|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Anyway that got me thinking about two things - one, is there any good quotes from DE types laying out anti-LGBT opinions? What to replace sexual orientation theory with Sexual orientation is a scientific theory, but when you say out loud what it entails, you laugh out loud. While I’m interested in the reasons for the lies of feminism and race-doesnt-exist-ism, sexual orientation is to me pretty clearly not a remotely serious proposition but just a Schilling point for the proggies. It appears barely believable when you sever your views about human sexuality from both reproduction and ethology. The next generation grows up watching The Discovery Channel, and will think more clearly by and large about ethological issues including the Jewish parasite. So I’m not here to say that sexual orientation is retarded, but to give pointers to where to look to be actually informed about the other choices humans have beyond marriage. Marriage is good for humans. It is also good for penguins and snowy owls, who go back to the same partners every breeding season. Peacocks, meanwhile, put on as much bling as they can afford, so they can get a hook up. Duck women can either get married, have steady boyfriends, hook up, or get raped. They have specially designed vaginas – vaginas, not cloacas – so they can have some control over whether they actually get inseminated by their rapists. Of course, we’re not supposed to talk about the fact that human women also can be raped and want to be raped by the most impressive man. Even progressives who own cats know that cats always reproduce through rape. Giraffes headbutt their women, then lick their urine, to determine if they are in season. Some human men can sense whether better than other human men whether women are in season. Bear men sometimes infanticide children so the women will go into estrus sooner. Zebra men will infanticide the new children of their new sex slaves, which is a pretty common and not very talked about occurrence in humans, especially with Black men infanticiding stepchildren. Left unsaid by the ethologists making the video I watched about the zebras is how zebra women ended up following around the strongest man as a harem. I think it’s pretty clear that they do it to avoid infanticide. Some species of goats like to separate into separate herds. So do the Ents – as Fangorn sadly tells the tale, the Entwives wanted to make nice gardens and the Ents weren’t interested, so they separated, and then they lost track of each other, and there haven’t been any Entings in an age. Anyway, that’s all about rape and infanticide. My purpose here was transgenderism and sexual orientation. Salmen like to find a good woman and fertilize her egg pile. Weak salmen, who aren’t able to compete, like to not wear the bright colors salmen are supposed to wear, but instead pretend to be women and skulk around egg piles guarded by salmen who are obeying their gender role. The other salmen probably think that faggots are disgusting and should be fed to the bears, but, it’s an equilibrium. In one species of goats, that separates into separate herds, there are transwomen. They get the advantage of if a woman enters estrus begins before the herds recombine they get to nail her first. Human transwomen who want to access female safe spaces don’t even promise that they’re only interested in “having sex with” men. That’s it for transgenderism. But what of sexual orientation? Everyone hears about the bonobos that love to have lots of sex, including homosexual oral sex and sodomy. (Funny story about the baboons, sexual strategies, and speciation – http://youtu.be/4LTWi13_jjk?t=17m30s – of course, it’s nothing we haven’t seen before). No one ever accuses them of being gay. No one ever talks about how they use man-on-man action to rank themselves, either. Human men who are in prison are notorious for using sodomy to rank themselves. But wait, why would Anal Turing and Oscar Wild have been interested in buggery, when they were pretty popular guys? Well, I don’t have answers for everything. Also, what’s the deal with humans, in particular the Muzzies, using 12 year old boys for Greek sex? At some point, you’re not ranking yourself, you’re just a pervert, right? The Muzzies may be responding to a culture in which the strongest men have four wives and most men must content themselves with buggering each other, and showing off their strength by buggering the choicest of men. But that doesn’t explain the Greeks like Plato. Anyway, it’s pretty clear that buggery is a show you put on to impress women, that transwomanism is an attempt to circumvent social mores to access women, and that humans should only be allowed to reproduce in one man : one women marriages. At least until we figure out how to build perfect comrades in tanks.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 04:47 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 05:06 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I was talking to my DE-believing-in, /pol/-posting yet gay and genderfluid "friend" earlier today and pointed out that if the DE gets their way he'd probably be up against the wall first with the rest of the "degenerates" and he came back with "actually there's probably more gays and transpeople (and weebs and neets) in the alt-right than in most other internet subcultures" and all I had as a comeback was "the only ones I know are terrible people like Milo and Justine Tunny" and then it just devolved into a weird "would you do Justine Tunny" thing (he would, I wouldn't because I find despicable views a major turn-off, for the record). You can "not be associated with the 'effeminate queens' part of gayness" just by not being camp. It's not like the Homintern are going to loving arrest you for being insufficiently fabulous. Some people like that sort of thing, some people don't, there's no reason to become an anusbreathing shitlord and poo poo on people who do like it. Some rear end in a top hat quoted by LoB posted:Sexual orientation is a scientific theory, but when you say out loud what it entails, you laugh out loud. While I’m interested in the reasons for the lies of feminism and race-doesnt-exist-ism, sexual orientation is to me pretty clearly not a remotely serious proposition but just a Schilling point for the proggies. I did nazi this pun coming! Woolie Wool has a new favorite as of 04:55 on Jul 10, 2016 |
# ? Jul 10, 2016 04:51 |
|
Woolie Wool posted:You can "not be associated with the 'effeminate queens' part of gayness" just by not being camp. It's not like the Homintern are going to loving arrest you for being insufficiently fabulous. Some people like that sort of thing, some people don't, there's no reason to become an anusbreathing shitlord and poo poo on people who do like it. I mean I know this but yet I've met several gays who have to suffix "I am gay" with "but I don't act gay, i'm not like that," and I know a big problem with Grindr is all the people demanding MASC ONLY or whatever for their totally no homo 69 sessions. Maybe it's just living in the south that's loving everything up. Thanks, you're the best poster
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 04:54 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I mean I know this but yet I've met several gays who have to suffix "I am gay" with "but I don't act gay, i'm not like that," and I know a big problem with Grindr is all the people demanding MASC ONLY or whatever for their totally no homo 69 sessions. Who was that totally no homo Nordic YouTube guy with the bleached blond hair and steroid physique who spouts NRx bullshit while flexing shirtless? Dude was like a walking parody.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 04:57 |
|
Woolie Wool posted:Who was that totally no homo Nordic YouTube guy with the bleached blond hair and steroid physique who spouts NRx bullshit while flexing shirtless? Dude was like a walking parody. The Golden One, still on his crusade to eliminate all the hoh moh sessual beh tahs.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 04:59 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I was talking to my DE-believing-in, /pol/-posting yet gay and genderfluid "friend" earlier today and pointed out that if the DE gets their way he'd probably be up against the wall first with the rest of the "degenerates" and he came back with "actually there's probably more gays and transpeople (and weebs and neets) in the alt-right than in most other internet subcultures" and all I had as a comeback was "the only ones I know are terrible people like Milo and Justine Tunny" and then it just devolved into a weird "would you do Justine Tunny" thing (he would, I wouldn't because I find despicable views a major turn-off, for the record). He's full of poo poo, and is claiming some Reagan "silent majority" bullshit. Most of the channer LGBT I know are far-left tumblr-krew, moderate libertarians, or stringently apolitical. There are the occasional edgelords who might flirt with Alt-Right poo poo, but I can count the number on one hand.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 05:25 |
|
ikanreed posted:So... I decided to go to a futurism meetup. Yes yes but did they get into the thinly-veiled scientific racism? Parallel Paraplegic posted:I was talking to my DE-believing-in, /pol/-posting yet gay and genderfluid "friend" earlier today and pointed out that if the DE gets their way he'd probably be up against the wall first with the rest of the "degenerates" and he came back with "actually there's probably more gays and transpeople (and weebs and neets) in the alt-right than in most other internet subcultures" and all I had as a comeback was "the only ones I know are terrible people like Milo and Justine Tunny" and then it just devolved into a weird "would you do Justine Tunny" thing (he would, I wouldn't because I find despicable views a major turn-off, for the record). It's true, though, that the word salad Moldbug fan club end of neoreaction is hella queer. Despite the galloping homophobia. Parallel Paraplegic posted:Anyway that got me thinking about two things - one, is there any good quotes from DE types laying out anti-LGBT opinions? All I have is people saying wishy-washy things like Milo does. The other is whether or not there's any actual data on how many I actually know of nothing coherent that doesn't descend into difficult-to-quote word salad.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 07:08 |
|
This alt-right critical analysis of Zootopia is a loving goldmine.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 08:02 |
|
(((the article))) posted:Almost immediately, she learns that it was all con-artistry and she was the mark. Nick took the enormous $15 elephant-sized popsicle, melted it down into dozens of “pawsicles” and resold them at $2 each. The Fox, a clear stand-in for a member of a parasite tribe, had gotten the better of her. Looking carefully at his cooler, the sticker says “Niceberg.” Was that a subtle allusion to his (((ethnicity))) or just a random word that rhymes with Iceberg. We think the former is more likely, yet the latter offers plausible deniability. Holy gently caress, these people.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 08:46 |
|
Shouldn't he be a rat then, by the allegorical logic of nazi fuckheads?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 08:56 |
|
.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 13:30 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:Shouldn't he be a rat then, by the allegorical logic of nazi fuckheads?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 14:03 |
|
The gently caress is up with that writing? Is that just ridiculously flamboyant cursive? It looks more like Armenian script.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 14:26 |
|
Tesseraction posted:The gently caress is up with that writing? Is that just ridiculously flamboyant cursive? It looks more like Armenian script. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BCtterlin
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 14:46 |
|
That Zootopia thing reminds me of that one glowing neo-Nazi review of The Angry Birds Movie.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 14:59 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:What to replace sexual orientation theory with I tried looking up "Schilling point," which doesn't seem to be a thing (other than a location in Virginia). Google suggested "Schelling point" as an alternative, so I checked that out, but even that doesn't make a lot of sense in this context, so now I'm just trying to figure out what he thought he was expressing. A misspelled "shilling" meant to replace "talking" in "talking point"? Just a complete misunderstanding of a basic concept? What was this strange man trying to say?! (I'm also wondering how bottom surgery fits into his theory of how transwomen just want to sneakily inseminate all the ciswomen.)
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 15:50 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Duck women Is this the opposite of the stemlord tendency to overuse "females"?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 16:29 |
|
Puppy Time posted:I tried looking up "Schilling point," which doesn't seem to be a thing (other than a location in Virginia). Google suggested "Schelling point" as an alternative, so I checked that out, but even that doesn't make a lot of sense in this context, so now I'm just trying to figure out what he thought he was expressing. A misspelled "shilling" meant to replace "talking" in "talking point"? Just a complete misunderstanding of a basic concept? What was this strange man trying to say?! It's some game theory jargon they've appropriated and made too big of a deal about(like all game theory amiright)
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 16:30 |
|
Puppy Time posted:I tried looking up "Schilling point," which doesn't seem to be a thing (other than a location in Virginia). Google suggested "Schelling point" as an alternative, so I checked that out, but even that doesn't make a lot of sense in this context, so now I'm just trying to figure out what he thought he was expressing. A misspelled "shilling" meant to replace "talking" in "talking point"? Just a complete misunderstanding of a basic concept? What was this strange man trying to say?! He was trying to say (((Jews))) because he is an anti-semite. Or at least, it sure looks like anti-semitism.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2016 17:02 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:Holy gently caress, these people. hahaha. holy poo poo. so the foxs are supposed be jews now. wtf. I thought it was kinda supposed to be the lesson of "everyone can be an intolerant dickhead, so try to actualy learn the truth and meet people"
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 00:16 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:hahaha. holy poo poo. so the foxs are supposed be jews now. wtf. I thought it was kinda supposed to be the lesson of "everyone can be an intolerant dickhead, so try to actualy learn the truth and meet people" This is probably the nicest comparison of Jews to animals an anti-semite has ever made. Foxes are cool as heck. Progress!
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 03:06 |
|
divabot posted:Yes yes but did they get into the thinly-veiled scientific racism? Nope, just a casual focus on the white middle class future without a word towards any other segment of society. More privileged than racist. Definitely all left-leaning types.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 04:01 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:Holy gently caress, these people. Hey now, Nick was just taking a service for those who needed more resources and was able to turn a profit by selling it to those who might need it more and need less but can;t have it. It's the free market at work, baby. Come to think of it, DE and the alt-right have a really bizarre relationship with capitalism: they hate the elites but rally against groups with the fewest of them, they like the free market but not when it goes out of control and creates the super elites but hate socialism, they like libertarian values but constantly try for collectivism through race or social class instead of nationality, despite being heavily nationalist. It's almost like they don;t give a poo poo about the economy as long as they're not threatened by some other from above or below.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 05:04 |
|
ManlyGrunting posted:Hey now, Nick was just taking a service for those who needed more resources and was able to turn a profit by selling it to those who might need it more and need less but can;t have it. It's the free market at work, baby. Or, you know, they're just mad that capitalism didn't make them the elites like it rightfully should have because they're the sunken socketed white godkin who deserve it more than those
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 05:14 |
ManlyGrunting posted:Hey now, Nick was just taking a service for those who needed more resources and was able to turn a profit by selling it to those who might need it more and need less but can;t have it. It's the free market at work, baby.
|
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 07:58 |
|
ManlyGrunting posted:Hey now, Nick was just taking a service for those who needed more resources and was able to turn a profit by selling it to those who might need it more and need less but can;t have it. It's the free market at work, baby. The capitalist system is perfect, it's some corrupting element (elites/Jews) that's ruining it.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 09:50 |
|
Y'know, I'm surprised these dickheads haven't been screaming about Dallas since it would seem to play into their dumb-rear end race realism. ...Or are they commentating on it, and people are just not posting it cause it is depressing as hell?
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 12:12 |
|
massive spider posted:The capitalist system is perfect, it's some corrupting element (elites/Jews) that's ruining it. Like when republicans talk about how the pope only hates capitalism because he's only seen "crony capitalism." (I still have no idea what the difference is supposed to be)
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 12:56 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Like when republicans talk about how the pope only hates capitalism because he's only seen "crony capitalism."
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 13:56 |
|
Darth Walrus posted:Did they at least have nice art? Plus they lived their philosophy and died horrifically doing so, so points for conviction. Parallel Paraplegic posted:I was talking to my DE-believing-in, /pol/-posting yet gay and genderfluid "friend" earlier today and pointed out that if the DE gets their way he'd probably be up against the wall first with the rest of the "degenerates" and he came back with "actually there's probably more gays and transpeople (and weebs and neets) in the alt-right than in most other internet subcultures"... The thing with the LGBT folks in the alt-right is that we'd be second against the wall. First would be whatever groups actively opposed them, second would be us, and then when society hadn't magically fixed itself third would be the people on the alt-right who agreed but didn't agree hard enough. The gentleman's agreement they've got about no enemies to the Right only lasts as long as there is a coherent Left. Once they've crushed the opposition into the ground it's open season on allies. Better hope you picked the right brand of Monarchism/Elitism/Some weird psuedo-nationalism or you're next for the skull pile.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 17:43 |
|
Will Davis Aurini get to curate the skull pile? He's spent a lifetime preparing.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 18:27 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:He's full of poo poo, and is claiming some Reagan "silent majority" bullshit. Most of the channer LGBT I know are far-left tumblr-krew, moderate libertarians, or stringently apolitical. There are the occasional edgelords who might flirt with Alt-Right poo poo, but I can count the number on one hand. I don't think he's saying "a majority of LGBT people are actually in the alt-right," he's saying "the alt-right has a significant amount of / majority LGBT people." The first one is trivially untrue, the second one is hard to prove either way since I don't even have any good statistics on how many people constitute the alt-right to begin with. Peztopiary posted:The thing with the LGBT folks in the alt-right is that we'd be second against the wall. First would be whatever groups actively opposed them, second would be us, and then when society hadn't magically fixed itself third would be the people on the alt-right who agreed but didn't agree hard enough. The gentleman's agreement they've got about no enemies to the Right only lasts as long as there is a coherent Left. Once they've crushed the opposition into the ground it's open season on allies. Better hope you picked the right brand of Monarchism/Elitism/Some weird psuedo-nationalism or you're next for the skull pile. Yeah, though I'm not sure how to convey this fact to someone who's already a self-professed ancap and who was saddened when moldbug closed his blog. ... maybe I should just
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 18:38 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I don't think he's saying "a majority of LGBT people are actually in the alt-right," he's saying "the alt-right has a significant amount of / majority LGBT people." The first one is trivially untrue, the second one is hard to prove either way since I don't even have any good statistics on how many people constitute the alt-right to begin with. Let me adjust that for you: There are a number of gay people, no lesbians that I'm aware of, at least one transwoman, and probably some bisexuals.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 19:04 |
|
Samovar posted:Y'know, I'm surprised these dickheads haven't been screaming about Dallas since it would seem to play into their dumb-rear end race realism. Mostly that. I've seen it about but I'm not about to go searching for it. Mostly they're doubling down on BLM though: you know, the ones having a peaceful protest who were getting along fine with the cops to the degree that they weren't wearing body armour to de-escalate the situation?
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 20:07 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:no lesbians that I'm aware of There are some TERFs who have made allies with Alt-Right folks, but they don't consider themselves "alt-right"
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 21:21 |
|
I feel like TERFs are enough of their own weird terrible thing that I'm willing to acknowledge that distinction. As opposed to the distinction between MRAs and PUAs, which should eternally be ignored to enrage both semi-identical parties
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 21:41 |
|
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/...ment-2769563885 i love modern nerddom
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 23:05 |
|
I can see how "basing all your opinions on gender relations on antiquated stereotypes and quack science" is a thing that would appeal equally well to gay men as to MRA incels. Both groups usually lack experience in interacting with real women in the dating arena or having to care about women's issues.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 23:07 |
|
Race Realists posted:https://disqus.com/home/discussion/...ment-2769563885 Haha, someone was butthurt
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 23:43 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 05:06 |
|
pookel posted:I can see how "basing all your opinions on gender relations on antiquated stereotypes and quack science" is a thing that would appeal equally well to gay men as to MRA incels. Both groups usually lack experience in interacting with real women in the dating arena or having to care about women's issues. Might want to rephrase that a little. It sounds like you're implying that gay men can't have empathy for women, which is pretty unsteady ground to walk on.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2016 23:46 |