|
SinineSiil posted:Apps with GUI really work? I remember reading it was limited to command line stuff. http://mspoweruser.com/now-can-run-linux-gui-apps-windows-10-using-bash/ It's super weird, but also kinda cool?
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 14:52 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 08:57 |
|
xamphear posted:It's super weird, but also kinda cool? Super cool
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 15:11 |
|
Odd choices, because these apps use the least amount of platform specific APIs due to portability.
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 15:38 |
|
Robo Reagan posted:honestly feels like google and microsoft should be paying me I'm fine with payment in free services. Not as fine with Win10's free upgrade! being more like "rent with the option to buy".
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 15:58 |
Klyith posted:I'm fine with payment in free services. What? It's a free digital entitlement generated from a license key. It's a legitimate, full copy of Windows. This comment makes no sense.
|
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 16:05 |
|
Klyith posted:Not as fine with Win10's free upgrade! being more like "rent with the option to buy". That's not what it is, unless you're in the habit of constantly replacing your computer with a new one.
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 16:22 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:Odd choices, because these apps use the least amount of platform specific APIs due to portability. Here's someone who setup i3 as a window manager and it all worked. https://brianketelsen.com/i3-windows/
|
# ? Jul 20, 2016 20:32 |
|
Is there any alternative program that will allow me to increase the size of my Taskbar Font? DPI scaling is unacceptable as it causes games to work incorrectly. Classic Shell and Start10 didn't do it. Deviant fucked around with this message at 22:31 on Jul 20, 2016 |
# ? Jul 20, 2016 22:29 |
|
Deviant posted:Is there any alternative program that will allow me to increase the size of my Taskbar Font? DPI scaling is unacceptable as it causes games to work incorrectly. If this was adjustable with "advanced appearance options" in Windows 7's personalization controls, you can change it in this part of the registry: This includes allowing you to export changed settings from the matching part in Windows 7 An example of what that would look like is here: code:
fishmech fucked around with this message at 01:12 on Jul 21, 2016 |
# ? Jul 20, 2016 23:21 |
|
Any idea when the final build for the anniversary update will be available?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:09 |
|
I believe it's going out to non-insiders on August 2nd or 3rd.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:11 |
|
hooah posted:I believe it's going out to non-insiders on August 2nd or 3rd.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:18 |
|
Arsten posted:the new terrible version they made for "User Friendliness" Is this snap or something else?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:26 |
|
Deviant posted:Is there any alternative program that will allow me to increase the size of my Taskbar Font? DPI scaling is unacceptable as it causes games to work incorrectly. You can turn off scaling for an individual app by right clicking shortcut and in compatiblity tab click disable scaling.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:32 |
|
MikusR posted:Which games? EDF 4.1, and that doesn't work for this game, tried it already. Also, that checkbox re-enables itself every time I exit the game.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:38 |
|
Inverness posted:I should have been more clear: I meant for insiders.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:42 |
|
Arsten posted:I'm curious as to the Pros and Cons of Linuchs on the Windowz vs a VM. If it can actually run desktop applications and has a package manager of some sort (since it's Ubuntu, I assume both Synaptic and the new terrible version they made for "User Friendliness") then wouldn't it be a great step to marrying the strengths of both systems? I missed this, but did you ever use andLinux or coLinux back about a decade or so? It's pretty much useless now because it only supports 32 bit Windows and Linux (due to not being able to be signed for 64 bit use), but that should be equivalent to the new Linux on Windows experience. You could use the package manager, and run desktop linux applications if you installed an X server for Windows. Of course you were also sharing less than 4 GB of RAM between the two operating systems, so things could get bogged down.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:47 |
|
ItBurns posted:Is this snap or something else? I forget what their manager was called. I used it for like two minutes on a vm last year before switching back to synaptic. I searched for nano and it only brought LibreOffice fishmech posted:I missed this, but did you ever use andLinux or coLinux back about a decade or so? It's pretty much useless now because it only supports 32 bit Windows and Linux (due to not being able to be signed for 64 bit use), but that should be equivalent to the new Linux on Windows experience. I used colinux about 15 years ago in its heyday, but it was kludgey to use and install packages. I hope that this is significantly better than that. If I can run stuff like logging daemons without needing a vm, I'd be sold.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 01:56 |
|
Is there any specific information yet about how the Anniversary Update account-linked licenses are going to work with hardware upgrades? All I've read so far has been kind of vague and unsure about whether it'll work for major component changes. My sister's in the situation where she wants the free upgrade to 10, but she also wants to upgrade the parts in her system soon (motherboard, CPU, RAM, main drive). Will the license work if she does that account linking process, then does a fresh install on the newly upgraded parts and goes through the activation troubleshooter? Or is it still unknown at this point? e: To clarify, I'm just talking about one system using her license in the end.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 02:38 |
|
Grog posted:Is there any specific information yet about how the Anniversary Update account-linked licenses are going to work with hardware upgrades? All I've read so far has been kind of vague and unsure about whether it'll work for major component changes. All still unknown, the stuff about account linking was on the insider blog -- so official -- but vague enough to leave plenty of "that's not what we meant" room to walk back. And they've not responded to any of the legion of reporters asking for clarification. After the terrible messaging a year ago (like when real MS employees were saying 7&8 keys would become 10 keys and work forever) you shouldn't count on anything we see it happen for real. I figure with the way that MS has been just so hosed up about consumer strategy the last few years, even as we speak there are 30 executives all screaming about which way to actually have it work, and how to release the news. But snag a 10 upgrade on the old machine and link an account just in case.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 04:40 |
|
This is really pissing me off, hopefully someone here will be able to help out. Recently upgraded from Win7 Home to Win10 Home. Things were working fine up until today, when I began having save game issues with Dishonored. While trying to figure out why it was failing to save the game, I discovered that the directory files were being saved to (not Program Files, I created a separate folder for my stuff back in Win7 because I knew there would be problems otherwise) had been set to read only. I attempted to remove the read only setting from the entire file, only for every file and folder to inform me that I did not have permission. At this point, I have done the following: 1) Adjusted my user account permissions from "Debugger"(HA!) to Administrator. 2) Gave ownership of almost* the entire C drive to my user account, which again is set to Administrator. 3) Used RegEdit to turn off UAC, which apparently limits even Admin access to poo poo. Above I mentioned that I had taken control of almost my entire C drive. If you guessed that the file I was not able to take ownership of was the file all the actually important to not be set to read only poo poo is saved to, you win a cookie. I have attempted to follow the same process I used for taking ownership of everything else (right click, properties, security, advanced, Change Owner). When I did that on the C-drive, it brought up a new window that let me define a user account. When I do that on the file in question, a box pops up for a fraction of a second, immediately closes, and the Change button stays greyed out. I have also attempted the alternative of downloading the take ownership registry file that lets you make that change from the right-click menu, but it doesn't appear to do a drat thing. I'm been working on this for about three hours at this point. Going to drop this post here and then get a little sleep. I hope someone has a idea when I get back.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 13:14 |
|
Windows 10 seems to have my Poweredge T20 that I use as a desktop (core i5-4960K using iGPU). It runs fine for a few days after first build, then eventually the display stops working (using DP). It's an issue with Windows assigning some setting that causes the monitor to likely go out of range. I can see the Dell boot logo (secure boot enabled) and after it starts the initial windows boot the monitor stops receiving signal. I cannot figure this out out at all .. ordered a secondary GPU to bypass the integrated. Anyone have another idea?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 14:46 |
|
Is there a way to make File Explorer display selected file metadata at the bottom? I can do with the Details Pane open, but I prefer the less obtrusive 2-line display at the bottom of the explorer window like W7 Windows Explorer did.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 16:25 |
|
If you mean you'd prefer the Details pane at the bottom like in 7, I was looking for that myself. The only solution I've found so far deals with using OldNewExplorer, but apparently some people have been having issues with it in the most recent builds of 10.Klyith posted:All still unknown [...] But snag a 10 upgrade on the old machine and link an account just in case.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 18:40 |
|
So, I've just noticed that Windows 10 doesn't have Libraries and has gone back to the old way of just having a special 'Pictures' (etc.) folder which you can set as any folder if you want. I never really used it but I always assumed other people found it useful, did they say why they removed it?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 20:13 |
|
I'm playing around with build 14393 in a VM and can't seem to find the toggle for one part of the new start menu search. It seems to be searching the Windows Store for apps (that I don't have installed), and I'd rather it wasn't doing that. Does anyone know what setting turns that off? Edit: Disabling Cortana via GPO seems to have stopped this, as well as making the Start Menu faster overall. xamphear fucked around with this message at 20:36 on Jul 21, 2016 |
# ? Jul 21, 2016 20:22 |
|
chippy posted:So, I've just noticed that Windows 10 doesn't have Libraries and has gone back to the old way of just having a special 'Pictures' (etc.) folder which you can set as any folder if you want. I never really used it but I always assumed other people found it useful, did they say why they removed it? I have it on my system, I assume because they were already set up in Windows 7. Looks like this page has a guide to creating them on your own: http://www.windows10update.com/2015/07/windows-10-tutorials-133-how-to-create-a-new-library/ To be honest I don't really use them, but if you want them, there they are.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 20:25 |
|
This "System and compressed Memory" process is constantly using ~3% of my laptop CPU thus generating enough heat to make it spin up its fans for 20 sec every 2 minutes. What can I do to fix it? I have had this issue before but it fixed itself after a while (couple months), but now it's back.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 22:10 |
|
Arsten posted:If you have privacy, they get less money. Why do you hate Microsoft when they gave you this operating system for free? I don't hate Microsoft. If they're going to give you the option to turn that stuff off, they shouldn't make it difficult or more obscure though. All that does is irritate people who care about it. There will be plenty of people who will choose the express install and allow that fully. Or don't let people turn it off and be upfront about what it does. But this squirmy half-assed stuff just makes it look more suspicious. Just like the whole thing with updating people's systems without them specifically selecting it.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 22:22 |
|
SinineSiil posted:This "System and compressed Memory" process is constantly using ~3% of my laptop CPU thus generating enough heat to make it spin up its fans for 20 sec every 2 minutes. That process is literally the system kernel and the handler for a certain kind of paging. How many cores/threads do you have? On my 4 core/8 thread system it usually idles around 1-2% CPU in normal circumstances, so 3% would sound about right for a system with fewer cores/threads, and especially with low RAM.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 22:23 |
|
fishmech posted:That process is literally the system kernel and the handler for a certain kind of paging. How many cores/threads do you have? Doesn't the System process also cover the idle defrag?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 22:25 |
|
fishmech posted:That process is literally the system kernel and the handler for a certain kind of paging. How many cores/threads do you have? 4 cores 8 threads too and 16GB of RAM. I had periods of time when it didn't use that much CPU and my computer fans would be off for much longer periods which was nice. Arsten posted:Doesn't the System process also cover the idle defrag? Don't have any HDDs
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 22:29 |
|
Hey, I wanna grab the upgrade from Win 7 to Win 10 before the end of the free period. Only thing is that my computer is kind of set up stupidly. I've got the OS on a 64gb SSD, and the rest of everything else on a standard hard drive. Will this effect anything with the upgrade? Do I have to do anything special during the process? What can I expect to have happen here?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:02 |
|
neogeo0823 posted:Hey, I wanna grab the upgrade from Win 7 to Win 10 before the end of the free period. Only thing is that my computer is kind of set up stupidly. I've got the OS on a 64gb SSD, and the rest of everything else on a standard hard drive. Will this effect anything with the upgrade? Do I have to do anything special during the process? What can I expect to have happen here? I would advise you to download the installer on a separate computer if possible (to put on a flash drive), and move as much stuff as you can off the small SSD temporarily to your main hard drive, before you do the install. That should give you enough room to safely perform the install. (You only need like 20 GB of free space or something to do the install, but it doesn't hurt to leave extra space)
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:08 |
|
Yeah, the upgrade will work OK on a 32GB system disk (if it's a fresh install of 7) but that ends up being so tight that when I tried it, I think I was forced to insert an external drive for the recovery image before the process would advance. If you have your 64GB drive over half full then you might have a similar experience and need an external hard drive or flash drive to make the upgrader happy. Of course, you can just blow up the recovery image once you're done if you are confident that you won't want to roll back.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:19 |
|
fishmech posted:I would advise you to download the installer on a separate computer if possible (to put on a flash drive), and move as much stuff as you can off the small SSD temporarily to your main hard drive, before you do the install. That should give you enough room to safely perform the install. (You only need like 20 GB of free space or something to do the install, but it doesn't hurt to leave extra space) What can I expect post-upgrade as far as my other hard drive? I assume I'll have to go through and reinstall all the various programs I had, and everything that's there now will be moved to a folder or something, right? EDIT: The only stuff I really ever installed on the SSD were the operating system and programs that worked closely with it. I do know the SSD's full, but I'm not sure what I can delete to free up space. I assume there's no easy way to tell, either, is there?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:20 |
|
neogeo0823 posted:What can I expect post-upgrade as far as my other hard drive? I assume I'll have to go through and reinstall all the various programs I had, and everything that's there now will be moved to a folder or something, right? You won't need to reinstall anything (besides some drivers, maybe) if you do the normal upgrade install, the default way it works. I mean if you had to move some programs off of the SSD temporarily to the hard drive, you'll need to move them back, but reinstall shouldn't be necessary. Just make sure you run the setup from within Windows 7 to make it the easiest
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:24 |
|
fishmech posted:You won't need to reinstall anything (besides some drivers, maybe) if you do the normal upgrade install, the default way it works. I mean if you had to move some programs off of the SSD temporarily to the hard drive, you'll need to move them back, but reinstall shouldn't be necessary. Sounds good. I just need a thumb drive that can hold the installer then, correct?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:32 |
|
neogeo0823 posted:What can I expect post-upgrade as far as my other hard drive? I assume I'll have to go through and reinstall all the various programs I had, and everything that's there now will be moved to a folder or something, right? If your SSD is full it's probably having a lot of write amplification. It's probably time to quickly buy a new one, image your old one to it, expand the volume and do your upgrade.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:34 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 08:57 |
|
neogeo0823 posted:Sounds good. I just need a thumb drive that can hold the installer then, correct? Yes. By the way, WinDirStat is a great program for scanning your drive and telling you what folders are using the most space, so you know what to move temporarily.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2016 23:45 |