|
Only old people watch Pekka ja Pätkä and they're racists anyway so it's all good
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:50 |
|
|
Yeah seriously no one sane would sit through those borefests anymore
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
Hogge Wild posted:mitäs mieltä sa:n suomalaisyhteisö on viimeisimmästä someragesta liittyen suomifilmiklassikkoon pekka ja pätkä n-sanoina? Pekka ja lyhytkasvuinen Mannerheimina
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
Speaking of Mannerheim, I don't think in his nights out with the guys the alcohol bill was ever limited to 30% of all expenses.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
If you think of it, you just don't lead an army like that of Finland against one like that of Russia without being high on booze or drugs. Our marshall and his generals understood this and started training well before to have the stamina to stay drunk through all of WW2. Mannerheim later died of the hangover.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
Finnish tango? are you kidding
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 18:45
|
|
|
Hogge Wild posted:mitäs mieltä sa:n suomalaisyhteisö on viimeisimmästä someragesta liittyen suomifilmiklassikkoon pekka ja pätkä n-sanoina? Buncha ligurs are going to get real upset because somebody thinks that YLE shouldn't show movies so bad that one of the actors committed suicide out of shame after it was first released.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
We should erase everything from our past that doesn't pass the reactionary kneejerk test today. And tomorrow. And the day after that etc.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
To prove they don't believe in censorship Yle should quickly show "Sex and Death" so we can see the kissantappovideo in prime time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
saisivat näyttää deep throatin jonain teemailtana
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
eiks ne jo joskus näyttäneet?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Rexroom posted:Who the gently caress cares. Sort of what Rexroom said. It's weird in more than few ways that a lily white girl posing as a "brown person" (after tanning & dying her hair to display herself as an oppressed minority) gets any facetime in any medias by copying tmblr feeds from USA college campuses (she can't even write in Finnish), but that's just our times right now. Hey we just had Musta Barbaari and that Somali woman who claimed she was assaulted "by racists" even though she was not. This is certainly en vogue right now and I'm sure there will be more in the near future, there really isn't a media in Finland that does not have at least some portion of the reporters thrown out to the world from either the Green HKI sphere or Tampere so that is and will be their mission. The IL or IS reporter who reported about the mass assault against a Muslim woman which never happened told her readers she doesn't give a poo poo if it happened or not, the Most Important Thing is to Talk poo poo About Racism. Koirat haukkuu. Karavaani kulkee. Tai jotain, oliko se toisinpäin.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
Kyllähän sekin mietityttää, että meillä oli, koska MV-lehti ja muuta, joku päätoimittajien julkinen itku "vastuullisesta mediasta" tovi sitten. MV-lehdet ja muut ovat toki kuraa, käytännössä yhden asian kohujulkaisuja, ja pistävät uutista nettiin sen ihmeemmin tarkistamatta taustoja kunhan löytyy jotain mehukasta. Nyt on vain käynyt niin ikävästi, että tämä meidän "vastuullinen media" tekee täysin samaa. Julkaisu kuten Ilta-whatever saattaa olla monipuolisempi uutisoinniltaan (ja henkilökuntaa on varmaan pirusti enemmän) mutta ei niitä voi sanoa yhtään sen luotettavimmaksi tässä vaiheessa. Varmaan ne jostain forumula-ajoista ja lätkämatseista uutisoi ihan normaalisti, eikä siellä ole mitään salaliittoa takana, mutta se sama sektori millä MV:t ja muut kunnostautuu menee ihan samalla tavalla pelkän yhden tai kahden toimittajan fiilarin mukaan eetteriin meidän vastuullisella medialla. Hyvä jos oikaisevat edes mitään kun tulee mokia. Että mitäs vittua tästä nyt pitäisi miettiä? Mikä on se vastuullinen media oikeasti?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
Ligur posted:Mikä on se vastuullinen media oikeasti? mun postaukset
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
Ligur posted:Että mitäs vittua tästä nyt pitäisi miettiä? Mikä on se vastuullinen media oikeasti? LongPlay? Though they just cover specific spots no one else seems to cover.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
Molemmat iltalehdethän ovat olleet täyttää tuubaa aina, ei se mikään uusi ilmiö ole. Vituttaa molemmat
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:48
|
|
|
Juuri nyt Iltasanomat julkaisee uutisena jenkki-juntti-Trumppien salaliittoteoriaa, että Clintonilla on kaksoisolento joka hoitaa osan sen esiintymisistä. Oho! Jyrähti ja pamahti!
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
no se oli aika helpo huomata oikealla hillarylla on suomut
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Ligur posted:IL or IS Ligur posted:vastuullinen media 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
IL or IS, more like ISIL or ISIS
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
hyvä lähtökohta on että toimittajat kusettaa aina
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
Kemper Boyd posted:Someone should figure out why Sipilä is standing up for Berner so hardcore. Sipilä has directing government-owned enterprises (omistajaohjaus) in his portfolio. I suspect he's done something very similar that just hasn't been exposed yet, so he can't throw Berner under the bus.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
Heh yeah. But HS and YLE were and are on the same boat. I was just saying, an Iltaläystäke journalist was so hell bent on providing news based on Mulli posted:Molemmat iltalehdethän ovat olleet täyttää tuubaa aina, ei se mikään uusi ilmiö ole. Vituttaa molemmat HS ja YLE on olleet myös täynnä sitä samaa tuubaa. Samat "uutiset" sielläkin julkaistaan heti jos toimituksissa aistitaan, että pääsee ehkä mässäilemään rasismoinnilla. Turha teidän on jätkät keskittyä siihen, että se oli nimenomaan Iltahöpön toimittaja joka julkisesti kieltäytyi tarkistamasta tätä yhtä uutista, kaikki isot mediat ovat olleen ihan samalla tavalla mukana tässä viime aikaisessa hössötyksessä jonka mukaan fascistiset rasistisuomalaiset hakkaavat kaikkia erilaisia, sylkevät viattomien päälle ja pahoinpitelevät raskaana olevia naisia silkkaa pahuuttaan (paitsi, että oikeasti eivät). edit: (also heh, D&D - jengi osaa tarttua siihen epäolennaiseen yhdellä hymiöllä tai yhden rivin postauksella... sigh) Ligur fucked around with this message at 09:14 on Sep 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 09:05
|
|
|
Antti posted:Sipilä has directing government-owned enterprises (omistajaohjaus) in his portfolio. I suspect he's done something very similar that just hasn't been exposed yet, so he can't throw Berner under the bus. I'm just gonna start stating this as a fact.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 09:15
|
|
|
Ligur posted:later on deemed it irrelevant if something happened or not - in her opinion, reporting about racist violence being the best for us all even when it doesn't happen. Ligur posted:fascistiset rasistisuomalaiset hakkaavat kaikkia erilaisia, sylkevät viattomien päälle ja pahoinpitelevät raskaana olevia naisia silkkaa pahuuttaan (paitsi, että oikeasti eivät). However, watching about 5 seconds of the video did leave me with an impression that the demonstrators around that woman were racist shitlords who enjoyed bullying her by shoving and physically preventing her from entering that store. Do you have an alternative interpretation of the events?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 10:38
|
|
|
Herman Merman posted:However, watching about 5 seconds of the video did leave me with an impression that the demonstrators around that woman were racist shitlords who enjoyed bullying her by shoving and physically preventing her from entering that store. Do you have an alternative interpretation of the events? Sigh. You can't be this stupid in real life can you? There was an anti-immigration demonstration, and this woman (Maryam whatever) decided to try and barge through the demonstrators while shoving them. It was a provocation you fool, if she wanted to really hard visit the store she could have gone there 2 hours earlier or 2 hours later with no problem. If you put a swastika or just yelled "gaaaah I am a persu" and ran through an Antifa demonstration and started shoving them what the gently caress do you think would happen? You would not get off it that easy. Then she filed a completely false report about what happened when nobody actually assaulted her.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 13:17
|
|
|
Ligur posted:There was an anti-immigration demonstration, and this woman (Maryam whatever) decided to try and barge through the demonstrators while shoving them. Lol no, she tried pushing them aside only after they purposefully blocked her way. Which they did because they're racist shitlords who think she has no right to visit Itis because of her ethnicity. There's really no way around that interpretation if you're being honest.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
Oh yeah man, she really needed to visit that store right there and then and did in no way try to provoke anything, as witnessed by her very truthful stories later 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
It doesn't matter if she was provoking or not, protesters don't have the right to physically block people from moving into a store or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
Yeah gently caress that woman for visiting a pubic store when it's the racists' time to shine
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
Jesus gently caress this forum. Of course the people protesting (or whatever) are fools, but that is not what I was talking about. If you didn't figure out, this isn't a matter how stupid the other people in the same space were when I posted of the shenanigan. Andrast, doverhog Herman, you don't really find it at all peculiar that she chose to go full veil and try to push through the demonstrators demonstrating against Muslim immigration at that particular time, and later made up falsified stories about what happened, it really really does not occur to any of you that this person might simply be there to try to provoke poo poo, so she could go the press and play the victim? Which she did, full of poo poo. "Really, she just happened to walk by on accident..."
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Andrast posted:Yeah gently caress that woman for visiting a pubic store when it's the racists' time to shine Yeah, you have the right to shop for pubic hair even if you're going to keep them hidden behind a niqab.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
In other news, this country's most dangerous biker club is at it again.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Ligur posted:Jesus gently caress this forum. Of course the people protesting (or whatever) are fools, but that is not what I was talking about. If you didn't figure out, this isn't a matter how stupid the other people in the same space were when I posted of the shenanigan. doverhog posted:It doesn't matter if she was provoking or not, protesters don't have the right to physically block people from moving into a store or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Ahh Andrast, so do you think that justifies the person going to the press with total bs stories or what?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Ligur posted:Ahh Andrast, so do you think that justifies the person going to the press with total bs stories or what? Nope.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
Ligur posted:Jesus gently caress this forum. Of course the people protesting (or whatever) are fools, but that is not what I was talking about. If you didn't figure out, this isn't a matter how stupid the other people in the same space were when I posted of the shenanigan. I've made no comment about the story or false reports, I just said protesters don't have the right to block people like they do in that video.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Well all good then! I posted that a regular public crazy woman tried to make herself a victim of a most heinous and brutal racist assault so she could play a card, and nearly all of our major news outlets published the story and went along without verifying it. Then some of ya'll started about something else altogether like "but she has the right to go to a shop!!!1", sounded like some of you thought that evens it out somehow... But glad if not. We don't need one single more false story about people playing victim on a race card, or someone saying "ethnic group X did this" if it isn't true. It doesn't help anyone in the end, even though it makes some people of certain persuasion feel good (about themselves).
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
It seems we more or less agree then and for once there is no reason to get triggered
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:50 |
|
|
hooray, sounds good
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 20:06
|
|