|
steinrokkan posted:Yes, replacing a transexual character with a woman is progressive now.
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:53 |
|
|
Al Cowens posted:Frank N Furter is considered a problematic portrayal these days How will they deal with Dr- Scott being an ableist minstrel show character? And Rocky's sexual consent issues?
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
dear god what have we become Crowsbeak posted:Oh man I want some of that Salami. same they can keep the "coke" though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Yes, replacing a transexual character with a woman is progressive now. I think he directly says that he is a transvestite in one of the songs?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
bongwizzard posted:I think he directly says that he is a transvestite in one of the songs? he's a sweet transvestite but he's from a planet of transsexuals so both? also is the fake live theater audience gonna be an actual thing during the show? this will be a voyage into new frontiers of cringe
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
Isn't that person actually transgendered? Iirc
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
Klyith posted:he's a sweet transvestite But his planet hates him, right? So maybe on his planet he is the oppressed minority? And ya, holy poo poo that will be impossible to watch. I will cop to being into RHPS in high school but back then it was really my first window into anything remotely transgressive and exposed me to the wonders of aggressively trampy theatre chicks, so I have no regrets.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
boy if even rocky horror is deemed problematic...
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:boy if even rocky horror is deemed problematic...
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Isn't that person actually transgendered? Iirc yes Uncle Wemus posted:boy if even rocky horror is deemed problematic... welcome to the wacky world of tumblr activism, we got an attic filled with problems and we keep making more! (basically anything that a normal person can enjoy has to be redefined as problematic so that they can continue to be hated and shunned. Rocky Horror is too mainstream, it's on cable all the time and the internet loves Tim Curry. Bad, wrong! It's problematic for a straight cis white man to portray a trans gay character! But it was cool when it was the thing that queer people went to midnight showings and got crazy at.)
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:boy if even rocky horror is deemed problematic... RuPaul is officially a poo poo lord now Imagine being a literal tranny friend of the family human being that survived the brutal racism and homophobia of the 70s through 90s and manage to have a successful career despite all this and then having tumblr kids dogpile you over "shemale" Transsexuality was turned into a retarded meme by idiots
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:when they remake jaws there will be riots in the streets. It looks like the rights are still with Amblin (now called Amblin Partners, an amalgamation of Amblin, Dreamworks and Participant Media and part of the Universal group) and Spielberg said in an interview last year that he'll never remake any of his Amblin films. If anyone wants to remake Jaws they'd have a hell of a legal battle on their hands. http://www.avclub.com/article/steven-spielberg-will-never-remake-jaws-might-rema-229953 Not that we need another shark film, what with films like The Shallows and SyFy's Sharknado quatrology and the Sharktopus trilogy etc flooding the market.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
Al Cowens posted:RuPaul is officially a poo poo lord now
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
What? I thought being a Fuckboy was cool Like drat, that dude fucks a lot, he's a gently caress boy
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
Don Tacorleone posted:What? I thought being a Fuckboy was cool that's a gently caressman
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
Klyith posted:that's a gently caressman God drat it, I knew I shouldn't have laminated my bucket list
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 07:05
|
|
|
Klyith posted:that's a gently caressman it was their bar mitzvah
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 07:05
|
|
|
Laverne Cox looks like she's having so much fun in that RHPS trailer. Never saw the original and have no interest in the remake though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 08:26
|
|
|
hollywood is so averse to any sort of risk that they let a remake of RHPS be a network tv movie
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 08:28
|
|
|
VideoGames posted:Didn't she lick the guns in an overtly sexual manner? Good lord, whoever wrote this might not have properly watched the film.  You think they ever watched it at all before spouting their feminist bullshit. How naïve.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
Out of loving nowhere, a Blair Witch Project sequel called Blair Witch that looks like it's basically the same exact movie beat for beat but with jump scares, sick special effects, more stick figures and black people! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=girSv9UH_V8
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
jump scares make me more pissed off than scared
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Y-Hat posted:jump scares make me more pissed off than scared 
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
Castor Poe posted:Out of loving nowhere, a Blair Witch Project sequel called Blair Witch that looks like it's basically the same exact movie beat for beat but with jump scares, sick special effects, more stick figures and black people! Good to see they managed to miss everything that made Blair Witch Project good. No need to waste money on this.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
Y-Hat posted:jump scares make me more pissed off than scared Jump scares are such a cheap loving trick. The best jump scares are the ones with none of that wack soundtrack crescendo that is common now; like Leatherface opening that door in the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and nailing that dude on his head with a sledgehammer, out of nowhere.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
more like the scared bitch project.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Castor Poe posted:Out of loving nowhere, a Blair Witch Project sequel called Blair Witch that looks like it's basically the same exact movie beat for beat but with jump scares, sick special effects, more stick figures and black people! Sounds similar to the remake of Death at a Funeral that had an all black cast with the same plot minus the comedy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 21:27
|
|
|
awwwwwwwwwwwww, Dirk Squarejaw posted:Sounds similar to the remake of Death at a Funeral that had an all black cast with the same plot minus the comedy. Seriously that remake really didn't make sense. I get remaking like French or Korean films, but the original is an English film, did (OH wait Sony made it) never mind..... Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 21:47 on Jul 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:awwwwwwwwwwwww, 
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
It that a shoop?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
Blair Witch is actually a sequel though. Bloody Disgusting loved it. Which doesn't mean anything but at least it's something. Could be worse like that new Batman comic movie which adds a 30 minute prologue to it where Batgirl fucks Batman on a rooftop. To you know, add DEPTH to when Joker cripples her and then takes pictures of her undressed and crippled. Vvvv because it's so mindbogglingly RETARDED it alone ruins the entire goddamned thing. Which already has issues to begin with. I mean I love the novel IT but there is one scene towards the end, like 5-6 pages that nearly destroys a 1000 page book. (Drugs are bad kids!). Vvvv Captain Rufus fucked around with this message at 22:14 on Jul 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Captain Rufus posted:Blair Witch is actually a sequel though. Bloody Disgusting loved it. Which doesn't mean anything but at least it's something. Actually, the loving only takes like half a minute or so. The rest is character development Its weird to see people zero in on a minuscule portion of a movie like that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
lol gb2016 finished 5th yesterday wrap it up, feigailures
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
Castor Poe posted:Out of loving nowhere, a Blair Witch Project sequel called Blair Witch that looks like it's basically the same exact movie beat for beat but with jump scares, sick special effects, more stick figures and black people! adam wingard and simon barrett made you're next and the guest which were both really good so there's a chance this won't actually be total poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:lol gb2016 finished 5th yesterday It's actually in a three way tie for third between Ice Age (which flopped) and Lights Out (which has had little to no marketing outside of generally positive reviews.) Star Trek is also having the lowest opening of the three in the series. It's been a rough year for theaters. What's the next bomb in the pipeline, anyway?
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
“There’s going to be an implosion where three or four or maybe even half a dozen of these mega-budgeted movies are going to go crashing into the ground, and that’s going to change the paradigm again.” -steven spielberg, 2013, via this article now might be the time that he predicted, but i just can't see the paradigm shift happening
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 08:26
|
|
|
Maybe not a total paradigm shift but likely even more reboots/sequels. With movies costing more every year sticking with an existing IP guarantees an existing fan base. I'm fascinated with how many Chinese film production companies are popping up in this summer's films. Star Trek, the latest Independence Day, and I believe the latest TMNT movie has Chinese backers. It's going to be fun seeing their influence on our entertainment the next couple years.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 08:38
|
|
|
Android Bicyclist posted:Maybe not a total paradigm shift but likely even more reboots/sequels. With movies costing more every year sticking with an existing IP guarantees an existing fan base.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 08:46
|
|
|
Android Bicyclist posted:Maybe not a total paradigm shift but likely even more reboots/sequels. With movies costing more every year sticking with an existing IP guarantees an existing fan base. how about making cheaper movies
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 08:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:53 |
|
|
steinrokkan posted:how about making cheaper movies
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 09:13
|
|