|
a primate posted:You guys still seem mad that a nobody senator from Vermont won a bunch of states even though he lost. What would you be doing with your time if Hillary ran unopposed? Lost really badly, just to clarify, like was totally destroyed into complete submission
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
a primate posted:You guys still seem mad that a nobody senator from Vermont won a bunch of states even though he lost. What would you be doing with your time if Hillary ran unopposed? Insecurity -- from Hillary voters? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Rand alPaul posted:Insecurity -- from Hillary voters? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Lost really badly, just to clarify, like was totally destroyed into complete submission I mean if he wasn't a well known politician yeah, but gotta take into account relative variables like "Who the gently caress is Bernie Sanders? Why is he getting votes at all?" I mean he lost yeah, but you gotta be real mad about him running to say that some schmuck no one knows lost 'badly' when Trump won more handily and he's a loving orange clown bound to destroy the very fabric of modern republicanism.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
my favorite part of this still is bernie sanders being both the champion of REAL AMERICA leading an army that can't be ignored as it marches through the nation, and also being a literal nobody that no one knew anything about (ignore the polls showing his awareness with voters was pretty much right around Clinton's) depending on if we're sucking his dick or downplaying Clinton's win. Remember, just like how Obama didn't REALLY win the election, Clinton won't either, because the standards are different
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:(ignore the polls showing his awareness with voters was pretty much right around Clinton's) Early polls showed not many people knew much about him until it was practically decided. Either way, no one knew of him prior to the election which is the main crux of the point being made and in a year or two no one will remember Sanders. Typical for nobody candidates. Well, unless the movement he started continues properly, then he'd be remembered as much as Ron Paul is. ThndrShk2k has issued a correction as of 06:26 on Aug 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 06:23
|
|
|
my team > ur team
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
a primate posted:You guys still seem mad that a nobody senator from Vermont won a bunch of states even though he lost. What would you be doing with your time if Hillary ran unopposed? I'm surprised any liberal is upset at him running, given the new party platform.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:I'm surprised any liberal is upset at him running, given the new party platform. Bernie was good at closing deals and winning concessions such as more progressive platform. He bent the knee but got something in return.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
etalian posted:Bernie was good at closing deals and winning concessions such as more progressive platform.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:I'm surprised any liberal is upset at him running, given the new party platform. Bernie was fine, now is the time to mock his core supporters. The ones who needed "time to be upset" about the loss while posting right wing conspiracies and claiming they were chill bros. Basically the revolution is dead and now their political idealism needs to be destroyed too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Bernie was fine, now is the time to mock his core supporters. The ones who needed "time to be upset" about the loss while posting right wing conspiracies and claiming they were chill bros. Basically the revolution is dead and now their political idealism needs to be destroyed too. Someone's gonna try to astroturf it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Basically the revolution is dead and now their political idealism needs to be destroyed too. reactionism is cool
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Bernie was fine, now is the time to mock his core supporters. The ones who needed "time to be upset" about the loss while posting right wing conspiracies and claiming they were chill bros. Basically the revolution is dead and now their political idealism needs to be destroyed too. The core of Bernie's supporters are voting for Clinton and, hopefully, inspired enough to run at a state level to gradually shift the party to the left. They're not as you described above.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:The core of Bernie's supporters are voting for Clinton and, hopefully, inspired enough to run at a state level to gradually shift the party to the left. They're not as you described above. (I do hope they at least submit a valid ballot no matter if they choose a president or not.)
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Either way there are plenty of opportunities for his supporters to shift the party to the left other than withholding their vote in November. Stamping them out is both self destructive and reactionary.
Dead Cosmonaut has issued a correction as of 00:52 on Aug 22, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:Either way there are plenty of opportunities for his supporters to shift the party to the left other than withholding their vote in November. Stamping them out is both self destructive and reactionary. The core I am talking about will not be voting D in November regardless of what the Democrats do. Those people deserve to be mocked, not placated.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:The core I am talking about will not be voting D in November regardless of what the Democrats do. Those people deserve to be mocked, not placated. Over 75% of Bernie's supporters are voting for Clinton. That's his core.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
Rand alPaul posted:Never forget :bernget:
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
lol at xylroc's bad posts squash and kill people for having ideas that are different than yours, sounds ironically familiar...
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
It's August 21, 2016, and we're still having Clinton supporters melting down over Sanders. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:Over 75% of Bernie's supporters are voting for Clinton. That's his core. You keep telling yourself that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:You keep telling yourself that. I don't have to. Virtually any poll that has been done on his supporters can prove it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:You keep telling yourself that. Polls show around 85-95% of Bernie Bros will vote for Shillery this fall. it's not like they were going to support the madman Trump instead.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
etalian posted:Polls show around 85-95% of Bernie Bros will vote for Shillery this fall. I'm totally down with purging the remaining Naderite five percent.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
etalian posted:Polls show around 85-95% of Bernie Bros will vote for Shillery this fall. *looks at polls* No, no, I think I'll trust the guy Arzying over the professionals. He's got moxie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
Pander posted:*looks at polls* Bernie said he will be campaigning alongside Hillary this fall. He will do his part to make sure Trump is humilated in a yuge landslide defeat.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
etalian posted:Bernie said he will be campaigning alongside Hillary this fall. A 19 year old in Minnesota just decided Hillary was the devil and Bernie's an rear end in a top hat for not fighting through the convention, so nothing you say is true anymore.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:I don't have to. Virtually any poll that has been done on his supporters can prove it. Let me break it down for you. I define the core one way, and you define it another. The people I troll are the guys posting 20 year old Clinton Foundation conspiracies or the ones who crash the DNC dancing around and catching fire by accident while attempting to derail the nomination process. Your definition of core includes all people who voted for Sanders but that is a really stupid definition (no one is going to call the 90% of Bernie supporters going to Hillary "core" supporters).
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
By your own definition I can find the "core" of Hillary's supporters at hillaryis44.com (i.e., a group of people who got really upset that she lost to Obama, started PUMA, attempted to protest the DNC, and post conspiracy theories). We both know that's pure nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Let me break it down for you. I define the core one way, and you define it another. The people I troll are the guys posting 20 year old Clinton Foundation conspiracies or the ones who crash the DNC dancing around and catching fire by accident while attempting to derail the nomination process. Your definition of core includes all people who voted for Sanders but that is a really stupid definition (no one is going to call the 90% of Bernie supporters going to Hillary "core" supporters). Speaking of core: 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 03:38
|
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:By your own definition I can find the "core" of Hillary's supporters at hillaryis44.com (i.e., a group of people who got really upset that she lost to Obama, started PUMA, attempted to protest the DNC, and post conspiracy theories). We both know that's pure nonsense. People worthy of mocking, I can get behind this
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
Nader was right.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:People worthy of mocking, I can get behind this turn on your monitor
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
i care about who people vote for unironically as it satisfies my desperate need to feel superior
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
i dont like that bernie bros who had clinton as a second choice voting for her  "I want them to keep losing so badlyyyy so that i can feel better about myself because im a massive shithead who wonders why nobody likes me" - xylroc
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:Nader was right. False, the Corvair owned.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:i dont like that bernie bros who had clinton as a second choice voting for her Give me the good stuff, maybe post some updates on delegates who "won't be voting for Clinton" just to help me finish, I need it
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Give me the good stuff, maybe post some updates on delegates who "won't be voting for Clinton" just to help me finish, I need it this desperation that you have going on? i like that you're doubling down on it and instead of shrugging it off, its comically backfiring on you and it makes you look even more dependent on a punching bag next thing i know youre gonna puppetmaster your way out of it lmbo 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:Let me break it down for you. I define the core one way, and you define it another. The people I troll are the guys posting 20 year old Clinton Foundation conspiracies or the ones who crash the DNC dancing around and catching fire by accident while attempting to derail the nomination process. Your definition of core includes all people who voted for Sanders but that is a really stupid definition (no one is going to call the 90% of Bernie supporters going to Hillary "core" supporters). 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 05:15
|
|
