|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 03:30 on Jul 13, 2021 |
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 03:22 |
|
|
In the league as Weaselior.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
In as Senior Belvedere
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
Draft is at 11 pacific 10 central 9 right now, correct?
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
What? this is not how clocks work. 8pm PST/11PM EST this is all I can tell you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
I think I did that backwards I dunno
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:In the league as Weaselior. Not "Weaselsior"?
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 04:47
|
|
|
Oh I thought it was next Monday welp
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
Elotana posted:Oh I thought it was next Monday Start a relegation league
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
Kirk cousins? Adrian Peterson? you guys rigged this against me but I'll show you!!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 12:39
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:Kirk cousins? Adrian Peterson? you guys rigged this against me but I'll show you!!! Obligatory https://vine.co/v/eYBbTpLquPd
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
I wanted AP
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:I wanted AP well now I'm happy since Bridgewater just died
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:well now I'm happy since Bridgewater just died Bridgewater looks like one of those aliens from the movie with the sexy alien chick. Edit:Species
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:well now I'm happy since Bridgewater just died That just means they'll be running every play instead of every other play. Also RIP this viking's season.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
One of my new patent applications has literal manga panels in the drawings. I looked up the inventor disclosures for the original Japanese application and yep they were scanned from a manga about driving lmao.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 10:39
|
|
|
Speaking of patents... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/08/31/patent-office-workers-cost-taxpayers-millions-by-playing-hooky-watchdog-finds/
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 15:39
|
|
|
gret posted:Speaking of patents... lol we don't actually have any duty to badge in or log on or anything
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
like if I worked on campus still I could just show up and smoke cigarettes on the quad all day and count it as a full day worked
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 16:28
|
|
|
You guys definitely have too much time to perform a search too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Whats wrong with me that I read the first couple of paragraphs of that report, and thought, "I'm sure most of those 300,000 hours are explained away, and the rest... well, who cares?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Whats wrong with me that I read the first couple of paragraphs of that report, and thought, "I'm sure most of those 300,000 hours are explained away, and the rest... well, who cares?" i read it, found that all of the top performers were responsible for the "unexplained hours", and determined that there was not really a problem here
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
Court closed due to hurricane today so I got the day off! (Still went to the office to do work)
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:i read it, found that all of the top performers were responsible for the "unexplained hours", and determined that there was not really a problem here Argh, our top performers are so good they do the work we assign them for a year in just 6 months! We could pay them more to do more work or demand they sit at their desks doing nothing. It's the children who are wrong.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 02:52
|
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 03:30 on Jul 13, 2021 |
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Argh, our top performers are so good they do the work we assign them for a year in just 6 months! We could pay them more to do more work or demand they sit at their desks doing nothing. they actually can't pay more. top performers are hitting the 5 U.S.C. § 5547(a) cap.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
it's actually a nice scam because thanks to step increases, it actually means you have to do less work to hit the cap the longer you work. but yeah, between hitting the max biweekly takehome plus like $15k in available bonuses you're pretty close to getting paid as much as it's possible to get paid as a GS employee.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
Union memo:quote:As we all know, we have faced trying times lately. Criticisms and attacks on our work product and work ethics come from all sides. Now, seemingly, even our integrity is being called into question by the latest IG report.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
i'll be in alexandria in a few weeks and ill be sure to give those unethical examiners a piece of my mind!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
everyone knows to do a prior art search for a patent you just type in a phrase in Google and call it a day
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 03:30 on Jul 13, 2021 |
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
When a doctor gives you a medical narrative for a PI client with 30k per year expected future medical. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
Roger_Mudd posted:When a doctor gives you a medical narrative for a PI client with 30k per year expected future medical. Woop! For how many years? Forever? What are lost wages like? How big's the policy?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
CaptainScraps posted:Woop! For how many years? Forever? What are lost wages like? How big's the policy? For-ev-er. No lost wages (retired). Commercial 2 mill policy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:they actually can't pay more. top performers are hitting the 5 U.S.C. § 5547(a) cap. My point was since the examiner's cannot get paid more, why not let them gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
Roger_Mudd posted:For-ev-er. No lost wages (retired). Commercial 2 mill policy. helllooooo liability limit settlement.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Roger_Mudd posted:For-ev-er. No lost wages (retired). Commercial 2 mill policy. Pay off all that debt and retire, girl. We just sent out a policy demand on 7 policies totalling 15m for one accident. We'll be lucky to get 2
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
Who's in San Diego looking for a new client? https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/4zmtq8/ca_are_there_any_legal_implications_associated/ He won't hire women as employees though, so watch out!
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:My point was since the examiner's cannot get paid more, why not let them gently caress off. protestant work ethic. they should happily work for free and be glad to have a job, after all
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 03:22 |
|
|
So quick question for your personal injury types - friend's car got totaled last night. Other driver at fault (and admitted it in police report). Open and shut for the most part except she's still dealing with a lawsuit from a wreck three years ago. What's going to be the order of events here? Does the old have to close out before the new can start up? How much of a pain is it going to be to switch to a better attorney? I haven't dealt with any of this on a practical scale so I really have no idea. I'm pretty sure previous lawsuit is in settlement negotiations right now. My gut feeling is that one will be basically settled immediately and the new one will proceed because there's no way to claim any further medical on the old one without muddying the waters quite a bit because the new one certainly exacerbated existing problems.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 20:18
|
|