|
Still love how zero-effort that "new" costume is. I'd love to see the check Alex Ross got for that.
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 14:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
Lobok posted:If someone thinks that IS Spider-Man and attacks him, then what? They get PROWL'd!
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
Lobok posted:If someone thinks that IS Spider-Man and attacks him, then what? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
Since Spider-Man has his Spider-Mobile, it's only fair that Prowler gets one too.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 15:22
|
|
Lobok posted:Since Spider-Man has his Spider-Mobile, it's only fair that Prowler gets one too. I think I had a toy of that.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
I think I'm the only adult on earth that's both not a rich douche, and thinks the Prowler is a pretty neat looking car.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:I think I'm the only adult on earth that's both not a rich douche, and thinks the Prowler is a pretty neat looking car. Technically meets the requirements for funny panels as well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
I like how the prowler is apparently an idiot if he can't figure out Petes gambit here.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I like how the prowler is apparently an idiot if he can't figure out Petes gambit here. It not Peter, it Gambit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I like how the prowler is apparently an idiot if he can't figure out Petes gambit here. Wait, does he not know Peter's Spiderman??? (I haven't read Marvel in years except for USG)
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:Wait, does he not know Peter's Spiderman??? (I haven't read Marvel in years except for USG) No, Spider-Man is Peter Parker's bodyguard at the moment. Peter Parker being a famous wealthy dude.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
No, he's never known. Spider-man knows Prowler's identity because he unmasked him on their second encounter, but has never told anybody so Prowler still trusts him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:Wait, does he not know Peter's Spiderman??? (I haven't read Marvel in years except for USG) He doesn't, even if it would make much more sense if he did.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Iron Fist did a stint as fake Daredevil, and he'd be a great candidate for this kind of thing. As fake DD, he was so good an actor that he mimicked Daredevil's fighting style with such precision that he got beaten up instead of winning a fight that Iron Fist could have taken easily. (Unless I imagined that.)
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:No, Spider-Man is Peter Parker's bodyguard at the moment. Peter Parker being a famous wealthy dude. "Tony Stark lied all those years but Peter Parker seems like an upstanding guy! They're obviously different people!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:"Tony Stark lied all those years but Peter Parker seems like an upstanding guy! They're obviously different people!" Tony Stark didn't lie all the time. When he was a full-time drunk, Rhodey wore the suit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
prefect posted:Tony Stark didn't lie all the time. When he was a full-time drunk, FTFY 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Lobok posted:If someone thinks that IS Spider-Man and attacks him, then what? He fights back? The Prowler's a real superhero as well, and Peter has actually built some gadgets into the new suits.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
there's a page later in that book where villains crash the wedding and prowler gets sucker punched because he's trying to concentrate on wisecracking like spiderman does and doesn't notice the shot coming because he doesn't have spider sense
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
Wait Peter Parker is rich now? Now I know how Joe Quesada felt about Spider-Man being married!
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:Wait Peter Parker is rich now? Now I know how Joe Quesada felt about Spider-Man being married! When Doctor Octopus took over Peter's body he was like "why not become a wealthy supergenius" and then he was still one when Peter got his body back, combined with the status quo changing significantly enough that he had no competition.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
Spidey is Steve Jobs now. Just wait for the cancer storyline
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Why wait.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
Ghostlight posted:Why wait. SWEET CAROLINE
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
 Amazing Spider-Man #17 (the current series)
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 02:46
|
|
Roth posted:
Joke already out of date by the time the comic gets printed!
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Joke already out of date by the time the comic gets printed! Nah, PG is still huge. Now mind you, the person who reads the collection in 20 years is going to be very WTF about it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Nah, PG is still huge. Now mind you, the person who reads the collection in 20 years is going to be very WTF about it. In 20 years, Pokémon Go will become so huge and all encompassing that it will facilitate all our social and business interactions, making readers go WTF about why you wouldn't use the company wifi.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
Uthor posted:In 20 years, Pokémon Go will become so huge and all encompassing that it will facilitate all our social and business interactions, making readers go WTF about why you wouldn't use the company wifi. Fair point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
I saw your email but couldnt catch it before it ran away.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Joke already out of date by the time the comic gets printed! I found it funny enough to post it, so I don't particularly care if it is or not.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
Red posted:I like that Peter has a real, actual friend he can count on. Well... not so fast on that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Joke already out of date by the time the comic gets printed! 20 years ago people were saying the same thing about any references to this Pokemon fad being dated as hell in only a few years 
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 04:27
|
|
|
I was just referring to how Pokemon Go's various server issues, bugs, bad PR moves etc. had soured a lot of people on it.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
To be fair hasn't the user base for Pokemon go shrunk by a huge amount now that the novelty has passed for most people? Much like other Pokemon soon the only audience will be kids and a small number of adults who range from normal to "I'm sorry officer i didn't know I couldn't had on a playground with kids but you see there was a DoDuo you see and I needed Madison's help to find it."
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
You don't capitalize the second D. Sheesh.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:To be fair hasn't the user base for Pokemon go shrunk by a huge amount now that the novelty has passed for most people? From what I heard second hand, they lost a ton of users, but the user base is so huge, it's a much smaller loss percentage wise than other fad social games.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure we can stop trying to claim only kids play Pokemon when there's a huge number of teens and adults who readily admit to still playing it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 05:26
|
|
|
I acknowledged that pretty thoroughly
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
Yeah literally no one is claiming that, they are saying Go is loosing people but that was going to happen as it's barely a game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2016 05:29
|
|