|
Galaga Galaxian posted:You had already punished the rebels by imprisonment, execution is considered excessive and has few valid reasons. It's weird, though, another case it comes up, I believe, is if you imprison someone for a plot you can execute them fine with no penalty, but if you fail on catching them and they rebel, then you capture them at the end... you get the penalty for executing them then.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:22 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 02:24 |
|
Satan speaks to me constantly, healed my Maimed trait, healed my Infirm trait, and I'm speaking in tongues... but Jesus is also giving me military advice. I'm 12/36/6/16/10 at 60!
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:23 |
|
Is there any way to get around the Foreign Culture negative bump when trying to vassilize people? I don't want to waste my time warring with titchy Scottish lords now I've usurped their Kingdom, I've still got England to conquer and only 100 years to go!
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:24 |
|
Rarity posted:Is there any way to get around the Foreign Culture negative bump when trying to vassilize people? I don't want to waste my time warring with titchy Scottish lords now I've usurped their Kingdom, I've still got England to conquer and only 100 years to go! DoW multiple at once.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:26 |
|
And another maybe bug that just hit me. Apparently you can be hit with slander by someone outside of diplomatic range? I was slandered by someone in Africa as a British ruler.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:31 |
|
BenRGamer posted:I was slandered by someone in Africa as a British ruler. Yeah, welcome to how every British Monarch has felt since the 1700's.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:41 |
|
Lareine posted:What? Is THAT what they are trying to do? poo poo, that makes a lot of sense. But why would they want to be part of a weakened country? Because isn't really a country in the modern sense. They benefit from being under a weak king because a weak king means more power to the aristocracy.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:43 |
|
Rarity posted:Is there any way to get around the Foreign Culture negative bump when trying to vassilize people? I don't want to waste my time warring with titchy Scottish lords now I've usurped their Kingdom, I've still got England to conquer and only 100 years to go! Generally no. People will usually only accept vassalization if they share your culture and religion. If they really like you and they are a duke and you are an emperor, maybe? But even then Probably not.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 22:51 |
|
Galaga Galaxian posted:You had already punished the rebels by imprisonment, execution is considered excessive and has few valid reasons. This is really unfortunate, they added all these methods of execution and torture but there's no mechanical reason to use them.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 23:28 |
|
Just murder infidels, nobody cares about them. Also, on that note, I just got the Papal Mache achievement from executing the Caliph while taking back the Zun holy sites.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 23:34 |
|
And now apparently one of my own counties got called into a war against me by Defensive Pact but its... not rebelling? Still has the same realm color and doesn't have its own outline, just the glowing red thing from the war. Edit: ...is there a cap on how high you can get a levy from a single county? My army is basically just my capital's levy and my retinue, and that makes up about 30k troops, about an even split between them. DMW45 fucked around with this message at 23:46 on Aug 31, 2016 |
# ? Aug 31, 2016 23:40 |
|
Holy poo poo have the hordes been un-gimped. I set them to random spawn and started in the Charlemagne start date, because every other time I'd seen them go nowhere and wanted a challenge. I cut off more than I could chew, since it's the 950s, I'm still just Venice, and the Aztecs own Francia and Germania. And the Mongols are in the East, having broken the back of the Nomadic tribes and are threatening from the East.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 23:46 |
|
BenRGamer posted:And now apparently one of my own counties got called into a war against me by Defensive Pact but its... not rebelling? Still has the same realm color and doesn't have its own outline, just the glowing red thing from the war. There's pretty much no cap except how high you can stack modifiers on it really.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 23:48 |
|
SeaTard posted:It also looks like being sieged will reset the prosperity progress, which means that war is doubly risky. also: what the gently caress is up with some of my kinsmen???
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:02 |
|
I had an event telling me that my wife poisoned me, but I think it was all in my lunatic head because I had no status effect, symptom or anything. It gave me a chance to imprison her, behead her or let it slide. I chose beheading since she was old and ugly anyways then remarried a 16 yo girl. It's good to be the duke. It didn't even give me tyranny or any malus, I wish it fired more often!
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:30 |
|
Rarity posted:Is there any way to get around the Foreign Culture negative bump when trying to vassilize people? I don't want to waste my time warring with titchy Scottish lords now I've usurped their Kingdom, I've still got England to conquer and only 100 years to go! http://www.ckiiwiki.com/Diplomatic_actions#Offer_vassalization quote:AI rulers will swear fealty when asked if they like the liege, the liege has a significantly larger number of troops, and at least two of the following are true:
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:31 |
|
Man, I'd love a Tenacious D total conversion where they have to run City Hall, but end up poisoning each other. Rage Cage would be Duke. Be a kickass duke.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:38 |
|
Oh my god. There's special text if you're diagnosed with gout by a horse. edit: Also for treatment, apparently. I was prescribed a bag of oats, to be attached to the face.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:43 |
|
That horse is gonna kill you.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 00:44 |
|
Anybody else having city courtiers rebel, then not even raising troops? It's really weird because it's not even like they would stand a chance rebelling.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 01:19 |
|
Strudel Man posted:They can't inherit titles if blinded or castrated, but it doesn't kick them out of titles they already hold, nor even from having claims pressed and getting titles that way. Thank you. Just a quick second question then: I have the Emperor of the Byzantine Empire in my prison and he is my liege (hooray for abduction event). If I am a faction leader and try to push my ultimatum , can he still go to war? I mean I understand there is a regent but wouldn't any war automatically hit 100% warscore because he was captured? Edit: So it turns out you give the ultimatum, it goes to war but because you have him in jail, the warscore is automatically 100% and you can instantly win. SkySteak fucked around with this message at 02:45 on Sep 1, 2016 |
# ? Sep 1, 2016 01:40 |
|
Galaga Galaxian posted:You had already punished the rebels by imprisonment, execution is considered excessive and has few valid reasons. Eh, if I remember correctly in the game's time period imprisonment wasn't generally thought of as a punishment in itself. Criminal were punished by execution, torture, mutilation, ritual humiliation, fines etc.; the dungeon was just a basement you kept people in until you decided what to do with them.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 02:40 |
|
Autonomous Monster posted:Eh, if I remember correctly in the game's time period imprisonment wasn't generally thought of as a punishment in itself. Criminal were punished by execution, torture, mutilation, ritual humiliation, fines etc.; the dungeon was just a basement you kept people in until you decided what to do with them. Yeah, kinda odd that a game set in the middle ages doesn't want you to go medieval on people.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 02:50 |
|
Autonomous Monster posted:Eh, if I remember correctly in the game's time period imprisonment wasn't generally thought of as a punishment in itself. Criminal were punished by execution, torture, mutilation, ritual humiliation, fines etc.; the dungeon was just a basement you kept people in until you decided what to do with them. And an easy death was actually considered escaping justice in a lot of places. Germany in particular considered the torture leading up to death to be the punishment, death was just the parole.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 02:58 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Oh my god. There's special text if you're diagnosed with gout by a horse. Horse M.D. always enters with a long face. He's like...the Dr. Cox of medieval physicians so...he's probably competent? CrazyLoon fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Sep 1, 2016 |
# ? Sep 1, 2016 03:11 |
|
Ok, seriously... what's the deal with the horse doctors? I mean... what?
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 03:18 |
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Ok, seriously... what's the deal with the horse doctors? I mean... what? Lunatics can sometimes hire a horse to be their doctor.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 03:22 |
|
Why did I lose my kingdom after I lost the emperorship Also can I refuse to be emperor
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 03:43 |
|
I just started playing my first game using only the base CK II. I managed to beat the guy who was in Desmond to become my vassal but my half brother bishop assassinated my son (who luckily already sired an heir) but when I tried to imprison him he ran away. Fortunately his son and grandson were still in my domain so I threw them both in prison. I kind of hope he comes back to free them so that I can execute him but I don't know if that's possible. I'm also not sure what I do next, fabricate claims on Leinster I think? I also need to kick my vassals out so I can become to soul ruler of Munster?
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 03:49 |
|
Roland Jones posted:Lunatics can sometimes hire a horse to be their doctor.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 04:20 |
|
Strudel Man posted:That's the intended method, though in this case, my doctor was a horse because my character was brought up by a horse chancellor, and became horse-cultured himself. Thus the physicians he hires are naturally horses, unless another culture is specified. Okay well that's loving amazing. Wow.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 04:58 |
|
Strudel Man posted:That's the intended method, though in this case, my doctor was a horse because my character was brought up by a horse chancellor, and became horse-cultured himself. Thus the physicians he hires are naturally horses, unless another culture is specified. Paradox must be so proud of you.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 05:19 |
Strudel Man posted:That's the intended method, though in this case, my doctor was a horse because my character was brought up by a horse chancellor, and became horse-cultured himself. Thus the physicians he hires are naturally horses, unless another culture is specified. Crusader Kings II: Dances with Horses
|
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 05:23 |
|
It's fine, they just made Lunatic inheritable
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 05:24 |
|
So I imprisoned my Duke for plotting to usurp my Chiefdom, stripped him of his titles, and banished him. His son inherits, all is well. Five years later I declare war to conquer part of superSjaelland, call my vassals, and get a notice that one of them denied me reinforcements - the ex-now not ex-Duke! His son had died of cancer and the cheeky fucker just waltzed right back into his old duchy. The issue solved itself when he Holmganged me in the middle of another war. He was 6 martial, I was 31 martial. So I personally killed my rear end in a top hat returned Duke in the middle of the largest battle of the war.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 06:18 |
|
Duel outcomes are not affected by Martial ability anymore, it's based on your Personal Combat skill.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 06:29 |
|
Oh man I think they fixed the Shia uprising event. They now spawn with ~20% more troops then the target has, so it actually has a chance of succeeding. A successful one took hold in Mesopotamia and ended up conquering half of Persia before winning their own jihad against the Byzantines.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 07:16 |
|
The abbas got rocked by a one two punch of shia uprising and decadence revolt. Unfortunately I think the revolters ate the Shia guys because there's tons of independent vassals in the near east but none are Shia
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 07:29 |
|
What's the deal with AI rulers being able to maintain hired troops while deep in the negatives for gold? I'm trying to gobble up part of the Fatimid caliphate, but the Caliph has troops for days, even when it seems like he shouldn't.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 07:32 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 02:24 |
|
Pfox posted:What's the deal with AI rulers being able to maintain hired troops while deep in the negatives for gold? I'm trying to gobble up part of the Fatimid caliphate, but the Caliph has troops for days, even when it seems like he shouldn't. The Fatimids have a gigantic vassal merc company that they can keep in the field indefinitely and that regenerates its numbers fairly quickly.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2016 07:38 |