|
Aw man. Yeah, forgot we had swedes here. HEGEL, please don't ever take my answers on what the Swedish do or say as not lies. Our history is.. complicated.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 11:26 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 10:02 |
|
Kemper Boyd posted:I think I fell asleep while watching that and woke up to needing to use the toilet. That is my Lindybeige experience. thank u 4 ur service
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 11:27 |
|
Tias posted:Aw man.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 11:28 |
|
Tias posted:Aw man. haha no, i'm a finn, we have mandatory swedish in schools (where almost no one learns any usable swedish), but i've studied more than the minimum and i have swedish speaking relatives HEY GAL posted:as far as i can tell, this thread is mostly Nordics. More enemies for me when we play Pike and Shotte in grey hunter's upcoming Pike and Shotte game, then! drat i had forgotten about that, when it's on, is there a thread yet?
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 11:34 |
|
Hogge Wild posted:drat i had forgotten about that, when it's on, is there a thread yet?
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 11:40 |
|
Hogge Wild posted:Were the big estates in Prussia better mechanized? The large estates were generally much more developed and mechanized and worked like farms in the US or UK, some were also let out in lots of small parts to tenant farmers in a similar process to what occurred in the middle ages, though that was still known to happen across europe at this time in other countries at well.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 12:29 |
|
The Germans also experienced huge shortages of pork during the war Because the pigs all joined the Wehrmacht
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:01 |
MikeCrotch posted:Oh god. Lindybeige has a new video. It's called..."Cavalry Was a Stupid Idea". Somebody clearly hasn't moved out the way of a horse!
|
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:09 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:Oh god. Lindybeige has a new video. It's called..."Cavalry Was a Stupid Idea". Its a really dumb title for a not very good video about the difficulties of fighting on horseback and developing the technology for such.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:32 |
|
I'm not going to give that idiot page views. Can someone tldr how he hand waves away the only option for that kind of tactical mobility before the internal combustion engine?
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:37 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:Oh god. Lindybeige has a new video. It's called..."Cavalry Was a Stupid Idea". Should never have invented the saddle, imo, chariot was fine, don't need to change. Also Huns never existed.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:37 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Should never have invented the saddle, imo, chariot was fine, don't need to change. Athena Lied Hector Died
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:38 |
|
Bodicea had a chariot and she beat rome, ergo roman tactics are poo poo and chariots are best. And if you think about it tanks are just horseless chariots. Makes u think.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:39 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:Oh god. Lindybeige has a new video. It's called..."Cavalry Was a Stupid Idea". That is a click bait title if I have ever seen one.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 15:39 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:I'm not going to give that idiot page views. Can someone tldr how he hand waves away the only option for that kind of tactical mobility before the internal combustion engine? Sitting on a horse is hard. Barely domesticated horses are not naturally inclined to fight. Horses are a big vulnerable target that when they charge at you an infantryman will casually shiv it up. Early horses were small and sitting on them in armor is difficult. Chariots are apparently superb. Stopped about the time of the Romans with a brief afterword about stirrups. There are no upsides to cavalry except in their use as chariots and logistical movers.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:00 |
|
HEY GAL posted:Athena Lied Hector Died Helen of Troy was a 8.5 at best, didn't even score one mega-Monroe!! Click to SEE
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:10 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:Oh god. Lindybeige has a new video. It's called..."Cavalry Was a Stupid Idea". It's clickbait. He's talking mostly about how people didn't physically ride horses into battle for the longest time, and something about how the stirrups weren't as important of an innovation as the saddle that distributed their weight, but he overlooks the most important technological innovation for cavalry: horses big enough to ride.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:24 |
|
Shetland pony cavalry seems fine to me. Get tiny fat men to ride them.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:27 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:It's clickbait. He's talking mostly about how people didn't physically ride horses into battle for the longest time, and something about how the stirrups weren't as important of an innovation as the saddle that distributed their weight, but he overlooks the most important technological innovation for cavalry: horses big enough to ride. I'm assuming robust enough agriculture to support large numbers of big horses was pretty important too (unless you are the Mongols and live on giant grassy steppes)
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:36 |
|
What was typically done with horses past their working prime? Eaten or put out to stud, I'm assuming? At least in modern times horses are considered past their prime once they're into their teens, but can live well into their twenties or thirties. Their lifespans are roughly twice the number of years they'd be fit for battle I'd guess.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 16:55 |
|
Hogge Wild posted:haha no, i'm a finn, we have mandatory swedish in schools (where almost no one learns any usable swedish), but i've studied more than the minimum and i have swedish speaking relatives I'm going to a sober tribe thing in Helsinki next year, think we could get together and watch military thinges?
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 17:00 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:I'm assuming robust enough agriculture to support large numbers of big horses was pretty important too (unless you are the Mongols and live on giant grassy steppes) what if i am the hungarians (your choice of three versions of them)
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 17:41 |
|
Tias posted:I'm going to a sober tribe thing in Helsinki next year, think we could get together and watch military thinges? Coming to Finland to be sober? But yeah sure!
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 17:43 |
|
Polyakov posted:
RECONNAISSANCE MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU DO IT?
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:04 |
|
Anyone coming to Turku in Finland can hit me up, I can show you the tombs of Tott and Stålhandske and rant about the local geography and the lack of historical sources about the area.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:10 |
|
it not even like sitting on a horse with a saddle is hard, just use your thighs jesus how fat/anemic is this dweeb
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:19 |
|
Agean90 posted:it not even like sitting on a horse with a saddle is hard, just use your thighs jesus
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:24 |
|
Tias posted:I'm going to a sober tribe thing in Helsinki next year, think we could get together and watch military thinges? There is some suitable real estate coming available soon: https://goo.gl/maps/cz7aS2Psryw As automatic translation always works for Finnish really well: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fi&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=fi&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffi.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FIsosaari&edit-text= (BTW, does anyone anymore use gun/fortress coastal artillery anymore? Koreans?)
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:26 |
|
Polyakov posted:Sitting on a horse is hard. quote:Barely domesticated horses are not naturally inclined to fight. quote:Horses are a big vulnerable target that when they charge at you an infantryman will casually shiv it up. quote:Early horses were small and sitting on them in armor is difficult. quote:Chariots are apparently superb. quote:Stopped about the time of the Romans with a brief afterword about stirrups. quote:There are no upsides to cavalry except in their use as chariots and logistical movers. 1. gently caress. 2. If a horse is being used as a pack animal it is no longer cavalry.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:33 |
|
Rodrigo Diaz posted:lmao
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:37 |
MikeCrotch posted:I'm assuming robust enough agriculture to support large numbers of big horses was pretty important too (unless you are the Mongols and live on giant grassy steppes) Draught animals increase yields so having more of them isn't a problem as such.
|
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:47 |
|
That thing where Hannibal won them battles with them numidian horses, didn't happen.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:49 |
|
Disinterested posted:Draught animals increase yields so having more of them isn't a problem as such. Horses eat like horses, so keeping large cavalry formations on non-steppes is extremely expensive.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:56 |
|
Speaking of cavalry, I have a stupid question. There's man on a horse with a bow, with a javelin, with a pistol, with a carbine, etc. but did anyone ever try horse slingers? I imagine this is a recipe for a disaster such as cracking your skull open with a rock, but it seems like the sort of thing that if you could get it to work would be worthwhile. Also, no mention of elephant cavalry in that dumb video? Lame.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:57 |
|
OwlFancier posted:That thing where Hannibal won them battles with them numidian horses, didn't happen. I think you'll find that Hannibal ultimately lost that war. Checkmate, cavailures
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:02 |
|
OwlFancier posted:That thing where Hannibal won them battles with them numidian horses, didn't happen. Mongols? Never heard of them.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:03 |
|
ArchangeI posted:RECONNAISSANCE MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU DO IT? Pfft reconnaissance. If you horse guys are so great why can't you go do the thing *infantry doesn't support attack, gains are not exploited* Lol idiot horses, cavalry sucks
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:04 |
|
Cavalry is dumb and stupid, just look at the Charge of the Light Brigade!
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:04 |
|
Ithle01 posted:Speaking of cavalry, I have a stupid question. There's man on a horse with a bow, with a javelin, with a pistol, with a carbine, etc. but did anyone ever try horse slingers? I imagine this is a recipe for a disaster such as cracking your skull open with a rock, but it seems like the sort of thing that if you could get it to work would be worthwhile. Quick googling says that it was tried: https://books.google.fi/books?id=ba...lingers&f=false
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:05 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 10:02 |
|
Ithle01 posted:Speaking of cavalry, I have a stupid question. There's man on a horse with a bow, with a javelin, with a pistol, with a carbine, etc. but did anyone ever try horse slingers? I imagine this is a recipe for a disaster such as cracking your skull open with a rock, but it seems like the sort of thing that if you could get it to work would be worthwhile. The physical limitations of your weapon are important to consider. If a likely end-state of using a weapon in a certain way is "disaster", nobody is going to pick it up. I have no idea why it would be worthwhile either. Slings are just "okay" and you can't really scale them up.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 20:05 |