|
Rhyno posted:I can't wait to see how badly they fuckup Black Bolt. I don't even watch AoS and I think I'd be madder over this hypothetical scenario than any dumbass stuff Barry Allen does on Flash this season.
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 08:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:15 |
|
|
Things that will happen in aos: Black bolt talks ummmm Lockjaws a cat Ummm It doesnt have karnak To be serious for a sec, if there's no inhumans movie you guysd think they'd change ms. marvel's origin if they wound up doing a movie for that? site fucked around with this message at 08:44 on Jul 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 08:37
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:How do we get a similar deal in place for AoS?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 10:29
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:How do we get a similar deal in place for AoS? As the previous poster said, you can just ignore it. It's not like there's any meaningful connections to the MCU anyways, since the films avoid AoS like the plague. I'm in the camp where the show is just "okay", but it doesn't bother me that much. It's biggest offense is that it's pretty mediocre overall, and this past season they treated the Inhumans like cheap knock-off mutants. I wouldn't worry, I'm sure this show will be axed after this next season is over, unless it's ratings improve drastically
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 11:44
|
|
|
Inhumans are cheap knock off mutants.SonicRulez posted:I can see Laurel on LoT being big. I can see how Captain Cold can be a challenging yet still grounded Arrow villain. What the hell can Merlyn add to The Flash? Like how do they engineer a story where Barry doesn't beat him up and send him packing to Star City in under 15 seconds? Because when has Barry ever managed to not embarrass himself in a fight?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 13:56
|
|
|
site posted:Things that will happen in aos:
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 14:31
|
|
|
ToastyPotato posted:Sadness. I guess that also means its game over if SHIELD ever gets cancelled. I'm pretty skeptical of that, because it's not a direct quote from Whedon and the only source reporting it is io9; at least one other outlet at that roundtable has reported it quite differently. http://collider.com/comic-con-2016-agents-of-shield-panel-recap/ quote:Now that Marvel has bumped the Inhumans movie from its current slate, there could be a bigger opening for the show to explore that roster of character. Both Bell and Loeb said it’s going to be easier to explain the origins of characters’ new powers, while Tancharoen and Whedon feel they now have more freedom to expand into that world. While they did not comment on whether they would be able to tap into any of the classic or more popular Inhuman characters, expect to see further integration of Inhumans into this new season. That said, if it's true, the Inhumans movie is definitely 100% dead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:How do we get a similar deal in place for AoS?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
irlZaphod posted:You can just ignore it, you know. NEV-AH. achillesforever6 posted:Man what did AoS ever do to you other than waste your time? IT KEELED MY FAH-THA
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 17:54
|
|
|
I like AoS. Although part of that is that my mother is into it so whenever I visit we watch it together. I feel like it rotates between not good at all to pretty good over and over.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
Xinder posted:I like AoS. Although part of that is that my mother is into it so whenever I visit we watch it together. I feel like it rotates between not good at all to pretty good over and over. Agreed. The best writing, roles, and performances are all from temporary and guest characters. Except for sort of Ward. Mr. Hyde, Bill Paxton, Ward, the Asgardian who has been lost on earth forever, Lucy Lawless, Powers Boothe, Edwards James Olmos, and Daniel Whitehall were all fantastic performances / characters. The main cast is 25% great, 50% okay, and 25% forgettable. The guest characters are 90% great.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:The main cast is 25% great, 50% okay, and 25% forgettable. The guest characters are 90% great. I will agree with this. I got super hyped when EJO joined the show and them they killed him off in the lamest way.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
As a die hard Twin Peaks fan, I adored seeing Kyle MacLachlan show up in this. I had such a crush on his character in Twin Peaks. I know I'm blinded by nostalgia, but I was loving every minute he was on screen in AoS.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
I sorta hate the Fitz/Simmons drama but the episode with the flashbacks to Simmons' time trapped on the Kree planet or whatever was a brilliant episode.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:24
|
|
|
Superman in costume for Supergirl. http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/look-supergirl-introduces-superman-in-first-family-photo
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
He looks like Phil from  That's a lovely Superman.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
I like how the cape leads into the S, much like Supergirls' 80's costume.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Is his head photoshopped or is it just too big for his body?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:48
|
|
|
X-O posted:Is his head photoshopped or is it just too big for his body? I think photoshop because there was also a new interview released where he said he hadn't seen the costume yet nor has he shot a scene.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
They gave him the traditional S which is slightly different from hers. And I know they're doing their best but compared to Cavill he looks like SuperBOY.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:They gave him the traditional S which is slightly different from hers. And I know they're doing their best but compared to Cavill he looks like SuperBOY. Just wait until his first appearance. The internet will be happy to point out how much better he is than Cavill at being Superman at that point.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Thank you Twitter for quickly nailing exactly what was bugging my about Superman in that picture. Never gonna be able to unsee that now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
He's weirdly pale and emo-looking, which kind of spoils the Superman look. Put that Teen Wolf stare back where it came from so help me! Costume looks good though. It's very silver agey, which fits with this show.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
X-O posted:Thank you Twitter for quickly nailing exactly what was bugging my about Superman in that picture. lol good catch
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:He's weirdly pale and emo-looking, which kind of spoils the Superman look. Put that Teen Wolf stare back where it came from so help me! Silver Agey? It looks like the New 52 suit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
It doesn't to me. The neck is uncovered, the actual exposed collar (that slut) is very broad and comics-like. Cavill's Superman goes with the MoS motif of organic, curving shapes, but here we've got a full ridged belt and squared boots that makes Hoechlin look more like a pulp space explorer of some sort. The yellow on the S is fairly bright even in this washed-out filter they went with for some reason. There's obviously modern influences, but it's reminding more of (classic) Star Trek than of Superman's more recent looks. Even Hoechlin's build is more like the Reeveses.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
I like the costume. The CGI makes it look bad. I'll need to see him in motion. MacheteZombie posted:Just wait until his first appearance. The internet will be happy to point out how much better he is than Cavill at being Superman at that point. Can you at least let him have an episode before you start whining about how nobody likes the DCCU?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ConnorFilm/status/758765116435202048
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
The only problem I have with the costume is the lower have just seems off. The belt is so blocky and red and without the underpants there's just a lot of empty space there. I do prefer the texturing over the Justice League version.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
SonicRulez posted:Can you at least let him have an episode before you start whining about how nobody likes the DCCU?  I'm sure he'll be perfectly fine for a cw show.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 02:44
|
|
X-O posted:Is his head photoshopped or is it just too big for his body? Very obvious photoshop, I don't know why TV/Movie people keep doing this.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
Pretty sure that's Bizarro.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
Beeeeezarro!
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Very obvious photoshop, I don't know why TV/Movie people keep doing this. What's worse is that the show starts filming this week, and they couldn't wait to do a fitting before putting out that picture.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
Cross-post from Cinema Discussion -io9 posted:The Television Critics Association summer press tour is ongoing at the moment, and Marvel is there to promote the incoming Netflix Luke Cage series. Naturally, the topic of whether or not characters like Luke, Jessica Jones, or Matt Murdock could ever show up in the movies. The answer given to /Film by Marvel TV president Jeph Loeb is a similar refrain at this point: The logistics make it practically impossible: Source: http://io9.gizmodo.com/marvel-has-a-new-different-explanation-for-how-its-tv-1784526484 What a cop out. Why bother having the universes be connected if there aren't any meaningful connections in the first place? The film division seems to want nothing to do with the Netflix and ABC series. Agents of Shield is about as mediocre as a show could get, but what about the Netflix series? Those have been legitimately good (so far).
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
Jonny_Rocket posted:Cross-post from Cinema Discussion - lmao Marvel is too hapless to put tv characters into a thirty second movie cameo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Television moves at an incredible speed! It also takes 6-8 months! Our hands are tied!
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
redbackground posted:Television moves at an incredible speed! It also takes 6-8 months! Our hands are tied! It sounds like a bullshit excuse to me lol while Marvel is like 
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
I don't really see how you could cross over the Netflix characters into the movies without making it seem really forced.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:15 |
|
|
JT Smiley posted:I don't really see how you could cross over the Netflix characters into the movies without making it seem really forced. Well yah at this point because they've been so forcibly written to be clearly separate. Infinity would be the only potential thing. Anyway that interview is pretty much just the confirmation that the TV and movies simply aren't actually connected. Without a major behind the scenes change, that is just the way it is going to be, and until then, we are going to keep getting weird excuses in interviews because it is bad for business and investors to admit that office drama is the big problem.
|
|
#
?
Jul 29, 2016 18:59
|
|