Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Forever_Peace
May 7, 2007

Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah
Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah

Beer4TheBeerGod posted:

I think I screwed that up, because I do recall pooled variance being superior. Remind me how we approached that again? I think I might have copied stuff over from an older sheet.

Oh, yeah I can't actually see where your tiers come from, but your description says you are grouping players within 1 SD of the mean projection for the player at the top of the tier.

What we did last year after a bit of back and forth is still saved on google drive here. It takes a "pooled variance" approach with a moving tier average. Essentially, it adds players to a tier (in order) until either A) the player to add is a specified distance from the weighted tier mean (in units of the pooled variance for the whole tier), or B) the player to add would lower the mean of the tier enough to move the player at the top of the tier a specified distance from the weighted tier mean (also in units of the pooled variance for the whole tier). The columns highlighted in yellow are the columns of formulas I added to the beersheet backend you provided last year (you could probably consolidate this considerably, but I opted to make it easy to follow rather than concise). Most of the columns won't work until they are all filled in.

The "specified distance" for cutoffs is set in two places in the formula in column A. Currently, it uses a cutoff of 2/3 of a standard deviation. This is approximately equal to a 50% confidence interval for a normally distributed variable. To make this 1 SD instead of 2/3 SD, just delete the two instances of "2/3" in that column.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Benne
Sep 2, 2011

STOP DOING HEROIN
It's worth noting that Arian is not the type of guy who will play through an injury. Not to say he's not a tough guy or "soft" or any stupid hot take, just that he's kind of a perfectionist and wants his body fully ready to cooperate with his desire. If you watched his prime years you will never doubt that he goes hard on every play he can.

The fact that he signed now, instead of taking the opportunity to skip training camp reps, tells me that his Achilles is probably responding well. I try not to put too much emphasis on "intangibles" or "good vibes" but Arian Foster is like the ultimate "intangibles/good vibes" type of player, so when he says he's ready to play I tend to give him the benefit of the doubt.

And as said before, Arian might actually benefit from a limited workload -- he can get 8-12 touches a game and go full-blast on every one, without the pressure of being the every-down workhorse. Arian's always been an underrated asset in the passing game, so he could end up being a PPR value pick while Ajayi handles the early-down work.

Benne fucked around with this message at 08:54 on Jul 19, 2016

Thelonius Van Funk
Apr 7, 2007
Oh boy
So I'm in a pretty deep dynasty league(2qb, 30 roster spots) and I'm having trouble deciding who of my bubble guys to cut in order to make room for the rookie draft. I need to cut 4 out of Dontrelle Inman, Keith Mumphery, Chris Polk, Jonathan Grimes, Kendall Gaskins & Shaun Draughn. I also have a kicker (Mcmanus) and a D/St(Bengals) on the roster but people hoard both of those positions so streaming those don't really work. Right now I'm thinking of keeping Draughn and flipping a coin between the two WRs
Edit: Standard scoring, 0 ppr

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012

Thelonius Van Funk posted:

Right now I'm thinking of keeping Draughn and flipping a coin between the two WRs

Yeah, sounds about right. Don't lose any sleep over it, haha.

Amergin
Jan 29, 2013

THE SOUND A WET FART MAKES

Thelonius Van Funk posted:

So I'm in a pretty deep dynasty league(2qb, 30 roster spots) and I'm having trouble deciding who of my bubble guys to cut in order to make room for the rookie draft. I need to cut 4 out of Dontrelle Inman, Keith Mumphery, Chris Polk, Jonathan Grimes, Kendall Gaskins & Shaun Draughn. I also have a kicker (Mcmanus) and a D/St(Bengals) on the roster but people hoard both of those positions so streaming those don't really work. Right now I'm thinking of keeping Draughn and flipping a coin between the two WRs
Edit: Standard scoring, 0 ppr

Considering Chris Polk is an FA I'd drop him. Mumphery is also likely behind Shorts, Washington and maybe even Fuller so he's probably not worth wasting a roster slot on either.

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
I'm just impressed there's a league deep enough to roster Kendall Gaskins. Currently #6 on the 49ers' depth chart.

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
Also here is my hot take about Arian Foster

2.6 YPC in 2016, (more carries for zero or no yards than more than 4), turns 30 in a month and a half, coming off injury and will likely be a full blown committee.

I'm good thanks.

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012
So like, unrosterable? Seems a bit extreme

Forever_Peace
May 7, 2007

Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah
Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah
Finally got around to doing a more complete cluster analysis of running backs over in GroundControl. Some fantasy-relevant notes:
- Despite the awesome season by David Johnson, it was Gurley that got the better comparables (he was grouped with the other franchise backs, like AP and Charles).
- Matt Jones got grouped with TRich and Alfred Blue.
- Langford was comped with the likes of Bilal Powell instead of Forte.
- Yeldon was comped with SJax, and Melvin Gordon with Tre Mason.
- Buck Allen is a big weirdo that doesn't really run like anybody else in the database.
- Miller and Mathews were lumped right next to JStew and Ivory.
- Forte and Foster are still the two most closely matched players in the database (over the past six years).
- Thomas Rawls might be really loving good.
- Latavius really looks like a McFadden clone.
- Duke and Draughn are close to being in the Vereen/Woodhead mold of passing-down backs, but Benny Cunningham is already there.

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
His ADP before the signing was RB39. His upside is splitting the backfield enough so that he gets touches enough to be productive but not so many that he gets hurt.

Guys I'd rather have behind him at that point in the draft.

Charles Sims, RB40
Theo Riddick, RB44 (PPR)
Tevin Coleman, RB48 (and I don't believe in Tevin Coleman)
Kenneth Dixon, RB49
C.J. Prosise, RB55
DeAndre Washington, RB62

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012

Spoeank posted:

His ADP before the signing was RB39. His upside is splitting the backfield enough so that he gets touches enough to be productive but not so many that he gets hurt.

Guys I'd rather have behind him at that point in the draft.

Charles Sims, RB40
Theo Riddick, RB44 (PPR)
Tevin Coleman, RB48 (and I don't believe in Tevin Coleman)
Kenneth Dixon, RB49
C.J. Prosise, RB55
DeAndre Washington, RB62

Oh yeah that's all fine, but if he's there in the last few rounds I'd take a shot at Foster. I would take Foster over Prosise and probably Washington, but I don't think we're too far apart on his value. I can't believe Sims and Riddick are going so late after last year, either.

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
Oh that's my point. He won't be there. From what I'm hearing/seeing today, he's suddenly a single-digit round player.

Barf.

Azhais
Feb 5, 2007
Switchblade Switcharoo

Spoeank posted:

Oh that's my point. He won't be there. From what I'm hearing/seeing today, he's suddenly a single-digit round player.

Barf.

Just means you can quietly get Jay later!

Beer4TheBeerGod
Aug 23, 2004
Exciting Lemon

Forever_Peace posted:

Oh, yeah I can't actually see where your tiers come from, but your description says you are grouping players within 1 SD of the mean projection for the player at the top of the tier.

What we did last year after a bit of back and forth is still saved on google drive here. It takes a "pooled variance" approach with a moving tier average. Essentially, it adds players to a tier (in order) until either A) the player to add is a specified distance from the weighted tier mean (in units of the pooled variance for the whole tier), or B) the player to add would lower the mean of the tier enough to move the player at the top of the tier a specified distance from the weighted tier mean (also in units of the pooled variance for the whole tier). The columns highlighted in yellow are the columns of formulas I added to the beersheet backend you provided last year (you could probably consolidate this considerably, but I opted to make it easy to follow rather than concise). Most of the columns won't work until they are all filled in.

The "specified distance" for cutoffs is set in two places in the formula in column A. Currently, it uses a cutoff of 2/3 of a standard deviation. This is approximately equal to a 50% confidence interval for a normally distributed variable. To make this 1 SD instead of 2/3 SD, just delete the two instances of "2/3" in that column.

Thanks for the link. I think what happened is that I meant to use that method but forgot about it and just used my previous sheet. I did remember looking at things when I started back up and going "didn't I have a better method"? Turns out we did.

VietCampo
Aug 24, 2010

Spoeank posted:

Also here is my hot take about Arian Foster

2.6 YPC in 2016, (more carries for zero or no yards than more than 4), turns 30 in a month and a half, coming off injury and will likely be a full blown committee.

I'm good thanks.

He was still a RB2 on average in his 4 games last season in PPR league though.

In half ppr his weekly points were

5
16.3
19.7
27

And they'd all be higher in full PPR. Almost like 80% of his points came from the receptions and yards, he definitely won't be running with the ball as much in Miami, but i wouldn't find it surprising if he got a good amount of passing work.

I wouldn't take him anywhere near past seasons, but if he drops to a mid to late round, i'd certainly think about grabbing him in a PPR league.

VietCampo fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Jul 19, 2016

Beer4TheBeerGod
Aug 23, 2004
Exciting Lemon
Well that worked out super easy Forever_Peace. Thanks for your help again; the new method has been incorporated and looks much better.

Tiptoes
Apr 30, 2006

You are my underwater, underwater friends!

VietCampo posted:

He was still a RB2 on average in his 4 games last season in PPR league though.

In half ppr his weekly points were

5
16.3
19.7
27

And they'd all be higher in full PPR. Almost like 80% of his points came from the receptions and yards, he definitely won't be running with the ball as much in Miami, but i wouldn't find it surprising if he got a good amount of passing work.

I wouldn't take him anywhere near past seasons, but if he drops to a mid to late round, i'd certainly think about grabbing him in a PPR league.
I don't think we can expect anywhere near the same usage with the Dolphins as Foster saw with the Texans. His total touches in those four games were 11, 28, 23, and 23. There are going to be a lot more games closer to 11 than 20+ this year. He provides a veteran presence in pass protection and will take a large majority of the passing down work but I'm still expecting a duo at RB. I still get the sense they like Ajayi and figure he'll play the larger factor in the run game than Foster will. His age and the Achilles injury still concerns me, even if Foster says all the right things in practice.

The receptions may provide enough PPR value but the Dolphins have more depth at WR/TE than the Texans did. At best, he may be third in red zone target share after Landry and Parker, so I'm not optimistic about his scoring upside either. If he's Tannehill's #3 option, that doesn't interest me a whole lot. Feels like a low--upside RB2 to me.

Nawid
Mar 27, 2011
Why is Rishard Matthews ranked so low dynasty wise? He was productive last year when he wasn't injured, is young, potentially a top 2 target on the Titans, and Mariota needs someone to throw to. What am I not seeing here? Does he not have talent?

Metapod
Mar 18, 2012

Nawid posted:

Why is Rishard Matthews ranked so low dynasty wise? He was productive last year when he wasn't injured, is young, potentially a top 2 target on the Titans, and Mariota needs someone to throw to. What am I not seeing here? Does he not have talent?

Nawid posted:

What am I not seeing here?


You had the answer the whole time

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
How does Rishard fit in ~*~exotic smash mouth~*~

Also

Tiptoes posted:


I don't think we can expect anywhere near the same usage with the Dolphins as Foster saw with the Texans. His total touches in those four games were 11, 28, 23, and 23. There are going to be a lot more games closer to 11 than 20+ this year. He provides a veteran presence in pass protection and will take a large majority of the passing down work but I'm still expecting a duo at RB. I still get the sense they like Ajayi and figure he'll play the larger factor in the run game than Foster will. His age and the Achilles injury still concerns me, even if Foster says all the right things in practice.

The receptions may provide enough PPR value but the Dolphins have more depth at WR/TE than the Texans did. At best, he may be third in red zone target share after Landry and Parker, so I'm not optimistic about his scoring upside either. If he's Tannehill's #3 option, that doesn't interest me a whole lot. Feels like a low--upside RB2 to me.

This. Also this is assuming he can stay healthy (he can't).

Teemu Pokemon
Jun 19, 2004

To sign them is my real test

With full no movement clause
Arian Foster this year is the same thing as Arian Foster last year: draft him late, trade him to a rube, profit

Metapod
Mar 18, 2012
I am excited to see how Mathews plays now that he's a day 1 focal point of the offense

Papes
Apr 13, 2010

There's always something at the bottom of the bag.

Nawid posted:

Why is Rishard Matthews ranked so low dynasty wise? He was productive last year when he wasn't injured, is young, potentially a top 2 target on the Titans, and Mariota needs someone to throw to. What am I not seeing here? Does he not have talent?

Dynasty wise he probably only has 1 year as a starter.

Forever_Peace
May 7, 2007

Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah
Shoe do do do do do do do
Shoe do do do do do do yeah

Beer4TheBeerGod posted:

Well that worked out super easy Forever_Peace. Thanks for your help again; the new method has been incorporated and looks much better.

No problem. Glad it worked out!

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
Steve Smith has a ninth round ADP

loving ell oh ell

Papes
Apr 13, 2010

There's always something at the bottom of the bag.

Spoeank posted:

Steve Smith has a ninth round ADP

loving ell oh ell

Someone in that offense is going to put up points. My money is on Aiken but I can't really fault someone for taking a shot on smith, Wallace, or Periman.

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
He has the highest ADP. The 37 year old coming off a torn achilles has the highest ADP.

I'm achin' for some Aiken so I'm biased

Edit: It's the highest by over 50 picks by the way

Spoeank fucked around with this message at 04:05 on Jul 22, 2016

Veritek83
Jul 7, 2008

The Irish can't drink. What you always have to remember with the Irish is they get mean. Virtually every Irish I've known gets mean when he drinks.

Spoeank posted:

He has the highest ADP. The 37 year old coming off a torn achilles has the highest ADP.

I'm achin' for some Aiken so I'm biased

Edit: It's the highest by over 50 picks by the way

Not to mention that he's actively telling reporters that maybe he just quits once gets the 39 catches he needs to get to 1000 career.

Aiken is the only (e: Baltimore) receiver I'd draft right now outside of deep stashes/dynasty, though I can imagine someone emerging as a usable TE during camp or early in the season.

Veritek83 fucked around with this message at 12:39 on Jul 22, 2016

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
Aiken was one catch shy of 100 catches, 1200 yards and 8 touchdowns last year. The only thing stopping him from getting there again is an old broken (literally) Steve Smith.

His ADP is behind Justin Tucker.

what the hell is happening I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

Metapod
Mar 18, 2012
What if that catch was touchdown? Makes you think

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
whoopsie daisy I was reading his career line. 944 yards and 5 TDs on 75 receptions last year. 50 receptions, 611 yards and 3 TD in eight games after Smith went down.

Still Steve Smith is gonna be fuckin garbage don't draft his rear end

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
I got so gosh darn angry

http://theinscribermag.com/uncategorized/fantasy-football-youre-drafting-the-wrong-ravens-wide-receiver.html

Veritek83
Jul 7, 2008

The Irish can't drink. What you always have to remember with the Irish is they get mean. Virtually every Irish I've known gets mean when he drinks.
Well I imagine DeAngelo Williams starts getting drafted higher. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/17124034/pittsburgh-steelers-rb-leveon-bell-facing-four-game-ban-missed-drug-test

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
AP is gonna be the only first round RB with a full season of use under his belt unless this lifts Miller into the first :stonk:

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012

Spoeank posted:

AP is gonna be the only first round RB with a full season of use under his belt unless this lifts Miller into the first :stonk:

I'm taking Miller in the first

A Concrete Divider
Jan 20, 2012

The Unbearable Whiteness of Eating
Jeeze Bell.

Amergin
Jan 29, 2013

THE SOUND A WET FART MAKES
Might need to pump the brakes on that Zeke hype train.

RCarr
Dec 24, 2007

Why do my keepers always get suspended :(

A Concrete Divider
Jan 20, 2012

The Unbearable Whiteness of Eating

RCarr posted:

Why do my keepers always get suspended :(

:psyberger:

(psy-burghers)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012

Quit being shitheads, football dudes :manning:

  • Locked thread