the script is just that good? Hard to believe but you never know where the next Fury Road will come from.
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 06:29 |
|
|
He's more into flying his vintage planes, rescuing people lost in the woods via helicopter, and getting trashed in clubs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
http://www.theonion.com/article/harrison-ford-begs-agents-to-just-let-him-die-now-34408
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
He also really really likes to smoke weed. Like, lots and lots of weed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
Another batch of Character posters for Suicide Squad           Boomerang and Katana's are my favorites.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
If the movie actually combined those animated visuals with its live action elements Scott Pilgrim style I'd see it a dozen times in theaters. But it's all probably just marketing nonsense to try to make it seem more interesting than it is, unless they really did go back for reshoots to make it more fun.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm really digging the posters but the trailers make it look like not something I'd like to look at.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
Actually, the posters are pretty appropriate, not just pallet-wise - Just check out Joker's gang and the the supernatural villain in the subway:          
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
I like all the people in the movie, I like the people who made the movie and I like the people who marketed the movie. I'm not sure what it is about it that convinces me it will be infuriating dogshit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I like all the people in the movie, I like the people who made the movie and I like the people who marketed the movie. It stars a horny psycho clown
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
The whole reshoot thing seems like a good cop out for not giving David Ayer & co any credit. If you don't like the movie then it was a lost cause to begin with. If you do like the movie it's because they wised up and fixed a disaster.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Ayer did the reshoots. Also every movie does reshoots.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Ayer did the reshoots. Exactly.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I'm almost afraid to ask since I don't really care for Blade Runner but how is Harrison Ford's character still alive? Was he the only replicant who figured out how to live longer than a couple years? Maybe he was just a regular creep
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:06
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I'm almost afraid to ask since I don't really care for Blade Runner but how is Harrison Ford's character still alive? Was he the only replicant who figured out how to live longer than a couple years? I thought Ford thought the Deckard as replicant thing was dumb, so maybe this is a good way to troll.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
I hope this kickstarts a string of Blade Runner sequels, all unnecessary yet somehow packed with top talent across the board
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:14
|
|
|
Teflon Don posted:I thought Ford said gently caress movies I'm going to make fancy cabinets now? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
I'm assuming this thread is participating in one long, shared in-joke? because everyone keeps referring to Deckard as a replicant and oooh boy am I trembling with rage
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I like all the people in the movie, I like the people who made the movie and I like the people who marketed the movie. DAMAGED HA HA HA HA HA  Also, the DC cinematic universe has already shot itself in the dick twice while trying to get up and running.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I like all the people in the movie, I like the people who made the movie and I like the people who marketed the movie. The trailer had such great lines like "they're bad guys" "come on we're bad guys" "the voices in my head are telling me to kill you, hahaha, just kidding that's not what they're saying" "they are bad guys" and lest we forget "so we're some kind of suicide squad"
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
SciFiDownBeat posted:I'm assuming this thread is participating in one long, shared in-joke? Well, I'd assume if Ford is in the sequel that means we're getting a more definitive answer to that question. You're absolutely supposed to think that there's a strong possibility he's a replicant though, but no it shouldn't be like an accepted fact that he is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:20
|
|
|
"Reshoots" is a negative-sounding term that is used incorrectly. When you do reshoots it's because part of the story isn't working, or you recast a role, or your ending sucks, or you just made World War Z. The correct term for what 90% of features do these days is "pickups", where they film most of the movie but leave some money the budget for an extra few days to a few weeks of shooting to clean up any loose ends or unclear plot points, or to help tighten up the pacing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:You're absolutely supposed to think that there's a strong possibility he's a replicant though, but no it shouldn't be like an accepted fact that he is. I mean, this guy is producing it and has story credit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
Deckard is a replicant. Mark my words.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
SciFiDownBeat posted:I'm assuming this thread is participating in one long, shared in-joke? Please post your 13 page manifesto about why Deckard isn't a replicant, despite what the actors and directors and everyone involved with the film say.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Please post your 13 page manifesto about why Deckard isn't a replicant, despite what the actors and directors and everyone involved with the film say. Isn't Harrison Ford pissed that Ridley confirmed that Dekard's a replicant? According to Ford, "that was the main area of contention between Ridley and myself at the time. I thought the audience deserved one human being on the screen that they could establish an emotional relationship with. I thought I had won agreement to that, but in fact I think he had a little reservation about that. I think he really wanted to have it both ways."
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Please post your 13 page manifesto about why Deckard isn't a replicant, despite what the actors and directors and everyone involved with the film say. trying to decide between a quick rant in one long unbroken paragraph with multiple misspellings or a peer-reviewed research paper with quotes and citations
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
I mean, thematically the film falls apart if he's a replicant. The entire point is that Batty is "more human" than Deckard is, despite being artificial. That he is actually more empathetic than a cop who hunts down replicants and uses the word "retire" to distance himself from the reality that he's killing sentient, emotional creatures. A cop who practically sexually assaults a replicant because he doesn't view her as a valid being (until the end, after he sees the beauty and humanity in Batty). One who has no friends or emotional connections to anyone else in his life, unlike Batty who has surrounded himself with caring relationships. In his short time in life, Batty managed to be a far better human than Deckard had in an entire human lifespan. However, the unicorn memory (or dream, prior to the Final Cut) and Gaff's origami unicorn at the end are completely opposed to this reading. Clearly the film was conceived as ambiguous to whether or not Deckard is replicant and shows us evidence for both possibilities, but the unicorn is pretty damning and doesn't fit into the movie otherwise. I'm fine with it being metatexually definitive in one direction via Scott, though, because the important thing is that the film brings up the questions and explores them, not what the actual answers are. feedmyleg fucked around with this message at 22:09 on Jun 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
SciFiDownBeat posted:trying to decide between a quick rant in one long unbroken paragraph with multiple misspellings or a peer-reviewed research paper with quotes and citations Why not both?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
Maybe that's just what they want you to think. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:I mean, thematically the film falls apart if he's a replicant. I don't really agree because Deckard believes he is human for the entire movie, he acts the way he does under the assumption that he is human and always has been. He, and therefore the audience, learn the same lessons regardless of whether or not he's a replicant.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
I think the more important and ground-breaking theme is that Sean Young needed a emotional psych evaluation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I think the more important and ground-breaking theme is that Sean Young needed a emotional psych evaluation. James Woods would agree.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
They could play it ambiguous about how far along after the first it is, and thus Deckard's aged appearance could be because he's an old man, or because replicants 'degrade' in a similar way to humans. Or they could go all the way, and make it ambiguous if Ford is playing the same character as Deckard.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:I mean, thematically the film falls apart if he's a replicant. The entire point is that Batty is "more human" than Deckard is, despite being artificial. That he is actually more empathetic than a cop who hunts down replicants and uses the word "retire" to distance himself from the reality that he's killing sentient, emotional creatures. A cop who practically sexually assaults a replicant because he doesn't view her as a valid being (until the end, after he sees the beauty and humanity in Batty). One who has no friends or emotional connections to anyone else in his life, unlike Batty who has surrounded himself with caring relationships. In his short time in life, Batty managed to be a far better human than Deckard had in an entire human lifespan.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I like all the people in the movie, I like the people who made the movie and I like the people who marketed the movie. Because it's trying too hard. "Haha LooOK how WAAcckKY we are XD!!!" in movie promotional form
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 07:13
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:Because it's trying too hard. "Haha LooOK how WAAcckKY we are XD!!!" in movie promotional form No that was Deadpool.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 07:13
|
|
|
But that is staying true to the character.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 07:18
|
|
|
Suicide Squad the movie being obnoxious is staying true to Suicide Squad the characters too (post-reboot anyway). And at least Bohemian Rhapsody is old enough to be considered "a classic", as opposed to X Gon Give It To Ya, which just made the Deadpool trailers feel outdated. Lady Naga fucked around with this message at 07:36 on Jun 22, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 06:29 |
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:They didn't want to distract people from their surprise that it's being made. Either that or it's a vague court date announcement for Oscar Pistorious next year...
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 10:36
|
|
