|
https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/776912648877252608 2nd Ammendment chat again. Every time he starts catching up in the polls it goes to his head and he starts getting crazier.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/776912648877252608 Surely this will be the quote that nails him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/776912648877252608 It has been what, one month since he last called for the assassination of his opponent?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
I was not aware Hillary Clinton was in favor of a complete repeal of the second amendment and guns being taken away from all soldiers, police officers, and secret service agents. That's a pretty crazy position! I wonder why people don't talk about it more?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
Superrodan posted:I was trying to determine who the Democrat equivalent of Trump would be that we would need Superdelegates and I couldn't really figure it out. I understand why the system exists in theory but I can't think of anyone who people could choose in practice. Huey Long
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
Superrodan posted:I was trying to determine who the Democrat equivalent of Trump would be that we would need Superdelegates and I couldn't really figure it out. I understand why the system exists in theory but I can't think of anyone who people could choose in practice. Chuck Schumer or Dianne Feinstein immediately comes to mind.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MikeGrunwald/status/776912570687127553 jesus
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Superrodan posted:I was trying to determine who the Democrat equivalent of Trump would be that we would need Superdelegates and I couldn't really figure it out. I understand why the system exists in theory but I can't think of anyone who people could choose in practice. The reason it's there is in fact in case there's a Trump. I bet the Republicans are going to institute a similar system if Trump loses.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Superrodan posted:I was trying to determine who the Democrat equivalent of Trump would be that we would need Superdelegates and I couldn't really figure it out. I understand why the system exists in theory but I can't think of anyone who people could choose in practice. If the GOP ever moderates itself we become much more vulnerable to things like billionaires running vanity candidates that we can't push out because of CU. As far as facist strongmen are concerned it's not terribly likely, not because Democrats are inherently noble, but because in the US all the anti-fascist, anti-nativist voters (aka minorities) are only welcome in a single party in which they wield disproportionate influence So if the GOP moderates AND there's a restructuring of minority support (not impossible but is probably a generational thing at this point thanks to Trump), then supers will possibly be needed to prevent a Democrat Hitler. Until then they're primarily useful in preventing a lunatic from riding the split votes of a wide and never narrowing field to take control as the face of the party, not that something like that would ever happen in modern politics
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
lozzle posted:Huey Long with the democratic voterbase looking like it does right now?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I think it was put into place after Mondale. After 1980, when Ted Kennedy had run against Carter and this was seen as one of the major causes for Carter losing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/776912648877252608
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
A Fancy 400 lbs posted:They're like Slavic neo-Nazis. Which is somehow even dumber than Islamaphobes mistakenly targeting Sikhs. It's one thing to be ignorant of someone else's race, but how do you not know that your own was targeted for genocide while your grandparents were children? Staggering.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:with the democratic voterbase looking like it does right now? Wikipedia posted:Long is best known for his Share Our Wealth program, created in 1934 under the motto "Every Man a King." It proposed new wealth redistribution measures in the form of a net asset tax on corporations and individuals to curb the poverty and homelessness endemic nationwide during the Great Depression. To stimulate the economy, Long advocated federal spending on public works, schools and colleges, and old age pensions. He was an ardent critic of the policies of the Federal Reserve System. Maybe?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Pretty sure he went up in the polls last time he said this. He didn't.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Dirt posted:https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/776912648877252608 This is it guys! The election is over!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Pretty sure he went up in the polls last time he said this. Donald Trump is going to be President of the United States
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
*angles for the assassination political rival 2 times in 3 months* NYT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HVejEB5uVk
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:Donald Trump is going to be President of the United States lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:Which is somehow even dumber than Islamaphobes mistakenly targeting Sikhs. It's one thing to be ignorant of someone else's race, but how do you not know that your own was targeted for genocide while your grandparents were children? I'm pretty sure they agree with Hitler about there being a master race that should be elevated above all others, they just disagree with what that master race actually is (hint: it's themselves).
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:Donald Trump is going to be President of the United States your red text seems to declare otherwise
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
This is great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
I can't stop Arzying I'm melting doooooown
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:I can't stop Arzying Then go donate your time and money to the Clinton campaign. If you're not willing to do that you're not worried enough to Arzy
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:He didn't. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Then go donate your time and money to the Clinton campaign. I'm Canadian 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:I'm Canadian Then enjoy the wall that will be put up when Donald Trump declares you all 'more polite rapists'
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
I point this out only to explain that this is what America wants. This is why people support Trump so heavily.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:He did. Only slightly, but still. Here's a poll aggregate. Notice the sharpest rise in this period (August 8 to August 20) is immediately after he says that on the 9th, then rises steadily but slower for the rest of the period.  "He went up vaguely over 12 days (then sharply went down)! Clearly it helped him in the polls!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Then enjoy the wall that will be put up when Donald Trump declares you all 'more polite rapists' Our economy is already in a bubble and our prime minister recently went and bent over for the Chinese, if we lose NAFTA its over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Sure, that could be very minor statistical noise as a result of Clinton's lead just not being sustainable, but I posted a screenshot of a graph and that graph has numbers on it and that makes the things I say correct.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:It didn't hurt him at all. I didn't say it did. I said it did not noticeably help him; we were also in a different moment in the cycle where Clinton was still riding pretty high -- not in the nadir of race for Clinton.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Zeeman posted:I believe you mean Dr. Ron Paul In my imagination Ron Paul is about to walk this infant outside and place him in the gutter because his parents don't have health insurance.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
I think we should call doctors Second Opinion People.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
prom candy posted:In my imagination Ron Paul is about to walk this infant outside and place him in the gutter because his parents don't have health insurance. That's a hell of a thing to imagine.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
Hillary's down to 57% on the 538 Now Cast. Someone please send Silver a message to stop Arzying. Only by chanting the ritual words ARZY can we keep the chaos at bay.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Sure, that could be very minor statistical noise as a result of Clinton's lead just not being sustainable, but I posted a screenshot of a graph and that graph has numbers on it and that makes the things I say correct.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
prom candy posted:In my imagination Ron Paul is about to walk this infant outside and place him in the gutter because his parents don't have health insurance. "Pro-life, until it's out of the womb." It's the
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 16:52 |
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Sure, that could be very minor statistical noise as a result of Clinton's lead just not being sustainable, but I posted a screenshot of a graph and that graph has numbers on it and that makes the things I say correct. your numbers are hosed up and bad, Bob
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 23:59
|
|