|
Didn't the AP also make a fuss about the Chairmam of the Kennedy Center or some poo poo?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 16:43 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Yes This: WhiskeyJuvenile posted:The whole "scandal" is that she met with these 80-somethings people as part of her job too though so why does the fact that she met other people as part of her job not count again? Also, sorry for your luck but it is the responsibility of the journalist to provide the context of their accusations. Like that is a core part of responsible journalism. Not just asking who she met with -- but asking why those people matter and how you got to those numbers. WhiskeyJuvenile posted:Didn't the AP also make a fuss about the Chairmam of the Kennedy Center or some poo poo? Yes. She sat with the chairmen of the Kennedy Center!
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:02 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Wait you seriously think Elie Wiesel is part of a pay to play scheme with the Clinton Foundation and the State Department? I think Hillary met with Elie Wiesel outside her official State Sec duties, and that she was probably running a pay to play scheme on at least a mild level theflyingorc posted:...outside of her official duties? How, exactly, is that wrong? Except that the charities she met with made large contributions to her personal foundation WhiskeyJuvenile posted:The whole "scandal" is that she met with these 80-somethings people as part of her job too though so why does the fact that she met other people as part of her job not count again? It wasn't part of her job though. Her job was to conduct official business with foreign foreign ministries
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:02 |
|
icantfindaname posted:I think Hillary met with Elie Wiesel outside her official State Sec duties, and that she was probably running a pay to play scheme on at least a mild level lol
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:03 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Also, sorry for your luck but it is the responsibility of the journalist to provide the context of their accusations. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/82df550e1ec646098b434f7d5771f625/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state quote:The 154 did not include U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives. Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP's calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties. It's the sixth paragraph of the story. And no, it's not the journo's responsibility to do damage control for Hillary Clinton's campaign
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:05 |
|
Petr posted:I'm gay and I know I'm staying home. Don't want to be embarrassed by voting for a clear loser who did something shady with a foundation! No one want the furry vote.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:05 |
|
Hillary Clinton runs a charity that actually helps people. As part of running that charity, she meets with people. Why is this the loving da vinci code
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:06 |
|
Bernie Bro/Trumpeter conspiracy theorists coming out of the woodwork!
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:06 |
|
lol at people thinking sec state only deals with other governments.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:06 |
|
icantfindaname posted:It wasn't part of her job though. Her job was to conduct official business with foreign foreign ministries lol
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:07 |
|
icantfindaname posted:http://bigstory.ap.org/article/82df550e1ec646098b434f7d5771f625/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state That was added to the story -- also doesn't give full context; the tweet and card, which didn't link to the story did not mention it; they lede without parenthetical citation of their facts; the headline also hyped a baseless accusation. And it is the journalists responsibility to be honest about their reporting, which they weren't. But you've already gave your game away.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:07 |
|
icantfindaname posted:http://bigstory.ap.org/article/82df550e1ec646098b434f7d5771f625/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state You realize even the rest of the media thinks that is a lovely article, right? quote:Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:07 |
|
Yinlock posted:Hillary Clinton runs a charity that actually helps people. Binow's already gone apeshit over people confusing what hat she was wearing when collecting definitely-not-bribe money, please don't. She was wearing the SecState hat for these, not the charity
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:07 |
|
icantfindaname posted:It wasn't part of her job though. Her job was to conduct official business with foreign foreign ministries Holy poo poo you're dumb.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:07 |
|
http://m.state.gov/md115194.htm
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:08 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Except that the charities she met with made large contributions to her personal foundation What, exactly, is wrong about that?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:08 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Binow's already gone apeshit over people confusing what hat she was wearing when collecting definitely-not-bribe money, please don't. She was wearing the SecState hat for these, not the charity A Winner is Jew posted:Holy poo poo you're dumb.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:08 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Binow's already gone apeshit over people confusing what hat she was wearing when collecting definitely-not-bribe money, please don't. She was wearing the SecState hat for these, not the charity SecState Helmet.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:10 |
|
Christ, were you people birthers too? Stop falling for this poo poo. Let's talk about Fox again! I only worked at the creative side of Fox, not the news side, but it has one of the most abusive corporate cultures I've ever seen. Like, I was physically assaulted by someone there (not sexual - the person got angry and tried to break my wrist by slamming it in a door) and quickly learned that person has a history of doing that but won't be fired because of some kind of litigatory mexican standoff they had with the company because someone else did something undisclosed to them. Edit to add the kicker: When I described this situation to a colleague with a few more details added, my colleague still needed clarification on which violently abusive Fox employee retaining their position only by the threat of a countersuit I was talking about. When the Murdoch sons took power they offered a severance package to all longtime employees, and so many people took it the last time I was on the lot the corporate offices were ghost towns. There don't seem to be any plans to replace the employees who left. They'll just run on a skeleton crew until the whole thing crashes and burns I guess. Tiny Brontosaurus fucked around with this message at 17:13 on Sep 6, 2016 |
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:10 |
|
hillary clinton didn't drop five bucks in the tip jar at chipotle, evident and blatant proof that she's lining the pockets of her own foundation by stealing from american workers
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:10 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:You realize even the rest of the media thinks that is a lovely article, right? That quote's interesting, because the lesson a lot of people took away from it isn't "the controversy doesn't actually exist" but "she MUST be hiding it"
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:10 |
|
A Winner is Jew posted:SecState Helmet. Does she have to wear a helmet to minimize her brain damage when she has seizures and falls?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:11 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Christ, were you people birthers too? Stop falling for this poo poo. I'm curious if Alies is sill going to sue the gently caress out of New York Mag for reporting on it still.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:11 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:I'm curious if Alies is sill going to sue the gently caress out of New York Mag for reporting on it still. Given he's paying part of the settlement with Carlson, I am guessing he wants this to go away.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:12 |
|
Y'all ever heard of the March of Dimes?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:12 |
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Holy poo poo you're dumb. theflyingorc posted:...if that's outside of her official duties, that's 100% fine? The fact that she's a public official at the same time, and thus in a position to potentially give preferential treatment to people who give her money. Do you understand what corruption is and how it works? Here's a hint: you don't collect on favors right away, you accumulate them and trade them among your allies over time
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:13 |
|
icantfindaname posted:
Prove it. Do you understand what burden of proof is and how it works?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:14 |
|
icantfindaname posted:The fact that she's a public official at the same time, and thus in a position to potentially give preferential treatment to people who give her money. Do you understand what corruption is and how it works? I mean it's pretty loving obvious you don't.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:15 |
|
icantfindaname posted:The fact that she's a public official at the same time, and thus in a position to potentially give preferential treatment to people who give her money. Do you understand what corruption is and how it works? Here's a hint: you don't collect on favors right away, you accumulate them and trade them among your allies over time Do you have any proof or evidence other than "the potential for corruption exists" which can be said about literally anyone who takes money?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:15 |
|
icantfindaname posted:The fact that she's a public official at the same time, and thus in a position to potentially give preferential treatment to people who give her money. Do you understand what corruption is and how it works? You are painfully stupid, please go away. Public officials can and do work with charities - it's frequently considered one of their qualifications for the public job they hold. And you must not know who Elie Wiesel was if you think he'd have to bribe his way into a meeting with anyone.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:15 |
|
anonumos posted:Prove it. Do you understand what burden of proof is and how it works? Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:16 |
|
icantfindaname posted:The fact that she's a public official at the same time, and thus in a position to potentially give preferential treatment to people who give her money. Do you understand what corruption is and how it works? And no, corruption usually doesn't funnel money to a charity, and I will never care if that's done. Corruption occurs when the money is funneled into their own pockets.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:16 |
|
icantfindaname posted:
They're giving money to her charity which by all accounts is actually legit. And there's also absolutely no evidence that people giving money to her charity were given preferential treatment. Please find something substantial beyond your feeling that Hillary is corrupt.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:16 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law i'm hungry and my foot hurts is a valid reason not to vote for someone. doesn't make it smart or well considered though
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:17 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law and there it is Again do you not see Trump openly laundering money while you throw out baseless accusations or something.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:17 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law And you're free to do so, as I've said for eons. Vote for Jill Stein.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:17 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law She only looks corrupt to idiots.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:18 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law So did you get this opinion from Kill La Kill, or Attack on Titan?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:18 |
|
icantfindaname posted:
So does almost every loving person in public office. gently caress I was in a position in my college job to give preferential treatment to people. Like right now If I was immoral I could do the same with my job at the state. Corruption is not the opportunity to do bad. Corruption is actually acting on it.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 16:43 |
|
the appearance of impropriety does not share the same relationship with corruption that smoke shares with fire
|
# ? Sep 6, 2016 17:18 |