|
LordArgh posted:"starvation mode" is a myth I haven't eaten anything in the past twenty minutes and let me tell you, starvation mode is real.  E: quoted previous post for new page.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:39 |
|
|
What about the effects of having your blood sugar spike due to going from eating nothing to eating a huge meal? Then your pancreas has to make a lot of insulin to get it back down, storing it all into fat. If you eat a lot of little meals through the day you probably also feel a lot less hungry each time you eat, so you probably eat cumulatively less overall.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:thats actually a terrible way to do it. Eating once daily typically makes your body think you are conservation mode so you hold on to more of what you eat. If you are managing to maintain a weight or lose weight while eating like this you would probably have way more success by eating in properly spaced intervals. lol you're a dummy. What is my body living on during the day then before I eat? Mystical energy from dimension 9? No fool. I'm burning body fat into fatty acids and glycerol and using glycogen stores for energy during the day. Then I replenish them at night. I'm not magically using less calories when I walk up the stairs or beat my heart or maintain my tissues. When I'm not in "conservation mode" does my body magically just decide to poo poo out my food undigested or something? To not "hold onto it".
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
the only hard rule to weight loss is this: eat fewer calories than you expend other than that just try and use some common sense and don't do poo poo like lose weight by exclusively guzzling bacon drippings
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
LethalGeek posted:That's right up there with the "don't eat before bed" in Not True. Don't eat too much food that's it, that's all it really really is. The rest is all about dealing with the stupid human brain tricking itself. Carmant posted:If you guys are going to make fun of fat people you should at least know something about nutrition, because everything u just said is complete bullshit runupon cracker posted:yes, eating one meal a day causes your body to ignore the laws of thermodynamics Oh look. Hello goons who understand physics. "Starvation mode" has got to be what fats just call feeling sluggish. If you still do poo poo anyway and push through it you'll still burn same amount of calories. Because you know conservation of energy. The first loving law of thermodynamics.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
rap music posted:the only hard rule to weight loss is this: eat fewer calories than you expend I think fats must think they go through photosynthesis to explain where those extra calories come from that physics demands is necessary to maintain their 400lbs bulk despite "swearing they only have 1800 calories a day".
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:33
|
|
|
ya'll are stupid my body goes into conservation mode all the time and i poop once a month like a food camel
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:thats actually a terrible way to do it. Eating once daily typically makes your body think you are conservation mode so you hold on to more of what you eat. If you are managing to maintain a weight or lose weight while eating like this you would probably have way more success by eating in properly spaced intervals. Yesterday: WOke up, got out of bed, dragged a comb across my head. I had 2 cups of coffee during the morning commute. I swam a mile at 8am. I had a protein shake right after. Fasted. I ate arby's at 8pm, their giant roast beef sammitch, a small order of curly fries, and a small diet coke. I was 2 pounds lighter this morning than I was yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
GORDON posted:Yesterday: this is a trick scenario since the Arby's gave you two pounds of diarrhea obviously
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:this is a trick scenario since the Arby's gave you two pounds of diarrhea obviously I thought the whole point of mentioning eating arbys was to explain the weight loss by diarrhea.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
GORDON posted:Yesterday: maybe, but you didn't lose 2 lbs of fat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Onion Buns are cheaper than Ex Lax
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:maybe, but you didn't lose 2 lbs of fat. Oh ok thanks. I always lift a little heavier on Friday mornings for some gains and so I can recover over the weekend, so I will tell myself this morning I was actually weaker and didn't lift what I lifted because I lost muscle. *insert rolly eye emoticon* edit - sry I'm always a little cranky when I am fasting. I'm sure you honestly thought what you said even though you couldn't possibly have any idea what you're talking about in regards to my metabolism. GORDON fucked around with this message at 17:49 on Sep 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
2 pounds of fat is 7000 calories. Some of the two pounds is fat, some is water. I want some roast beef.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
A big problem is fat folk going to the gym thinking they'll gym the weight away and it almost never works because a (hard) gym session is only worth like a glass of beer or two small cookies in terms of calories burned and fat folk overeat so much
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Oh well in that case yeah, some was water. Where's excess water stored in the body? Within fat cells? The answer is 65% yes, I actually already knew that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:52
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:A big problem is fat folk going to the gym thinking they'll gym the weight away and it almost never works because a (hard) gym session is only worth like a glass of beer or two small cookies in terms of calories burned and fat folk overeat so much Weight loss is 85% diet. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something or feeling guilty about something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:54
|
|
|
GORDON posted:Oh well in that case yeah, some was water. I had to look it up to confirm but fat cells store disproportionately little water compared to other cells. This makes intuitive sense.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:plus you get to take speed My wife and I went through a period of using DXM cough pills as an appetite suppressant to lose weight, it was pretty effective. Just sucks if you aren't in one of the parts of the world that has dxm/guafinesin pills available with no other additives because it's not an option
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
GORDON posted:edit - sry I'm always a little cranky when I am fasting. I'm sure you honestly thought what you said even though you couldn't possibly have any idea what you're talking about in regards to my metabolism.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
Germstore posted:that's his cheat day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NjTWvl8x-U
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
Germstore posted:I had to look it up to confirm but fat cells store disproportionately little water compared to other cells. This makes intuitive sense. Correct, oil and water don't mix. That's why when I order/give medications to fats that are not lipid soluble I use ideal body weight or adjusted body weight and give less per pound/kilo then I would a normal person, because a 600lbs fat doesn't have 4 times the body water of a 150lbs human for the drug to distribute into.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
Germstore posted:that's his cheat day yeah after 5 months of eating clean dont do this every week, buttlards
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
I was under the impression that when you starve yourself you're basically shooting your metabolism to poo poo? Not looking to cause gently caress fest about this, genuinely curious what the deal is. When I started eating regularly after that year of sub 1000 calories a day, I didn't gorge, I still worked out, maintained my basic lifestyle, so what accounted for the sudden ridiculous weight regain? 40lbs in 3 months seems rather high for an average diet and exercise regiment.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
Blitter posted:Edit: (omg!) Our long-term plan to conquer the sumo world is nearing completion, stay the course my corpulent Western brothers. Soon all the sumo riches will ours, OURS I tells ya!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
rap music posted:yeah after 5 months of eating clean
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
RGBRIOT posted:I was under the impression that when you starve yourself you're basically shooting your metabolism to poo poo? You were still eating too much for your body mass/build. What you should have done is kept getting on the scale and when you went up 5lbs, drastically cut down your intake until you were slowly losing again. Maybe your basal metabolic rate may be a little lower than a skeletor person by a few hundred calories a day(I don't think people of the same size and gender differ too much more than that), you just need to figure out where yours lies and adjust to it. I mean really you saw yourself gaining weight, the 40lbs in three months and chose not stop it. If your weight was going up you were simply having too many calories and you should have corrected for it. Bum the Sad fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Sep 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:lol yeah please tell us how you burn 7000+ calories in a day I don't I'm in a depressed socioeconomic status so my body actually puts on weight when I eat less. edit - "By banging your mom all day"
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
GORDON posted:I don't I'm in a depressed socioeconomic status so my body actually puts on weight when I eat less. What County do you live in?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:16
|
|
|
RGBRIOT posted:I was under the impression that when you starve yourself you're basically shooting your metabolism to poo poo? I feel you though brother, I like to eat junk and I honestly think my metabolism is a little shittier than some. But what I do about it is I weight myself once a week when I'm on the dry side(dehydrated from drinking) and if I see I've gone up 5ish pounds I just dial back my diet. The way I like to eat honestly is not sustainable for my size and activity level, I like to have too many calories a day, so when I am at a good weight I usually spend 3 weeks of a month eating "normally" then a week fasting and that's just the sacrifice I have to make. I mean I could exercise but gently caress that/
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:My wife and I went through a period of using DXM cough pills as an appetite suppressant to lose weight, it was pretty effective. You and your wife are loving idiots.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:24
|
|
|
RGBRIOT posted:I was under the impression that when you starve yourself you're basically shooting your metabolism to poo poo? "starvation mode" is a real thing but only happens after about not eating for three or four days. otherwise there is only about 5-8% variation in the majority of humanity's resting metabolic rate. if i was a betting man, i would say your weight gain was very simply the result of eating too much food, as is virtually always the case.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:24
|
|
|
Falun Bong Refugee posted:You and your wife are loving idiots. No poo poo why not just use ephedrine as an appetite suppressant like a normal 90's/2000's person. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
Bum the Sad posted:I feel you though brother, I like to eat junk and I honestly think my metabolism is a little shittier than some. But what I do about it is I weight myself once a week when I'm on the dry side(dehydrated from drinking) and if I see I've gone up 5ish pounds I just dial back my diet. The way I like to eat honestly is not sustainable for my size and activity level, I like to have too many calories a day, so when I am at a good weight I usually spend 3 weeks of a month eating "normally" then a week fasting and that's just the sacrifice I have to make. I mean I could exercise but gently caress that/ Isn't this the fast track towards getting gallstones the size of golf balls? Something similar happened to one of my old roommates.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
rap music posted:"starvation mode" is a real thing but only happens after about not eating for three or four days. otherwise there is only about 5-8% variation in the majority of humanity's resting metabolic rate. What is real starvation mode? I haven't researched that. Is it simply like you said where you get less fidgety?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
hey guess what retards. carmant is a troll and that cracker poster is a fat troll. 300 lb to 200lb is still fat as gently caress lol suck my dick blimpo
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
Panfilo posted:Isn't this the fast track towards getting gallstones the size of golf balls? Something similar happened to one of my old roommates.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
If carmant wants to troll GBS by pretending to be a fat loser for our amusement, he should feel free to continue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Bum the Sad posted:What is real starvation mode? I haven't researched that. Is it simply like you said where you get less fidgety? there are several stages but initially your body will begin to burn stored fat along with a bit of muscle. after all of your body fat is consumed it will start to burn lean tissue. even so, "starvation mode" only resulted in an 180 kcal reduction to daily metabolic expenditure when studied in a lab
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:39 |
|
|
did you know in medival times nobels were fat because the extra layer made it hard for people to pierce them with arrows therefore keeping them alive through the winter? GBS KING  "and the kingin' is good!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 18:37
|
|
