|
Kajeesus posted:man is that an actual modern hunting bow It's a compound - the cams kick in at full-draw, so once you get the fucker back you can hold it for ages. I would mock his manliness for using a compound (you're allowed mechanical release aids, magnified sights, spirit levels, and arrows as thick as tree trucks) but for hunting they're probably sensible.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 19:31 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 17:22 |
|
Kajeesus posted:man is that an actual modern hunting bow All these people talking about Pokemon as if its some hot new craze is making me feel really old.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 19:53 |
|
Kajeesus posted:man is that an actual modern hunting bow You can tacticalol up a bow just as much as an average rifle. Also someone talking about how manly it is to hunt from a stand is hilarious.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 20:13 |
|
High school friend's wife posts constantly about Juice Plus, and what a miracle supplement it is. Goes to all of the conventions and everything. Puts on the typical MLM "wow I love working from home on my own business" bullshit. Shares this article, yet another reason to hate Huffington Post. "Mothers have met their breaking points head on and are taking leaps of faith to become Entrepreneurs, becoming their own boss of something that is giving them some freedoms. And you know what - it’s WORKING. There are no pyramid schemes, despite so many wanting to tag them as such, because you see - pyramid schemes are illegal. A lot of these businesses are multi level marketing which is what people are misinformed about. The MLM set up is why they are working with such success. They are set up in such a way to help the small business owner have a huge potential for financial success." Such an irresponsible piece of poo poo to publish on a major website.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 20:15 |
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 20:26 |
|
Parasol Prophet posted:Is hunting deer really all that manly/impressive? Yes? Hunting is masculine, which is why men do it. Calling to cops on your black neighbours in the hope they'll be killed is feminine, which is why women do it.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 20:46 |
|
"You moles who agree with the president" am I missing some new racist term or is this dude completely mixing up his metaphorical animals.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:09 |
|
I don't have a great quality filter and I'm sure that ISIS truck and 'I want to run over any protester who impedes my life in any way' post left a bad taste in everyone's mouths so check out these things that I thought were pretty funny. http://fandom.wikia.com/articles/5-male-remakes-wed-like-see?utm_source=wikia&utm_campaign=recirc&utm_medium=rail&utm_content=4 http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/07/strong-female-character-sexuality/ http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/06/when-are-women-allowed-to-be-offended/
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:15 |
|
FAROOQ posted:Yes? Do not submit to feminist attempts at rewriting history. Traditional patriarchies served men and women. Historically, traditional patriarchies have manifested in numerous cultures as a response to the Neolithic Revolution. We now take for granted agriculture, domestication of animals, and the modern state apparatus, but these developments shaped gender roles for over 6,000+ years to the benefit of men and women. Since the survival of a family relied on producing healthy progeny, and birth control methods barely encompassed lamb intestines and natural abortifacients, women survived into adulthood in a nearly perpetual state of pregnancy. This left the task of managing the land to the husband. His physical prowess also made him susceptible to serving in the defense of the state when no such demands were rested at the feet of women. Keep in mind historical battles were usually anything from tame: the great general Hannibal is thought to have lost nearly 40,000 men in his march through the Alps, and many of the remaining forces from Carthage died in a bitter campaign through Italy the following year even as he decimated Rome's generals. The numbers are far from accurate, but we can be certain that the overwhelming casualties to war and famine were men, not women. Because these economic and political responsibilities were decidedly pegged on one sex, the state granting men political superiority to women in legal representations only makes sense. Herein lies yet another deception of feminism: the belief that men had it "better." In certain societies, the task of feeding one's family was entirely the responsibility of the husband. You see this enshrined in Islamic law: women could still earn an income, but none of their money is subject to the family's needs. In many European jurisdictions, if a wife or daughter misbehaved, her male protector would be legally held accountable. Many historians believe the craze of "witchcraft" trials was partially a response to the problem of female homicide and infanticide. Gynocentricism is not an appendage to traditional patriarchies; it is foundational to how society operated until the 20th century with the victory of the industrial age. Feminism does not teach history like this because feminism relies on the false notion that women were oppressed for thousands of years, forgetting that the normal male had NO contemporary political liberties beyond possibly owning property, and even that was irrevocably subject to the demands of the state. Men had many more responsibilities to society than women. That is why women, feminists included, are so hard-pressed to give up their gynocentric privileges. Feminism is about cleaving patriarchy and gynocentricism, but like a squirrel rummaging through its collection of nuts, the feminist hopes to keep all aspects of gynocentric culture that benefit her. Our brothers in the MRA forums are fighting to dispose of both entirely. Whether they succeed or not isn't really the concern of a MGTOW. We're aware that the entire situation is poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:18 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Do not submit to feminist attempts at rewriting history. Traditional patriarchies served men and women.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:20 |
|
women have never suffered more than men. the leisure gender.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:28 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:women have never suffered more than men. the leisure gender. Does that mean that MtF trans people are just wanting to go on a proverbial vacation?
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:33 |
|
Fashionable Jorts posted:Does that mean that MtF trans people are just wanting to go on a proverbial vacation? do not worry about such petty things, when we perfect and master the technology of the sexbot and the artificial uterus, the only thing they will be worth is their ovaries and ovums, nothing more and nothing less, I can assure you that once we already have those 2 things working then it will be impossible for a woman to be worth of something besides giving her ovum for the survival of the human race...but when we solve that problem then we can wipe them off, but for now I suggest you to wait for now and save some popcorn for the future. which will be from now to 2050. So full and actual sex change technology (down to the chromosones) will also be likely...but I predict we will see gestation tourism. Affluent men doing a year as a woman to have a "extra special" offspring with more status than the usual synthwombs. Rich people poo poo. Also that mortality curve will get flatter and flatter. When people are living to 140... everyone will have time to grow into a bitter old curmudgeon. Even the feminists might grow into wisdom.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:36 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:women have never suffered more than men. the leisure gender. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:38 |
|
Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW) submitted 6 hours ago by Mutamba_zimbabwe Hello, black mgtow here. It's always been an African tradition to circumcise girls, all our religions, tribes, and races do it. It is in fact good for girls because it stops them from committing adultery and paternity fraud. The girls will later be grateful they are circumcised cause they know it makes them loyal wives and devoted mothers. Plus the clitoris is not that important to women anyway cause women only have sex as an exchange for money or resources. Orgasms are not at all important to women like they are to us, that's why when western women talk about female circumcision being awful they only bring up how it might cause infections or how painful the procedure itself is, cause they don't see orgasms as something worth whining about, a woman's brain is fundementally different from a man's when it comes to sex.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:45 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW)
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 21:53 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW) This is the one that broke me.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 22:16 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW) loving hell
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 22:29 |
|
I'm glad he's a mgtow
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 22:58 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW) I really hope that with a username like Mutamba_zimbabwe that this is a troll post on reddit.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2016 23:04 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW)
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 01:23 |
|
Guilty Spork posted:MGTOW I always parse this as MTGOX, the failed Bitcoin exchange.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 01:26 |
|
Byzantine posted:I always parse this as MTGOX, the failed Bitcoin exchange. I imagine there's significant overlap.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 01:33 |
|
Guilty Spork posted:I keep waiting for MGTOW to actually Go Their Own Way instead of relentlessly, bitterly, creepily whining about the evils of women nonstop. No, see, it's very important that everyone knows they're alone because it's their choice, not because they're vile, repugnant garbage that no one would ever date, let alone have sex with.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 02:02 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW) Jesus Christ
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 02:55 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Should female circumcision be legalized? (self.MGTOW)
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 03:10 |
|
the problem isn't female sexuality, it's female retardation. you make a strong case though, i wouldn't necessarily be opposed to a society that has this as a norm. i think the main problem with the female psyche is the propensity towards thrill seeking, obsession with highs and lows. if you cut off(pun half intended) a source of cheap dopamine for her then she can have a more balanced life, some of the Buddha poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 03:12 |
|
Watch these anti-rape people get rek'd! http://imgur.com/gallery/oHadnXN
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 03:42 |
|
Gaunab posted:Watch these anti-rape people get rek'd! I'm not sure what's going on here or even if that's a good metaphor for sex/rape. I'm guessing no.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:04 |
|
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:07 |
|
Funnyjunk is the inverse imgur. Rascist poo poo gets memed and posted and everyone applauds it in the comments.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:13 |
|
RareAcumen posted:Funnyjunk is the inverse imgur. Rascist poo poo gets memed and posted and everyone applauds it in the comments. No, that's just imgur
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:23 |
|
BJPaskoff posted:I'm not sure what's going on here or even if that's a good metaphor for sex/rape. I'm guessing no. That's Lauren Southern, a journalist for The Rebel, which appears to be Canada's answer to Glenn Beck's Blaze network, and she's insinuating that she would absolutely violate journalistic ethics to prove a point.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:26 |
|
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:48 |
|
unwantedplatypus posted:No, that's just imgur People actually, y'know, argue against it in the comments on imgur at least.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 04:57 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:the problem isn't female sexuality, it's female retardation. Man, you really put us all to shame, you know that, right? I'm slowly building up a bookmark album "Racism on Imgur" with posts and comments. Hopefully to just poo poo it all out in one mega post on Imgur/Imgur forums and sees what happens. If it's anything like the blog post cataloging every rape/death threat Anita got then they'll probably end up blaming me for it. Edit: Ohaha Ularg has a new favorite as of 09:40 on Jul 18, 2016 |
# ? Jul 18, 2016 05:48 |
|
Ularg posted:Man, you really put us all to shame, you know that, right? FYI: LoB's shtick is only ever posting terrible posts from other forums without context or quotes. So your just arguing at a post from who knows where and god knows when.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 13:43 |
|
Crain posted:FYI: LoB's shtick is only ever posting terrible posts from other forums without context or quotes. So your just arguing at a post from who knows where and god knows when. Who is arguing?
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 13:54 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Who is arguing? Whoops. My misread. Read it as "wow you sure shamed us". It's too early.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 14:02 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 17:22 |
|
Oh man. This is just.. there is so much happening in this video you guys. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bZnqyE14RY
|
# ? Jul 18, 2016 14:48 |