|
Exotic smashmouth 
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:50 |
|
|
Metapod posted:Exotic smashmouth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjWkO15-gcE
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
Metapod posted:Exotic smashmouth Seriously, it's crazy the Chargers didn't invest in serious dline help if they are just going to gashed on the ground like that by a Mike Mularkey team. Could really use a big physical run stopper. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
Its Miller Time posted:Is there a source for good free data for fantasy football (or just the regular underlying data about yards/TDs/etc)? I'm thinking about trying to develop my own projections for the first time and other analyses. I"d be looking for weekly yards/TDs/other relevant stuff such as fumbles or interceptions for 5-10 years. Drop $35 for Armchair Analysis. They update it every year for no extra cost and it's everything you could need in an Excel spreadsheet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Zach Zenner and CMike getting hype NFL you really are back
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Tiptoes posted:Stop me if you've heard this one before: Christine Michael is being criminally underdrafted right now. this is absolutely huge if true
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 16:54
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Zach Zenner and CMike getting hype NFL you really are back Glad I cut Zenner already! I also traded Brady and 2017 2nd round rookie pick for chris ivory. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Please rate my team: Qb- Phillip rivers RB- shady McCoy RB- Frank gore WR- Antonio brown WR- Keenan Allen FLEX: Mike Evans TE: Zach ertz D/ST: K: B- Darren sproles B- cj spiller B- Karlos Williams B- Rishard Mathews B- Chris Johnson B- Pierre garçon B- Christine Michael B- spencer ware
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
Those wrs 
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
Wait, it's pronounced "Nuke"? I've been reading it as Nuck this whole time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
Ty1990 posted:Please rate my team: Is this a 10 man league?
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Ty1990 posted:Please rate my team: I love it. Sproles and Spiller are the drops for a D and K, but do that can be done later.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
Papes posted:Is this a 10 man league? Im stupid. Should've mentioned it's a 12 man keeper PPR league. I kept Antonio Brown and Lacy but moved Lacy and stuff to acquire picks and ended up with what I got.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Somebody remind me how it doesn't matter if your WR1 and RB1 is on the same team.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Hi guys. Need some help on my beersheets. This fantasypros mock draft is using my league's rules and I've noticed in these mock's I'm getting free reign in WR's. I'm picking third overall and you can see my rules up at the top. This is my third pick (3.3). I've taken Odell and Dez with my first two. Here's my dilema that I may be over thinking. Who would you take?  To me, Allen Robinson is the clearcut pick here. This puts me with ODBJ, Dez, and then Allen Robison in the flex. However, playing devil's advocate, I see that Matt Forte is the last available RB in the tier and the scarcity in running backs after him goes down to 28% (WR's is 66%). Forte is also a reach going in the middle of the 4th round. Do I go with Forte and then get a next tier running back like Hill or Mathews? Or do I stack my team with 3 WR 1's and hope I get 2 of the next tier running backs. FantasyPros is actually suggesting Andrew Luck: 
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Take Allen Robinson. I like forte this year but he's significantly more risky than a rob.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
RisqueBarber posted:Hi guys. Need some help on my beersheets. This fantasypros mock draft is using my league's rules and I've noticed in these mock's I'm getting free reign in WR's. I'm picking third overall and you can see my rules up at the top. This is my third pick (3.3). I've taken Odell and Dez with my first two. Here's my dilema that I may be over thinking. Who would you take? I'm starting to think that positional scarcity may not be the best indicator for drafting, as it inherently promotes a pure VBD approach that ignores the risks associated with the predictions themselves being wrong. That said I would avoid Forte; his rank is 4.6 and there's no formatting which means his ADP is between 3.6 and 5.6. Furthermore if you look at Forte's value it falls near the bottom of the Robinson-Evans tier. With that in mind I would likely go WR heavy and draft Robinson and possibly a fourth WR from that tier and then focus on getting RB value further down the line.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 22:50
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I'm starting to think that positional scarcity may not be the best indicator for drafting, as it inherently promotes a pure VBD approach that ignores the risks associated with the predictions themselves being wrong. That said I would avoid Forte; his rank is 4.6 and there's no formatting which means his ADP is between 3.6 and 5.6. Furthermore if you look at Forte's value it falls near the bottom of the Robinson-Evans tier. With that in mind I would likely go WR heavy and draft Robinson and possibly a fourth WR from that tier and then focus on getting RB value further down the line. I ended up going with my gut and taking Robinson. My next four picks were Ryan Matthews, Matt Jones, Jeremy Langford and then John Brown. So I got three out of those six running backs in that tier. I thought that the main goal of VBD was to minimize damage for predictions being wrong. By taking the best valued played and not reaching for a starting spot position(like TE or QB) it gives you a better option for when one of your RB/WR starters is disappointing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I'm starting to think that positional scarcity may not be the best indicator for drafting, as it inherently promotes a pure VBD approach that ignores the risks associated with the predictions themselves being wrong. That said I would avoid Forte; his rank is 4.6 and there's no formatting which means his ADP is between 3.6 and 5.6. Furthermore if you look at Forte's value it falls near the bottom of the Robinson-Evans tier. With that in mind I would likely go WR heavy and draft Robinson and possibly a fourth WR from that tier and then focus on getting RB value further down the line. I do not know if this has been asked/answered or not. Are your sheets set in stone no matter what the current pool of players is, or if you removed let's say the top 20 players drafted the calculations would skew the tiers and other numbers creating a completely different view of a draft at an individual point?
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
ATTENTION SPOEANK: lol McDonald touchdown
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
Blaine "Emperor Checkdown" Gabbert is about to break a lot of Torrey Smith owners' hearts.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
I am quite impressed that Vance only managed to almost drop half his targets instead of outright drop half of them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Benne posted:Blaine "Emperor Checkdown" Gabbert is about to break a lot of Torrey Smith owners' hearts. Yeah but come on, is Gabbert going to hold off Kaep once he's healthy? It's Blaine Gabbert.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:Yeah but come on, is Gabbert going to hold off Kaep once he's healthy? It's Blaine Gabbert. Look at the coach.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:Yeah but come on, is Gabbert going to hold off Kaep once he's healthy? It's Blaine Gabbert. I think Kap is broken beyond repair so ...
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
Benne posted:I think Kap is broken beyond repair so ... Free Thad?
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
#5 after the big 3 WRs and D. Johnson are off the board in PPR? AJ Hopkins Gurley Lamar Miller Elliott Bell
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
I'd go gurley but that's tough
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
AJ Green gonna get 400 targets
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:AJ Green gonna get 400 targets In 7 games?
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Does anyone know a resource for a keeper/dynasty value calculator that would include more than just PPR as options? One of my leagues does IDP/.5 per carry/.5 pt per completion. Just seems like most of the trades I look at have lead me to probably have a stronger WR core and everything else is kind of ok at best.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Well, it has come to a close. I could have done better with my receivers, but we'll see how it goes. I'm 11th pick with Lamar Miller & Jamaal Charles. We have one waiver wire pickup, which is where I'll grab my defense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
Hand Row posted:In 7 games? Is this a jab at Green's health, because he's played 76 of 80 games since entering the league. For a guy who's basically an automatic 90/1300/10 every year, Green is weirdly underrated by fantasy people.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
I would take aj green #4 overall and certainly before any rbs
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Papes posted:I would take aj green #4 overall and certainly before any rbs Only thing about Green is that 6 of those TD's happen in two games and it's a barren wasteland in between.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
I'd probably still take Nuk before AJ Green in PPR, but it's close.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
Ugh, I'm already considering dropping Theo Riddick for Christine Michael to handcuff Rawls and I just finished that draft 4 hours ago. Fantasy Football.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 04:52
|
|
|
89 posted:Only thing about Green is that 6 of those TD's happen in two games and it's a barren wasteland in between. Except he'd still get you ~6 catches and ~90-100 yards even when he's not scoring. People cream their pants for Torrey Smith when the Bengals have a version of Torrey Smith (deep threat who can flip the scoreboard on any given pass) who can actually run a full route tree and haul in tight-window catches. The dismissive way fantasy people treat AJ is bizarre to me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 04:53
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:I'd probably still take Nuk before AJ Green in PPR, but it's close. That's what I'm battling over right now. Dalton is a significantly better QB than anything the Texans have, Cinci's offensive line was #1 in pass blocking and 11th in run blocking while the Texans were #2 in run blocking but only 18th in pass blocking, and the weapons around both players are pretty much even or leaning towards Cinci. Both seem talented and athletic but I think the edge goes to Hopkins both because of his coach and his target totals. Hopkins:  Green:  They both had some holy gently caress games and were both consistent TD scorers but Hopkins just seemed so much safer PPR wise each week. Got a minimum of ten targets in all but 3 games while Green only had above ten targets 4 times. That burns considering he put up a real stinker week 14 and that could have sunk a lot of people who picked him last year. Either way it's a fresh season and it just feels like the Bengals' offense is poised to make a big leap if everyone stays healthy. Texans offense just seems so murky with Osweiler but the targets are too good to pass up. I'm picking 4th in my 14 person ppr league and I think I have to go Hopkins just for the safe bet on targets.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:50 |
|
|
Found a good one I think blue squares fucked around with this message at 05:18 on Aug 15, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:12
|
|
