|
Gyges posted:If it wasn't for Kansas, we'd be looking at an outside shot at all the blue being linked from sea to shining sea. And Florida too.
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:It's mostly background-development miniarcs for some of the earlier side characters. Finding Rand Paul left me shrugging my shoulders, but Into the Green Mountains was fantastic. I wish this were a thing now. The early donators can get campaign swag from all the failed candidates. Highlight of the set would be one of the brand guacabowles of course
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
Koalas March posted:Hello thread! hello
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:29
|
|
|
Koalas March posted:Hello thread! trump insults one baby and suddenly goons are climbing aboard the hillwagon 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
Constant Hamprince posted:trump insults one baby and suddenly goons are climbing aboard the hillwagon All are welcome here.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
Constant Hamprince posted:trump insults one baby and suddenly goons are climbing aboard the hillwagon Look, not everyone can be the first person on the Hillwagon.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
To be fair, that baby was being kind of a dick.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Constant Hamprince posted:trump insults one baby and suddenly goons are climbing aboard the hillwagon Calm your tits, enjoy the gifs. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Obama won't withdraw the nomination, and I really doubt Clinton would either should he not get confirmed before she's sworn in since it confirm that picking him was purely about politics and not about putting forward a serious candidate. Obama will withdraw the nomination and nominate someone else if it comes to that. He's not going to give the Republicans a handout after everything that's happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 08:25
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Obama will withdraw the nomination and nominate someone else if it comes to that. He's not going to give the Republicans a handout after everything that's happened. Yes. This is what I am hoping for. That would be best case scenario; the new president doesn't have to spend any of her political capital immediately upon entering office because Obama in the Obama gives no fucks portion of his presidency basically speeds away with one giant last middle finger to the Republican Party.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 09:39
|
|
|
Obama isn't going to yank Garland's nom, he's not playing games with loving SCOTUS seats.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
zoux posted:Obama isn't going to yank Garland's nom, he's not playing games with loving SCOTUS seats. It's this. Obama's biggest fault is that he still wants to be seen as bipartisan as possible even in the face of the GOP behaving like spoiled little shits. Pulling the Garland nod would be going against the entire image he's cultivated as the first black president being level headed and not a vindictive poo poo, plus he's too smart and too concerned about how history will judge him to pull that nomination.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
zoux posted:Obama isn't going to yank Garland's nom, he's not playing games with loving SCOTUS seats. The only one playing games is the Republican Party. Obama should get the most out of the opening, not let them have a halfway-victory after all this poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:The only one playing games is the Republican Party. Obama should get the most out of the opening, not let them have a halfway-victory after all this poo poo. So you aren't one of the ones who thinks that Obama deliberately picked a more centrist nominee to highlight the intransigence of the GOP? Because you seem to be implying that his first choice is a pawn.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:22
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:The only one playing games is the Republican Party. Obama should get the most out of the opening, not let them have a halfway-victory after all this poo poo. I agree. Obama can withdraw the nomination under the guise of if Hillary wants to renominate him, she can, it is her decision now. Edit: Also I believe Obama hates the Republicans just enough to do this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
zoux posted:So you aren't one of the ones who thinks that Obama deliberately picked a more centrist nominee to highlight the intransigence of the GOP? Because you seem to be implying that his first choice is a pawn. I think his pick is an acceptable option for him, but he also chose Garland to demonstrate the Republicans' obstinacy. It was definitely a centrist pick, anyway.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:I think his pick is an acceptable option for him, but he also chose Garland to demonstrate the Republicans' obstinacy. So you think he is playing games then.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
zoux posted:So you think he is playing games then. I don't think that's "playing games." Garland was a legitimate nomination that also exacted a political toll on the GOP. It was a savvy move.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
Obama just has to go "Na y'all were right. We'll let the next president decide" come December.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
The safest of toxxes has become boring. We need a separate thread for toxxing on specific minimum EC thresholds.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:The safest of toxxes has become boring. We need a separate thread for toxxing on specific minimum EC thresholds. I would appreciate this too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
zoux posted:So you think he is playing games then.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 20:40
|
|
|
Jonked posted:"The president performed his duties in a way that also furthered his political agenda. We go now live to Thomas Conway in France. Tom, do you think President Washington went too far this time?" 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 22:23
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:The safest of toxxes has become boring. We need a separate thread for toxxing on specific minimum EC thresholds. SirJohnnyMcDonald posted:I would appreciate this too. I know it's a ways off, but things will probably take us safely back in  territory once we get to the first debate.Of course Trump could always pull his campaign out of its tailspin by adopting more responsible strategy and refraining froHahahahahahhaha sorry, sorry. I couldn't- just give me a minute to catch my breath here, whew.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:I know it's a ways off, but things will probably take us safely back in I know, dude!  just trying to get the forums some additional revenue here!
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:I know it's a ways off, but things will probably take us safely back in
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Maybe Trump's hoping his polls drop so low they overflow and jump to 64,000%.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Maybe Trump's hoping his polls drop so low they overflow and jump to 64,000%. trump (trump!) wouldn't know enough about computers to come up with a buffer underrun strategy. Maybe a Manafort plan from his russian hacker allies?
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton will get at least 309 electoral votes  I started the bar low lets go chums. Edit: I reserve the right the revise my prediction if we make Toxxes based on accurate maps, cause I love maps. Double edit: I'm willing to start an EV map toxx thread if you guys are down. Winner based of closest without going over, and accurate map gets a forums upgrade on me. Edmund Lava has issued a correction as of 07:04 on Aug 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/CarolanRoss/status/760591701450760193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw nice
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
Edmund Lava posted:Double edit: I'm willing to start an EV map toxx thread if you guys are down. Winner based of closest without going over, and accurate map gets a forums upgrade on me. That'd be incredibly generous- great idea!
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
we'd get more participation if an account wasn't on the line. lower stakes I know, but even though I'm really confident about the PV margins I feel like the state polling + the uncertainty of GOTV and turnout makes it too soon to predict the EC. also a toxx thread would have a bunch of boring predictions stolen from sam wang. just a thought. I appreciate people wanting to raise the stakes + fund the lowtax college fund though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
Yeah thinking maybe just go for pride and prizes. I'll put it up tonight.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Edmund Lava posted:Yeah thinking maybe just go for pride and prizes. I'll put it up tonight. I was going to say this is the sort of angle you should take. I dunno if you participated, but the sheep games we did periodically in D&D always had good participation and they usually just had minor prizes ('cert that one time Arkane actually put up some of his own money. Joementum took the pot, rear end Cobra got second....and I came in third.)
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Hahahahahaha it includes Georgia ahahahahhahaaha suck a dick Trump.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
Welp, that quantum waveform should collapse early in the evening.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
just realized i made fun of boosted for not toxxing for trump, so here i am to officially toxx for the devil incarnate (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
a helpful bear posted:just realized i made fun of boosted for not toxxing for trump, so here i am to officially toxx for the devil incarnate In very slight fairness to Boosted, he took on the Trump toxx thread at my suggestion and so it wasn't like he did that as a way to have his toxx cake and eat it too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
Bill gona be Bill
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 19:00
|
|